Küreselleşme ve Makro-Kurumsal Teori: Bir Literatür Taraması

Öz

Bu çalışmada örgüt kuramı içindeki makro-kurumsal yaklaşımın küreselleşme tartışmalarına getirdiği önemli açılımlar değerlendirilmektedir. Çalışmada makro-kurumsal bakış açısıyla geliştirilen bu açılımların gelişimi, bunların küreselleşme tartışmaları içinde nereye tekabül ettiği ve ne gibi yeni bakış açıları ortaya koyduğu incelenmektedir. Çalışmada makro-kurumsal yaklaşımların getirdiği sonuçlardan yola çıkarak, genel nitelikli küreselleşme tartışmalarında ele alınan üçlü tasnife ek olarak ‘aşırı küreselleşmeci makro kurumsalcı yaklaşımlar’, ‘şüpheci makro kurumsal değerlendirmeler’ ve ‘dönüşümselci makro kurumsal perspektifler’ başlıkları altında yeni bir sınıflama önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• küreselleşme, aşırı küreselleşmeciler, kuşkucular, dönüşümselciler, yakınsama, ıraksama, melezleşme, makro kurumsal yaklaşım

Globalisation and Macro-Institutional Theory: A Literature Survey

Öz

The diversity of differing point of views on the “Globalisation” debate can be classified under three main headings. These are the hyperglobalisers, the sceptics and the transformationalists. In this study we argued that this classification can be enriched with the help of macro institutional approaches. Although there are many empirical and literature survey studies related to macro institutional theories, none of them evaluate this literature by specifically analysing what these aproaches have to offer on the analysis of the effects of globalization. In this study we interpreted the findings of macro institutional approaches through the lens of the three main perspectives of globalization. In the study, we proposed a new classification with the help of findings of the macro institutional studies. This classification is based on the three title that is; hyperglobaliser macro institutional approaches, sceptic macro institutional approaches and transformationalists macro institutional approaches. We believe that this classification contributes to the globalization literature by integrating macro institutional insights into the globalisation debate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• globalization, hyperglobalisers, sceptics and transformationalists, macro institutional approaches, convergence, divergence, hybridisation

Kaynakça

1. Aglietta, M. ve Breton, R. (2001), Financial systems, corporate control and capital accumulation, Economy and Society, 30 (4), 433- 466.doi:10.1080/03085140120089054
2. Amable, B. (2000), Institutional Comple- mentarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production, Review of International Political Eco- nomy, 7(4), 645–687.
3. Amable, B ve Petit, P. (2001), The Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production during the 1990’s, Working Paper, Cepremap 2001/15.
4. Casper, S. ve Whitley, R. (2002), Managing competences in entrepreneurial tech- nology firms: a comparative institutio- nal analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK. Proceedings of Takeda Foun- dation Symposium on Engineering In- tellect and Knowledge, Scasss, Uppsala, June.
5. Chandler, A. (1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
6. Djelic, M. L. (1998) Exporting the American Model: The postwar transformation of European Business, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
7. Frenkel, M. ve Shenhav, Y. (2003),From Americanization To Colonization: The Diffusion of Productivity Models Re- visted, Organization Studies, 24, 1537– 1561. doi:10.1177/0170840603249006
8. Geppert, M, Matten, D., ve Williams, K. (2002) Challenges for European Mana- gement in a Global Context, London, Palgrave.

9. Guillen, M. F. (1994), Models of manage- ment: Work authority, and organiza- tion in comparative perspective, Chicago CA, The University of Chi- cago Press.
10. Gültekin-Karakaş, D. (2009) Hem Hasımız Hem Hısımız: Türkiye Finans Kapitali- nin Dönüşümü ve Banka Reformu, İs- tanbul, İletişim Yayınları.
11. Hall, P. A. ve Soskice D. (2001),Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundati- ons of Comparative Advantage, Ox- ford / New York, Oxford University Press.
12. Hanckle, B., Rhodes, M. ve Thatcher, M. (2007), Beyond varieties of capitalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
13. Harvey, D. (1994), The condition of post modernity, England, Blackwell.
14. Harzing, W. A. ve Sorge A. (2003), The re- lative impact of Country of Origin and Universal Contingencies of Internali- zation Strategies and Corporate Con- trol in the Multinational Enterprices: Worldeide and European Perspectives, Organization Studies, 24, 187–214. doi:10.1177/0170840603024002343
15. Held, D. McGrew, A. Gollblatt, D., ve Per- raton, J. (1999), Global Transformati- ons, Standford CA, Standford University Press.
16. Hirst, P. ve Thompson. (1996), Globaliza- tion in Question, London Polity Press.
17. Höpner, M. ve Jackson, G. (2006), Revisi- ting the Mannemann takeover: how markets for corporate control emerge, European Management Review, 3,142- 155. doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500061
18. Kenichi, O. (1995), The End of the Nation State, London, Harper Collins Press.
19. Kipping, M. ve Bjaenar, O. (1998),The Ame- ricanization of European business: The Marshall Plan and the transformation of management models, London, Ro- utledge.
20. Kogut, B. (2008), Knowledge, Options and Institutions, Oxford, Oxford Univer- sity Press.
21. Kristensen, P. H. ve Morgan G. (2007), Mul- tinationals and Institutional Competi- tiveness, Regulation & Governance, 1, 197–212.
22. Lane, C. (1998), European companies bet- ween globalization and localization: a comparison of internationalization strategies of British and German MNCs, Economy and Society, 27,517– 540. doi:10.1080/03085149800000030
23. Lane, C. (2003), Changes in Corporate Go- vernance of German Corporations: Convergence to Anglo-American Model?, Compettion and Change, 7,79–100. doi:10.1080/1024529032000146678
24. Lane, C., Potton, M., ve Littek, W. (2000), The Professions Between State and Market A cross national study of con- vergence and divergence, ESRC Cen- tre for Business Research, Cambridge, University of Cambridge Working Paper, No: 189.
25. Maurice, M., Sellier, F., ve Silvestre, J. (1982), Politique d’éducation et organi- sation industrielle en France et en Al- lemagne. Essai d’analyse sociétale,Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
26. Morgan, G. (2001), Transnational commu- nities and business systems, Global Networks, 1 (2), 113-130. doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00008
27. Morgan, G. (2010), Globalization, multina- tionals and institutional diversity, Eco- nomy and Society, 38,580–605. doi:10.1080/03085140903190342
28. Morgan, G., Whitley, R., ve Moen, E. (2005) Changing Capitalisms, Internationali- zation, Institutional Change and systems of economic organization, Ox- ford, Oxford University Press.
29. Oliver, N. ve Wilkinson, B. (1992),The Japa- nisation of British Industry: Develop- ments in the 1990s, Oxford, Blackwell.
30. Özen, Ş. ve Berkman, Ü. (2007), Cross-na- tional Reconstruction of Managerial Practises: TQM in Turkey, Organiza- tion Studies, 28, 825–851. doi:10.1177/0170840607079863
31. Smith, C. ve Meiskin, P. (1995), System, So- ciety, and Dominance Effects in Cross- National Organisational Analysis, Work, Employment and Society, 9 (2),241-67.
32. Strang, D. ve Meyer, J. (1993), Institutional Conditions for Diffusion, Theory and Society, 22,487–511. doi:10.1007/BF00993595
33. Streeck, W. ve Kathleen, T. (2005), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Ox- ford, Oxford University Press.
34. Üsdiken, B. (2009), Bir Örgütsel Alanın Ye- niden Şekillenişi: Türkiye’de İş Haya- tına Yönelik Yüksek Öğretimde Değişim 1955–1975, Ankara, ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi., 35 (Özel Sayı),1-40.
35. Vitols, S. (2004), Continuity and change: Making Sense of the German Model. Competition and Change, 8,331-337. doi:10.1080/1024529042000304383
36. Waters, M. (1995) Globalization, Routledge, New York
37. Westney, E. D. (1987), .Imitation and inno- vation: The transfer of western organi- zational patterns to Meiji Japan, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
38. Whitley, R. (1999), Divergent capitalisms: the social structuring and change of business Systems, Oxford, Oxford Uni- versity Press.
39. Whitley, R. (2000), National Capitalisms, Global Competition and Economic Performance, Amsterdam, John Benja- mins.
40. Whitley, R. (2003), How National are Busi- ness Systems The Role of States and Complementary Institutions in Stan- dardising Systems of Economic Co-or- dination and Control at the National Level, in Changing Capitalisms, Eds. Morgan, G. et al., pp.190-231.
41. Whitley, R. (2007), Business Systems and Organizational Capabilities: The insti- tutional structuring of competitive competences, Oxford, Oxford Univer- sity Press.
42. Whitley, R., Morgan G., Kelly, W., ve Sharpe, D. (2001), The Changing Japa- nese Multinational Consequences of Internationalisation and recession in manufacturing and financial services, Working Paper, 435.