KÜÇÜK-ÖLÇEKLİ BİR PROSES ISI UYGULAMASINA İLİŞKİN PARABOLİK OLUK KOLEKTÖR AĞININ PERFORMANS TESTİ

Year 2018, Volume: 38 Issue: 1, 43 - 53, 30.04.2018

İbrahim Yılmaz , Hakan Hayta Recep Yumrutaş Mehmet Söylemez

Abstract

Bu çalışma, seri bağlanmış üç modülden oluşan bir parabolik oluk güneş kolektör (POGK) ağının performans
testinin deneysel olarak incelenmesini sunmaktadır. Bu POGK ağının ısıl performansının ASHRAE 93-1986
standardına uygun olarak test edilmesi için yeni bir test düzeneği önerilmiştir. Deneysel testler, Gaziantep'te bulutsuz
gökyüzü koşulları altında uygulanmış ve birkaç gün boyunca izlenmiştir. Performans analizlerinde, direk ışınım,
kolektör giriş sıcaklığı, ortam koşulları ve çalışma akışkanının kütlesel akış debisinin etkileri araştırılmıştır. POGK
ağının daimi-durum ve dinamik testleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verimlilik testleri, termal yağ kullanılarak daimi koşullar
altında 50 °C ila 200 °C sıcaklık aralığı ve 0,1 kg/s ila 0,5 kg/s kütlesel debi aralığı için gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca,
deney sonuçları daha önce yapılan teorik çalışma sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılmış ve iyi tutarlılık göstermiştir.

Keywords

Güneş enerjisi, Parabolik oluk kolektör, Optik analiz, Performans testi

PERFORMANCE TESTING OF A PARABOLIC TROUGH COLLECTOR ARRAY FOR A SMALL-SCALE PROCESS HEAT APPLICATION

Abstract

This study presents the experimental investigation on performance testing of a parabolic trough solar
collector (PTSC) array consisting of three modules connected in series. A new test setup has been proposed to test the
thermal performance of this PTSC array in compliance with ASHRAE 93-1986 standard. The experimental tests have
been carried out and monitored in a number of days under cloudless sky conditions in Gaziantep. In the performance
analyses, the effects of beam radiation, collector inlet temperature, ambient conditions, and the variation in mass flow
rate of the working fluid were investigated. The steady-state and dynamic tests of the PTSC array were performed. The
efficiency tests were conducted with thermal oil for the temperature range from 50 °C to 200 °C, and mass flow rate of
0.1 kg/s to 0.5 kg/s under steady conditions. Additionally, the experimental results were compared with the results of
the theoretical study made previously and gave good coherency.

Keywords

Solar energy, Parabolic trough collector, Optical analysis, Performance testing

References

• ANSI/ASHRAE 93-1986 (RA91), 1986, Methods of Testing to Determine the Thermal Performance of Solar Collectors.
• Arasu A. V. and Sornakumar T., 2007, Design, manufacture and testing of fiberglass reinforced parabola trough for parabolic trough solar collectors, Sol. Energy, 81, 1273–1279.
• Brooks M. J., Mills I. and Harms T. M., 2006, Performance of a parabolic trough solar collector. J. Energy South Afr., 17(3), 71–80.
• Coccia G., Nicola G. D. and Sotte M., 2015, Design, manufacture, and test of a prototype for a parabolic trough collector for industrial process heat, Renew. Energ., 74, 727–736.
• Dudley V. E., Evans L. R. and Matthews C. V., 1995, Test Results – Industrial Solar Technology Parabolic Trough Solar Collector. Sandia National Laboratories, SAND94-1117.
• Duffie J. A. and Beckman W. A., 2005, Solar engineering of thermal processes (Third Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
• Eskin N., 1999, Transient performance analysis of cylindrical parabolic concentrating collectors and comparison with experimental, Energ. Convers. Manage., 40, 175–191.
• Fernandez-Garcia A., Zarza E., Valenzuela L. and Perez M., 2010, Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 14, 1695–1721.
• Fischer S., Lüpfert E. and Müller-Steinhagen H., 2006, Efficiency testing of parabolic trough collectors using the quasi-dynamic test procedure according to the European standard EN 12975, SolarPACES 13th Symposium on Concentrating Solar power and Chemical Energy Technologies, Seville, Spain.
• Gama A., Larbes C., Malek A., Yettou F. and Adouane B., 2013, Design and realization of a novel sun tracking system with absorber displacement for parabolic trough collectors, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 5, 033108–1/18.
• Gnielinski V., 1976, New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow, Int. Chem. Eng., 16, 359–68.
• Internet, 2017a, Technical datasheet of Pt100, http:// www.ordel.com.tr.
• Internet, 2017b, Optimass 6000 technical datasheet, http://www.krohne.com.
• Internet, 2017c, Type 40 maximum anemometer, http://www.renewablenrgsystems.com.
• Internet, 2017d, Technical datasheet of CMP11, http://www.kippzonen.com.
• Internet, 2017e, USB-2416 and USB-TEMP User’s Guide, http://www.mccdaq.com.
• Jaramillo O. A., Venegas-Reyes E., Aguilar J. O., Castrejón-García R. and Sosa-Montemayor F., 2013, Parabolic trough concentrators for low enthalpy processes, Renew. Energ., 60, 529–539.
• Kalogirou S. A., Lloyd S., Ward J. and Eleftheriou P., 1994, Design and Performance Characteristics of a Parabolic-Trough Solar-Collector System, Appl. Energ., 47, 341–354.
• Kalogirou S., 1996, Parabolic Trough Collector System for Low Temperature Steam Generation: Design and Performance Characteristics, Appl. Energ., 55, 1–19.
• Kline S. J. and McClintock F. A. 1953, Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments, Mech. Eng., 75(1), 3–8.
• Krüger D., Pandian Y., Hennecke K. and Schmitz K., 2008, Parabolic trough collector testing in the frame of the REACt project, Desalination, 220, 612–618.
• Mullin T., 2011, Experimental studies of transition to turbulence in a pipe, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 43, 1–24.
• Mwesigye A., Yılmaz İ. H. and Meyer J. P., 2018, Numerical analysis of the thermal and thermodynamic performance of a parabolic trough solar collector using SWCNTs-Therminol®VP-1 nanofluid, Renew. Energ., (Accepted).
• Qu M., Yin H. and Archer D. H., 2010, Experimental and Model Based Performance Analysis of a Linear Parabolic Trough Solar Collector in a High Temperature Solar Cooling and Heating System, J. Sol. Energ.- T. ASME, 132(2), 0210041–02100412.
• Rosado H. N. and Escalante S. M. A, 2011, Efficiency of a parabolic trough collector as a water heater system in Yucatán, Mexico, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 3, 063108–1/6.
• Sagade A. A., Aher S. and Shinde N. N., 2013, Performance evaluation of low-cost FRP parabolic trough reflector with mild steel receiver, Int. J. Energ. Env. Eng., 4(1), 5.
• Venegas-Reyes E., Jaramillo O. A., Castrejón-García R., Aguilar J. O. and Sosa-Montemayor F., 2012, Design, construction, and testing of a parabolic trough solar concentrator for hot water and low enthalpy steam generation, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 4, 053103–1/18.
• Xu L., Wang Z., Li X., Yuan G., Sun F. and Lei D., 2013, Dynamic test model for the transient thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors, Sol. Energy, 95, 65–78.
• Xu L., Wang Z., Li X., Yuan G., Sun F., Lei D. and Li S., 2014, A comparison of three test methods for determining the thermal performance of parabolic trough solar collectors, Sol. Energy, 99, 11–27.
• Yılmaz İ. H., Söylemez M. S., Hayta H. and Yumrutaş R., 2014a, Model-Based Performance Analysis of a Concentrating Parabolic Trough Collector Array, Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment, Springer, Cham.
• Yılmaz İ. H., Söylemez M. S., Hayta H. and Yumrutaş R., 2014b, A Process Heat Application Using Parabolic Trough Collector, Springer Proceedings in Physics (Vol. 155), Springer, Switzerland.
• Yılmaz İ. H. and Söylemez M. S., 2014, Thermo-mathematical modeling of parabolic trough collector, Energ. Convers. Manage., 88, 768–784.
• Yılmaz İ. H., Hayta H., Yumrutaş R. and Söylemez M. S., 2015, Performance Testing of A Parabolic Trough Collector Array. The 6th International Congress of Energy and Environment Engineering and Management (CIIEM15), Paris, France.
• Yılmaz İ. H., Söylemez M. S., 2016, Transient simulation of solar assisted wheat cooking by parabolic trough collector, J. GloB. Eng. Stud., 3(1), 93–106.