Reconstructing Financial Reality in a Decentralised World: A Searlean Perspective on Financial Technology, Blockchain, and Cryptocurrencies

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 75 Sayı: 2, 413 - 431, 15.01.2026

Yunus Emre Akdoğan

https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1707174

https://izlik.org/JA62UE38HP

Öz

John Searle is a philosopher known for his work on the philosophy of mind, language, and social reality. Searle’s theory of social reality provides an essential framework for explaining the functioning of blockchain and cryptocurrencies. According to Searle’s concept of “institutional facts,” social reality is constructed by people’s acceptance of certain things and attributing a common meaning to them. In this context, cryptocurrencies, like traditional currencies, exist only to the extent that their users value and accept them. The difference, however, is that cryptocurrencies are not based on a centralised authority but on consensus among the participants of a distributed network. Searle’s notion of “deontic powers” can be associated with smart contracts on the blockchain. Smart contracts are digital rules that automatically enforce agreements between parties, require no central authority, and create new rights and obligations. Thus, blockchain technology offers a digital social reality within Searle’s theoretical framework. The operation of cryptocurrencies and smart contracts is a powerful example of how social reality is constructed through collective acceptance and consensus. Therefore, this study aims to apply John Searle’s theory of social reality to the functioning of blockchain and cryptocurrencies to explain how decentralised digital assets create a new reality based on social acceptance and consensus.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Reality , Fintech , Institutional Finance , Blockchain , Cryptocurrencies , John Searle

Kaynakça

• Authority, F. I. R. (2017). Distributed Ledger Technology: Implications of Blockchain for the Securities Industry. Washington DC: FINRA. google scholar
• Bashir, I. (2020). Mastering Blockchain. Packt Publishing. Third Editiongoogle scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2020). Outline of a Theory of Practice. In The new social theory reader (pp. 80-86). Routledge. google scholar
• Chang, S. E., Luo, H. L., & Chen, Y. (2019). Blockchain-enabled trade finance innovation: A potential paradigm shift on using letter of credit. Sustainability, 12(1), 188. google scholar
• Chawla, C. (2020). Trust in blockchains: Algorithmic and organisationalorganizational. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, e00203. google scholar
• Dai, H. N., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Blockchain for Internet of Things: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 8076-8094. google scholar
• Decentralised Finance: Adventures in DeFiLand, The Economist, September 18, 2021, p. 18. google scholar
• Fang, W., Chen, W., Zhang, W., Pei, J., Gao, W., & Wang, G. (2020). Digital signature scheme for information non-repudiation in blockchain: a state-of-the-art review. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2020, 1-15. google scholar
• Ferretti, S., & D'Angelo, G. (2020). On the Ethereum blockchain structure: A complex networks theory perspective. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 32(12), e5493. google scholar
• Gokoglan, K., Cetın, S., & Bılen, A. (2022). Blockchain technology and its impact on audit activities. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 9(2), 72-81. google scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879/ASSET//CMS/ASSET/73111A81-10BA-458B-B10B-B845B2387BDD/00213624.2006.11506879.FP.PNGgoogle scholar
• Iota Kaousar Nassr, OECD, “Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) for SME,” 2019, p. 45, www.oecd.org/finance/initial-coin-offerings-for-sme-financing.htm(Access Date: 02.06.2022). google scholar
• Joe Guastella, Alex Rozman, and Tom Nassim, “Blockchain: Democratized Trust”, https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/insights/focus/tech-trends/2016/blockchain-applications-and-trust-in-a-global-economy.html, (Access Date: 08.08.2022). google scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
• Leemon Baird, “The Tokenization of the World Starts Now,” Guest Contributors, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-tokenization-of-the-world-starts-now, (Access Date: 05.08.2022). google scholar
• Linoy, S., Stakhanova, N., & Ray, S. (2021). De‐anonymizing Ethereum blockchain smart contracts through code attribution. International Journal of Network Management, 31(1), e2130. google scholar
• Liu, J., Xu, Z., Li, R., Zhao, H., Jiang, H., Yao, J., Yuan, D., Chen, S. (2021). Applying blockchain for primary financial market: A survey. IET Blockchain, 1(2-4), 65-81. google scholar
• Maurer, B., Nelms, T. C., & Swartz, L. (2013). “When perhaps the real problem is money itself!”: the practical materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics, 23(2), 261–277. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2013.777594 google scholar
• Mitselmakher, K. 2019. Demystifying Blockchain: A New Wave of “Creative Destruction” or Hype?. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. google scholar
• Mori, T. (2016). Financial technology: Blockchain and securities settlement. Journal of Securities Operations & Custody, 8(3), 208-227. google scholar
• Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Satoshi Nakamoto. google scholar
• Nawari, N. O., & Ravindran, S. (2019). Blockchain and the built environment: Potentials and limitations. Journal of Building Engineering, 25, 100832.google scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performanceInstitutional Change and Economic Performance. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678 google scholar
• OECD, “Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Big Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications for Policy Makers,” 2021, p. 34, [https://www.oecd.org/finance/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-big-data-in-finance.htm(Access](https://www.oecd.org/finance/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-big-data-in-finance.htm(Access) Date: 25.04.2022). google scholar
• OECD, “The Tokenisation of Assets and Potential Implications for Financial Markets,” 2020, p. 10, [https://www.oecd.org/finance/The-Tokenisation-of-Assets-and-Potential-Implications-for-Financial-Markets.htm(Access](https://www.oecd.org/finance/The-Tokenisation-of-Assets-and-Potential-Implications-for-Financial-Markets.htm(Access) Date: 09.08.2022). google scholar
• Oliva, G. A., Hassan, A. E., & Jiang, Z. M. (2020). An exploratory study of smart contracts in the Ethereum blockchain platform. Empirical Software Engineering, 25, 1864-1904. google scholar
• Pasterny, Z. (2021). FinTech–A Step Ahead or a Force of Creative Destruction in Finance. Finanse i Prawo Finansowe, 2(30), 87-102. google scholar
• Perera, S., Nanayakkara, S., Rodrigo, M. N. N., Senaratne, S., & Weinand, R. (2020). Blockchain technology: Is it hype or real in the construction industry?. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 17, 100125. google scholar
• Potts, J., Davidson, S., & Berg, C. (2020). Blockchain innovation and public policy. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 9(2), 149-151. google scholar
• Raj, K. (2019). Foundations of Blockchain: The pathway to cryptocurrencies and decentraliseddecentralized blockchain applications. Packt Publishing. google scholar
• Saxena, S., Bhushan, B., & Ahad, M. A. (2021). Blockchain-based solutions to secure IoT: Background, integration trends and a way forward. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 181, 103050. google scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Routledge.google scholar
• Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. Ethics, 108(1), 208–210. https://doi.org/10.1086/233794 google scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173452 google scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1990). Collective Intentions and Actions Intentions in Communication, 401–416. doi: 10.7551/MITPRESS/3839.003.0021 google scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1998). Mind, language, and society: philosophy in the real world. PhilPapers.org/rec/SEAMLA-3. google scholar
• Searle, J. R. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1–22. doi:10.1017/S1744137405000020 google scholar
• Searle, J. R. (2006). Social ontology: Some basic principles. Anthropological Theory, 6(1), 12-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499606061731 google scholar
• Shermin Voshmgir, Token Economy: How the Web3 Reinvents the Internet, 2020, https://github.com/Token-Economy-Book/EnglishOriginal/wiki/Tokens, (Access Date: 10.08.2022). google scholar
• Singhal, T., Bhargavi, M. S., & Hemavathi, P. (2021). Coalescence of Artificial Intelligence with Blockchain: A Survey on Analytics Over Blockchain Data in Different Sectors. 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9927-9_68google scholar
• Soumen Mukerji and Pankaj Arjunwadkar, “Blockchain: Toolkit for the Future Finance Professionals,” https://www2.deloitte.com/in/en/pages/finance-transformation/articles/blockchain-influencing-finance.html, (Access Date: 08.08.2022). google scholar
• Varma, J. R. (2019). Blockchain in finance. Vikalpa, 44(1), 1-11. google scholar
• Werbach, K. (2018). The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. The MIT Press. google scholar
• Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2019). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352-375. google scholar