TOWARDS THE FIELD OF A TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION: An Evaluation of the Second University Students at Anadolu University in Terms of Gender

Abstract

In a sociological context, this study aims to analyse the reasons for the adult women who study at the Second University with open admission to choose distance education in Turkey. For this study, based on the context of "individual in society", the women who are structured with distance education system and studying at the Second University are thought to be the resources for the researches presenting the educational models necessary for designing a transformative educational field. This research supports the idea that the problem of woman's individual existence in Turkish society can be solved with education and a woman-centred rearrangement of educational facilities. Also, distance education strategies are regarded important for providing equal educational facilities to developing countries like Turkey. In order to enable transformation in constructing the change-transform process in distance education, providing the change in the first place is the primary necessity. The aim is to open the action field and then to experience the transformative process. Evaluating the preferences of the women studying at the Second University within the framework of gender, this research applies the survey method by complying with the screening model. Within the framework of anticipated conditions of the survey, this study was conducted with 429 participants, chosen according to the "Small Sample Techniques" by Krejicie and Morgan. As the variables are of a nominal scale, during the analysis, the square method has been used and the relations have been explained with crosstabs. According to the results of the research, a second degree for women is an important step for them to break the glass ceiling in their work lives. Defined as the learned helplessness of women in work life, the glass ceiling syndrome is eliminated with the chance of a second degree. Also, considered with the positive effects on social life and self-esteem, Second University is thought to be the name of the transformative education process.

Keywords

• Anadolu University, Second University, distance education, woman, gender

Kaynakça

1. Adar, B. (2012). Türk Siyasal Yaşamında Kadın Politikacılar ve Medyada Kadın
2. Politikacıların Kodlanması (Female Politicians in Turkish Politics Life and Coding of Female Politicians in Media), s. 233. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Istanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü). Demiray, E. and Curabay, S. (2000). Distance Education for Women’s Development: A
3. Case Study at Anadolu University, Turkey. ss.23-33. Malaysia, December-2000, Malaysian
4. Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), ISSN 1511-6433.
5. Demiray, U. (1993). Older Graduates in Distance Education: A Case Study of the Open
6. Education Faculty, pp. 137-146. New Delhi, India: Media Technology For Human Resource Development, vol: 5, Number: 2. Demiray, U. (2003) Açıköğretim Fakültesi ve Açıköğretim Lisesi Uygulamalarını İçeren
7. Araştırmalara İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme [An Evaluation of the Researches Dealt With OEF and OHL], Adapazari, Turkey, Turkish Online Journal Educatiomnal Technology-TOJET, Vol: 2, Number: 4, Sakarya University. Demiray, U. (2005). Development of Distance Education in Turkey, Global pespectives:
8. Philosopy and Practice in Distance Education, (Edited by Weiyuan Zhang), ss. 310-325, China: China Radio Central and Television Press, Volume Three, ISBN 7-304-03438-6.

9. Giddens, A. (2000). Sosyoloji (Sociology), Haz. Cemal Güzel ve Hüseyin Özel, s.621.
10. Ankara: Ayrac Yayınevi. Izmirli, S., O.; Odabasi, F. And Yarakul, I. (2012). Dönüştürücü Öğrenme Kuramı ve Öğretmen Yetiştirme Üzerine Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme (A Conceptual Analysis of
11. Transformative Learning Theory and Teacher Training) pp. 169-177. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Cilt; 12, Sayı:3, Eylül 2012 ISSN: 1303-0876.
12. Karasar, N. (2008) Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (17. Baskı) (Methodology of Scientific
13. Research). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Krejicie, W. D. and Morgan D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research
14. Activities, ss. 607-610. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Koray, M.(1993). Çalışma Yaşamında Kadın Gerçekleri (Women Realities in Working Life), retrieved on November 2012. http://books.google.com.tr/books/about/%C3%87al%C4%B1%C5%9Fma_ya%C5%9Fam%C4%B1nda_kad%C 4%B1n_ger%C3%A7ekler.html?id=ej1AAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
15. Kurnaz, Ş. (1992). Cumhuriyet Öncesinde Türk Kadını: 1839-1923 (Turkish Women
16. Previous Turkish Republic: 1839-1923), pp.16-17. Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
17. Mezirow, J. (1996). Contemporary Paradigms of Learning. pp.158-173. Adult Education
18. Quarterly, 46(3).Retrieved September 2, 2008, from the SAGE Social Science Collections.
19. Mezirow J.,and Associates (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a
20. Theory in Progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc., A Wiley Company. Mezirow, J. (2001). Transformative Learning as Discourse. pp.61-63, retrieved on March 20 http://www.corwin.com/upm-data/3506_1Jted03.pdf#page=59.
21. Peirce, L. P.(1996). Harem-i Hümayun Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Hükümranlık ve Kadınlar (Sovereignty in Ottoman Empire Harem-i Hümayun and Women), p. 369.
22. Trans: Ayşe Berktay). Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları. Sancar, S. (2009). Erkeklik: İmkânsız İktidar (Manhood: Impossibility of Power), p. 176.
23. Istanbul, Metis Yayınları. Taninli, S. (2006). Ne Olursa Olsun Savaşıyorlar, Kadın Sorununun Neresindeyiz? (Under
24. Any Circumstance Whatsoever They Could Fight a Circle Saw, Where Are We on Problem of the Women), pp. 223-224. Istanbul: Alkım Yayınevi. Tanrıover, H. (2007). Medyada Kadınların Temsil Biçimleri ve Kadın Hakları İhlalleri
25. (Women Presentation Styles in Media and Women Impingements), (Ed. Sevda Alankuş, Kadın Odaklı Habercilik), s. 152. İstanbul: IPS Iletisim Vakfı Yayınları. Toussaint, J. (1993). The Glass Ceiling, http://feminism.eserver.org/the-glass-ceiling.txt retrieved on april 2012, Feminism and Women’s Studies.
26. Unat, A., N. (1982). Toplumsal Değişme ve Türk Kadını: Türk Toplumunda Kadın (Social
27. Change and Turkish Women: Women in Turkish Society), (Der. Nermin Abadan Unat, pp. 1- Ankara: Araştırma, Eğitim, Ekin Yayınları. Yasin, Y. N. (2000). Evde Taylorizm”: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin İlk Yıllarında Ev İşinin
28. Rasyonelleşmesi; 1928-1940 (Taylorism in the House: Rasyonalism in Houseworks
29. Around the First Years of Turkish Republic), pp. 52-75. Toplum ve Bilim Dergisi, 84/ Bahar. Young, M. I. (2009). Yaşanan Bedene Karşı Toplumsal Cinsiyet: Toplumsal Yapı ve Öznellik Üzerine Düşünceler (Social Gender against Living Body: Thoughts on Social
30. Structure and Subjectivity), pp. 40-41. (Translated by Rüya Kalıntaş), Cogito Feminizm, Sayı:58/ Bahar 2009, Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2011. 03 Nisan 2012 www.tuik.gov.tr