Psychometric Properties of Children's Hope Scale:  Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

In the present study, it was aimed at adapting the Children’s Hope Scale (CHS) developed by Snyder et al.’s (1997) into Turkish by obtaining evidence related to its validity and reliability. The CHS was administered to 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students (403 female, 355 male) in Ankara, Turkey. Findings regarding the construct validity of the scale were rather consistent with the original scale’s two-factor structure. In terms of convergent and incremental validity, CHS scores were found to be positively and significantly correlated with students’ self esteem and academic achievement scores. Moreover, CHS scores predicted children’s academic achievement beyond projections stemming from statistically from the scores of students’ self-esteem. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the overall scale was .74. Test-retest reliability was .57. There were no significant gender differences, but significant grade level differences were obtained. The findings are discussed in terms of relevant literature with suggestions for further studies.

Keywords

• Children’s hope,agency,pathways

Çocuklarda Umut Ölçeği'nin Psikometrik Özellikleri: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Bu öğrenci, Snyder ve arkadaşları (1997) tarafından yazılmış olanlarlarda Umut Ölçeği'nin (ÇUÖ) Türkçe'ye çevrilerek, geçerlik ve güvenirlikte alın kanıtların olması amaçlanmıştır. Ölçekler, Ankara'daki ilköğretim 2. kademe öğrencilerine (403 kız, 355 erkek) uygulanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerli düzlemsel, orijinal çalışmadaki iki faktörlü yapıyı içeren özelliklertedir. Ölçeğin uyum ve artımsal geçerli öğretmen adayları, ÇUÖ puanlamaları benlik saygısı ve akademik başarı ile geçerli ve anlamlı ilişkilendirilmiştir; puan bu puanların akademik başarıyı, sözleş benlik saygısı puanlarından daha fazla yordadırmalıdır. ÇUÖ'nün tüm ölçekli için Cronbach alfa iç-tutarlık katsayısı .74 olarak bulundu, test-tekrar testi korelasyon katsayısı ise .57'dir. Kız ve erkek puan ortalama puan anlamlı farklılıklar elde etmek. Bu sonuçlar alan analizi konusu tartışılarak, bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çocuklarda umut, amaca güdülenme, amaca ulaşma yolları

Kaynakça

1. Akman, Y. ve Korkut, F. (1993). Umut ölçei üzerine bir çalQ+ma. H.Ü. E(itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 193-202.
2. Byrne, B.M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Carvajal, S. C., Evans, R. I., Nash, S. G., & Getz, J. G. (2002) Global positive expectancies of the self and adolescents’ substance use avoidance: Testing a social influence mediational model. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 422-442.
4. Çuhadarolu, Ö. (1985). Adolesanlarda benlik sayg s . YayQmlanmamQ+ Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi TQp Fakültesi Psikiyatri Anabilim DalQ, Ankara.
5. Denizli, S. (2004). The role of hope and study skills in predicting test-anxiety levels of university students. YayQmlanmamQ+ Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Dou Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
6. Gariglietti, K. P., McDermott, D., Gingerich, K., & Hastings, S. (1997). Hope and its relationship to self-efficacy in adolescent girls. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 412416).
7. Hagborg, W. J. (1993). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Harter's Self-Perception Profile for adolescents: A concurrent validity study. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 132-136. 389
8. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L., (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

9. Kemer, G. ve Atik, G. (2005). K rsal kesimde ve kent merkezinde okuyan lise ö(rencilerinin umut düzeylerinin aileden alg lanan sosyal destek düzeyine göre kar. la.t r lmas . VIII. Ulusal Psikolojik DanQ+ma ve Rehberlik Kongresi’nde bildiri olarak sunulmu+tur. 21-23 Eylül, stanbul.
10. Kemer, G. (2006). The role of self-efficacy, hope, and anxiety in predicting university entrance examination scores of 11th grade students. YayQmlanmamQ+ Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Dou Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
11. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
12. McCarthy, J. D., & Hoge, D. R. (1982). Analysis of age effects in longitudinal studies of adolescent self-esteem. Developmental Psychology, 18(3), 372-379.
13. Özmen, O. (2006). Predictors of risk-taking behaviors among Turkish adolescents. YayQmlanmamQ+ Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Dou Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
14. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescents: Self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15. Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
16. Silbert, E., & Tippett, J. (1965). Self-esteem: Clinical assessment and measurement validation. Psychological Reports, 16, 1017–1071.
17. Snyder, C. R. (1995). Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 355-360. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275.
18. Snyder, C. R. (2004). Hope and the other strengths: Lesson’s from animal farm. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 23(5), 624-627.
19. Snyder, C. R., Feldman, D. B., & Rand, K. L. (2002). Hopeful choices: A school counselor’s guide to hope theory. Professional School Counseling, 5(5), 298-307.
20. Snyder, C. R., Feldman, D. B., Taylor, J. D., Schroeder, L. L., & Adams, V. (2000). The roles of hopeful thinking in preventing problems and enhancing strengths. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 15, 262-295.
21. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., & et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570-585.
22. Snyder, C. R., Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Rapoff, M. Ware, L., Danovsky, M., & et al. (1997). The development and validation of the Children’s Hope Scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22(3), 399-421.
23. Snyder, C. R., Ilardi, S. S., Cheavens, J., Michael, S. T., Yamhure, L., & Sympson, S. (2000). The role of hope in cognitive-behavior therapies. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(6), 747–762.
24. Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (p. 257-276). NY: Oxford University Press.
25. Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., Pulvers, K. M., Adams III, V. H., & Wiklund, C. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 820-826.
26. Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, T. F. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321-335.
27. Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
28. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
29. Van de Vijver, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.
30. Vilaythong, A. P., Arnau, R. C., Rosen, D. H., & Mascaro, N. (2003). Humor and hope: Can humor increase hope? Humor, 16(1), 79-89.