Research Article

A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022

Volume: 25 Number: 1 May 15, 2024
TR EN

A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022

Abstract

This review critically examines the evolving interface of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) within the realm of mathematics education between 2017 and 2022. Drawing on a detailed content analysis of 23 seminal papers sourced from the Web of Science, the study seeks to unravel patterns across various dimensions, including geographical distribution, journal prominence, sample characteristics, employed technologies, and foundational learning theories. The overarching objective remains anchored in discerning prevailing themes and trends that could illuminate future research trajectories and enhance pedagogical design in mathematics. The outcomes underscore dynamic shifts in technological adoption, with certain technologies finding more resonance in mathematical education for varied learner groups. Additionally, the review throws light on the prevalent learning theories guiding these studies, hinting at the pedagogical underpinnings steering this academic discourse. Intended for academics, policymakers, and educators, this study not only maps the current terrain of TEL in mathematics but also delineates the contours for impending explorations, emphasising the need for more inclusive and exhaustive reviews in the future.

Keywords

Technology Enhanced Learning, Mathematics Education, Content Analysis

References

  1. Bayne, S. (2014). What’s the matter with “technology-enhanced learning”?. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.915851
  2. Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2017). Digital Technology in Mathematics Education: Research over the Last Decade. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_14
  3. Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research – A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004
  4. Goktas, Y., Kucuk, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacik, O., Yildirim, G., & Reisoglu, I. (2012). Educational Technology Research Trends in Turkey: A Content Analysis of the 2000-2009 Decade. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 191–199. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ978439
  5. Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019). Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12412
  6. Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8
  7. Marín, V. I., de Benito, B., & Darder, A. (2020). Technology-Enhanced Learning for Student Agency in Higher Education: a Systematic Literature Review. Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 45, 15–49. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-045-001
  8. Prasad, D. B. (2008). Content analysis: A method of Social Science Research. In D. K.L. Das & V. Bhaskaran (Eds.), Research methods for social work (pp. 174–193). New Delhi:Rawat Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1748.1448
  9. Sarker, M. N. I., Wu, M., Cao, Q., Alam, G. M., & Li, D. (2019). Leveraging Digital Technology for Better Learning and Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(7), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.7.1246
  10. Schweighofer, P., & Ebner, M. (2015). Aspects to Be Considered when Implementing Technology-Enhanced Learning Approaches: A Literature Review. Future Internet, 7(4), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi7010026
APA
Karlinger, P., & Erbaş, Ç. (2024). A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 25(1), 214-233. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1394586
AMA
1.Karlinger P, Erbaş Ç. A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022. INUJFE. 2024;25(1):214-233. doi:10.17679/inuefd.1394586
Chicago
Karlinger, Panna, and Çağdaş Erbaş. 2024. “A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 25 (1): 214-33. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1394586.
EndNote
Karlinger P, Erbaş Ç (May 1, 2024) A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 25 1 214–233.
IEEE
[1]P. Karlinger and Ç. Erbaş, “A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022”, INUJFE, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 214–233, May 2024, doi: 10.17679/inuefd.1394586.
ISNAD
Karlinger, Panna - Erbaş, Çağdaş. “A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 25/1 (May 1, 2024): 214-233. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1394586.
JAMA
1.Karlinger P, Erbaş Ç. A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022. INUJFE. 2024;25:214–233.
MLA
Karlinger, Panna, and Çağdaş Erbaş. “A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, vol. 25, no. 1, May 2024, pp. 214-33, doi:10.17679/inuefd.1394586.
Vancouver
1.Panna Karlinger, Çağdaş Erbaş. A Content Analysis of Technology Enhanced Learning in Mathematics Education Studies Between 2017 And 2022. INUJFE. 2024 May 1;25(1):214-33. doi:10.17679/inuefd.1394586