Conducting of the Liquidation of Bankrupt Bank by the Fund

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 71 - 84, 01.04.2016

Müjgân Tunç Yücel Serdar Kale

Öz

Applicable provisions in case of bankruptcy of banks has been amended many times in our legal system, for this reason, it is difficult to determine applicable provisions for the bankruptcy and liquidation of banks. In accordance with the regulations relating to the bankruptcy of the banks in the Banks Act, even if tasks of the bodies that conducting of the liquadation given to the Fund, the Fund is obliged to do this within the framework of the İİK Turkish Bankruptcy and Enforcement Law . In this case, the Fund will primarily try to collect its receivables, because receivables of the Fund arised from reimbursement of deposits in the failed bank. While the Fund is conducting of the liquadation in lieu of bankruptcy organs, it is obliged to take into account the interests of bankrupt bank, other creditors of the bank and people whose responsibility depend on the result of the bank’s bankruptcy liquidation such as bank managers .In this concept, the Fund will be responsible for all the faults due to its procedures that cause the bankrupt’s estate to loss . In this situation, the liability case will be filed against the state in the scope of Banks Act clause 127/6 . However, since it will be evaluated under the provisions of the İİK, the case should be filed in ordinary courts

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fund, Bankruptcy of Banks, Liquidation, Responsibility of Fund

Fona Devredilen Bankanın İflas Tasfiyesi

Öz

Kaynakça

• • Altay, Sümer, Türk İflas Hukuku C I, İstanbul 2004.
• • Atalay, Oğuz, “Bankaların İflasında İflas Tasfiyesi”, Şükrü Postacıoğlu’na Armağan, İzmir 1997.
• • Deynekli, Adnan, Bankaların İflasında İflas İdaresinin Yargısal Denetimi, Haluk Ko- nuralp Anısına Armağan, C.II, Ankara 2009.
• • Doğrusöz, Hanife, Banka Yöneticilerinin ve Hakim Ortaklarını Şahsi Sorumluluğu, İstanbul 2010.
• • Erdönmez, Güray, İflasta Alacaklılar Toplanmasını Yetkileri, İstanbul 2005.
• • Günel, Mete, İflas Davaları ve İflasın Ertelenmesi, Ankara 2006.
• • Kostkiewicz Jolanta Kren, SchKG Kommentar, 19. Auflage, Zürich 2016.
• • Kuru, Baki, İcra ve İflas Hukuku El Kitabı, 2. Baskı, İstanbul 2013.
• • Pekcanıtez, Hakan / Erdönmez, Gülay, Bankacılık Kanunu’nun İcra ve İflas Hukuku Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, Bankacılar Dergisi, S 55, 2005,.
• • Reisoğlu, Seza, Bankacılık Kanunu Şerhi, Ankara 2015, C II, s.1849.
• • Tekinalp, Ünal, Fondaki Bankanın Hukuku, İstanbul 2003.
• • Yılmaz, Ejder, Banka Tasfiyelerinde İflas İdaresi, BATİDER, C XXIV, S 2, s.175-185 (BATİDER).
• • Yılmaz, Ejder, İflas İdaresi, Ankara 1976 (İdare).
• • Yılmaz, Ejder, “İflaslarda Devletin İşlevi ve İflas Masasına Ait Paraların İflas İda- resince Nemalandırılmasını Gerekliliği, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 1996/2, s.173-187 (Devletin İşlevi).