The role of dark patterns in manipulating users in digital environments

Öz

Dark patterns are described as digital design patterns that entice users to take actions that counter to their “real” interests or that they would not otherwise have undertaken. Dark patterns may pose challenges in digital environments by infringing users’ fundamental rights. These deceptive practices may lead users to unknowingly undertake financial obligations; their personal data processed without permission or become parties in contracts they did not intend to enter. Therefore, legal regulations alone are not sufficient enough; preventive strategies must also be identified, digital literacy must be improved, and users must be aware of their rights. In this context, the article defines the concept of dark patterns and analyses the difficulty of identifying such designs and the lack of specific regulations in national and international levels. Current rules on dark patterns are mostly regulated under general consumer protection rights and unfair competition provisions. This situation has been assessed as facilitating the continuation of manipulative practices by platforms and creates a significant gap in the effective protection of user rights. Furthermore, the study highlights lawsuits against large-scale companies and discusses the need to strengthen the regulatory framework through concrete cases.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• information technology law
• dark patterns
• user experience
• unfair commercial practices
• data privacy

Dijital ortamlarda kullanıcıların yönlendirilmesinde karanlık tasarımların rolü

Öz

Karanlık tasarımlar kullanıcıları “gerçek” isteklerine veya çıkarlarına aykırı olarak hareket etmeye veya normalde gerçekleştirmeyecekleri eylemleri yapmaya teşvik eden dijital tasarım desenleri olarak tanımlanabilir. Son yıllarda sıklıkla kullanılan bu tasarımlar, dijital ortamlarda kullanıcıların bilgilendirilme, rıza gösterme ve sözleşmeden cayma gibi temel haklarını ihlal ederek ciddi sorunlara yol açabilmektedir. Bu tür uygulamalar, kullanıcıların farkında olmadan finansal yükümlülükler üstlenmesine, kişisel verilerinin izinsiz işlenmesine veya istemedikleri sözleşmelere taraf olmalarına ve bunun sonucunda birçok davanın açılmasına da neden olabilmektedir. Karanlık tasarımların tespiti ve manipülatif etkilerinin ortaya konması yapısal olarak güçtür. Bu nedenle, yalnızca hukuki düzenlemelerle yetinilmemeli; dijital okuryazarlığın artırılması ve kullanıcı bilincinin güçlendirilmesine yönelik önleyici stratejiler de ulusal ve uluslararası düzeyde ele alınmalıdır. Bu bağlamda yapılan çalışmada, kullanıcıları manipüle etmeye yönelik karanlık tasarımlar kavramsal olarak tanımlanmış; bu tasarımların saptanmasının güçlüğü, ülkeler bazında özel düzenlemelerin eksikliği belirlenmiştir. Karanlık tasarımlara yönelik mevcut hukuki düzenlemelerin çoğunlukla genel tüketici haklarına ilişkin kurallar ile haksız rekabet hükümlerine dayanması, karanlık tasarımlara ilişkin özel kanunların olmaması, platformların manipülatif uygulamaları sürdürmesini kolaylaştırdığı gibi kullanıcıların haklarının korunmasında da ciddi bir boşluk yaratmaktadır. Bu nedenle, çalışmada, karanlık tasarımları kullanan, büyük ölçekli şirketlere karşı açılan örnek davalara yer verilmiş, düzenleyici çerçevenin güçlendirilmesine duyulan ihtiyaç somut vakalar üzerinden tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• bilişim hukuku
• karanlık tasarımlar
• kullanıcı deneyimi
• haksız ticari uygulamalar
• veri gizliliği

Kaynakça

1. Akhurst, T., Zurdo, L., Rapparini, R. & Mautner Markhof, C. (2023). How should the European Union regulate dark patterns?. SciencesPo. https://www.sciencespo.fr/public/chaire-numerique/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Dark-Patterns.pdf
2. Başer, E. & Akıncı, S. (2020). Kullanıcı deneyimi ve kişiselleştirme bağlamında bir dijital platform incelemesi. Selçuk İletişim, 13(2), 866-897. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/josc/issue/55089/688523
3. Bösch, C., Erb, B., Kargl, F., Kopp, H. & Pfattheicher, S. (2016). Tales from the dark side: Privacy dark strategies and privacy dark patterns. Proceedings on privacy enhancing technologies, 4, 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2016-0038
4. Brignull, H. (2023). Deceptive patterns: Exposing the tricks tech companies use to control you. https://www.deceptive.design/book/contents/part-1
5. Cara, C. (2019). Dark patterns in the media: A systematic review. Network intelligence studies, 7(14), 105-113. https://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/NIS_14_3.pdf
6. Conti, G. & Sobiesk, E. (2010). Malicious interface design: Exploiting the user. WWW '10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web, 271-280. http://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772719
7. Çeken, B. & Delil, S. (2021). Arayüzlerde hacim ilhamı: Yaratıcı UI tasarım konseptlerinde 3 boyutlu grafikler. Dünya İnsan Bilimleri, 2, 68-83.
8. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (1993, April 5). Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (Unfair Contract Terms Directive). Official journal of the European communities, L 95, 29-34. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1993/13/oj

9. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2002, September 23). Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 on the distance marketing of consumer financial services (Distance Marketing of Consumer Financial Services Directive). Official journal of the European communities, L 279, 16-28. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2002/65/oj
10. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2005, May 11). Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive). Official journal of the European Union, L 149, 22-39. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32005L0029
11. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2016, April 27). Directive 2016/679/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). Official journal of the European Union, L 119, 1-88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
12. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2022, September 14). Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 October 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 265, 1-42. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj
13. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024, June 13). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (OJ L 2024/1689, 12.7.2024, 1-144). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
14. FTC. (2022, November 3). FTC action against Vonage results in $100 million for customers trapped by illegal dark patterns and junk fees when trying to cancel service. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/11/ftc-action-against-vonage-results-100-million-customers-trapped-illegal-dark-patterns-junk-fees-when-trying-cancel-service
15. Folkvord, F., Peschke, L., Gümüş Ağca, Y., van Houten, K., Stazi, G., Roca-Umbert, A., Güneş Peschke, Z. S., Seyfafjehi, S., Gallego, A., Gaeta, E., Fico, G., Karinsalo, A. & Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F. (2022, June 24). Preferences in the intention to download a COVID tracing app: A discrete choice experiment study in the Netherlands and Turkey. Frontiers in communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.900066
16. Gençtürk Hızal, G. S. (2005). Reklam endüstrisinin topografyası: Türkiye örneği. İletişim araştırmaları, 3(1-2), 105-131.
17. Gray, C. M., Kou, Y., Battles, B., Hoggatt, J. & Toombs, A. L. (2018). The dark (patterns) side of UX design. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108
18. Gray, C. M., Santos, C., Bielova, N. (2023) Towards a preliminary ontology of dark patterns knowledge. Extended abstracts of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 286, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585676
19. Güneş Peschke, S., Aydoğdu, Y. & Peschke, L. (2022). İnternet sitelerinin ve mobil uygulamaların çerez (cookies) politikalarında dezenformasyon ve hukuki boyutu. B. Kent, Y. Söyler & M. A. Kulular İbrahim (Ed.), İnternet hukukunda dezenformasyonla mücadele (p. 17-38). On İki Levha.
20. Hroch, M., Kompatsiaris, P., Grassmuck, V., Moreno, J., Peschke, L., Jirák, J. & Poddar, D. (2024). Futures of algorithms and choices: Structuration of algorithmic imaginaries and digital platforms in Europe. Central European journal of communication, 17(1), 38-60. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.1(35).707
21. ISO. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO Standard No. 9241-210:2010). https://www.iso.org/standard/52075.html
22. Koca, Y. & Güneş Peschke, Z. S. (2023). Dijital hizmetler yasası ve dijital piyasalar yasası kapsamında çevrim içi davranışsal reklamcılık faaliyetlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Yargıtay, 49(4), 827-864.
23. Lu, Y., Yang, Y., Zhao, Q., Zhang, C. & Li, T. J. J. (2024). AI assistance for UX: A literature review through human-centered AI. arXiv:2402.06089v2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.06089
24. Luguri, J. & Strahilevitz, L. J. (2021). Shining a light on dark patterns. Journal of legal analysis, 13(1), 43-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa006
25. Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Boluda, A., Bogliacino, F., Liva, G., Lechardoy, L. & Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell, T. (2022). Behavioural study on unfair commercial practices in the digital environment: Dark patterns and manipulative personalisation: Final report. Publications office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/859030
26. Maier, M. & Harr, R. (2020). Dark design patterns: An end-user perspective. Human technology, 16(2), 170-199. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.202008245641
27. Martini, M., Drews, C., Seeliger, P. & Weinzierl, Q. (2021). Dark patterns: Phänomenologie und antworten der rechtsordnung. Zeitschrift für digitalisierung und recht, 1(1), 47-74. https://www.uni-speyer.de/fileadmin/Lehrstuehle/Martini/2021_Dark_patterns__zfdr_mit_Weinzierl_Seeliger_Drews_S_74ff.pdf
28. Mathur, A., Acar, G., Friedman, M. J., Lucherini, E., Mayer, J., Chetty, M. & Narayanan, A. (2019). Dark patterns at scale: Findings from a crawl of 11K shopping websites. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 81, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359183
29. Mathur, A., Mayer, J., & Kshirsagar, M. (2021). What makes a dark pattern... dark?: Design attributes, normative considerations, and measurement methods. CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 360, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445610
30. Nimwegen, C., Bergman, K. & Akdag, A. (2022). Shedding light on assessing dark patterns:Introducing the system darkness scale (SDS). 35th international BCS human-computer interaction conference. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2022.7
31. Nousiainen, K. & Ortega, C. P. (2023). Dark patterns in law and economics framework. Loyola consumer law review, 36(1), 90-112. https://lawecommons.luc.edu/lclr/vol36/iss1/4
32. Peschke, L. & Güneş Peschke, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the new challenges for EU legislation. Yıldırım Beyazıt law review, 2, 1267-1297. https://doi.org/10.33432/ybuhukuk.1104344
33. Rieger, S. & Sinders, C. (2020). Dark patterns: Regulating digital design. Stiftung Neue Verantwortung. https://www.interface-eu.org/storage/archive/files/dark.patterns.english.pdf
34. Sin, R., Harris, T., Nilsson, S. & Beck, T. (2022). Dark patterns in online shopping: Do they work and can nudges help mitigate impulse buying?. Behavioural public policy, 9(1), 61-87. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.11
35. Yılmaz, S. & Erkan, V. U. (2020). Sosyal medya hesaplarının miras yoluyla intikal edip edemeyeceği sorusunun kişisel verileri koruma hukuku kapsamında incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi, 11(2), 567-586. https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.789817
36. Waldman, A. E. (2020). Cognitive biases, dark patterns, and the ‘privacy paradox’. Current opinion in psychology, 31, 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.025