Spatial Econometric Analysis of the Ecological Footprint of European Countries

Öz

This study explains the effects of various economic factors on the ecological footprint of 34 European countries in 2022 using spatial econometric techniques. Unlike previous studies on the ecological footprint, this study presents more comprehensive results by including spatial effects in the model using spatial econometric techniques for 34 countries for 2022. This study analyzes the lagged effects of per capita GDP growth, trade openness, and renewable energy use on the ecological footprint. The spatial Durbin Model was confirmed as the most appropriate through diagnostic tests and selection criteria. The results show that per capita GDP growth, trade openness, and renewable energy usage positively and significantly affect the ecological footprint. Additionally, the spatially lagged per capita GDP growth rate has a negative impact on the ecological footprint, while the spatially lagged trade openness has a positive impact, both of which are statistically significant. These findings underscore the importance of considering the environmental impacts of economic policies to achieve sustainable development. Furthermore, the identification of spatial effects in the spread of ecological footprints highlights the need to address environmental issues not only at the national level but also in relation to neighbouring countries. JEL Classification : Q57 , C21 , O44

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecological Footprint
• Spatial Econometric Analysis
• Spatial Durbin Model

Kaynakça

1. Abdo, A. B., Bin, L., Zhang, X., Saeed, M., Qahtan, A. S. A., & Ghallab, H. M. H. (2022). Spatial analysis of financial development’s effect on the ecological footprint of belt and road initiative countries: Mitigation options through renewable energy consumption and institutional quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, 132696. google scholar
2. Addai, K., Serener, B., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2022). Empirical analysis of the relationship among urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprint: evidence from Eastern Europe. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(19), 27749-27760. google scholar
3. Adedoyin, F. F., Alola, A. A., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). An assessment of environmental sustainability corridor: the role of economic expansion and research and development in EU countries. Science of the total environment, 713, 136726. google scholar
4. Anselin, L. (1988). Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical analysis, 20(1), 1-17. google scholar
5. Anselin, L., Bera, A. K., Florax, R., & Yoon, M. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional science and urban economics, 26(1), 77-104. google scholar
6. Arbia, G. (2006). Spatial Econometrics: Statistical foundations and applications to regional convergence. Springer Science & Business Media. google scholar
7. Burridge, P. (1980). On the Cliff-Ord test for spatial correlation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42(1), 107-108. google scholar
8. Cliff, A., & Ord, K. (1972). Testing for spatial autocorrelation among regression residuals. Geographical analysis, 4(3), 267-284. google scholar

9. Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial processes: models & applications. google scholar
10. Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., & Dogan, E. (2018). Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29387-29396. google scholar
11. Fischer, M. M., & Wang, J. (2011). Spatial data analysis: models, methods and techniques. Springer Science & Business Media. google scholar
12. Global Footprint Network (2024). https://www.footprintnetwork.org/ google scholar
13. Hordijk, L. (1974). Spatial correlation in the disturbances of a linear interregional model. Regional and Urban Economics, 4(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-3331(74)90025-6 google scholar
14. Kassouri, Y., & Alola, A. A. (2022). Towards unlocking sustainable land consumption in sub-Saharan Africa: Analysing spatio-temporal variation of built-up land footprint and its determinants. Land Use Policy, 120, 106291. google scholar
15. LeSage, J. P. (1999). The theory and practice of spatial econometrics. University of Toledo. Toledo, Ohio, 28(11), 1-39. google scholar
16. LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall/CRC. google scholar
17. Our World in Data (2024). https://ourworldindata.org/ google scholar
18. Paelinck, J. (1978). Spatial econometrics. Economics Letters, 1(1), 59-63. google scholar
19. Rahman, S., Chen, S., Saud, S., Saleem, N., & Bari, M. W. (2019). Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 31856-31872. google scholar
20. Ramezani, M., Abolhassani, L., Shahnoushi Foroushani, N., Burgess, D., & Aminizadeh, M. (2022). Ecological footprint and its determinants in MENA countries: a spatial econometric approach. Sustainability, 14(18), 11708. google scholar
21. Ramirez, Y. N. (2014, September). Spatial econometric model of the Ecological Footprint. In Proceedings of the METMA VII and GRASPA14 Conference. Torino (IT), Universitâ degli studi di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy (pp. 10-12). google scholar
22. Rees, W., & Wackernagel, M. (2008). Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable— and why they are a key to sustainability. Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature, 537-555. google scholar
23. Saint Akadiri, S., Alola, A. A., Akadiri, A. C., & Alola, U. V. (2019). Renewable energy consumption in EU-28 countries: policy toward pollution mitigation and economic sustainability. Energy Policy, 132, 803-810. google scholar
24. Saqib, M., & Benhmad, F. (2021). Does ecological footprint matter for the shape of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), 13634-13648. google scholar
25. Saqib, N., Ozturk, I., Usman, M., Sharif, A., & Razzaq, A. (2023). Pollution haven or halo? How European countries leverage FDI, energy, and human capital to alleviate their ecological footprint. Gondwana Research, 116, 136-148. google scholar
26. Schaefer, F., Luksch, U., Steinbach, N., Cabeça, J., & Hanauer, J. (2006). Ecological footprint and biocapacity: the world’s ability to regenerate resources and absorb waste in a limited time period. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg. google scholar
27. Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., Bello, P., Linares, A. C., Falfan, I. S. L., Garcıa, J. M., ... & Guerrero, M. G. S. (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological economics, 29(3), 375-390. google scholar
28. Wang, R., Usman, M., Radulescu, M., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2023). Achieving ecological sustainability through technological innovations, financial development, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption in developing European countries. Gondwana Research, 119, 138-15. google scholar
29. World Bank (2024). https://databank.worldbank.org/ google scholar
30. Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2022). Mekansal Ekonometri Stata Uygulamalı. Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım AŞ, İstanbul. google scholar
31. Zakari, A., & Toplak, J. (2021). Investigation into the social behavioural effects on a country’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Central Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120891. google scholar
32. Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., Ruano, M. A., Ruano, M. A., Ormeno-Candelario, V., & Sanchez-Loor, D. A. (2020). Global ecological footprint and spatial dependence between countries. Journal of environmental management, 272, 111069. google scholar