The Impact of Financial Innovation, Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment, and Economic Growth on Ecological Footprint: New Evidence from the Top 10 Financially Innovative Countries

Öz

This study investigates the impact of financial innovation, trade openness, foreign direct investment (FDI), and economic growth on the ecological footprint. Originally designed to examine the nexus between economic growth and environmental quality, the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis has been tested with other factors too, such as FDI and trade. Financial innovation, on the other hand, has not attracted the same attention in the literature. This is surprising because financial innovation is as important as trade openness and FDI in the transition to more sustainable economies. We therefore test the EKC hypothesis with these factors on the top 10 financially innovative economies from 1996 to 2017. We employ panel data cointegration and causality tests and two different long-run estimators. Based on the outcomes obtained by the cointegration and long-run coefficient analyses, the EKC postulate is empirically supported solely in the cases of Switzerland and Turkey. Moreover, financial innovation lessens the pressure on the ecological footprint only in Chile and Colombia. It is also observed that findings concerning causal relationships show divergence when comparing one country to another. The direction of the causality is from FDI and trade openness to the ecological footprint for the whole panel. However, there is a bidirectional causality between financial innovation and ecological footprint. According to the overall results, policymakers should be aware of the effects of financial innovation, FDI, and trade openness on the ecological footprint while trying to reach higher levels of economic growth and development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Financial innovation
• ecological footprint
• panel estimation

Kaynakça

1. Abdouli, M., & Hammami, S. (2020). Economic growth, environment, FDI inflows, and financial development in Middle East countries: Fresh evidence from simultaneous equation models. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(2), 479-511. google scholar 
2. Addai, K., Serener, B., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2022). Empirical analysis of the relationship among urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprint: Evidence from Eastern Europe. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(19), 27749-27760. google scholar 
3. Ajmi, A. N., & Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2021). Revisiting the Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia: carbon dioxide vs. Ecological footprint. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 16(5), 406-419. google scholar 
4. Ali, M. U., Gong, Z., Ali, M. U., Wu, X., & Yao, C. (2021). Fossil energy consumption, economic development, inward FDI impact on CO2 emissions in Pakistan: testing EKC hypothesis through ARDL model. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), 3210-3221. google scholar 
5. Altıntaş, H., & Kassouri, Y. (2020). Is the environmental Kuznets Curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions?. Ecological Indicators, 113, 106187. google scholar 
6. Anwar, , M.A., Zhang, Q., Asmi, F., Hussain, N., Plantinga, A. , Zafar, M.W, Sinha, A. (2021) Global perspectives on environmental Kuznets curve: A bibliometric review, Gondwana Research, 103 (March), 135-145. google scholar 
7. Aydin, M., & Turan, Y. E. (2020). The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(34), 43233-43245.google scholar 
8. Bordo, M.D. (2002). Globalization in Historical Perspective, Business Economics, January 2002, 20-29 google scholar 

9. Borucke, M., Moore, D., Cranston, G., Gracey, K., Iha, K., Larson, J., & Galli, A. (2013). Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecological Indicators, 24, 518-533. google scholar 
10. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. google scholar 
11. Bulut, U. (2021). Environmental sustainability in Turkey: an environmental Kuznets curve estimation for ecological footprint. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(3), 227-237. google scholar 
12. Chandran, V. G. R., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 445-453. google scholar 
13. Charfeddine, L., & Mrabet, Z. (2017). The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 138-154. google scholar 
14. Chishti, M. Z., & Sinha, A. (2022). Do the shocks in technological and financial innovation influence the environmental quality? Evidence from BRICS economies. Technology in Society, 68, 101828. google scholar 
15. Copeland, H., Zarnic, Z., & Cervantes, M. (2018). Accelerating the development and diffusion of low-emissions innovations. Background Paper for the 37th Round Table on Sustainable Development, 20-21.google scholar 
16. Climate Policy Initiative. (2020). Updated View of the Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2019. Climate Policy Initiative: London, UK. google scholar 
17. Destek, M. A., & Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118537. google scholar 
18. Dkhili, H. (2022). Investigating the theory of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in MENA countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-18. google scholar 
19. Dogan, E., Ulucak, R., Kocak, E., & Isik, C. (2020). The use of ecological footprint in estimating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Science of The Total Environment, 723, 138063. google scholar 
20. Du, L., Wei, C., & Cai, S. (2012). Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China: Provincial panel data analysis. China Economic Review, 23(2), 371-384. google scholar 
21. Eberhardt, M., and Teal, F. 2010. Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Discussion Paper 515, Department of Economics, University of Oxford. Access address: http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/research/WP/pdf/paper515.pdf. google scholar 
22. Egli, H. (2002). Are cross-country studies of the environmental Kuznets curve misleading? New evidence from time series data for Germany. New Evidence from Time Series Data for Germany (April 2002). google scholar 
23. Emirmahmutoglu, F., & Kose, N. (2011). Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 870-876. google scholar 
24. Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85-91. google scholar 
25. Gillani, S., & Abbas, H. S. M. (2025). Impact of government expenditures, foreign direct investment, trade openness, and energy consumption on ecological footprints in selected Asian economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(2), 4167-4184. google scholar 
26. Gormus S, Aydin M (2020) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using innovation: new evidence from the top 10 innovative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:27904–27913 google scholar 
27. Gorus, M. S., & Aydin, M. (2019). The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emission in MENA countries: causality analysis in the frequency domain. Energy, 168, 815-822. google scholar 
28. Grossman, Gene M, and Alan B. Krueger, “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, “ in The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement, P. Garber, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993. google scholar 
29. Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148-161. google scholar 
30. Hadri, K., & Kurozumi, E. (2012). A simple panel stationarity test in the presence of serial correlation and a common factor. Economics Letters, 115(1), 31-34. google scholar 
31. Hao, Y., & Liu, Y. M. (2015). Has the development of FDI and foreign trade contributed to China’s CO2 emissions? An empirical study with provincial panel data. Natural Hazards, 76(2), 1079-1091. google scholar 
32. Hervieux MS and Darné O (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve and ecological footprint: a time series analysis. Econ Bull 35(1):814–826 google scholar 
33. Hitam, M. B., & Borhan, H. B. (2012). FDI, growth and the environment: impact on quality of life in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 333-342. google scholar 
34. Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167-5172. google scholar 
35. Jaunky, V. C. (2011). The CO2 emissions-income nexus: evidence from rich countries. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1228-1240. google scholar 
36. Jiang, Y. (2015). Foreign direct investment, pollution, and the environmental quality: a model with empirical evidence from the Chinese regions. The International Trade Journal, 29(3), 212-227. google scholar 
37. Kaika, D., & Zervas, E. (2013). The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory—Part A: Concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case. Energy Policy, 62, 1392-1402. google scholar 
38. Khan, A., Chenggang, Y., Hussain, J., & Kui, Z. (2021). Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy and the environment in belt & Road Initiative countries. Renewable Energy, 171, 479-491. google scholar 
39. Kongbuamai, N., Bui, Q., Yousaf, H. M. A. U., & Liu, Y. (2020). The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(16), 19251-19264. google scholar 
40. Leal, P. H., & Marques, A. C. (2020). Rediscovering the EKC hypothesis for the 20 highest CO2 emitters among OECD countries by level of globalization. International Economics, 164, 36-47 google scholar 
41. Lin B, Omoju OE, Nwakeze NM, Okonkwo JU, Megbowon ET (2016) Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis a sound basis for environmental policy in Africa? J Clean Prod 133:712–724 google scholar 
42. Liu, H., Kim, H., Liang, S., & Kwon, O. S. (2018). Export diversification and ecological footprint: a comparative study on EKC theory among Korea, Japan, and China. Sustainability, 10(10), 3657. google scholar 
43. López-Menéndez, A. J., Pérez, R., & Moreno, B. (2014). Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 368-373. google scholar 
44. Mehmood, U. (2022). Biomass energy consumption and its impacts on ecological footprints: analyzing the role of globalization and natural resources in the framework of EKC in SAARC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 17513-17519. google scholar 
45. Mainelli, M., & Mill, S. (2016). Financial Innovation and Sustainable Development. Business & Sustainable Development Commission, London EC2R 7HG, United Kingdom. google scholar 
46. Majeed, MT, & Mazhar, M. (2020), Reexamination of Environmental Kuznets Curve for Ecological Footprint: The Role of Biocapacity, Human Capital, and Trade. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 14(1), 202-254., google scholar 
47. Mert, M., Bölük, G., & Çağlar, A. E. (2019). Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO2 emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(21), 21495-21510. google scholar 
48. Merton, R.C. (1992), “Financial innovation and economic performance”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 4(4):12-22. google scholar 
49. Miyan, M. S., Cheong, C. W., Sharif, A., & Afshan, S. (2025). Green Finance, Innovation, and Environment: Testing the EKC in ASEAN-4 with MMQR Approach. Global Transitions. google scholar 
50. Mohammed ASM, Guo P, Haq IU, Pan G, Khan A (2019) Do government expenditure and financial development impede environmental degradation in Venezuela? Plos One 14(1):1–13 google scholar 
51. Mrabet, Z., & Alsamara, M. (2017). Testing the Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Qatar: A comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 1366-1375. google scholar 
52. Murshed, M., & Dao, N. T. T. (2020). Revisiting the CO2 emission-induced EKC hypothesis in South Asia: the role of Export Quality Improvement. GeoJournal, 1-29. google scholar 
53. Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661-666. google scholar 
54. Nasir, M., & Rehman, F. U. (2011). Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1857-1864. google scholar 
55. Nazir, M. R., Tan, Y., & Nazir, M. I. (2021). Financial innovation and economic growth: Empirical evidence from China, India and Pakistan. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), 6036-6059. google scholar 
56. Ochoa-Moreno, W. S., Quito, B. A., & Moreno-Hurtado, C. A. (2021). Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Quality: Revisiting the EKC in Latin American Countries. Sustainability, 13(22), 12651. google scholar 
57. OECD, World Bank, & UN Environment. (2018). Financing Climate Futures: Rethinking Infrastructure. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264308114-en. google scholar 
58. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002) Foreign Direct Investment for Development: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Costs google scholar 
59. Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220-3225. google scholar 
60. Pata, U. K., & Aydin, M. (2020). Testing the EKC hypothesis for the top six hydropower energy-consuming countries: evidence from Fourier Bootstrap ARDL procedure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121699.google scholar 
61. Pata, U. K., Aydin, M., & Haouas, I. (2021). Are natural resources abundance and human development a solution for environmental pressure? Evidence from top ten countries with the largest ecological footprint. Resources Policy, 70, 101923. google scholar 
62. Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012.google scholar 
63. Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13-50. google scholar 
64. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. google scholar 
65. Rume, T., & Islam, S. D. U. (2020). Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability. Heliyon, 6(9), e04965.google scholar 
66. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2012). Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 51, 184-191. google scholar 
67. Sapkota, P., & Bastola, U. (2017). Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Economics, 64, 206-212. google scholar 
68. Shah, W. U. H., Yasmeen, R., & Padda, I. U. H. (2019). An analysis between financial development, institutions, and the environment: a global view. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(21), 21437-21449. google scholar 
69. Shiller, R. J. (2013). Capitalism and financial innovation. Financial Analysts Journal, 69(1), 21-25. google scholar 
70. Stine, R. A. (1987). Estimating properties of autoregressive forecasts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(400), 1072-1078. google scholar 
71. Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 311-323. google scholar 
72. Seker, F., Ertugrul, H. M., & Cetin, M. (2015). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347-356. google scholar 
73. Tiba, S., & Belaid, F. (2020). The pollution concern in the era of globalization: Do the contribution of foreign direct investment and trade openness matter?. Energy Economics, 92, 104966. google scholar 
74. Tufano, P. (2003). Financial innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 307-335. google scholar 
75. Ullah, A., Dogan, M., Pervaiz, A., Bukhari, A. A. A., Akkus, H. T., & Dogan, H. (2024). The impact of digitalization, technological and financial innovation on environmental quality in OECD countries: Investigation of N-shaped EKC hypothesis. Technology in Society, 77, 102484. google scholar 
76. Ulucak, R., & Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 144-157. google scholar 
77. Usman, M., & Hammar, N. (2021). Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12), 15519-15536. google scholar 
78. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth (Vol. 9). Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.google scholar 
79. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233. google scholar 
80. World Trade Organization (WTO). (2021). Trade and Climate Change Information Brief. Access address: https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/clim_03nov21-4_e.pdf.google scholar 
81. Wurgler, J. (2000). Financial markets and the allocation of capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 187-214. google scholar 
82. WWF (2020) Living Planet Report 2020 -Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten M. and Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland. google scholar 
83. Yang, B., Jahanger, A., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Does the inflow of remittances and energy consumption increase CO2 emissions in the era of globalization? A global perspective. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(11), 1313-1328 google scholar 
84. Zafar, M. W., Mirza, F. M., Zaidi, S. A. H., & Hou, F. (2019). The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 15162-15173. google scholar