Natural Resources and Rent Seeking Collusion in the Context of Dutch Disease

Öz

A new model is proposed in this paper by concentrating on the Dutch disease phenomenon along with rent seeking to demonstrate how a natural resource abundance (or a resource boom) affects resource movement and national income under rent seeking collusion in the energy sector. Dutch disease and rent seeking problems are studied under the natural resource curse theory which states that countries with natural resources usually perform worse than resource-poor countries. The resource movement is considered one of the effects of the Dutch disease. The resource movement occurrence or the movement of labor inputs from services to the energy sector depends on the degree of the boom. The boom may also facilitate rent seeking depending on its degree and the number of firms in the energy sector. In the duopoly case (n=2), a sufficiently small degree of the boom is necessary for rent seeking to be facilitated. However, with more than two firms (n>2), rent seeking activities will not happen because profits in collusion will be less than those without collusion in the model. Hence, the paper analyzes rent seeking by concentrating on duopoly results (n=2). The impact of the boom on national income depends on parameter values.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Collusion
• Rent-seeking
• Dutch disease

Kaynakça

1. Auty, R. M. (2001a). The Political Economy of Resource-Driven Growth. European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 839-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00126-X google scholar
2. Auty, R. M. (2001b). Resource Abundance and Economic Development. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/0199275785.001.0001 google scholar
3. Baland, J. M. & Francois, P. (2000). Rent-seeking and resource booms. Journal of Development Economics 61, 527- 542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00067-5 google scholar
4. Bertrand, L., & Céline, Q. (2015). What do we know about the sharing of mineral resource rent in Africa? Resources Policy, 46(2), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.10.005 google scholar
5. Bello, A., & Cavero, S. (2008). The Spanish retail petroleum: new patterns of competition since the liberalization of the industry. Energy Policy, 36, 612-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2007.10.014 google scholar
6. Bruno, M., & Sachs, J. (1982): Energy and Resource Allocation: A Dynamic Model of the Dutch Disease. Review of Economic Studies, 49(5), 845-859. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297191 google scholar
7. Caselli, F., & Guy, M. (2013). Do Oil Windfalls Improve Living Standards? Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1), 208-238. DOI:10.1257/app.5.1.208 google scholar
8. Cassing, J. H., & Warr, P. G. (1985). The Distributional Impact of a Resource Boom. Journal of International Economics, 18 (3-4), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(85)90057-1 google scholar

9. Chernova, E. G., & Razmanova, S. V. (2018). Development of Competitive Environment at the Oil Market of Russian Federation: Empirical Analysis. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 14(2), 547-561. DOI: 10.17059/2018-2-17 google scholar
10. Conti'n, I., Correlje', A., & Palacios, B. (2009). Competition, regulation, and pricing behavior in the Spanish retail gasoline market. Energy Policy, 37(1), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2008.08.018 google scholar
11. Cournot, A. A. (1838). Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses. Paris, France: L. Hachette. google scholar
12. Corden, W. M., & Neary, J. P. (1982). Booming Sector and De-Industrialization in a Small Open Economy. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 825-848. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232670 google scholar
13. Corden, W. M. (1984). Booming Sector and Dutch Disease Economics: Survey and Consolidation. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 36(3), 359-380. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals. oep.a041643 google scholar
14. Garcia, J. P. (2010). Dynamic pricing in the Spanish gasoline market: A tacit collusion equilibrium. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1931-1937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.073 google scholar
15. Gillies, A. (2020). Corruption trends during Africa’s oil boom, 2005 to 2014. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(4), 1171-1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.06.006 google scholar
16. Hindricks, J., & Myles, D. G. (2013). Intermediate Public Economics. 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 387- 408. google scholar
17. Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). It’s the rents, stupid! The political economy of the resource curse. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5317-5325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.055 google scholar
18. Lane, P.R., & Tornell, A. (1996). Power, growth and the voracity effect. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 213- 241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138863 google scholar
19. Muradov, A. (2022). Energy Sector’s Monopoly Rent-seeking and Supplementary Time-series Analysis in the Case of Azerbaijan. Anadolu University Journal of Faculty of Economics, 4(1), 3649. https://doi.org/10.54737/aujfe.1065684 google scholar
20. Neary, J. P., & Wijnbergen, S. (1984). Can Higher Oil Revenues Lead to a Recession? A comment on Eastwood and Venables. Economic Journal, 94, 390-395. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232359 google scholar
21. Ogbuabor, J. E., God’stime, O. E., Charles, O. M., & Ifeoma, C. M. (2018). Asymmetric Price Transmission and Rent seeking in Road Fuel Markets: A Comparative Study of South Africa and Selected Eurozone Countries. African Development Review, 30(3), 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12336 google scholar
22. Ogbuabor, J. E., & Onuigbo, F. N. (2018). Are There Problems of Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Rent-Seeking in Spanish Retail Diesel Market? Saudi Journal of Economics and Finance (SJEF), 2(6), 376-381. Retrieved from https://www.saudijournals.com/media/articles/SJEF-26-376-381-c.pdf google scholar
23. Ogbuabor, J. E., & Onuigbo, F. N. (2019). Response of Italian Domestic Heating Oil Market to Variations in Crude Oil Costs: Symmetric or Asymmetric? Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 9(2). DOI: 10.7176/JETP/9-2-02 google scholar
24. Ogbuabor, J. E., Anthony, O., & Onyinye, I. A. O. (2020). Are anticompetitive behaviors rampant in global retail energy markets? A study of price elasticity, asymmetric price adjustment and rent-seeking.Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. erss.2020.101783 google scholar
25. Tornell, A., & Lane, P.R. (1999). The voracity effect. American Economic Review, 89, 22-46. DOI: 10.1257/aer.89.1.22 google scholar
26. Torvik, R. (2002). Natural resources, rent seeking and welfare. Journal of Development Economics, 67, 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(01)00195-X google scholar
27. Tullock, G. (1967). The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft. Western Economic Journal (now Economic Inquiry), 5, 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1967.tb01923.x google scholar
28. Van der Ploeg, F. (2010). Why do many resource-rich countries have negative genuine saving?: Anticipation of better times or rapacious rent seeking. Resource and Energy Economics, 32 (1), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.07.002 google scholar
29. Van der Ploeg, F. (2011). Curse or Blessing? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 366-420. DOI: 10.1257/jel.49.2.366 google scholar
30. Vicente, P.C. (2010). Does oil corrupt? Evidence from a natural experiment in West Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 92(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.005 google scholar