THE ANNUAL CO2 EMISSIONS AND ENERGY COSTS OF DIFFERENT EXTERIOR WALL STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN TÜRKİYE

Year 2024, Volume: 44 Issue: 1, 1 - 17, 03.06.2024

Aynur Uçar

https://doi.org/10.47480/isibted.1493675

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Carbon dioxide emissions are one of the most important causes of global climate change. It is accepted in the world today that the world urgently needs to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in order to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. In this study, the optimum thickness of each insulation material is determined depending on the available costs and the total annual CO2 emissions of insulation materials for building external walls with different structure in the selected cities from different climate regions of Turkey. The different wall types insulated with four different insulation materials are presented. The results indicate that the optimum insulation thickness varies from 2.5 to 13 cm and is different for each wall type and insulation material. The total annual CO2 emission per unit area of the wall varies between 3.32 and 10.32 kg CO2/m2 depending on the insulation material and wall type.

Keywords

CO2 emissions, life cycle cost, Optimum insulation thickness, Eco-efficiency

TÜRKİYE'DE KONUTLARDA FARKLI DIŞ DUVAR YAPILARININ YILLIK CO2 EMİSYONLARI VE ENERJİ MALİYETLERİ

Abstract

Karbondioksit emisyonları, küresel iklim değişikliğinin en önemli nedenlerinden biridir. İklim değişikliğinin en kötü etkilerinden kaçınmak için dünyanın acilen karbondioksit emisyonlarını azaltması gerektiği bugün dünyada kabul görmektedir. Bu çalışmada, her bir yalıtım malzemesinin optimum kalınlığı, Türkiye'nin farklı iklim bölgelerinden seçilen şehirlerde farklı yapıya sahip dış duvarlar için yalıtım malzemelerinin mevcut maliyetlerine ve yıllık toplam CO2 emisyonlarına bağlı olarak belirlenmiştir. Dört farklı yalıtım malzemesi ile yalıtılmış farklı duvar tipleri sunulmaktadır. Sonuçlar, optimum yalıtım kalınlığının 2.5 ile 13 cm arasında değiştiğini ve her duvar tipi ve yalıtım malzemesi için farklı olduğunu göstermektedir. Duvarın birim alanı başına yıllık toplam CO2 emisyonu, yalıtım malzemesine ve duvar tipine bağlı olarak 3.32 ile 10.32 kg CO2/m2 arasında değişmektedir.

Keywords

CO2 emisyonları, Yaşam döngüsü maliyeti, Optimum yalıtım kalınlığı, Eko-verimlilik

References

• Akan A. E., 2021, Determination and Modeling of Optimum Insulation Thickness for Thermal Insulation of Buildings in All City Centers of Turkey. International Journal of Thermophysics, 42:49
• Akan, A. P. and Akan A. E., 2022, Modeling of CO2 emissions via optimum insulation thickness of residential buildings, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24, 949–967
• Atmaca, A., 2016, Life-cycle assessment and cost analysis of residential buildings in South East of Turkey: part 2—a case study, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, 21, 925–942 Axaopoulos, I., Axaopoulos P., Gelegenis J. and Fylladitakis E.D., 2019, Optimum external wall insulation thickness considering the annual CO2 emissions, Journal of Building Physics, 42, 527–544.
• Axaopoulos I., Axaopoulos, P., Panayiotou, G., Kalogirou, S. and Gelegenis, J., 2015, Optimal economic thickness of various insulation materials for different orientations of external walls considering the wind characteristics, Energy, 90, 939-952.
• Bolattürk, A., 2006, Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey. Applied Thermal Engineering, 26 (11), 1301–1309.
• Braulio-Gonzalo, M. and Bovea, M. D., 2017, Department Environmental and cost performance of building’s envelope insulation materials to reduce energy demand: Thickness optimization, Energy and Buildings, 150, 527–545.
• Buyukalaca, O., Bulut H. and Yılmaz T., 2001, Analysis of variable-base heating and cooling degree days for Turkey, Applied Energy, 69, 269–283.
• Cabeza, L.F., Rincón L., Vilariño V., Pérez G. and Castell A., 2014, Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 394–416.
• Çomaklı, K. and Yüksel B. 2003, Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving, Applied Thermal Engineering, 23 (4), 473–479.
• Dombaycı, Ö.A., Gölcü M. and Pancar Y., 2006. Optimization of insulation thickness for external walls using different energy-source, Applied Energy, 83 (9), 921-928.
• Ertürk M., 2016, Optimum insulation thicknesses of pipes with respect to different insulation materials, fuels and climate zones in Turkey, Energy, 113, 991-1003.
• Evin D. and Ucar, A., 2019, Energy impact and eco-efficiency of the envelope insulation in residential buildings in Turkey, Applied Thermal Engineering, 154, 573–584.
• Ferrández-García, A., Ibánez-Forés V. and Bovea M.D., 2016. Eco-efficiency analysis of the life cycle of interior partition walls: a comparison of alternative solutions, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 649
• Global ABC Global Status Report, EIA, 2018 Gaarder, J.E., Friis N.K., Larsen I.S., Time B., Møller E. B. and Kvande T., 2023, Optimization of thermal insulation thickness pertaining to embodied and operational GHG emissions in cold climates – Future and present cases, Building and Environment, 234, 110187 Huang, H., Zhou Y., Huang R., Wu H., Sun Y., Huang G. and Xu T., 2020, Optimum insulation thicknesses and energy conservation of building thermal insulation materials in Chinese zone of humid subtropical climate, Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101840.
• Infation and interest rate values (2022). Data Accessed December 2022. https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/Statistics/Inflation+
• Jie, P., Zhang F., Fang Z., Wang H. and Zhao Y, 2018, Optimizing the insulation thickness of walls and roofs of existing buildings based on primary energy consumption, global cost and pollutant emissions, Energy, 159, 1132–1147.
• Kayfeci, M., Keçebas A. and Gedik E., 2013, Determination of optimum insulation thickness of external walls with two different methods in cooling applications, Applied Thermal Engineering, 50, 217-224.
• Kaynakli, Ö., 2012, A review of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for building applications, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 415–425
• Kurekci, N. A., 2016, Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls by using heating and cooling degree-day values of all Turkey’s provincial centers, Energy and Buildings, 118, 197–213.
• Lazzarin, R. M., Busato F. and Castellotti F., 2008. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost of buildings’ insulation materials in Italy, Int. J. of Low Carbon Technologies, 3, 44-58.
• Nematchoua, M. K., Ricciardi P., Reiter S. and Yvon A., 2017. A comparative study on optimum insulation thickness of walls and energy savings in equatorial and tropical climate, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6, 170-182.
• Özel, G., Açıkkalp E., Görgün B., Yamık H. and Caner N., 2015, Optimum insulation thickness determination using the environmental and life cycle cost analyses based entransy approach, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 11, 87-91.
• Stephan, A., Crawford R.H. and Myttenaere K., 2012, Towards a comprehensive life cycle energy analysis framework for residential buildings, Energy Building, 55, 592–600.
• Stocker, T.F., Qin D.G., Plattner K., Tignor M., Allen S. K., Boschung J., Nauels A., Xia Y., Bex V. and Midgley P.M., Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ucar, A. and Balo, F. 2011, Determination of environmental impact and optimum thickness of insulation for building walls, Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 30(1), 113–122.
• Ucar, A., 2010, Thermoeconomic analysis method for optimization of insulation thickness for the four different climatic regions of Turkey, Energy, 35, 1854–186.