Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41 (4), 212- 218.

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

Bloom Taksonomisinin Revizyonu: Genel Bir Bakış

Öz

u0ra/ma araçlar ve yollar bilgisi 1.21 Al / lar bilgisi 1.22 Yönelimler ve a/amal diziler bilgisi 1.23 S n flamalar ve kategoriler bilgisi 1.24 Ölçütler bilgisi 1.25 Yöntem bilgisi

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
2. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
3. Dave, R.H. (1970). Psychomotor levels. In R.J. Armstrong (Ed.), Developing and writing educational objectives (pp. 33-34). Tucson AZ: Educational Innovators Press.
4. Harrow, A.J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: A guide for developing behavioral objectives.New York: David McKay.
5. Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: The affective domain. New York: David McKay.
6. Simpson, B.J. (1966). The classification of educational objectives: Psychomotor domain. Illinois Journal of ome Economics, 10(4), 110-144.
7. State of Minnesota. (1998). State educational standards coupled to lesson plans and resources: Language Arts, High standards (1998): Grade 12: WritingUnit: Description, Academic. Retrieved April 20, 2001, from http://www.statestandards.com/showstate.asp?st=mn