SAME-SEX INTIMACY, INTIMATE CITIZENSHIP AND EXPERIENCES OF LIVED RELIGION OF NON-HETEROSEXUAL MUSLIMS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF EXISTING STUDIES

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 33 - 42, 01.01.2019

Dılvın Dılara Usta

Öz

Recent decades have witnessed significant progress in the literature on religion, faith/sanctity and nonheterosexual intimacy/desire. Arising from the discussion of homosexuality and religion, many liberal theological perspectives have encouraged discussion of homosexual-friendly religious thought. Gay/lesbian and queer theologies have produced new religious discourse, providing a critical discussion on religious sacred texts, particularly Christianity and Judaism Althaus-Reid, 2003; Ahmed, 2006 . In addition to the wealth of journal articles, several narrative studies about religious activists and self-identified LGBTQ believers in a particular faith have contributed to the discussion. But what the general public think about the relationship between Islam and non-heterosexuality is mostly confusing and contradictory. Recent debates about same-sex intimacy and spirituality have raised questions about this relationship. There is now a greater understanding that people self-identify as nonheterosexual Muslims and their position in Islamic societies. In this sense, a few scholars have made significant contributions to the literature regarding the discussion and recasting of the Islamic belief system through new liberal and queer theological perspectives. However, specifically regarding discussions on same-sex intimacy and intimate citizenship, the experiences of non-heterosexual Muslims are overlooked within Islamic sexuality studies. Several questions follow. What are the experiences of non-heterosexual Muslims’ intimate relationship and intimate citizenship? How do they negotiate their sexual identities and intimate citizenship with Islam? How can place and culture affect or reshape their perspectives on same-sex intimacy and intimate citizenship as nonheterosexual Muslims? I examine the current discussions of non-heterosexuality in Islam before proceeding to questions on the position of same-sex intimacy. I focus on the relationship of same-sex intimacy and intimate citizenship from the non-heterosexual Muslim lens. In particular, I explore what same-sex intimacy means to the Muslim community and discuss the position of non-heterosexual Muslims within the Western European Muslim communities in terms of intimate citizenship. Words account: 7328

Anahtar Kelimeler

Same-sex intimacy, lived religion, intimate citizenship, non-heterosexual Muslims

Kaynakça

• Abraham, I. (2009). ‘Out to get us’: queer Muslims and the clash of sexual civilisations in Australia. Contemporary Islam, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
• Abu-Dawud, S. Book of General Behaviour (Kitab Al-Adab). https://sunnah.com/abudawud/43.
• Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham and London, Duke University Press.
• Althaus-Reid, M. (2003). The Queer God. New York: Taylor and Francis Group Publications.
• Beckers, T. (2010). Islam and the acceptance of homosexuality: The shortage of socioeconomic well-being and responsive democracy. Islam and Homosexuality, 1, pp. 57-98.
• El-Rouayhed, K. (2005). Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500-1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• El-Tayeb, F. (2012). ‘Gays who cannot properly be gay’: Queer Muslims in the neoliberal European city. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(1), pp. 79-95.
• Fernando, M. L. (2014). Intimacy surveilled: Religion, sex, and secular cunning. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 39(3), pp. 685-708.
• Frost, D. M., I.H. Meyer, and S. Schwartz. (2016). Social support networks among diverse sexual minority populations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(1), pp. 91-102.
• Habib, S. (2008). Queer-Friendly Islamic Hermeneutics. Leiden University Repository, 21(1), pp. 32-33.
• Halstead, J. M., and K. Lewicka. (2006). Should Homosexuality be Taught as an Acceptable Alternative Lifestyle? A Muslim perspective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(1), pp. 49-64.
• Hamzić, V. (2016). The Resistance from an Alterspace: Pakistani and Indonesian Muslims beyond the Dominant Sexual and Gender Norms. In: P. Nynäs, ed., Religion, Gender and Sexuality in Everyday Life. London: Routledge, pp. 17-36.
• Hendricks, M. (2010). Islamic Texts: A Source for Acceptance of Queer Individuals into Mainstream Muslim Society. Equal Rights Review, 5, pp. 31-51.
• Hoel, N. (2015). Engaging Islamic sexual ethics: Intimacy, pleasure and sacrality. Sexualities, 18 (1-2), pp. 80-99.
• Jaspal, R. and M. Cinnirella. (2010). Coping with potentially incompatible identities: Accounts of religious, ethnic, and sexual identities from British Pakistani men who identify as Muslim and gay. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), pp. 849-870.
• Jaspal, R., & A. Siraj. (2011). Perceptions of ‘coming out’ among British Muslim gay men. Psychology & Sexuality, 2(3), pp. 183-197.
• Jaspal, R. and Cinnirella, M., (2014). Hyper-affiliation to the Religious In-group among British Pakistani Muslim Gay Men. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), pp.265-277.
• Jaspal, R. (2016). Coping with religious and cultural homophobia: Emotion and narratives of identity threat among British Muslim gay men. In: P. Nynäs, ed., Religion, Gender and Sexuality in Everyday Life. London: Routledge, pp. 71-89.
• Khan, S. I., M.I Hussain, S. Parveen, M. I. Bhuiyan, G. Gourab, G. F. Sarker, and J. Sikder. (2009). Living on the extreme margin: social exclusion of the transgender population (hijra) in Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 27(4), pp. 441-451.
• Kugle, S.S. Al-Haqq. (2003). Sexuality, diversity, and ethics in the agenda of progressive Muslims. In: O. Safi, ed., Progressive Muslims: On Justice, Gender, and Pluralism. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, pp. 190-234
• Kugle, S.S. Al-Haqq. (2010). Homosexuality in Islam: Critical Reflection on Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender Muslims. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
• Kugle, S.S. Al-Haqq. (2014). Living out Islam: Voices of Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender Muslims. New York: NYU Press.
• Mir-Hosseini, Z. and V. Hamzić. (2010). Control and Sexuality: The Revival of Zina Laws in Muslim Contexts. London: Women Living under Muslim Law.
• Najmabadi, A. (2006). Beyond the Americas: Are Gender and Sexuality Useful Categories of Analysis? Journal of Women’s History, 18(1), pp. 11-21.
• Naz Project. (1999). Hard to Reach, Hard to Teach. London: Naz Project.
• Pakulski, J. (1997). Cultural citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 1(1), pp. 73-86. Available at https://doi. org/10.1080/13621029708420648 (Accessed 16 Nov 2007).
• Plummer, K. (2001). The square of intimate citizenship: Some preliminary proposals. Citizenship Studies, 5(3), pp. 237-253.
• Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
• Rehman, J. and E. Polymenopoulou. (2013). Is Green a Part of the Rainbow: Sharia, Homosexuality, and LGBT Rights in the Muslim World. Fordham International Law Journal, 37(1), pp.1-52.
• Richardson, D. (1998). Sexuality and Citizenship. Sociology, 32(1), pp. 83-100.
• Richardson, D. (2000). Claiming citizenship? Sexuality, Citizenship and Lesbian/Feminist Theory. Sexualities, 3(2), pp. 255-272.
• Richardson, D. (2017). Rethinking sexual citizenship. Sociology, 51(2), pp. 208-224.
• Rowson, E.K., (1991). The effeminates of early Medina. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 111(4), pp. 671-693.
• Schneider, L.C. and C. Roncolato. (2012). Queer Theologies. Religion Compass, 6(1), pp. 1-13.
• Siker, J. S. (2007). Homosexuality and Religion an Encylopedia. London: Greenwood Publications.
• Shannahan, D. S. (2010). Some queer questions from a Muslim faith perspective. Sexualities, 13(6) pp. 671-684.
• Yip, A.K.T. (2004). Negotiating Space with family and kin in identity construction: The narratives of British non- heterosexual Muslims. The Sociological Review, 52(3), pp. 336-350.
• Yip, A.K.T. (2005). Queering Religious Texts: An Exploration of British Non-heterosexual Christians’ and Muslims’ Strategy of Constructing Sexuality-affirming Hermeneutics. Sociology, 39(1), pp. 47-65.
• Yip, A.K.T. (2008). Researching Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Christians and Muslim: Some Thematic Reflections. Sociological Research Online, 13(1)5. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/1/5.html.
• Yip, A.K.T. and Nynäs, P., (2016). Re-framing the intersection between religion, gender and sexuality in everyday life. In Religion, gender and sexuality in everyday life (pp. 1-16). Routledge.
• Weeks, J. (1998). The sexual citizen. Theory, Culture & Society, 15(3-4), pp. 35-52.