Investigation of Fracture Resistance of Different Core Materials

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Çalışkan MK. Endodontide Tanı ve Tedaviler. Endodontik tedavi sonrası restorasyon. İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2006, 466.
2. Hansen EK. In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fillings. Dent Mat J. 1988; 4: 169-73.
3. Hansen EK, et al. In vivo fractured of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored amalgam. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990; 6:
4. Smidt A, Venezia E. Techniques for immediate core build up of endodontically treated teeth. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 258-268.
5. Kantor ME, Pines MS. A comparative study of techniques for pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1977; 38: 405-412.
6. Chan RW, Bryant RW. Post-core foundations for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 48: 401-406.
7. Hoag EP & Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 47(2): 177-181.
8. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984a; 51: 780-784.

9. Taleghani M, Morgan RW. Reconstructive materials for endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57: 446-449.
10. Wilson NH, Setcos JC, Dummer PM et al. A split-shank prefabricated post system: A critical multidisciplinary rewiev. Quintessence Int. 1997; 28: 737-743.
11. Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G & Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of variosus core build-up materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 9 (1): 14
12. Cho GC, Kaneko LM, Donoven TE & White SN. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. J Prosthet Dent. ; 82 (3): 272-276. Gelfand M, Goldman M & Sunderman EJ. Effect of complete veneer crowns on the compressive strength of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52 (5): 635-638.
13. Kostka E, Roulet JF.: Textbook of endodontology (Ed. by Bergenholtz G, Bindsley PH and Reit C), 1st Ed, Singapore, Blackwell Publishing Co, 2003, 177-191.
14. Ziebert AJ, Dhuru VB. The Fracture toughness of various core materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 4: 33-37.
15. Yıldız M. Sonlu elemanlar ve mekanik stres analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak davranışlarının incelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, Erzurum, 1997.
16. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11 th ed, St. Louis, 2002, Mosby Co, 247.
17. Nyyar A. Coronal-radicular built up for endodontically treated teeth. Clinically Dent. 1983; 4 (26): 1-27.
18. Kane JJ, Burgess JO and Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 613.
19. Alaçam T, Nalbant L, Alaçam A. İleri Restorasyon Teknikleri, 1. Baskı, Ankara, Polat Basımevi, 1998, 47-135.
20. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal Cycling Procedures for Laboratory Testing of Dental Restorations. J Dent. 1999; 27: 89-99.
21. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 477 – 485.
22. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. ; 8: 59–67. Burke FJ, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25: 335–340.
23. Capp NJ, Warren K. An advantage of the direct post and core technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 712–713.
24. Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 55: 33–38.
25. Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 304–308.
26. Naasan MA, Watson TF. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1998; 11: 36–45. kuvvet altındaki