A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT

Aziz İlhan; Recep Aslaner; Cihat Yaşaroğlu

doi:10.17679/inuefd.1842865

TR EN

AKIL YÜRÜTME BECERİLERİNİN VE BAŞARININ GELİŞTİRİLMESİNE YÖNELİK YENİ BİR LABORATUVAR UYGULAMASI

Abstract

Akıl yürütme becerisi geometri alanında çözülmesi zor problemlerin üstesinden gelmede önemli rol oynamaktadır. Dolayısıyla çalışmada fiziksel ve teknolojik içerikleri entegre eden yeni bir laboratuvar uygulamasının Akıl Yürütme Becerileri (AYB) ve Geometri Başarısının (GB) geliştirilmesindeki etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma karma türde, ön test-son test kontrol gruplu gerçek deneysel desene göre tasarlanmıştır. Araştırma yansız atama yoluyla seçilen, laboratuvar uygulamalarının uygulandığı deney grubundaki 52 ve herhangi bir müdahalede bulunulmayan kontrol grubundaki 50 öğrenciyle yürütülmüştür. Deneysel uygulama on beş hafta sürmüştür. Çalışma verileri Geometrik Şekiller Üzerine Akıl Yürütme Beceri Testi (GŞAYB) ve GB testiyle beraber Görüşme Formu (GF) ile toplanmıştır. Nicel veriler ilişkili örneklemler t-testi, kovaryans analizi ve Benferroni testi ile analiz edilmiş, nitel veriler içerik analiziyle değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, GŞAYB ve GB’nin son test puanlarının Deney ve Kontrol grupları arasında anlamlı derecede deney grubunun lehine farklılaştığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca sonuçlar laboratuvar uygulamalarının uzamsal, matematiksel, orantısal, geometrik şekiller üzerine akıl yürütme ve teknolojik akıl yürütme becerilerini geliştirdiğini, farklı disiplinlerle ilişkilendirmeyi, teknoloji kullanımını, modellemeyi, somutlaştırmayı ve günlük yaşamla ilişkilendirmeyi desteklediğini kanıtlamıştır.

Keywords

Geometrik şekiller üzerine akıl yürütme, geometri başarısı, laboratuvar etkinlikleri, matematiksel akıl yürütme, uzamsal akıl yürütme, orantısal akıl yürütme, teknolojik akıl yürütme

Supporting Institution

İnönü Üniversitesi

Project Number

The author(s) received financial support from Inonu University Scientific Research Projects Unit (Project Number: SBA-2022-3114) for the research of this article.

Ethical Statement

Bu yayının temelini oluşturan ve insan denekleri içeren araştırma çalışması, İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Bilimsel Araştırma ve Etik Kurulu tarafından 2022-18-2 kayıt numarasıyla onaylanmıştır.

Thanks

İnönü Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT

Abstract

Reasoning skills play an important role in overcoming difficult problems in geometry. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a new laboratory application integrating physical and technological contents on the development of Reasoning Skills (RS) and Geometry Achievement (GA). The study was designed according to a mixed-type, pretest-posttest control group true experimental design. The study was conducted with 52 students in the experimental group where laboratory interventions were applied and 50 students in the control group where no intervention was applied. The experimental implementation lasted fifteen weeks. The study data were collected with the Reasoning Skills on Geometric Shapes (RSGS) Test and the Interview Form (IF) together with the GA test. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired samples t-test, analysis of covariance and Benferroni test, and qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that the post-test scores of the RSGS and the GA differed significantly between the experimental and control groups in favor of the experimental group. In addition, the results proved that the laboratory practices developed reasoning skills on spatial, mathematical, proportional, geometric shapes and technological, supported associating with different disciplines, using technology, modeling, concretization and making connections with daily life.

Keywords

Geometric Reasoning, geometry achievement, laboratory practice, mathematical reasoning, technological reasoning.

Supporting Institution

İnönü University

Project Number

The author(s) received financial support from Inonu University Scientific Research Projects Unit (Project Number: SBA-2022-3114) for the research of this article.

Ethical Statement

The research study that forms the basis of this publication involving human subjects has been approved by the Scientific Research and Ethics Committee of Inonu University, with registration number 2022-18-2.

Thanks

İnönü University Scientific Research Projects Unit

References

Abiam, P., Abonyi, O. S., Ugama, J. O., & Okafor, G. (2015). Effects of ethno mathematics-based instructional approach on primary school pupils’ achievement in geometry. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 9(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2016/19079
Amsterlaw, J. A. (2004). Development of children’s beliefs about everyday reasoning. [Doctoral Thesis], University of Michigan, USA.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (Eighth Edition). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Balanskat, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2014). Computing our future: Computer programming and coding - Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. European School net. http://www.eun.org/resources/detail?publicationID=481
Battista, M. T. (2017). Mathematical reasoning and sense making. In Reasoning and Sense Making in the Mathematics Classroom: Grades 3–5 (pp. 1-22). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., & Picard, A. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Research, 64(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijer.2013.06.005
Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning: A challenging task. Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms (pp. 7-22). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Brown, M., Jones, K., & Taylor, R. (2003). Developing geometrical reasoning in the secondary school: outcomes of trialing teaching activities in classrooms. A Report from the Southampton/Hampshire Group to the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. ISBN: 0854328092, Full report available online at: www.crme.soton.ac.uk/research/geomreason
Cameron, A. (2004). Kurtosis. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Liao (Eds.). Encyclopedia of social science research methods. (pp. 543-544). Sage Publications.
Casey, B. M. Andrews, N. Schindler, H. Kersh, J. E. Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177177

Chorney, S. & Sinclair, N. (2018). Fingers-on geometry: The emergence of symmetry in a primary school classroom with multi-touch dynamic geometry. In: Calder N., Larkin K., Sinclair N. (eds.) Using mobile technologies in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, Vol. 12. Springer, Cham.
Clark, E., Tullo, D., & Bertone, A. (2021). Perceptual reasoning skills mediate the relationship between attention and math proficiency in individuals with a neurodevelopmental condition. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 111(2021), 103880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103880
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (Third Edition). Sage publications.
Dong, A., Jong, M. S.-Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How Does Prior Knowledge Influence Learning Engagement? The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Load and Help-Seeking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1), 1-16. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (2009). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
Dreher, J. H. (2020). Descartes on Mathematical Reasoning and the Truth Principle. Open Journal of Philosophy, 10(3), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2020.103026
Ellis, H. C. & Hunt, R. R. (1993). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology. Oxford Brown and Benchmark.
European Commission (2014). Coding-the 21st century skill. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/ digital-single-market/coding-21st-century-skill
French, D. (2004). Teaching and learning geometry. Continuum.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision-making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
Gerald, L. M. (2002). An evolutionary theory of knowledge and conceptual evolution in science. Global Bioethics Journal, 15(3), 73-80.
Geteregechi, J. M. (2023). Investigating undergraduate students’ mathematical reasoning via problem posing. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(10), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1 080/0020739X.2023.2169646
Goldman, D. (2002). Mathematics=Content+process+product, but do thinking skills fit in? AMT, 58(4), 38-44.
Gravemeijer, K., & Stephan, M. (2002). Emergent models as an instructional design heuristic. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (p. 145–169). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Herbert, S., Vale, C., Bragg, L .A. & Loong, E. (2015). A framework for primary teachers’ perceptions of mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Educational Research, 74(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijer.2015.09.005
Herbert, S., & Williams, G. (2023). Eliciting mathematical reasoning during early primary problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00376-9
Henderson, P. B., Hitchner, L., Fritz, S. J., Marion, B., & Scharff, C. (2002). Materials development in support of mathematical thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1145/782941.783001
Herbert, S., & Williams, G. (2023). Eliciting mathematical reasoning during early primary problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00376-9
Hohenwarter, M. & Preiner, J. (2007). Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. The Journal of Online Mathematics and its Applications, 7(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-6-3-5
Hwang, W. Y., Su, J. H., Huang, Y. M., & Dong, J. J. (2009). A Study of Multi-Representation of Geometry Problem Solving with Virtual Manipulatives and Whiteboard System. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 229-247.
İlhan A. & Aslaner R. (2018). Examination of mathematics teacher candidates’ reasoning skills on geometric shapes in terms of university and class level variables. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(2), 82-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.332285
İlhan, A., & Aslaner, R. (2022). Investigation of the geometric successes of mathematics teacher candidates according to gender, class and university variables. Journal of Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, 4(1), 128-145.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169 Jadallah, M. (2009). Teacher scaffolding moves and children’s talk in collaborative reasoning discussions [Doctoral Thesis], University of Illinois.
Janssen, R., De-Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Knoors, E., & Colémont, A. (2002). National assessment of new standards for mathematics in elementary education in Flanders. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(2), 197-225. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.8.2.197.3859
Klaus-Tycho, F. (2017). Teaching spatial geometry in a virtual world: Using Minecraft in mathematics in grade 5/6. 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Athens, 1411-1418. https://doi.org/10.1109/ EDUCON.2017.7943032
Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury, S., Benford, R., Clark, B. R., & Falconer, K. A. (2000). What kinds of scientific concepts exist concept construction and intellectual development in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 996-1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<996::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-J
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh, & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Liang, C.-P., & She, H.-C. (2023). Investigate the effectiveness of single and multiple representational scaffolds on mathematics problem solving: Evidence from eye movements. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3882–3897. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943692
Lithner, J., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Boesen, J., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2010). Mathematical competencies: A research framework. Paper presented at the MADIF7 Mathematics and mathematics education: Cultural and social dimensions, Stockholm.
Long, C. T., DeTemple, D., & Millman, R. (2012). Mathematical reasoning for primary teachers (6th ed. ed.). Boston, Mass.: Pearson Addison Wesley.
Marchis, I. (2012). Preservice primary school teachers’ elementary geometry knowledge. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(2), 33-40.
Mason, J. (2001). Questions about mathematical reasoning and proof in schools. Opening address to QCA Conference, UK.
Melhuish, K., Thanheiser, E., & Guyot, L. (2020). Elementary school teachers’ noticing of essential mathematical reasoning forms: justification and generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(1), 35-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9408-4
Moln´ar, G., Alrababah, S. A., & Greiff, S. (2022). How we explore, interpret, and solve complex problems: A crossnational study of problem-solving processes. Heliyon, 8(1), e08775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022. e08775
Mousaa, M., & Molnárb, G. (2020). Computer-based training in math improves inductive reasoning of 9- to 11-yearold children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(2020), 100687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100687
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/ T11_IR_Mathematics_FullBook.pdf
National Research Council (2004). On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Niss, M. (2015). Mathematical competencies and PISA. K. Stacey, R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing Mathematical Literacy (pp. 35-55). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, PISA. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Oaksford, M. (2005). Reasoning. In Nick Brais by & Angus Gellatly, Cognitive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Ontario (2014). Paying attention to K–12 spatial reasoning. Support document for paying attention to mathematics education.
Öz, T. & Işık, A. (2024). Exploring mathematical reasoning skills of middle school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53(2024), Article 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101612
Poland, M., Van-Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2009). Schematizing activities in early childhood education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610902987195
Poon, K. K., & Leung, C. K. (2016). A study of geometric understanding via logical reasoning in Hong Kong. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 17(3), 1-31.
Saleem, T. & Aziz, S. (2017). Effect of using tangram puzzles on the achievement of students in geometry at primary level. International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.35993/ijitl.v3i2
Silverman, D. (2000). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publication.
Supriadi, N., Jamaluddin, W., & Suherman, S. (2024). The role of learning anxiety and mathematical reasoning as predictor of promoting learning motivation: The mediating role of mathematical problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity 52(2024), 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101497
Steen, L. A. (1999). Twenty question about mathematical reasoning. L. V. Stiff, F. R. Curcio. (Ed.), developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12. 1999 yearbook (pp. 270-285). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Stokes, S. (2002). Visual literacy in teaching and learning: A literature perspective. Electronic Journal for The Integration of Technology in Education, 1(1), 10-19.
Store, J. C. & Berenson, S. B. (2011). Supporting students’ development of mathematical reasoning through productive discourse. In L. R. Wiest and T. Lamberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 854-861). Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 258-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903253954
Stylianides, G. J. (2014). Textbook analyses on reasoning-and-proving: Significance and methodological challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 64(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.01.002
Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Shilling-Traina, L. N. (2013). Prospective teachers’ challenges in teaching reasoning-and-proving. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1463-1490.
Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 253-295. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0253
Thuneberga, H.M., Salmia, H.S., & Bogner, F.X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity 29(2018) 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
Van-Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3
Van-Oers, B. & Poland, M. (2007). Schematising activities as a means for encouraging young children to think abstractly. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 10-22.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind and society (pp. 79–91). Harvard University Press.
Weise, J. J., Greiff, S., & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2020). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on the relationship between intelligence and complex problem solving – Testing the Elshout-Raaheim hypothesis. Intelligence, 83(1), 101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101502
Whiteley, W. Sinclair, N. & Davis, B. (2015). What is spatial reasoning? Spatial reasoning in the early years principles, assertions and speculations. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315762371
Wicaksono, A. G. C., & Korom, E. (2025). Mediation effect of scientific competency on relationship between inductive reasoning and domain-general and domain-specific problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57(2025), Article 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101830
Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222-255. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035059
Zuya, H. E., & Kwalat, S. K. (2015). Teacher’s knowledge of students about geometry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 13(3), 100-114.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Mathematics Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Aziz İlhan ^*
0000-0001-7049-5756
Türkiye

Recep Aslaner
0000-0003-1037-6100
Türkiye

Cihat Yaşaroğlu
0000-0002-9574-1789
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 31, 2026

Submission Date

December 16, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 19, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 27 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1842865

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA67PS98YM

APA

İlhan, A., Aslaner, R., & Yaşaroğlu, C. (2026). A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 27(2), 491-510. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1842865

AMA

1.İlhan A, Aslaner R, Yaşaroğlu C. A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT. INUJFE. 2026;27(2):491-510. doi:10.17679/inuefd.1842865

Chicago

İlhan, Aziz, Recep Aslaner, and Cihat Yaşaroğlu. 2026. “A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 27 (2): 491-510. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1842865.

EndNote

İlhan A, Aslaner R, Yaşaroğlu C (August 1, 2026) A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 27 2 491–510.

IEEE

[1]A. İlhan, R. Aslaner, and C. Yaşaroğlu, “A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT”, INUJFE, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 491–510, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.17679/inuefd.1842865.

ISNAD

İlhan, Aziz - Aslaner, Recep - Yaşaroğlu, Cihat. “A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 27/2 (August 1, 2026): 491-510. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1842865.

JAMA

1.İlhan A, Aslaner R, Yaşaroğlu C. A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT. INUJFE. 2026;27:491–510.

MLA

İlhan, Aziz, et al. “A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, vol. 27, no. 2, Aug. 2026, pp. 491-10, doi:10.17679/inuefd.1842865.

Vancouver

1.Aziz İlhan, Recep Aslaner, Cihat Yaşaroğlu. A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT. INUJFE. 2026 Aug. 1;27(2):491-510. doi:10.17679/inuefd.1842865

AKIL YÜRÜTME BECERİLERİNİN VE BAŞARININ GELİŞTİRİLMESİNE YÖNELİK YENİ BİR LABORATUVAR UYGULAMASI

Abstract

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Project Number

Ethical Statement

Thanks

A NEW LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING REASONING SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENT

Abstract

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Project Number

Ethical Statement

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite