Dental Students' Attitudes to the Use of Rubber Dam in United Arab Emirates

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess, by means of structured questionnaire, dental students' attitudes to the use of rubber dam. Cross-sectional study, with anonymous structured questionnaires was distributed to final year dental students in Ajman University of Science and Technology in Feb 2012. Information sought included attitudes to the use of rubber dam for a variety of operative and endodontic treatment. The sample consisted of 75 dental students (response rate 83%). Rubber dam was routinely used by 94% of the respondents during root canal treatment on molar teeth of adult patients, but only 73% of respondents had used rubber dam on child patients (P < 0.05). Forty five percent of the respondents (n=34) who placed composite in anterior teeth never used rubber dam for this procedure. However, 44% of the students felt that the application of rubber dam is difficult. Around 97% of the respondents felt that patients do not like rubber dam. The findings revealed that our students showed positive attitude towards the use of rubber dam. However there is a room for improvement to overcome the difficulty in rubber dam application by increasing the preclinical training on phantom heads and hands-on training in clinics particularly for operative procedures and in pediatric patients in order to improve treatment quality and patient safety. Clinical article (J Int Dent Med Res 2013; 6: (1), pp. 20-24)

Keywords

• Dental students, endodontic, rubber dam, UAE

Dental Students' Attitudes to the Use of Rubber Dam in United Arab Emirates

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Elderton RJ. A modern approach to use of rubber dam. Dental Practitioner and Dental Record. 1971; 21: 187–193, 226–232, 267–273.
2. Harrel SK, Molinari J Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2004; 135: 429– 437.
3. Ingle JI, Walton RE, Malamed SF et al. Preparation for endodontic treatment. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, eds. Endodontics, 5th edn. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc, pp. 2002: 394– 403.
4. Glickman GM, Pettiette MT. Preparation for treatment. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, Keiser K, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 9th edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby, pp. 2006; 120–132.
5. Cohen S. Endodontics and litigation: an American perspective. International Dental Journal 1989; 39: 13–16.
6. Peters OA, Peters FC. Ethical principles and considerations in endodontic treatment. Endodontic Practice Today. 2007; 1, 101–108.
7. Feierabend SA, Matt J, Klaiber B.A. Comparison of conventional and new rubber dam systems in dental practice. Operative Dentistry. 2011; 36 (3):243-50.
8. Stewardson DA, McHugh ES. Patient’s attitudes to rubber dam. International Endodontic Journal. 2002; 35, 812–819.

9. Ireland L. The rubber dam – its advantages and application. Texas Dental Journal 1962; 80, 6–15.
10. European Society of Endodontology Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. International Endodontic Journal. 2006; 39, 921–930.
11. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry 2009; 30, 170–174.
12. American Association of Endodontists Guide to Clinical Endodontics, 2004, 4th edn. Chicago, IL: American Association of Endodontists.
13. Koshy S, Chandler NP. Use of rubber dam and its association with other endodontic procedures in New Zealand. New Zealand Dental Journal. 2002; 98, 12–16.
14. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. International Endodontic Journal. 2007; 40, 427–432.
15. Mala S, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Dummer PMH. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam. International Endodontic Journal. 2009; 42, 632–638.
16. Ryan W, O’Connell A. The attitudes of undergraduate dental
17. students to the use of the rubber dam. Journal of Irish Dental Association. 2007; 53, 87–91.
18. Hill EE, Rubel BS. Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use? Journal of Dental Education. 2008; 72, 1177–1181.
19. Jenkins SM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM. A study of endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice within the UK. International Endodontic Journal. 2001; 34, 16–22.
20. Whitworth JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. International Endodontic Journal. 2000; 33, 435– 441.
21. Marshall K, Page J. The use of rubber dam in the UK. British Dental Journal. 1990; 169, 286–291.
22. Redwood C, Winning T, Lekkas D, Townsend G Improving clinical assessment: evaluating students' ability to identify and apply clinical criteria. European Journal of Dental Education. 2010; 14(3):136-44.