Theoretical Substantiation Of Empowering Environment As A Condition For Successful Competence Development

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 79 - 94, 01.06.2007

Diana Lıpınskıene

Öz

The analysis of the empowering environment as a condition for successful employee’s competence development is highlighted in the article. The article consists of three main parts. In the first part the concept of competence is described and the model of competence development consisting of five stages is presented. Special emphasis on non-formal and informal competence development is done. In the second part of the article the notion of empowering environment is analyzed. Following characteristics of empowering environment are distinguished in this part: autonomy, responsibility, acceptance of failure, involvement and participation, access to resources, empowering leader, and appropriate rewarding system. The third part is aimed to relate two theoretical concepts – competence development and empowering environment and on the basis of the latter to substantiate the importance of empowering environment for successful competence development

Anahtar Kelimeler

competence development, empowerment, empowering environment

Kaynakça

• Bjurklo, Kardemark (1999), “Social tests in a Model for controlling the enhancement of competence”, Making Working Life Work: on Change
• Competence and Participation, pp.69-77. Bowden, Marton (1998), The university of learning: beyond quality and competence, London: Kogan page limited.
• Carr (1994), “Empowered organisations, empowering leaders”, Training and Development, Vol. 48, Issue 3, pp. 39-44.
• Cornwall, Perlman (1990), Organisational Entrepreneurship, Boston: IRWIN.
• Edwards (1997), Changing Places: flexibility, lifelong learning, and a learning society, London: Routledge.
• Fielding, M. (1997). Empowerment: emancipation or enervation. Education, autonomy and democratic citizenship: philosophy in changing World, pp.177
• French, Bell (1990), Organisation development, Englewood cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Glinskiene, Lipinskiene (2004), “Empowering environment: the notion, conditions and advantages”, Inzinerine ekonomika, Vol. 2 (37), pp. 43-49.
• Hiemstra (1996), “Self-directed learning”, International Encyclopedia of Adult
• Education and Training, pp. 427-432. Kornbluch, Greene (1989), “Learning, empowerment and participative work processes: the educative work environment”, Making Working Life Work: on
• Change Competence and Participation, pp.257-273. Lashley (1995), “Towards an understanding of worker empowerment in hospitality services”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality management, Vol. 7 (1), pp. 27-32.
• Lipinskiene (2004), “Environment that empowers student to study: its functioning and influence on students’ motivation and approach to learning”,
• Education: concepts and practices Lipinskiene (2005), “Competence development: in searching for the successful environment”, Bridges, Vol. 2, pp. 25-31.
• Lipinskiene, Stanikuniene (2006), “The theoretical Model for Employees’
• Competence development inside the Organisation”, Scientific Proceedings of the scientific-technical Union of mechanical Engineering, Bulgaria, Vol. 2 (85),pp. 191-195. Noon, Blyton (1997), The realities of work, Wiltshire: Antony Rowe Ltd.
• Pipan (1989), “Towards a Curricular perspective of workplaces”, Socialization and learning at work, pp. 159-179.
• Ramsden (1996), Learning to lead in higher education, London: Creative print and design.
• Slenning (1999), Future school management: do plans and needs match?,
• Stockholm: Erlanders Gotab. Thomasson (1999), “A model for improving Competence”, Making Working Life
• Work: on change competence and participation, pp. 93-110. Usher, Bryant, Johnston (1997), Adult education and the postmodern challenge: learning beyond the limits, London: Routledge.