SİTE ALANLARINDA KONUT YERLEŞİM KARARLARININ ENERJİ TÜKETİMİNE ETKİSİ

Öz

Konut alanları, temel yaşam alanları olarak, uzun vadede varlıklarını sürdürebilmeleri için birçok açıdan değerlendirilmelidir. En önemli husus sürdürülebilirliktir. Kaynak ve sosyal sürdürülebilirlik açısından, bir yapılaşmayı planlarken enerji kullanımı, gün ışığı ve açık alan potansiyelini göz önünde bulundurmak önemlidir. Farklı tasarım kararlarının yerleşim üzerindeki etkilerini görebilmek için, standart olan ve sıklıkla tekrarlanabilen mevcut bir örnek kullanılmıştır. Bir konut kat planı alternatifleri oluşturulmuş ve daha sonra dört farklı yerleşimde incelenmiştir. Oluşturulan yerleşim senaryolarının enerji tüketimi, gün ışığı performansı ve açık alan potansiyeli üzerindeki etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre, binaların lineer gelişim içinde konumlandırılması, birbirlerini gölgelemelerini sağlayarak aşırı ısınmayı önlemektedir. Bloklar arasındaki yeterli mesafe güneş enerjisi kullanımını optimize etmekte ve ısıtma ihtiyacını azaltmaktadır. Ayrıca hem bireysel hem de ortak sosyal alanların varlığı bu alanlara erişimi kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bu da onu en avantajlı geliştirme türü haline getirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gün ışığı
• Enerji tüketimi
• Açık alan potansiyeli
• Konut yerleşimi

THE EFFECT OF RESIDENCE SETTLEMENT DECISIONS ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN SITE AREAS

Öz

Residential areas, as basic living spaces, need to be assessed from many perspectives to ensure their long-term viability. The most important aspect is sustainability. With regard to resource and social sustainability, it is important to consider energy use, daylighting and open space potential when planning a development. In order to see the effects of different design choices on the settlement, an existing case was used as an example, which is a standard and can be often repeated. A residential floor plan alternatives were created and then examined in four different layouts. The effects of the created settlement scenarios on energy consumption, daylight performance and open space potential were evaluated. According to the results, the positioning of the buildings in the linear development prevents overheating by allowing them to shade each other. The sufficient distance between the blocks optimises the use of solar energy and reduces the need for heating. In addition, the presence of both individual and communal social areas facilitates access to these areas. This makes it the most advantageous type of development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Daylight
• Energy consumption
• Open space potential
• Residence settlement

Kaynakça

1. Akdağ, N. Y., Gedik, G. Z., Kiraz, F., & Şener, B. (2017). Effect of mass housing settlement type on the comfortable open areas in terms of noise. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-017-6202-1/TABLES/3
2. Atalay, N. D. and Aydın Yağmur Ş., Konutlarda Enerji Verimliliğini Artırmak için Uygun Pencere Camlarını Seçmeye İlişkin Bütüncül Bir Yaklaşım.YTÜ Grad-Symposium'25.
3. Bolleter, J., Hooper, P., Kleeman, A., Edwards, N., & Foster, S. (2024). A typological study of the provision and use of communal outdoor space in Australian apartment developments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 246, 105040. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2024.105040
4. Chen, H. C., Han, Q., & de Vries, B. (2020). Urban morphology indicators analyze urban energy modeling. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101863. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2019. 101863
5. Cody, B., Loeschnig, W., & Eberl, A. (2018). Operating energy demand of various residential building typologies in different European climates. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 7(3–4), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-08-2017-0035/FULL/PDF
6. European Committee for Standardization. (2018). Daylight in buildings (EN 17037:2018).
7. Erdemir Kocagil, İ., Koçlar Oral, G., (2021). A Parametric Model Proposal for Energy Efficient Settlement Texture and Building Design: Temperate-Humid Climate Zone. Megaron, 2021;16(4):735-750
8. Feng, W., Chen, J., Yang, Y., Gao, W., Zhao, Q., Xing, H., Yu, S. (2024). The Impact of Building Morphology on Energy Use Intensity of High-Rise Residential Clusters: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China. Buildings, 14(7):2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072245

9. Ferrari, S., Zagarella, F., Caputo, P., Bonomolo, M. (2023). Internal heat loads profiles for buildings’ energy modelling: comparison of different standards. Sustainable Cities and Society,89,104306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104306
10. Gür, E.A. and Dülgeroğlu Yüksel, Y. (2019), "Analytical investigation of urban housing typologies in twentieth century Istanbul", Archnet-IJAR, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH- 12-2018-0047
11. He, B. J., Ding, L., & Prasad, D. (2020). Relationships among local-scale urban morphology, urban ventilation, urban heat island and outdoor thermal comfort under sea breeze influence. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, 102289. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2020.102289
12. Huang, S. C. L. (2006). A study of outdoor interactional spaces in high-rise housing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2005.07. 008
13. Hui, S. C. M. (2001). Low energy building design in high density urban cities. Renewable Energy, 24(3–4), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(01)00049-0
14. Konya City Information System, (2025). https://kentrehberi.konya.bel.tr/. Access date: 10.07.2025.
15. Lee, J. (2011). Quality of Life and Semipublic Spaces in High-Rise Mixed-Use Housing Complexes in South Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 10(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.3130/JAABE.10.149
16. Li, L., Sun, W., Hu, W., & Sun, Y. (2021). Impact of natural and social environmental factors on building energy consumption: Based on bibliometrics. Journal of Building Engineering, 37, 102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2020.102136
17. Li, X., Ying, Y., Xu, X., Wang, Y., Hussain, S. A., Hong, T., & Wang, W. (2020). Identifying key determinants for building energy analysis from urban building datasets. Building and Environment, 181, 107114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2020.107114
18. Li, Y., Wang, D., Li, S., & Gao, W. (2021). Impact Analysis of Urban Morphology on Residential District Heat Energy Demand and Microclimate Based on Field Measurement Data. Sustainability, Vol. 13, Page 2070, 13(4), 2070. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13042070
19. Liu, K., Xu, X., Zhang, R., Kong, L., Wang, W., & Deng, W. (2023). Impact of urban form on building energy consumption and solar energy potential: A case study of residential blocks in Jianhua, China. Energy and Buildings, 280, 112727. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2022.112727
20. Liu, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, L., & Feng, Z. (2021). Enhancing building energy efficiency using a random forest model: A hybrid prediction approach. Energy Reports, 7, 5003–5012. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2021.07.135
21. Lu, Y., Chen, Q., Yu, M., Wu, Z., Huang, C., Fu, J., Yu, Z., & Yao, J. (2023). Exploring spatial and environmental heterogeneity affecting energy consumption in commercial buildings using machine learning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 95, 104586. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2023.104586
22. Manioğlu, G., Akşit Ş. F., Ganiç Sağlam, N., Köse Murathan, E., and Taşkın, H. F., (2023). Evaluation of Energy Efficient Settlement Pattern Options, TESKON.
23. Mindali, O., Raveh, A., & Salomon, I. (2004). Urban density and energy consumption: a new look at old statistics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2003.10.004
24. Natanian, J., & Auer, T. (2018). Balancing urban density, energy performance and environmental quality in the Mediterranean: a typological evaluation based on photovoltaic potential. Energy Procedia, 152, 1103–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2018.09.133
25. Quan, S. J., Wu, J., Wang, Y., Shi, Z., Yang, T., & Yang, P. P. J. (2016). Urban Form and Building Energy Performance in Shanghai Neighborhoods. Energy Procedia, 88, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2016.06.035
26. Ratti, C., Raydan, D., & Steemers, K. (2003). Building form and environmental performance: archetypes, analysis and an arid climate. Energy and Buildings, 35(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00079-8
27. Rode, P., Keim, C., Robazza, G., Viejo, P., & Schofield, J. (2014). Cities and energy: urban morphology and residential heat-energy demand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(1), 138-162.
28. Shi, L., Luo, Z., Matthews, W., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Liu, J. (2019). Impacts of urban microclimate on summertime sensible and latent energy demand for cooling in residential buildings of Hong Kong. Energy, 189, 116208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2019.116208
29. Steadman, P., Hamilton, I., & Evans, S. (2014). Energy and urban built form: an empirical and statistical approach. Building Research & Information, 42(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.808140
30. Strømann-Andersen, J., & Sattrup, P. A. (2011). The urban canyon and building energy use: Urban density versus daylight and passive solar gains. Energy and Buildings, 43(8), 2011– 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2011.04.007
31. Tereci, A., Ozkan, S. T. E., & Eicker, U. (2013). Energy benchmarking for residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 60, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2012.12.004
32. Turkish Standards Institution. (2008). TS825: Thermal Insulation Requirements for Buildings. Ankara
33. Turkish Standards Institution. (2024). TS825: Thermal Insulation Requirements for Buildings. Ankara
34. Turkish Statistical Institute, TUIK, Population and Housing Research Report, 2017, p. 27597. Issue.
35. Wu, W., & Ge, X. J. (2020). Communal Space Design of High- Rise Apartments: A Literature Review. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 20(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.22452/JDBE. VOL20NO1.
36. Xia, B. and Li, Z. (2021). Optimized methods for morphological design of mesoscale cities based on performance analysis: Taking the residential urban blocks as examples. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102489.
37. Xinyi, L., Runming, Y., Meng, L., Costanzo, V., Wei, Y., Wenbo, W., Short, A., Baizhan, L. (2018). Developing urban residential reference buildings using clustering analysis of satellite images. Energy and Buildings, 169,417-429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.064.
38. Zhang, J., Xu, L., Shabunko, V., Tay, S. E. R., Sun, H., Lau, S. S. Y., & Reindl, T. (2019). Impact of urban block typology on building solar potential and energy use efficiency in tropical high- density city. Applied Energy, 240, 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2019.02