Students’ Errors and Misunderstanding towards Algebra: Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Prediction Skills of Error and Misunderstanding and Solution Suggestions

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

İ
lköğretim Öğrencilerinin Basınç Konusu ile
İlgili Problemlerin Çözümünde Yaptıkları Hatalar

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fen Eğitimi, Basınç, Problem Çözme, Hata Kategorileri

Kaynakça

1. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood (Boston, MA, MIT Press).
2. Charles de berg, K. (1995). Student understanding of the volume mass and pressure of air within a sealed syringe in different states of compression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8),871-884.
3. Cooper, G. (1998). Research into Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW. School of Education Studies, The University of New South Wales, Australia, URL: http://www.uog.edu/coe/ed451/tHEORY/LoadTheory1.pdf,
4. De Jong, T. & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1986). Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics. Journal of Educational Phychology, 78(4),279-288.
5. Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987). Common Knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom, London: Methuen.
6. Fisher K.,M., & Lipson J. I. (1986). Twenty questions about student errors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(9), 783-803.
7. Gagatsis, A., & L., Kyriakides. (2000). Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Their Pupils’ Mathematical Errors. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 24-58
8. Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modelling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440-454.

9. Heyworth, R. M. (1999). "Procedural and conceptual knowledge of export and novice students for the solving of basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195-212.
10. Hierarchical Clustering (2006). Documentation for Math Works Products, R. URL: www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/toolbox/stats/f61427.html
11. Kariotogloy, P., Psillos, D. & Vallassiades, O. (1990). Understanding pressure: didactical transpositions and pupils’conceptions. Physics Education, 25 (2), 92-96.
12. Osborne, R.J. & Wittrock, M.C. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education, Studies in Science Education, 12, pp. 59-87.
13. Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (2005). Bibliography: students' alternative frameworks and science education (Kiel, IPN).
14. Pittman, K,M., (1999). Student-generated anologies: another way of knowing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1-22.
15. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, pp. 211-227.
16. Psillos, D &, Kariotogloy, P. (1999). Teaching fluids: intended knowledge and students’ actual
17. conceptual evolution, International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 17-38.
18. Raghavan, K. &, Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science. Science
19. Education, 79(1), 37-61.
20. Rollnick M., Rutherford M., (1990). African primary school teachers-what ideas do they hold on air and air pressure?. International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 101-113.
21. Sadler, (1998). Psychometric models of student conception in science: reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-driven assessment instruments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 265-296.
22. Scott P.,H. (1993). Overtures and obstacles: teaching and learning about air pressure in a high school classroom. in D.J. Novak (ed), third misconceptions seminar proceedings.
23. Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science, Studies in Science Education, 14, pp. 63-82.
24. Stefanich, G. P., Rokusek, T. (1992). An Analysis of Computational Errors in the Use of Division Algorithms by Fourth-Grade Students. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 4; Academic Research Library.
25. im ek, S., (2000). Fen Bilimlerinde De erlendirmenin Önemi, Milli E itim Dergisi sayı 148,
26. URL: yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/148/7.htm.
27. Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. &Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 442-468.
28. Tatlıdil, H. (1992). Uygulamalı çok de i kenli istatistiksel analiz, Ankara.
29. Valencia, S. W., Wixson, K. K. (1991). Diagnostic Teaching The Reading Teacher; 44, 6; Academic Research Library, pg. 420.
30. Leonard W. J., Gerace W. J. & Dufresne R. J. (1999). Concept- based problem solving, university of Massachusetts physics education research group technical report, scientific reasoning research institute and department of physics & astronomy, university of Massachusetts, URL: http://umperg.physics.umass.edu/.
31. Wilson, P. (1997). Simplex creative problem solving. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6(3), 161-167.