BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 49 - 54, 01.01.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Adorno, T. W. (2004) Negative Dialectics, trans. Ashton E.B. London: Routledge.
  • Aristotle, (1998) Politics, trans. Reeves C.D.C. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
  • Bhabha, H.K. (1983) ‘The Other Question’ in F. Baker (ed.), The Politics of Theory. Colchester: University of Essex Press.
  • Cahill, M. (2011) Another Earth, USA: Fox Searchlight Pictures.
  • Campbell D. (1996) ‘The Politics of Radical Interdependence: A Rejoinder to Daniel Warner,’ Millennium, 25(1), 129
  • Connolly, W. (2002) Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Minneapolis and London
  • University of Minnesota Press Connolly, W. (2004) The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Dominguez, V.R. (1989) People as Subject, People as Object. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Douzinas, C. (2000) The End of Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Douzinas, C. (2013) ‘Seven Theses on Human Rights: (1) The Idea of Humanity,’ Critical Legal Thinking [online]
  • Available from: http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/16/seven-theses-on-human-rights-1-the-idea-of- humanity/ [Accessed 07 November 2016].
  • Golding, S. (1997) ‘Curiosity’ in S. Golding (ed.), Eight Technologies of Otherness. London: Routledge.
  • Irigaray L. (1995) ‘The Question of the Other’ in L. Huffer (ed.), Another Look, Another Woman. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • King, P.J. (2016) ‘Against Tolerance,’ Philosophy Now [online], Available from: https://philosophynow.org/issues/11/Against_Tolerance [Accessed 04 November 2016].
  • Root, D. (1988) ‘The Imperial Signifier: Todorov and the Conquest of Mexico,’ Cultural Critique, 9, 197-219.
  • Todorov, T. (1992) The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other, trans. Howard R. New York: HarperPerennial.
  • Widder, N. (2012) Political Theory After Deleuze. New York and London: Continuum.
  • Wokler, R. (1996) ‘Todorov’s Otherness,’ New Literary History, 27(1), 43-55.
  • Woodward, K. (1997) ‘Identity and Difference’ in K. Woodward (ed.), Identity and Difference. London: Sage Publications.

RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 49 - 54, 01.01.2018

Öz

The essay examines how the question of otherness has been rethought in recent philosophical approaches. It consists of three parts. The first part discusses two possible understandings of otherness: The first presents it in a binary, dependent relation to identity. The second presents it as something which can be understood distinctively from identity, possibly as an enigma. The second part goes through Todorov’s Conquest of America and discusses how certain characters of the book try to understand the Other. Finally, the third part discusses possible solutions to that problem, where the Other can be understood independently, beyond a given framework of an identity - which seeks to dominate over otherness - and it concludes that despite their necessity, identities must be thought as contingent and relational. Only in that way, the possibility of a more genuine understanding of the Other opens up

Kaynakça

  • Adorno, T. W. (2004) Negative Dialectics, trans. Ashton E.B. London: Routledge.
  • Aristotle, (1998) Politics, trans. Reeves C.D.C. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
  • Bhabha, H.K. (1983) ‘The Other Question’ in F. Baker (ed.), The Politics of Theory. Colchester: University of Essex Press.
  • Cahill, M. (2011) Another Earth, USA: Fox Searchlight Pictures.
  • Campbell D. (1996) ‘The Politics of Radical Interdependence: A Rejoinder to Daniel Warner,’ Millennium, 25(1), 129
  • Connolly, W. (2002) Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Minneapolis and London
  • University of Minnesota Press Connolly, W. (2004) The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Dominguez, V.R. (1989) People as Subject, People as Object. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Douzinas, C. (2000) The End of Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Douzinas, C. (2013) ‘Seven Theses on Human Rights: (1) The Idea of Humanity,’ Critical Legal Thinking [online]
  • Available from: http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/16/seven-theses-on-human-rights-1-the-idea-of- humanity/ [Accessed 07 November 2016].
  • Golding, S. (1997) ‘Curiosity’ in S. Golding (ed.), Eight Technologies of Otherness. London: Routledge.
  • Irigaray L. (1995) ‘The Question of the Other’ in L. Huffer (ed.), Another Look, Another Woman. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • King, P.J. (2016) ‘Against Tolerance,’ Philosophy Now [online], Available from: https://philosophynow.org/issues/11/Against_Tolerance [Accessed 04 November 2016].
  • Root, D. (1988) ‘The Imperial Signifier: Todorov and the Conquest of Mexico,’ Cultural Critique, 9, 197-219.
  • Todorov, T. (1992) The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other, trans. Howard R. New York: HarperPerennial.
  • Widder, N. (2012) Political Theory After Deleuze. New York and London: Continuum.
  • Wokler, R. (1996) ‘Todorov’s Otherness,’ New Literary History, 27(1), 43-55.
  • Woodward, K. (1997) ‘Identity and Difference’ in K. Woodward (ed.), Identity and Difference. London: Sage Publications.
Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Chrıstos Marneros Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Marneros, C. (2018). RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 49-54.
AMA Marneros C. RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies. Ocak 2018;3(1):49-54.
Chicago Marneros, Chrıstos. “RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies 3, sy. 1 (Ocak 2018): 49-54.
EndNote Marneros C (01 Ocak 2018) RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies 3 1 49–54.
IEEE C. Marneros, “RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies, c. 3, sy. 1, ss. 49–54, 2018.
ISNAD Marneros, Chrıstos. “RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies 3/1 (Ocak 2018), 49-54.
JAMA Marneros C. RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies. 2018;3:49–54.
MLA Marneros, Chrıstos. “RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies, c. 3, sy. 1, 2018, ss. 49-54.
Vancouver Marneros C. RE THINKING OTHERNESS: HOW THE CONCEPT HAS BEEN RETHOUGHT IN RECENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies. 2018;3(1):49-54.