BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TEACHING STAFF' ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 21 - 30, 01.07.2012

Öz

Current research seeks to understand weather gender is a factor that should be considered when considering teaching staff' attitude toward Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Survey methodology is facilitated through the use of the questionnaires. The survey domain is a random sampling of teaching staff in Egyptian higher education institutions (HEI). The population for this study was 500 full-time Faculty staff, only 412 returned and complete questionnaires are considered as the study sample. The results showed that no difference between being a male or a female as regard to the attitude toward ICT among teaching staff in Egyptians HEI; thus, gender is not a significant factor when considering attitude toward ICT by teaching staff members in Egyptians HEI. The result of this research has significant implications to HEI when they plan, develop, and adopt ICT; thus, HEI has to consider that teaching staff' attitude toward ICT is not related to their gender.

Kaynakça

  • Adams, N. (2002). Educational computing concerns of postsecondary faculty. Journal of Research on Technology, 34(3), 285–303.
  • Ainley, J. & Enger, L. (2007). Student use of, and engagement with, information technology. CEETYA (Curriculum Corporation as the legal entity for the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs) ICT in Schools Taskforce. Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Albright, M. (1996). Instructional technology and higher education: rewards, rights and responsibilities. Keynote Address at the Southern Regional Faculty and Instructional Development Consortium. Baton Rouge, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 392 412).
  • Bhattacharjee, B. (2008). Factors affecting computer use among older adult users: a study in the backdrop of the Florida State University. PhD dissertation. Retrieved June 21, 2010, from http:// etd.lib.fsu.edu/ theses/available/etd-01032008153043/unrestricted/Bonnie.pdf
  • Brosnan, M. (1998). The role of psychological gender in the computer-related attitudes and attainments of primary school children (aged 6-11). Computers & Education, 30, 203-208.
  • Elsaadani, M. (2011). MITAM - a modified ICT adoption model for developing countries: case of business teaching in a developing country. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing – Germany.
  • Fulantelli, G. & Allegra, M. (2003). Small company attitude toward ICT based solutions: some key-elements to improve it. Educational Technology & Society, 6(13), 13-19.
  • Graff, M. (2003). Cognitive style and attitudes toward using online learning and assessment methods. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1, 21-28.
  • Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R. & Beierlein C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823-2837.
  • Jacobsen, M. (1997). Bridging the gap between early adopters’ and mainstream faculty’s use of instructional technology. Information Analysis. Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http:// eric.ed.gov ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/ed/23.pdf
  • Key Data on Information and Communication Technology in Schools in Europe. (2004). EURYDICE.
  • Kumar, N., Rose, R. & D'Silva, J. (2008). Predictors of technology deployment among Malaysian teachers. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(9), 1127-1134.
  • McGregor, E. & Bazi, F. (2001). Gender mainstreaming in science and technology. Commonwealth Press Office.
  • Milbrath, Y. & Kinzie, M. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 373-396.
  • Oscarson, D. (1976). Factors associated with vocational teacher proneness toward the adoption of innovations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  • Palaigeorgiou, G., Siozos P., Konstantakis N. & Tsoukalas I. (2005). A computer attitude scale for computer science freshmen and its educational implications. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 330-342.
  • Papaioannou, P. & Charalambous, K. (2011). Principals’ attitudes toward ict and their perceptions about the factors that facilitate or inhibit ICT integration in primary schools of Cyprus. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 333-347.
  • Intaganok, P., Waterworth, P., Andsavachulamanee, T., Grasaresom, G. & Homkome, U. (2008). Attitudes of staff to information and communication technologies in a provincial university in Thailand. EJISDC, 33(3), 1-14.
  • Primo, N. (2003). Gender issues in the information society. UNESCO Publications or the World Secretariat. Summit on the Information Society.
  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. & Tondeur, J. (2009). Factors support or prevent teachers from integrating ICT into classroom teaching: A Chinese perspective. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education – ICCE2009. Hong Kong: AsiaPacific Society for Computers in Education. 808-815.
  • Straub, E. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649.
  • Sugar, W., Crawley, F. and Fine, B. (2004). Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 201–213.
  • Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward computer use: a Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 413-424.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  • Warg, K., Olsen, S., Sorbring, E. & Stegberg, T. (2000). @ITudes - a study concerning the connection between attitudes and ICT usage. Proceedings of IRIS 23. Laboratorium for Interaction Technology, University of Trollhättan Uddevalla.
  • Whitley, B. (1996). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes: it depends on what you ask. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(2), 275-289.
  • Williams, J. (2003). Computers and project-based learning. Media & Methods Magazine - Philadelphia, PA, USA. Retrieved June 3, 2010, from http://www.media-methods.com.
  • Yu, C. (2002). ICTs and gender equality-women’s rights and the Internet. Workshop on “the world summit on the information society: the Asian response, 22-24, Bangkok.
Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 21 - 30, 01.07.2012

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Adams, N. (2002). Educational computing concerns of postsecondary faculty. Journal of Research on Technology, 34(3), 285–303.
  • Ainley, J. & Enger, L. (2007). Student use of, and engagement with, information technology. CEETYA (Curriculum Corporation as the legal entity for the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs) ICT in Schools Taskforce. Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Albright, M. (1996). Instructional technology and higher education: rewards, rights and responsibilities. Keynote Address at the Southern Regional Faculty and Instructional Development Consortium. Baton Rouge, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 392 412).
  • Bhattacharjee, B. (2008). Factors affecting computer use among older adult users: a study in the backdrop of the Florida State University. PhD dissertation. Retrieved June 21, 2010, from http:// etd.lib.fsu.edu/ theses/available/etd-01032008153043/unrestricted/Bonnie.pdf
  • Brosnan, M. (1998). The role of psychological gender in the computer-related attitudes and attainments of primary school children (aged 6-11). Computers & Education, 30, 203-208.
  • Elsaadani, M. (2011). MITAM - a modified ICT adoption model for developing countries: case of business teaching in a developing country. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing – Germany.
  • Fulantelli, G. & Allegra, M. (2003). Small company attitude toward ICT based solutions: some key-elements to improve it. Educational Technology & Society, 6(13), 13-19.
  • Graff, M. (2003). Cognitive style and attitudes toward using online learning and assessment methods. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1, 21-28.
  • Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R. & Beierlein C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823-2837.
  • Jacobsen, M. (1997). Bridging the gap between early adopters’ and mainstream faculty’s use of instructional technology. Information Analysis. Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http:// eric.ed.gov ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/ed/23.pdf
  • Key Data on Information and Communication Technology in Schools in Europe. (2004). EURYDICE.
  • Kumar, N., Rose, R. & D'Silva, J. (2008). Predictors of technology deployment among Malaysian teachers. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(9), 1127-1134.
  • McGregor, E. & Bazi, F. (2001). Gender mainstreaming in science and technology. Commonwealth Press Office.
  • Milbrath, Y. & Kinzie, M. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 373-396.
  • Oscarson, D. (1976). Factors associated with vocational teacher proneness toward the adoption of innovations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  • Palaigeorgiou, G., Siozos P., Konstantakis N. & Tsoukalas I. (2005). A computer attitude scale for computer science freshmen and its educational implications. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 330-342.
  • Papaioannou, P. & Charalambous, K. (2011). Principals’ attitudes toward ict and their perceptions about the factors that facilitate or inhibit ICT integration in primary schools of Cyprus. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 333-347.
  • Intaganok, P., Waterworth, P., Andsavachulamanee, T., Grasaresom, G. & Homkome, U. (2008). Attitudes of staff to information and communication technologies in a provincial university in Thailand. EJISDC, 33(3), 1-14.
  • Primo, N. (2003). Gender issues in the information society. UNESCO Publications or the World Secretariat. Summit on the Information Society.
  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. & Tondeur, J. (2009). Factors support or prevent teachers from integrating ICT into classroom teaching: A Chinese perspective. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education – ICCE2009. Hong Kong: AsiaPacific Society for Computers in Education. 808-815.
  • Straub, E. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649.
  • Sugar, W., Crawley, F. and Fine, B. (2004). Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 201–213.
  • Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward computer use: a Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 413-424.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  • Warg, K., Olsen, S., Sorbring, E. & Stegberg, T. (2000). @ITudes - a study concerning the connection between attitudes and ICT usage. Proceedings of IRIS 23. Laboratorium for Interaction Technology, University of Trollhättan Uddevalla.
  • Whitley, B. (1996). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes: it depends on what you ask. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(2), 275-289.
  • Williams, J. (2003). Computers and project-based learning. Media & Methods Magazine - Philadelphia, PA, USA. Retrieved June 3, 2010, from http://www.media-methods.com.
  • Yu, C. (2002). ICTs and gender equality-women’s rights and the Internet. Workshop on “the world summit on the information society: the Asian response, 22-24, Bangkok.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Mohamed Elsaadanı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Temmuz 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Elsaadanı, M. (2012). TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?. International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education, 1(2), 21-30.
AMA Elsaadanı M. TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?. International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education. Temmuz 2012;1(2):21-30.
Chicago Elsaadanı, Mohamed. “TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?”. International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education 1, sy. 2 (Temmuz 2012): 21-30.
EndNote Elsaadanı M (01 Temmuz 2012) TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?. International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education 1 2 21–30.
IEEE M. Elsaadanı, “TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?”, International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education, c. 1, sy. 2, ss. 21–30, 2012.
ISNAD Elsaadanı, Mohamed. “TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?”. International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education 1/2 (Temmuz 2012), 21-30.
JAMA Elsaadanı M. TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?. International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education. 2012;1:21–30.
MLA Elsaadanı, Mohamed. “TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?”. International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education, c. 1, sy. 2, 2012, ss. 21-30.
Vancouver Elsaadanı M. TEACHING STAFF’ ATTITUDE TOWARD ICT: Is Gender A Factor?. International Women Online Journal Of Distance Education. 2012;1(2):21-30.