Effects of the EU’s CBAM on Eurasian Countries

Öz

Starting from 2026, imports of certain goods to the EU will be subject to a special fee that is based on the carbon content of the imported products. Consequently, the EU’s trade partners have tried to predict the possible risks of such a change in the European trade policies. Given this, the article focuses on the analysis of the impact of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on different countries. In particular, the current research aims to assess CBAM payments for imports of products from Eurasian countries to the EU. Despite current trends in the EU’s trade policy, the largest CBAM payment is estimated to be for Russia. Analysis shows that the highest share of CBAM payments in exports to the EU is estimated to be for Uzbekistan, Georgia, Tajikistan and Belarus. The biggest share of CBAM payments falls on imports of metals, fertilisers, electricity and oil. However, these results should be treated with caution since some Eurasian countries are missing high quality data on the carbon intensity of the produced goods. In this light Eurasian countries should adopt a transparent system for collecting and publishing detailed information on the embedded emissions of different products. Adoption of CBAM by the EU may lead to the implementation of the analogous mechanisms by trade partners of the Eurasian region. Therefore, the decrease of carbon intensity of products and “green” transition should be among the top priorities of the industrial and economic policies of these countries. JEL Classification : F13 , H23

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Carbon border adjustment
• Trade policy
• Climate policy
• Export
• Sanctions
• CBAM
• EAEU

Kaynakça

1. Böhringer, C., Balistreri, E., & Rutherford, T. (2012). The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: Overview of an Energy Modeling Forum study. Energy Economics, 34, S97 - S110. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.10.003. google scholar
2. Butterworth, P. (2021, October 27). EU 2030 emission targets need a carbon price of ~€140 /tCO2. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://sustainability.crugroup.com/article/eu-2030-emission-targets-need-carbon-price-euro140-tco2. google scholar
3. Condon, M., & Ignaciuk, A. (2013). Border carbon adjustment and international trade: a literature review. OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, OECD. google scholar
4. Council of the EU. (2022). Draft regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism - Draft approach. Retrieved from https:// data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7226-2022-INIT/en/pdf. google scholar
5. Council of the EU. (2023). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) - Compromise text. Retrieved from https://data. consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16060-2022-INIT/en/pdf. google scholar
6. Dong, Y., & Whalley, J. (2009). How large are the impacts of carbon motivated border tax adjustments? Working Paper Series, NBER. google scholar
7. Durant, I., Contreras, C., Hamwey, R., Mott, G., Nicita, A., Peters, R., . . . Vivas, D. (2021, July 14). A European Union carbon border adjustment mechanism: implications for developing countries. UNCTAD. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ osginf2021d2_en.pdf. google scholar
8. Ember-climate. (2022, August 19). EU carbon price tracker. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https:// ember-climate.org/data/carbon-price-viewer/. google scholar

9. Eur-Lex. (2006). Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02006R0765-20220604. google scholar
10. Eur-Lex. (2014). Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0833. google scholar
11. Eur-Lex. (2021). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 of 19 December 2018 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/331/oj. google scholar
12. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/carbon_border_adjustment_mechanism_0.pdf. google scholar
13. European Commission. (2022, June 03). Russia’s war on Ukraine: EU adopts sixth package of sanctions against Russia. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/ presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_2802. google scholar
14. European Parliament. (2022). Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 22 June 2022 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.europarl. europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0248_EN.pdf. google scholar
15. Grübler, J., Ghodsi, M., & Stehrer, R. (2021). Import demand elasticities revisited. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 31:1, pp. 46-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963819 9.2021.1951820. google scholar
16. Haites, S. (2018). Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned? Climate Policy, 18(8), pp. 955 - 966. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1492897. google scholar
17. ITC. (2022, July 19). Trade map. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.trademap.org/. google scholar
18. Kennedy, K., Obeiter, M., & Kaufman, N. (2015, April 30). Putting A price on carbon: a handbook for U.S. policymakers. world Resource Institute Working Paper, WRI. google scholar
19. Krause, E., & Obeiter, M. (2015, June 30). Carbon pricing gains popularity with governments, Businesses. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.wri.org/insights/carbon-pricing-gains-popularity-governments-businesses. google scholar
20. Kuik, O., & Hofkes, M. (2010). Border adjustment for European emissions trading: competitiveness and carbon leakage. Energy policy, 38(4), pp. 1741-1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.048. google scholar
21. Kuusi, T., Björklund, M., Kaitila, V, Kokko, K., Lehmus, M., & Mehling, M. ... & Wang, M. (2020, October 29). Carbon border adjustment mechanisms and their economic impact on Finland and the EU. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/ handle/10024/162510/VNTEAS_2020_48.pdf. google scholar
22. Ministry of Economic Development of Russian Federation. (2018). Socio-economic development forecast of Russian Federation to 2036. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.economy. gov.ru/material/directions/makroec/prognozy_socialno_ekonomicheskogo_razvitiya/prognoz_ socialno_ekonomicheskogo_razvitiya_rossiyskoy_federacii_na_period_do_2036_goda.html. google scholar
23. Misch, F., & Wingender, P. (2021, August 6). Revisiting carbon leakage. Working Paper No. 2021/207, IMF. google scholar
24. Pietzcker, R.C., Osorio, S., & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Tightening EU ETS targets in line with the European Green Deal: Impacts on the decarbonization of the EU power sector. Applied Energy. No. 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116914. google scholar
25. Roshydromet. (2021). National inventory report 1990 - 2019: anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of all greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol. google scholar
26. Venmans, F., Ellis, J., & Nachtigall, D. (2019). Carbon pricing and competitiveness: are they at odds? Climate Policy, 20:9, pp. 1070-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1805291. google scholar
27. Kaitila, V., Kuusela, O. P., Kuusi, T., Pohjola, J., & Soimakallio, S. (2022). Revisiting the economic impacts of the EU CBAM on Finland and the EU. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www. etla.fi/en/publications/reports/euroopan-komission-ehdottaman-hiilirajamekanismin-vaikutuksia-suomessa-ja-eussa/. google scholar
28. Votinov A., Lazaryan S., Radionov S., Sudakov S. (2021). Impact of EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on Russia, HSE EconomicJournal. 25(3), pp. 452-477. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-3-452-477. google scholar
29. Weitzel, M., Hübler, M., & Peterson, S. (2012). Fair, optimal or detrimental? Environmental vs. strategic use of border carbon adjustment. Energy Economics, 34, S198 - S207. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.023. google scholar
30. World Bank. (2022a, July 19). Carbon pricing dashboard. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https:// carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/ google scholar
31. World Bank. (2022b, July 19). World integrated trade solution. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://wits.worldbank.org/ google scholar
32. Yakovlev I. A., Kabir L. S., Nikulina S. I. (2022). The national strategy for financing the energy transition: assessing opportunities and finding solutions. Financial Journal, vol. 14(5), pp. 9-24. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2022-5-9-24. google scholar
33. Zachmann, G., & McWilliams, B. (2020, March 5). A European carbon border tax: much pain, little gain. Bruegel, Policy Contribution. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.bruegel.org/ sites/default/files/wp_attachments/PC-05-2020-050320v2.pdf. google scholar