Trade Unions As Employers: The Case Of Union Experts In Turkey

Öz

Sendikalar, çalışanların yalnızca çalışma koşullarını iyileştirmeyi amaçlayan örgütler olarak değil, aynı zamanda işveren olarak da çalışma hayatının içinde yer almaktadır. Sendikaların ölçekleri büyüdükçe ve işlevleri karmaşıklaştıkça, istihdam ettikleri ofis çalışanlarının, danışmanların ve uzmanların sayısı da artmaktadır. Bu makale, sendika uzmanlarının çalışma koşulları, sorunları, sendikalaşma eğilimleri ve sendika yöneticileri ile olan ilişkileri üzerinde odaklanarak sendika uzmanlarının genel bir profilini çizmeyi ve sendikaların işveren rolünü değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Diğer bir ifadeyle bu makalenin temel amacı, ücretli çalışanların çalışma koşullarını iyileştirmeyi amaçlayan sendikaların, kendi çalışanlarının hak ve çıkarlarını ne ölçüde koruduğunu, anket ve derinlemesine görüşme yöntemlerini kullanarak tartışmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sendika uzmanı, sendikacılık, endüstri ilişkileri

Abstract

Trade unions are not only the associations of workers for the purpose of improving the conditions of their working life, but are also one of the employers. As trade unions grew in size and complexity, the number of clerical staff, consultants and experts has been increasing. This article aims to describe a general profile of the union experts and examine the roles of trade unions as employers by focusing on working conditions, problems and unionisation trend of union experts and also the relationship between union experts and union executives in Turkey. In other words, the main objective of the paper is to discuss to what extent the unions which are continuous associations of wage earners for the purpose of improving the conditions of their working life, protect and improve their own employees’ rights and interests by using both survey technique and in-depth interviews.

Keywords

• union expert, trade unionism, industrial relations

Kaynakça

1. Belfer N (May 1952) Personnel practices in trade unions. Personnel: 442-446.
2. Boraston I, Clegg HA and Rimmer M (1975) Workplace and Union. London: Heine- mann.
3. Burchill F (2008) Labour Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Clark P (July 1989) Organizing the organi- zers: professional staff unionism in the American labor movement. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42(4): 584- 599.
5. Clark P (Fall 1992) Professional staff in Ame- rican unions : changes, trends, implica- tion. Journal of Labor Research. 8(4): 381-392.
6. Clegg HA, Killick AJ and Adams R (1961) Trade Union Officers. Oxford: Black- well.
7. Dereli T (1975) Aydınlar, Sendika Hareketi ve Endüstriyel İlişkiler Sistemi. İstan- bul: Fakülteler Matbaası.
8. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES) (1999) Sendi- kal Eğitim Atölye Çalışmaları. İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.

9. Heery E (2003) Trade unions and industrial relations. In: Ackers P and Kelly J (eds) Understanding Work&Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 278- 304.
10. Heery E and Kelly J (March 1994) Professio- nal, participative and managerial unio- nism: an interpretation of change in trade unions. Work, Employment and Society 8(1): 1-22.
11. Kelly J and Heery E (1994) Working for the union. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press.
12. Ministry of Labour and Social Security (MLSS) (2008) Labour statistics 2007. Ankara: Directorate-General of Labour Publication No: 33.
13. Munro A and Rainbird H (2000) The new unionism and the new bargaining agenda: UNISON-employer partners- hips on workplace learning in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations 38(2): 223-240.
14. Petrol-İş (1993) Sendikalar-Yapıları- Çalışmaları. Istanbul: Petrol-İş Yayın: 29.
15. Shair DI (July 1970) Labor organizations as employers: ‘unions within unions’. Jo- urnal of Business 43: 296-316.
16. Snape E (September 1995) The development of ‘managerial unionism’ in Britian: a research note. Work, Employment Soci- ety 9(3): 559-568.
17. Uçkan B (2007) From the perspective of EU integration: trade union rights in Tur- key. SouthEast Europe Review for La- bour and Social Affairs 4: 107-126.
18. Vinton KL (1998) Nepotism:An interdicipli- nary model. Family Business Review. 11(4): 297-303.
19. Watson D (1988) Managers of Discontent: Trade Union Officers and Industrial Re- lations Managers. London: Routledge.
20. Webb S and Webb B (1902) Industrial De- mocracy. London: Longsman Green.
21. Webb S and Webb B (2007) The History of Trade Unionism (1920). Montana: Kes- singer Publishing
22. Wilensky, H (1956) Intellectuals in the Labor Movement. Glencoe: The Free Press,
23. Yücesan-Özdemir G (2009) Emek ve Tekno- loji. Ankara: Tan Kitabevi.
24. MLSS. (2008). http://www.csgb.gov.tr/ar- ticles.php?category_id=50 (accessed on July 19, 2010)
25. MLSS.(2010)http://www.csgb.gov.tr/csgbP ortal/ShowProperty/WLP%20Reposi- tory/csgb/dosyalar/istatistikler/ca- lisma_hayati_2009 (accessed on July 3, 2011)