BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

New actors within the European Employment strategy (EES): the presence of the legislative power and trade unions in a coexistent dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008)

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 5, 51 - 65, 01.12.2009

Öz

The appropriation of the Lisbon agenda 2010 by the legislative power and its participation in the elaboration of the National Reform Programmes (NRP) of 2005 and 2008 go hand in hand with an increasing parliamentary involvement in EU dossiers. In the context of the Lisbon treaty, this involvement will potentially increase. As regards the debates that have surrounded the Lisbon Strategy, it is shown that Luxembourg’s House of Representatives brought together both representatives from the government and the legislative power with the civil society to generate a debate on the future reforms to be put forward. Considering the panoply of actors involved, it is further argued that the resulting dialogue does coexist with more traditional and institutionalized instruments of dialogue that have embodied the consensus-seeking “Luxembourg social model”.

Kaynakça

  • Begg, I. 2006, “Economic reform governance in the EU and its limits”, in Radlo, J.M. et Bates, C. (Ed.) National Reform prog- rams: Key successful future of the Eu- ropean Project, Gdansk Institute for Market Economics, Varsovie.
  • Bongardt, A. and Torres, F, 2007, “Instituti- ons, Governance and Economic Growth in the EU: is there a role for the Lisbon strategy”, Intereconomics.
  • Borrás, S. 2009, “The Politics of the Lisbon Strategy: The changing role of the Com- mission”, West European Politics, 32, 1.
  • Borrás, S. and Conzelmann, T. 2007 “De- mocracy, Legitimacy and Soft modes of governance in the EU: The empirical turn”, European Integration, 29, 1.
  • Chambre des Députés (2006), « La stratégie européenne de la Chambre des Députés », www.chd.lu.
  • Clément, F. 2006, « Les Relations profession- nelles au Luxembourg », Publications EURES, Differdange.
  • Collignon, S. 2008, “Why Europe is not be- coming the world’s most competitive economy? The Lisbon Strategy, mac- roeconomic stability and the dilemma of governance without Governments”, International Journal of Public Policy, 3.
  • Commission européenne (COM 803 2007), “Strategic report on the renewed Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs: launching the new cycle (2008-2010)”.
  • Conseil économique et social 2008, « Avis dur les lignes directrices intégrées pour la croissance et l’emploi (2008-2010)».
  • Fontagné, L. 2005, « Compétitivité du Lu- xembourg : Une paille dans l’acier. Perspectives de Politique économique », Ministère de l’Economie et du Com- merce extérieur, Luxembourg.
  • Hirsch, M. 2003, « Le « modèle luxembour- geois » et ses limites », in Allegrezza, S., Hirsch, M. et Von Kunitzki, N. (Eds.) L’histoire, le présent et l’avenir du mo- dèle luxembourgeois, Institut d’Etudes européennes et internationaux du Lu- xembourg, Luxembourg, pp. 139-160.
  • Juncker, J, 2005, in « La Présidence luxem- bourgeoise du Conseil de l’Union euro- péenne », Service Information et presse du gouvernement luxembourgeois, Lu- xembourg.
  • Kok, W., 2004, “Facing the Challenge: the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Em- ployment”.
  • Ministère de l’Economie et du Commerce extérieur (2005/2008), Plan national pour l’innovation et le plein d’emploi, www.odc.lu.
  • Ministère d’Etat 2006, Avis du Comité de co- ordination tripartite.
  • Radlo, M. 2006, “National Reform Programs and their credibility”, in Radlo, J.M. et Bates, C. (Eds.) National Reform Prog- rams: Key to successful future of the Eu- ropean Project?, Gdansk Institute for market Economics, Varsovie.
  • Thill, P. 2009, “Les parlements et la Stratégie européenne de l’Emploi (SEE. Vers un dialogue coexistant au Luxembourg ?, REPREM Gouvernance et Emploi, Dif- ferdange.
  • Thill, P., Thomas, A., 2009. « Le modèle lu- xembourgeois face à la crise », REPREM Gouvernance et Emploi, Differdange (upcoming).
  • Tsakatika, M. 2007, “A parliamentary di- mension of EU soft governance”, Euro- pean Integration, 29, 5.
  • Zahlen, P., 2003. « La création du modèle lu- xembourgeois après la Deuxième Gu- erre mondiale. », dans Allegrezza, S., Hirsch, M., Von Kunitzki N., L’histoire, le présent et l’avenir du modèle luxem- bourgeois, Luxembourg, Institut d’étu- des européennes et internationales du Luxembourg.
Yıl 2009, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 5, 51 - 65, 01.12.2009

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Begg, I. 2006, “Economic reform governance in the EU and its limits”, in Radlo, J.M. et Bates, C. (Ed.) National Reform prog- rams: Key successful future of the Eu- ropean Project, Gdansk Institute for Market Economics, Varsovie.
  • Bongardt, A. and Torres, F, 2007, “Instituti- ons, Governance and Economic Growth in the EU: is there a role for the Lisbon strategy”, Intereconomics.
  • Borrás, S. 2009, “The Politics of the Lisbon Strategy: The changing role of the Com- mission”, West European Politics, 32, 1.
  • Borrás, S. and Conzelmann, T. 2007 “De- mocracy, Legitimacy and Soft modes of governance in the EU: The empirical turn”, European Integration, 29, 1.
  • Chambre des Députés (2006), « La stratégie européenne de la Chambre des Députés », www.chd.lu.
  • Clément, F. 2006, « Les Relations profession- nelles au Luxembourg », Publications EURES, Differdange.
  • Collignon, S. 2008, “Why Europe is not be- coming the world’s most competitive economy? The Lisbon Strategy, mac- roeconomic stability and the dilemma of governance without Governments”, International Journal of Public Policy, 3.
  • Commission européenne (COM 803 2007), “Strategic report on the renewed Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs: launching the new cycle (2008-2010)”.
  • Conseil économique et social 2008, « Avis dur les lignes directrices intégrées pour la croissance et l’emploi (2008-2010)».
  • Fontagné, L. 2005, « Compétitivité du Lu- xembourg : Une paille dans l’acier. Perspectives de Politique économique », Ministère de l’Economie et du Com- merce extérieur, Luxembourg.
  • Hirsch, M. 2003, « Le « modèle luxembour- geois » et ses limites », in Allegrezza, S., Hirsch, M. et Von Kunitzki, N. (Eds.) L’histoire, le présent et l’avenir du mo- dèle luxembourgeois, Institut d’Etudes européennes et internationaux du Lu- xembourg, Luxembourg, pp. 139-160.
  • Juncker, J, 2005, in « La Présidence luxem- bourgeoise du Conseil de l’Union euro- péenne », Service Information et presse du gouvernement luxembourgeois, Lu- xembourg.
  • Kok, W., 2004, “Facing the Challenge: the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Em- ployment”.
  • Ministère de l’Economie et du Commerce extérieur (2005/2008), Plan national pour l’innovation et le plein d’emploi, www.odc.lu.
  • Ministère d’Etat 2006, Avis du Comité de co- ordination tripartite.
  • Radlo, M. 2006, “National Reform Programs and their credibility”, in Radlo, J.M. et Bates, C. (Eds.) National Reform Prog- rams: Key to successful future of the Eu- ropean Project?, Gdansk Institute for market Economics, Varsovie.
  • Thill, P. 2009, “Les parlements et la Stratégie européenne de l’Emploi (SEE. Vers un dialogue coexistant au Luxembourg ?, REPREM Gouvernance et Emploi, Dif- ferdange.
  • Thill, P., Thomas, A., 2009. « Le modèle lu- xembourgeois face à la crise », REPREM Gouvernance et Emploi, Differdange (upcoming).
  • Tsakatika, M. 2007, “A parliamentary di- mension of EU soft governance”, Euro- pean Integration, 29, 5.
  • Zahlen, P., 2003. « La création du modèle lu- xembourgeois après la Deuxième Gu- erre mondiale. », dans Allegrezza, S., Hirsch, M., Von Kunitzki N., L’histoire, le présent et l’avenir du modèle luxem- bourgeois, Luxembourg, Institut d’étu- des européennes et internationales du Luxembourg.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA24EG45PC
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Patrick Thıll Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2009
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 5

Kaynak Göster

APA Thıll, P. (2009). New actors within the European Employment strategy (EES): the presence of the legislative power and trade unions in a coexistent dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008). ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 11(5), 51-65.
AMA Thıll P. New actors within the European Employment strategy (EES): the presence of the legislative power and trade unions in a coexistent dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008). isguc. Aralık 2009;11(5):51-65.
Chicago Thıll, Patrick. “New Actors Within the European Employment Strategy (EES): The Presence of the Legislative Power and Trade Unions in a Coexistent Dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008)”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 11, sy. 5 (Aralık 2009): 51-65.
EndNote Thıll P (01 Aralık 2009) New actors within the European Employment strategy (EES): the presence of the legislative power and trade unions in a coexistent dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008). ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 11 5 51–65.
IEEE P. Thıll, “New actors within the European Employment strategy (EES): the presence of the legislative power and trade unions in a coexistent dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008)”, isguc, c. 11, sy. 5, ss. 51–65, 2009.
ISNAD Thıll, Patrick. “New Actors Within the European Employment Strategy (EES): The Presence of the Legislative Power and Trade Unions in a Coexistent Dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008)”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 11/5 (Aralık 2009), 51-65.
JAMA Thıll P. New actors within the European Employment strategy (EES): the presence of the legislative power and trade unions in a coexistent dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008). isguc. 2009;11:51–65.
MLA Thıll, Patrick. “New Actors Within the European Employment Strategy (EES): The Presence of the Legislative Power and Trade Unions in a Coexistent Dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008)”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, c. 11, sy. 5, 2009, ss. 51-65.
Vancouver Thıll P. New actors within the European Employment strategy (EES): the presence of the legislative power and trade unions in a coexistent dialogue in Luxembourg (2005-2008). isguc. 2009;11(5):51-65.