A Products Mapping-Based Analysis of Türkiye's Agricultural Trade Performance: A Longitudinal Perspective with Categorical Transitions

Öz

This study examines agricultural trade performance of Türkiye from 2002 to 2023 using the products mapping approach developed by Widodo (2008), which combines the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) Index and Trade Balance Index (TBI) to classify products into four categories. This taxonomy provides insight into export specialization and trade dynamics across three major agricultural product groups: animal products, plant products, and processed food products. Using trade data at the 6-digit HS level, the study tracks product transitions between categories over time through bivariate categorical analysis, supported by contingency tables and scatter diagrams. The findings show that processed food products exhibit the strongest performance, characterized by rising net exports and a notable transition from the least competitive category D to more competitive categories A and B, indicating an increasing comparative advantage. In contrast, plant products display more complex dynamics. Although category A products positively contribute to the trade balance, these gains are largely offset by increasing deficits in categories B and D. This outcome is closely linked to a production structure which has increasingly centered on the processing of imported agricultural inputs. This structure has generated sustained trade surpluses in processed food products since the 2000s, alongside a weakening performance in raw and unprocessed agricultural goods. For animal products, the strong performance in fish and poultry exports is the main driver of net export growth. These products moved from category C in 2002 to category A by 2023, thereby partially offsetting rising imports of live animals and meat.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Products mapping approach
• Revealed comparative advantage
• Agricultural trade performance

Kaynakça

1. Akgüngör, S., Barbaros, R. F. and Kumral, N. (2002). Competitiveness of the Turkish fruit and vegetable processing industry in the European Union market. Russian and East European Finance and Trade, 38(3), 34-53. Access link: [suspicious link removed] google scholar
2. Aydın, M. M. and Aydın, B. (2018). Gıda rejimi çerçevesinde Türkiye’nin tarımsal dış ticareti üzerine bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 2(1), 111-130. doi: 10.29216/ueip.409306 google scholar
3. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and “revealed” comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33(2), 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x google scholar
4. Balassa, B. (1966). Tariff reductions and trade in manufacturers among the industrial countries. The American Economic Review, 56(3), 466-473. Access link: [suspicious link removed] google scholar
5. Balassa, B. (1977). “Revealed” comparative advantage revisited: an analysis of relative export shares of the industrial countries, 1953-1971. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 45(4), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1977.tb00701.x google scholar
6. Bashimov, G. (2018). Türkiye’de Canlı Hayvanlar ve Hayvansal Ürünlerin Dış Ticaret Yapısının Analizi, U. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 1-13. Access link: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/493304 google scholar
7. Bojnec, Š. (2001). Trade and revealed comparative advantage measures: regional and central and east european agricultural trade, Eastern European Economics, 39(2), 72-98. Access link: [suspicious link removed] google scholar
8. Bojnec, Š. and Fertő, I. (2008). European enlargement and agro-food trade. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56, 563-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2008.00148.x google scholar

9. Bojnec, Š. and Fertő, I. (2015). Agri-food export competitiveness in European Union countries. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), 476–492. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12215 google scholar
10. Bojnec, S. and Fertő, I. (2016). Export competitiveness of the European Union in fruit and vegetable products in the global markets. AGRIECON. 62(7), 299-310. doi: 10.17221/156/2015-AGRICECON. google scholar
11. Bojnec, Š. and Fertő, I. (2017). The duration of global agri-food export competitiveness. British Food Journal, 119(6), 1378-1393. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2016-0302 google scholar
12. Ceylan, R. F., Sayın, C., Ozkan, B., Akpınar, M. G. and Ilbasmıs, E. (2018). Comparative advantage analysis for Turkish grape and cherries export market, International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Science, 2(2), 75-86. Access link: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/560228 google scholar
13. Çiçek H. and Doğan İ. (2018). Türkiye’de canlı sığır ve sığır eti ithalatındaki gelişmeler ve üretici fiyatlarının trend modelleri ile incelenmesi. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 11(1), 1-10. doi: 10.5578/kvj.66117 google scholar
14. Edwards, L. and Schoer V. (2002). Measures of competitiveness: a dynamic approach to South Africa’s trade performance in the 1990s. The South African Journal of Economics, 70(6), 1008-1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2002.tb00055.x google scholar
15. Erkan, B., Arpacı, B. B., Yaralı, F. and Güvenç İ. (2015). Türkiye’nin sebze ihracatında karşılaştırmalı üstünlükleri, KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(4), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksujns.61527 google scholar
16. Erol, E. (2014). Türkiye tarımsal dış ticaretinin yapısal analizi ve AB sürecinin etkileri. (AB Uzmanlık tezi). Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Avrupa Birliği ve Dış İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. google scholar
17. FAO (2025) https://www.fao.org/statistics/methods-and-standards/agriculture/en#navbarNavWebsite. google scholar
18. FAOSTAT (2025). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QV google scholar
19. Fidan, H. (2009). Comparison of Citrus Sector Competitiveness between Turkey and EU-15 Member Countries, HORTSCIENCE, 44(1), 89-93. google scholar
20. Fojtíková, L. (2018). China’s trade competitiveness in the area of agricultural products after the implementation of the World Trade Organization commitments. AGRICECON, 64(9), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.17221/163/2017-AGRICECON. google scholar
21. Greenaway, D. and Milner, C. (1993). Trade and industrial policy in developing countries: a manual of policy analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
22. Grubel H.G. and Lloyd, P.J. (1975). Intra-industry trade: the theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products. London: MacMillan. google scholar
23. International Trade Center (n.d.). Trade Competitiveness Map, Technical Notes, Erişim adresi: https://tradecompetitivenessmap.intracen.org/Documents/TradeCompMap-Trade%20Performance%20Index-Technical%20Notes-EN.pdf google scholar
24. Ishchukova, N. and Smutka, L. (2013). Comparative Advantage: Products Mapping of the Russian Agricultural Exports, Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5(3), 13-24. google scholar
25. ITC-Trade Map (n.d.) Access link: https://www.trademap.org/Product_SelProductCountry_Graph.aspx?nvpm=1%7c792%7c%7c%7c%7c01%7c%7c%7c4%7c1%7c1%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c2 google scholar
26. Jarosz-Angowska, A., Nowak A., Kołodziej, E., Klikocka, H. (2022). Effect of European Integration on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector in New Member States (EU-13) on the Internal EU Market. Sustainability, 14, 13124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013124. google scholar
27. Karagöz Özenç, F. (2023). Üretimden dış ticarete Türkiye’nin tarımsal uzmanlaşma yapısı üzerine bir inceleme. Eğitim Bilim Toplum, 21(83), 33-84. Access link: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ueip/issue/34602/409306 google scholar
28. Kesgingöz, H. (2018). Türkiye’nin Tarım Sektörünün Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler Yöntemiyle Analizi, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 6(2), 508-523 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v6i2.267 google scholar
29. Lafay, G. (1992). The measurement of revealed comparative advantages. International Trade Modelling. In M. G. Dagenais ve P-A Muet (Eds.), (pp. 209-236). London: Chapman and Hall. google scholar
30. Laursen, K. (1998). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialisation. DRUID Working Paper No. 98-30, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies. Access link: https://wp.druid.dk/wp/19980030.pdf google scholar
31. Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization, Eurasian Business Review, 5, 99-115. doi:10.1007/s40821-015-0017-1 google scholar
32. Liesner, H.H. (1958). The European common market and British industry. The Economic Journal, 68(270), 302-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2227597 google scholar
33. Liu, B. and Gao, J., (2019). Understanding the non-Gaussian distribution of revealed comparative advantage index and its alternatives. International Economics. 158, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.01.001 google scholar
34. Málaga, J. E. and Williams, G. W. (2006) Mexican agricultural and food export competitiveness, TAMRC International Market Research Report, No. IM-01-06. Access link: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6614949.pdf google scholar
35. Platania, M. Rapisarda, P. and Rizzo, M. (2015). Italian trade specialization: persistence and change in regional agri-food production. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 7(4), 101 – 109. doi: 10.7160/aol.2015.070410 google scholar
36. Rumankova, L., Kuzmenko, E., Benesova, I. and Smutka, L. (2022). Selected EU countries crop trade competitiveness from the perspective of the Czech Republic. Agriculture, 12(127), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ google scholar
37. Saeyang, R. and Nissapa, A. (2021). Trade competitiveness in the global market: An analysis of four palm oil products from Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 17(3), 1077-1094. google scholar
38. Şahinli, M. A. (2013) Comparative advantage of agriculture sector between Turkey and European Union. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(10), 884-895. doi: 10.5897/AJAR12.2001. google scholar
39. Sanidas, E., and Shin, Y. (2010). Comparison of revealed comparative advantage indices with application to trade tendencies of east asian countries. Paper Presented at the 9th Korea and the World Economy Conference, New Economic Order after the Global Financial Crisis, Incheon, Korea. Access link: http://www.akes.or.kr/eng/papers(2010)/24.full.pdf google scholar
40. Smutka, L., Burianová, J., Belová, A. (2012). The Comparative Advantage of Czech Agricultural Trade in Relation to The Most Important Trade Partner Countries in The Period of 2008–2011, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, LX(7), 273–288. google scholar
41. Spatz, J. & Nunnenkamp, P. (2004). Globalization of the Automobile Industry-Traditional Locations under Pressure?, In Michael Faust, Ulrich Voskamp, Volker Wittke (Eds.), European Industrial Restructuring in a Global Economy: Fragmentation and Relocation of Value Chains (pp. 105-129). SOFI Berichte, Göttingen. google scholar
42. Stellian, R. & Danna-Buitrago, J. P. (2022). Revealed Comparative Advantage and Contribution-to-the-Trade-Balance indexes, International Economics, 170, 129-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2022.02.007 google scholar
43. TAGEM (2021), Bitkisel Yağlar Sektör Politika Belgesi 2020-2024 (Ankara: T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı) google scholar
44. Verter N., Zdráhal I., Bečvářová V. and Grega L. (2020). ‘Products mapping’ and trade in agri-food products between Nigeria and the EU28. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 66(1), 34–45. doi: 10.17221/145/2019-AGRICECON google scholar
45. Vollrath, T. L. (1991). A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(2), 265-280. Access link: [suspicious link removed] google scholar
46. WDI (2022) https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators google scholar
47. Widodo, T. (2008). Shift in comparative advantage, dynamic market and purchasing power parity in the East Asia, (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Graduate School of Economics Hiroshima University of Economics, Hiroshima, Japan. google scholar
48. World Integrated Trade Solutions (WITS), (2024). Access link: http://wits.worldbank.org/ google scholar
49. Zaghini, A. (2003). Trade Advantages and Specialization Dynamics in Acceding Countries, European Central Bank, Working Paper No: 249. ISSN 1725-2806. google scholar