Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’deki akademisyenlerin iş tatmini düzeylerini ölçmek ve iş tatmini ile iş tatminini etkileyen faktörler arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Veriler, toplam 78 kamu üniversitesinin ve özel üniversitenin İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültelerinde muhasebe – finansman anabilim dalında görev yapan 160 akademisyenden, sosyo-demografik anket formu, “iş tatmini“ ölçeği ve “iş ve iş çevresi“ ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistik, faktör analizi, kademeli regresyon analizi ve diskriminant analizi kullanılmıştır. Akademisyenlerin iş tatmini düzeylerini etkileme olasılığına sahip 13 unsura uygulanan faktör analizinin sonucunda, söz konusu unsurlar beş temel faktör altında toplanmıştır. Bu faktörler; iş çevresi, idari işyükü, akademik işyükü, ilerleme ve değerleme ve araştırma fonudur. Akademisyenlerin iş tatmini düzeylerini etkileyen belirleyici değişkenleri bulmak için yapılan kademeli regresyon analizi, iş tatmini ile iş tatmini etkileyen faktörler arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu ve iş tatmini düzeyinin en önemli belirleyicisinin iş çevresi olduğunu göstermiştir. Diskriminant analizinin sonuçları; iş çevresi ve akademik işyükünün, yüksek iş tatmini düzeyine sahip akademisyenler için belirleyici faktörler olduğunu, düşük iş tatmini düzeyine sahip akademisyenler için herhangi bir belirleyici faktör olmadığını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İş Tatmini, İş Tatminini Etkileyen Faktörler, Türk Akademisyenler, Faktör Analizi, Kademeli Regresyon Analizi, Diskriminant Analizi

Job Satisfaction of Academicians in TURKEY and the Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction

Abstract

The aim of this study is to measure the levels of job satisfaction among academicians in Turkey and to investigate the relationship between the job satisfaction and the factors that affect job satisfaction. The data was obtained by using sociodemographic data form, “job satisfaction” scale and “work and work environment” scale from 160 academicians that have been working in accounting and finance sub-department in Faculties of Economics and Administrative Sciences in 78 public and private universities. In the analysis of data, descriptive statistics, factor analysis, stepwise regression analysis and discriminant function analysis were used. The factor analysis of the 13 items which have possible effect on job satisfaction among academicians revealed five factors: Work environment, administrative workload, academic workload, promotion and evaluation and research fund. The stepwise regression analysis which was employed to determine the predictors that affect job satisfaction levels of academicians indicated that there was a meaningful relationship between the level of job satisfaction and the factors that affect job satisfaction and the most important predictor of job satisfaction scores was work environment. Results of the discriminant analysis indicated that while work environment and academic workload were the predictor factors for academicians who had high level of job satisfaction, there was no determining factors for academicians who had low level of job satisfaction.

Keywords

• Job Satisfaction, Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction, Turkish Academicians, Factor Analysis, Stepwise Regression Analysis, Discriminant Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Barak, M. E., Levin, A., Nissly, J. A., & Lane, C. J. (2006). Why do they leave? Modeling child welfare workers’ turnover intentions. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 548– 577.
2. Bas, T. (2002). Öğretim Üyelerinin İş Tatmin Profillerinin Belirlenmesi. D.E.Ü. İ.İ.B.F.Dergisi, 17(2), 19-37.
3. Bas, T., & Ardıc, K. (2002). A comparison of job satisfaction between public and private university academicians in Turkey. METU Studies in Development, 29(1-2), 27-46.
4. Brown, S., & Peterson, R. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction: Meta-analysis and assessment of causal effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 63-77.
5. Castillo, J. X., & Cano, J. (2004). Factors Explaining Job Satisfaction Among Faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(3), 65-75.
6. Castillo, J. X., Conklin, E. A., & Cano, J. (1999). Job Satisfaction Of Ohio Agricultural Education Teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, Vol: 40, No: 2, 19-27.
7. Dahlke, G.M. (1996). Absenteeism and organisational commitment. Nursing Management 27(10), 30.
8. Diener, T. (1984). College faculty and job satisfaction. (Report No. HE017707). New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED248820)

9. Fisher, C. D. (2000). Mood and emotions while working: Missing pieces of job satisfaction? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 185–202.
10. Hagedorn, L. S. (1996). Wage Equity and Female Job Satisfaction: The Role of Wage Differentials in a Job Satisfaction Causal Model. Research in Higher Education, 37(5), 569-598.
11. Hickson, C., & Oshagbemi, T. (1999). The effect of age on the satisfaction of academics with teaching and research. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(4), 537-544.
12. Houston, D., Meyer, L. H., & Paewai, S. (2004). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: expectations and values in academe. Massey University, New Zealand.
13. Kalaycı, S.(2005). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 405.
14. Koyuncu, M., Burke, R. J., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2006). Work Experience and Satisfaction of Male and Female Professors in Turkey: Signs of progress? Equal Opportunities International, 25(1), 38-47.
15. Kusku, F. (2001). Dimensions of employee satisfaction: a state university example. METU Studies in Development, 28 (3-4), 399-430.
16. Kusku, F. (2003). Employee satisfaction in higher education: the case of academic and administrative staff in Turkey. Career Development International, 8(7), 347-356.
17. Latif, D. A., & Grillo, J. A. (2001). Satisfaction of junior faculty with academic role functions. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 65, 137-143.
18. Leung, T., Siu, O., & Spector, P. E. (2000). Faculty stressors, job satisfaction and psychological distress among university teachers in Hong Kong: the role of locus of control. International Journal of Stress Management, 7(2), 121-138
19. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnettee (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). New York: Wiley & Sons.
20. Moyle, W., Skinner, J., Rowe, G., & Gork, C. (2003). Views of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in Australian long-term care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 168–176.
21. Okpara, J. O., Squillace, M., & Erondu, E. A. (2005). Gender differences and job satisfaction: a study of university teachers in the United States. Women in Management Review, 20(3), 177-190.
22. Oshagbemi, T. (1997a). The influence of rank on the job satisfaction of organizational members. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(8), 511-519.
23. Oshagbemi, T. (1997b). Job satisfaction profiles of university teachers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(1), 27-39.
24. Oshagbemi, T. (1997c). Job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in higher education. Education + Training, 39(9), 354-359.
25. Oshagbemi, T. (1998). Impact of age on the job satisfaction of university teachers. The Research in Education.
26. Oshagbemi, T. (1999). Academics and their managers: a comparative study in job satisfaction. Personnel Review, 28(1/2), 108-123.
27. Oshagbemi, T. (2000a). Gender differences in the job satisfaction of university teachers. Women in Management Review, 15(7), 331-343.
28. Oshagbemi, T. (2000b). Correlates of pay satisfaction in higher education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(1), 31-39.
29. Oshagbemi, T., & Hickson, C. (2003). Some aspects of overall job satisfaction: a binomial logit model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(4), 357-367.
30. Pearson, D. A., & Seiler, R. E. (1983). Environmental satisfiers in academe. Higher Education, 12(1), 35 – 47
31. Petty, G. C., Brewer, E. W., & Brown, B. (2005). Job Satisfaction among Employees of a Youth Development Organization. Child & Youth Care Forum, 34(1), 57-75.
32. Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational work and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151–176.
33. Rocca, A. D., & Kostanski, M. (2001). Burnout and job satisfaction amongst victorian secondary school teachers: a comparative look at contract and permanent employment. ATEA Conference, 24-26 September, Melbourne.
34. Satterle, B. (1988). A study to determine the job satisfaction of the engineering/industrial technology faculty at Delgado Community College. (Report No. CE058981). Florida: Practicum, Nova University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED336593)
35. Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 693–713.
36. Stevens, P. A. (2005). The job satisfaction of English academics and their intentions to quit academe. Discussion Paper, Number 262, 1-38.
37. Terpstra, D. E, & Honoree, A. L. (2004). Job Satisfaction And Pay Satisfaction Levels Of University Faculty By Discipline Type And By Geographic Region. Education.
38. Wagner, J., & Hollenbeck, J. (1992). Management of organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
39. Winkler, L. D. (1982). Job Satisfaction of University Faculty in the United States. DAI-A 43/03, 696- 852.
40. Youngblood, S., Mobley, W., & Meglino B. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the turnover process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(3), 507-516.