Populism and Income Inequality: Is Income Inequality in Türkiye a Political Choice?

Öz

The argument that national inequalities are political and thereby driven by political decisions implies that income distribution is not merely an economic phenomenon but also a political one. Hence, this study explores the impact of populist governance on income inequality in Türkiye. In doing so, this study addresses whether income inequality in Türkiye is a political choice, drawing on economic, social, and political data over the years 2008- 2022. According to the results of the quantitative analysis, the share of income for the working class has fallen, the income gap between the lowest and highest deciles of the working class has narrowed, and the potential for fiscal interventions to reduce income inequality is not realised. In return, the income inequality that existed in 2008 has persisted at the same magnitude over the years. In other words, even if income inequality is not an explicit political choice, the populist governance in Türkiye between 2008 and 2022 has chosen not to contribute to the solution to this prevailing inequality. JEL Classification : P00 , D63 , A12

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Populism
• income inequality
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu, D., Vindigni, A., & Ticchi, D. (2011). Emergence and persistence of inefficient states. google scholar
2. Journal of European Economic Association, 9(2), 177-208. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.01008.x google scholar
3. Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. (2013). A political theory of populism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 771-805. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs077 google scholar
4. Ak, M.Z., & Altıntaş, N. (2016). Kuznets’in ters u eğrisi bağlamında Türkiye’de gelir eşitsizliği ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: 1986-2012. Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 93-102. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1711366 google scholar
5. Akkoyunlu, K., & Öktem, K. (2016). Existential insecurity and the making of a weak authoritarian regime in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 505-527. https://doi.org/10.1 080/14683857.2016.1253225 google scholar
6. AKP (2002). 3 Kasım 2002 Genel Seçimleri Seçim Beyannamesi. Retrieved from https://www.akparti. org.tr/media/acqnb24y/3-kasim-2002-genel-secimleri-secim-beyannamesi-sayfalar.pdf google scholar
7. AKP (2007). 22 Temmuz 2007 Genel Seçimleri Seçim Beyannamesi. Retrieved from https://www. akparti.org.tr/media/o0omydr3/22-temmuz-2007-genel-secimleri-secim-beyannamesi-sayfalar. pdf google scholar
8. AKP (2023). Dev Şehir Hastaneleri geliyor! Retrieved from https://www.akparti.org.tr/parti/ hedef-2023/diger/dev-sehir-hastaneleri-geliyor/ google scholar

9. Aksoğan, G., & Elveren, A. (2012). Türkiye’de savunma, sağlık ve eğitim harcamaları ve gelir eşitsizliği (1970-2008): ekonometrik bir inceleme. Sosyoekonomi, 17(17), 263-280. https://doi. org/10.17233/se.44604 google scholar
10. Algan, Y., Guriev, S., Papaioannou, E., & Passari, E. (2017). The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 309-382. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3128274 google scholar
11. Altınörs, G. (2021). Rethinking populism geopolitically: authoritarian populism and migration politics in Britain and Turkey. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 297308. https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.1011407 google scholar
12. Ataç, B., Önder, İ., & Turhan, S. (2008). Maliye Politikası. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
13. Basu, A. (2024). Populist revolt from the margins: the ambiguous case of Uma Bharati. Critical Asian Studies, 56(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2023.2300270 google scholar
14. Bhagwati, J. (1958). Immiserizing growth: A geometrical note. Review of Economic Studies, 25(3): 201205. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295990 google scholar
15. BirGün (2022). Gözde 11 firmaya istisna yağmuru Retrieved from https://www.birgun.net/haber/ gozde-11-firmaya-istisna-yagmuru-393266 google scholar
16. Bischi, G.I., Favaretto, F., & Carrera, E. J.S. (2020). Long-term causes of populism. Journal of Economic Interaction andCoordination, 17, 349-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-020-00300-7 google scholar
17. Bulut, A.T., & Hacıoğlu, N. (2021). Religion, foreign policy and populism in Turkish politics: introducing a new framework. Democratization, 28(4), 762-781. https://doi.org/10.1080/135103 47.2020.1865318 google scholar
18. Bükey, A.M. (2022). Türkiye’de ücret politikaları ve gelir dağılımı eşitsizliği ilişkisi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 6(3), 3109-3128. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1000256 google scholar
19. Cinar, K. (2016). Local determinants of an emerging electoral hegemony: the case of Justice and Development Party (AKP) in Turkey. Democratization, 23(7), 1216-1235. https://doi.org/10.108 0/13510347.2015.1077228 google scholar
20. Çalışkan, Ş. (2010). Türkiye’de gelir eşitsizliği ve yoksulluk. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, (59), 89-132. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/9313 google scholar
21. Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018). The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936-953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12358 google scholar
22. Dasdemir, E., & Tunali, H. (2023). Sermaye sahipliği ve mülkiyetin tabana yayılmasının iktisadi gelir dağılımına etkisi. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 73(1), 533-554. https://doi.org/10.26650/ ISTJECON2022-1058516 google scholar
23. De Bromhead, A., Eichengreen, B., & O’Rourke, K.H. (2013). Political Extremism in the 1920s and 1930s: Do German Lessons Generalize?. The Journal of Economic History, 73(2), 371-406. Accessed at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24551040 google scholar
24. Decker, F. (2006). Die populistische Herausforderung. Theoretische und landervergleichende Perspektiven. In F. Decker (Eds.), Populismus: Gefahr für die Demokratie oder nützliches Korrektiv? (pp. 9-32). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. google scholar
25. Dornbusch, R., & Edwards, S. (1990). Macroeconomic populism. Journal of Development Economics, 32(2), 247-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(90)90038-D google scholar
26. Dornbusch, R., & Edwards, S. (1991). The Macroeconomics of Populism. In R. Dornbusch and S. Edwards (Eds.), The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America (pp. 7-13). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
27. Ducatenzeiler, G., Faucher, P., & Rea, J.C. (1993). Amerique Latine: Les Echecs du Liberal-Populisme. Revue Canadienne d'Etudes du Developpement, 14(2), 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/022551 89.1993.9669512 google scholar
28. Elçi, E. (2019). The Rise of Populism in Turkey: A Content Analysis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19(3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1656875 google scholar
29. Erkul, E., & Demir-erkul, F. (2019). Neoliberal politika çerçevesinde Türkiye ve Şili’ye ilişkin gelir dağılımı ve yoksulluk istatistiklerinin incelenmesi. Sosyoekonomi, 27(39), 11-38. https://doi. org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2019.01.01 google scholar
30. Farmisano, R.P. (2012). The Tea Party. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. google scholar
31. Fischer, A.M. (2020). The dark sides of social policy: from neoliberalism to resurgent right-wing populism. Development and Change, 51(2), 371-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12577 google scholar
32. Funke, M., Schularick, M., & Trebesch, C. (2022). Populist Leaders and the Economy. Hal-03881225. google scholar
33. Accessed at: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03881225/file/2022_funke_schularick_ trebesch_populist_leaders_and_the_economy.pdf. google scholar
34. Gemicioğlu, S., Kızılırmak, B., & Akkoç, U. (2024). Relative contributions of indirect taxes and inflation on inequality: What does the Turkish data reveal? Review of Development Economics, 28(1), 286309. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13055 google scholar
35. Glüzmann, P.A., Levy-Yeyati, E., & Sturzenegger, F. (2012). Exchange rate undervaluation and economic growth: Dı'az Alejandro (1965) revisited. Economics Letters, 117(3), 666-672. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.07.022 google scholar
36. Guiso, L., Herrera, H., Morelli, M., & Sonno, T. (2017). Populism: demand and supply. CEPR Discussion Paper no. 11871. Accessed at: https://cepr.org/publications/dp11871. google scholar
37. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000111 google scholar
38. İŞKUR 2021. 2021 Yılı İdari Ve Destek Hizmet Faaliyetleri Sektörü İşgücü Piyasasi Raporu. Ankara: Türkiye İş Kurumu. Erişim adresi: https://media.iskur.gov.tr/51148/idari-ve-destek-hizmet-faaliyetleri-sektoru.pdf. google scholar
39. Joppke. C. (2023). Explaining the populist right in the neoliberal west. Societies, 12(5), 110. https:// doi.org/10.3390/soc13050110 google scholar
40. Kenny, P.D. (2017). Populism and Patronage: Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia, and Beyond. Oxford University Press google scholar
41. Knight, A. (1998). Populism and Neo-populism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(2), 223-248. Accessed at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/158525 google scholar
42. Kyle, J., & Meyer, B. (2020). High Tide? Populism in Power, 1990-2020. London: Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. google scholar
43. Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. Verso. google scholar
44. Leser, J.& Pates, R. (2021). The Framing of Right-Wing Populism: Intricacies of ‘Populist’ Narratives, Emotions, and Resonance. In M. Oswald, (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Populism (pp. 437450). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_27 google scholar
45. Limanlı, Ö. (2017). Accounting for income inequality in Turkey: regression-based decomposition approach. Akademik Araştırmalar Ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 9(17), 137-146. https://doi. org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.315505 google scholar
46. Lockwood, E. (2020). The international political economy of global inequality. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 421-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1775106 google scholar
47. Mair, P. (2006). Ruling the void: the hollowing of western democracy. New Left Review, 42. Accessed at: https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii42/articles/peter-mair-ruling-the-void. google scholar
48. Mikucka-Wojtowicz, D. (2019). The chameleon nature of popülist parties. how recurring populism is luring ‘the people’ of Serbia and Croatia. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(3), 450-479. https://doi.org/10 .1080/09668136.2019.1590534 google scholar
49. Moudouros, N. (2014). The ‘harmonization’ of Islam with the neoliberal transformation: The case of Turkey. Globalizations, 11(6), 843-857. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.904157 google scholar
50. Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x google scholar
51. Mudde C., & Kaltwasser, C.R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
52. NTV (2014). ‘Seçim için yaz ortasında kömür dağıtılıyor’. Retrieved from https://www.ntv.com.tr/ turkiye/secim-icin-yaz-ortasinda-komur-dagitiliyor,l9H95Cxi0U62Tgjxe6IfHw google scholar
53. Onis, Z., & Kutlay, M. (2020). The global political economy of right-wing populism: deconstructing the paradox. The International Spectator, 55(2), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.20 20.1731168 google scholar
54. Oxhorn, P. (1998). The social foundations of Latin America’s recurrent populism: problems of popular sector class formation and collective action. Sociology Lens, 11(2), 212-246. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-6443.00061 google scholar
55. Ökten, N.Z., & Asfuroğlu, D. (2022). Küresel Ticarette Rekabet Politikaları: Pandemi Dönemi Türk Hazır Giyim Ve Konfeksiyon Ihracat Performansı Örneği. H. Yakışık & H. Ünlü (Ed.), Pandemi ve Türkiye Ekonomisi kitabı içinde (s. 75-100). Ankara: Adres Press. google scholar
56. Öniş, Z. (2015). Monopolising the Centre: The AKP and the Uncertain Path of Turkish Democracy. The International Spectator, 50(2), 22-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2015.1015335 google scholar
57. Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2020). Inequality Aversion, Populism, and the Backlash against Globalization. Chicago Booth Research Paper December 20-11. Accessed at: https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/Inequality-Aversion-Populism-and-the-Backlash-Against-Globalization_ PastorVeronesi_092518.pdf. google scholar
58. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. google scholar
59. Razmi, A., Rapetti, M., & Skott, P. (2012). The real exchange rate and economic development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(2), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. strueco.2012.01.002 google scholar
60. Rodrik, D. (2018a). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1, 12-33. https://doi.org/10.1057/s4221 4-018-0001-4 google scholar
61. Rodrik, D. (2018b). Is populism necessarily bad economics?. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108, 196199. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181122 google scholar
62. Sachs, J.D. (1989). Social conflict and populist policies in Latin America. NBER Working papers 2897. Accessed at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w2897. google scholar
63. Sawicky, M.B. (1998). Populist politics: a review of the new populist reader. Review of Radical Political Economics, 30(4), 170-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613498030004 google scholar
64. Taşkın, Y. (2008). AKP’s move to “conquer” the center-right: its prospects and possible impacts on the democratization process. Turkish Studies, 9(1), 53-72. https://doi. org/10.1080/14683840701814000 google scholar
65. Teyyare, E., & Sayaner, K. (2018). Türkiye’de gelir eşitsizliğinin maliye politikasi araçlari ve kurumsal faktörler açisindan analizi ve çözüm önerileri. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 309-334. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.454029 google scholar
66. Topuz, S.G. (2021). Türkiye’de bütçe açığı, kamu iç borcu ve gelir eşitsizliği ilişkisi. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.819198 google scholar
67. UNDP (1999). Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press. Accessed at: https:// hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/hdr1999ennostatspdf.pdf. google scholar
68. Viguera, A. (1993). “Populismo” y “neopopulismo” en America Latina. Revista Mexicana de Sociologı'a, 55(3), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3540921 google scholar
69. Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412 google scholar
70. Weyland, K. (2017). Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach. In C.R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P.O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 8-72). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
71. Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing. google scholar
72. Y alvaç, F., & Joseph, J. (2019). Understanding populist politics in Turkey: a hegemonic depth approach. Review of International Studies, 45(5), 786-804. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0260210519000238 google scholar
73. Y ilmaz, I., & Demir, M. (2023). Manufacturing the Ummah: Türkiye’s transnational populism and construction of the people globally. Third World Quarterly, 44(2), 320-336. https://doi.org/10.10 80/01436597.2022.2146578 google scholar
74. Y ilmaz, I., & Bashirov, G. (2018). The AKP after 15 years: Emergence of Erdoganism in Türkiye. Third World Quarterly, 39(9), 1812-1830. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1447371 google scholar
75. Y ilmaz, I., & Erturk, O.F. (2021). Populism, violence and authoritarian stability: necropolitics in Türkiye. Third World Quarterly, 42(7),1524-1543.https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.18969 google scholar