THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY IN BREAKING BARRIERS TOWARDS WOMEN’S LIBERATION IN OPEN DISTANCE LEARNING

Abstract

Technology has brought about unique changes in education as a whole, how people communicate; research, preference and social interaction. It presents before the society a growing recognition of the recent and wider possibilities in the new era. The proposed study identified the impact of technology in breaking barriers towards women’s liberation in Open Distance Learning (ODL) to contribute towards enhancing women empowerment. The two concepts Open Distance Learning (ODL) and Distance Education will interchangeably used in this research because the participants are furthering studies through ODL and DE (ODL/DE). This paper is qualitative research in nature and an auto-ethnographic approach focused on questions pertaining to how technology breaks barriers towards women’s liberation, perseverance, how women integrate the ODL/DE environment into their personal life. I reflected on my personal journey coming from being a primary school teacher and studied through ODL until I completed my doctoral degree with University of South Africa (Unisa). For this study, 117 women who studied at Unisa an ODL institution were interviewed and 58 women who studied at the University of Pretoria (UP) a Distance Education (DE) Unit. Amongst the 200 participants, there were 25 women who dropped out and they highlighted their attitude towards studying through ODL/DE. Also 110 questionnaires were sent out and 83 were returned. Data were analysed. The findings suggested that technology improved and liberated women’s livelihoods in many respects because of their perseverance and taking extra online modules through ODL/DE. Findings suggested that technology contribute towards enhancing women’s empowerment and liberation in. Therefore, women empowerment is an active multidimensional process which empowers women to realize their full uniqueness and powers in all walks of life. The paper concludes by recommending that women should be able to live a life without limits and see life in a better perspective.

Keywords

• Open Distance Learning, women empowerment, women liberation, barriers to women, perseverance, technology

Kaynakça

1. Bell, J. (1999). Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First time Researchers in
2. Education and Social Science. 3rd Edition. Buckingham: Open University Press. Candy, P. (1990). How People Learn to Learn. In Smith, Robert, ed., Learning To Learn
3. Across The Lifespan. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education. 4th Edition. London: Routledge.
4. COL (Commonwealth of Learning) (nd). “Open and Distance Learning (ODL) for Development”. Accessed 8 May 2009. http://www.col.org/about/whatis/ODL/Pages/default.aspx
5. Ellis, C. & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity:
6. Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Indiresan, J. (1996).
7. Implications for Women in Women and Emerging Technologies' editors Regina Papa and Yasodha Shanmuga Sundaram, British Council Division. Emerald Publishers, Chennai, 19 Emerging Technologies in Open and Distance Education, Jackson, M. (2001). Making a Mark. Globe and Mail, 23 June 2001.
8. Jung, I. (2008). ICT and quality assurance to support ubiquitous access to distance education: Promises, realities and recent breakthroughs.5th EDEN Research Workshop 20th-30th Oct 2008 Paris France. slideshare.net/eden online

9. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G. & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 560–565.
10. Lentell, H. (2003). The importance of the tutor in open and distance learning. In: A Tait, R
11. Mills (Eds.): Rethinking Learner Support in Distance Education: Change and Continuity in an International Context. London: Routledge Falmer, pp. 64-76. McDonough, J. & McDonoug, H.S. (1997). Research Methods for English Language
12. Teachers. London: Arnold. Smith, A. (2004). Off-campus support in distance learning: How do our students define quality? Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1): 28–38.
13. Voogt, J. (2003). Consequences of ICT for Aims, Contents, Processes and Environments of
14. Learning. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (blz. 217–236). Dordrecht: Kluwer.