Factors Affecting ESG Performance: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach

Öz

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance has gained increasing importance as a key indicator of sustainability in global economies. In this context, accurately identifying the determinants of ESG performance and designing appropriate policies accordingly is crucial. Therefore, this study constructs ESG scores for 141 countries over the period 2000-2021 using principal component analysis (PCA), and classifies countries into three homogeneous clusters—low, medium, and high ESG scores—by employing the K-means clustering algorithm, which groups countries with similar characteristics. Subsequently, for each cluster, the method-of-moments quantile regression technique introduced by Machado and Santos-Silva (2019) is applied to analyse the impacts of economic growth, foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, financial development, and government effectiveness on ESG performance across different quantiles. Empirical findings reveal that ESG scores are quantile-dependent with respect to the explanatory variables, regardless of cluster separation. Furthermore, in the cluster with the highest ESG scores, the ESG determinants are ranked by their positive impact, such as government effectiveness, financial expansion, GDP, and trade openness, whereas FDI exerts a negative effect. For countries with medium ESG scores, the determinants are GDP, financial development, trade openness, and government effectiveness, whereas FDI does not exhibit a statistically significant effect. In the third cluster, which consisted of the lowest ESG scores, GDP, financial development, government effectiveness, and FDI exert positive effects on ESG, whereas trade openness has a negative impact. Overall, the results indicate that improving ESG performance requires sustained economic growth and comprehensive structural and institutional policy measures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ESG Performance
• Foreign Direct Investment
• Trade Openness

Kaynakça

1. Abdioğlu, N., & Aytekin, S. (2025). An analysis of the determinants of environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores at the firm level on Borsa İstanbul Companies. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(1), 95-104. DOI: 10.37880/cumuiibf.1550128 google scholar
2. Abdul Rahman, R., & Alsayegh, M. F. (2021). Determinants of corporate environment, social and governance (ESG) reporting among Asian firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040167 google scholar
3. Alandejani, M., & Al-Shaer, H. (2023). Macro uncertainty impacts on ESG performance and carbon emission reduction targets. Sustainability, 15(5), 4249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054249 google scholar
4. Alharbi, F. (2024). The impact of ESG reforms on economic growth in GCC countries: The role of financial development. Sustainability, 16(24), 11067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411067 google scholar
5. Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
6. Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., & Kao, C. (2011). Testing for sphericity in a fixed effects panel data model. The Econometrics Journal, 14(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2010.00331.x google scholar
7. Boccaletti, S., & Gucciardi, G. (2025). ESG performance, institutional factors, and the cost of debt. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2025.2489386 google scholar
8. Borghesi, R., Chang, K., & Li, Y. (2019). Firm value in commonly uncertain times: the divergent effects of corporate governance and CSR. Applied Economics, 51(43), 4726-4741. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1597255 google scholar

9. Costache-Dragodan, C. A., Lepădatu, R. E., Istudor, M., & Toderasc, Ș. A. (2025). Determinants of ESG Score in the Energy Sector. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 5098-5117). Sciendo. google scholar
10. Crespi, F., & Migliavacca, M. (2020). The determinants of ESG rating in the financial industry: The same old story or a different tale?. Sustainability, 12(16), 6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166398 google scholar
11. Darıcı, B., Aydın, A., Ayhan, F., & Altaylar, M. (2023). Macroeconomic determinants of tourism demand toward emerging markets. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 73(2), 837-864. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1296548 google scholar
12. Davies D.L. and Bouldin D.W., A cluster separation measure, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (1979), 224–227. google scholar
13. Dhanachandra, N., Manglem, K., & Chanu, Y. J. (2015). Image segmentation using K-means clustering algorithm and subtractive clustering algorithm. Procedia Computer Science, 54, 764-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.06.090 google scholar
14. Diaye, M. A., Ho, S. H., & Oueghlissi, R. (2022). ESG performance and economic growth: a panel co-integration analysis. Empirica, 49(1), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-021-09508-7 google scholar
15. Di Simone, L., Petracci, B., & Piva, M. (2022). Economic sustainability, innovation, and the ESG factors: An empirical investigation. Sustainability, 14(4), 2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042270 google scholar
16. Duwairi, R., & Abu-Rahmeh, M. (2015). A novel approach for initializing the spherical K-means clustering algorithm. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 54, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2015.03.007 google scholar
17. Garcia, A. S., & Orsato, R. J. (2020). Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3261-3272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2570 google scholar
18. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889 google scholar
19. Guloglu, B., Tekin, R. B., & Saridogan, E. (2012). Economic determinants of technological progress in G7 countries: A re-examination. Economics Letters, 116(3), 604-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.06.012 google scholar
20. Hu, H., Tu, Z., Chen, A., & Huang, J. (2023). Enterprises’ globalization and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104653 google scholar
21. Huang, R., Cui, H., & Sun, X. (2025). Legal determinants of ESG growth: Cross-national evidence from regulatory reforms. Finance Research Letters, 108396. google scholar
22. Huo, W, Ullah MR, Zulfiqar M, Parveen S and Kibria U (2022) Financial Development, Trade Openness, and Foreign Direct Investment: A Battle Between the Measures of Environmental Sustainability. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:851290. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.851290 google scholar
23. Im, K. S., Lee, J., & Tieslau, M. (2005). Panel LM unit‐root tests with level shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 393-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00125.x google scholar
24. Işık, C., Ongan, S., Aydın, R., & İmamoğlu, İ. K. (2025). Economic, environmental, social, and governance (ECON‐ESG) strategies for sustainable development: Theory and a holistic evidence from Germany. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70342 google scholar
25. Ionașcu, A. E., Hordofa, D. F., Dănilă, A., Spătariu, E. C., Burcă, A. L., & Horga, M. G. (2025). ESG performance in the EU and ASEAN: The roles of institutional governance, economic structure, and global integration. Sustainability, 17(17), 7997. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177997 google scholar
26. Karavias, Y., & Tzavalis, E. (2014). Testing for unit roots in short panels allowing for a structural break. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 76, 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2012.10.014 google scholar
27. Kartal, M. T., Ayhan, F., Sarıhan, A. Y., & Altaylar, M. (2025). Examining A (symmetric) relationship of renewable energy, healthcare expenditures, and export with environmental degradation: Evidence from OECD countries by ARDL approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 390, 126236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126236 google scholar
28. Kevser, M., Altaylar, M., Bingöl, U., & Yaşar, Z. R. (2025). Inflation or Speculative Bubbles? Observing Housing Prices in Türkiye by Using PANICCA and GSADF Methods. Ekonomika, 104(3), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2025.104.3.3 google scholar
29. Khalid, F., Razzaq, A., Ming, J., & Razi, U. (2022). Firm characteristics, governance mechanisms, and ESG disclosure: how caring about sustainable concerns?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(54), 82064-82077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21489-z google scholar
30. Koenker, R. & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica. 46(1): 33-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643 google scholar
31. Lee, J., & Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review Of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815961 google scholar
32. Levin, A., Lin, C.F. ve Chu, C.S.J. (2002). Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics. 108: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7 google scholar
33. Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505 google scholar
34. Lumsdaine, R. L., & Papell, D. H. (1997). Multiple trend breaks and the unit-root hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397556791 google scholar
35. Machado, J. A., & Silva, J. S. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009 google scholar
36. Martiny, A., Taglialatela, J., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2024). Determinants of environmental social and governance (ESG) performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 456, 142213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142213 google scholar
37. Mazzioni, S., Soschinski, C. K., Leite, M., Magro, C. B. D., & Sanches, S. L. R. (2024). ESG performance in emerging economies. Macro Management & Public Policies, 6(1), 21-35. google scholar
38. Nakip, M. (2006). Pazarlama araştırmaları, teknikler ve (SPSS destekli) uygulamalar. Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
39. Ng, TH., Lye, CT., Chan, KH. et al. Sustainability in Asia: The Roles of Financial Development in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance. Social Indicators Research. 150, 17–44 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02288-w google scholar
40. O’Connell, P. G. (1998). The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics, 44(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00017-2 google scholar
41. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics. Cambridge WP 0435 in Economics. google scholar
42. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross sectional dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 22(2): 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951 google scholar
43. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x google scholar
44. Ruiz, L. G. B., Pegalajar, M. C., Arcucci, R., & Molina-Solana, M. (2020). A time-series clustering methodology for knowledge extraction in energy consumption data. Expert Systems with Applications, 160, 113731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113731 google scholar
45. Sachs, J. D., Lafortune, G., & Fuller, G. (2024). The SDGs and the UN summit of the future. Sustainable development report 2024. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. google scholar
46. Salzmann, E. (2025). ESG indices and macroeconomic factors: A European panel data analysis. Available at SSRN 5291809. google scholar
47. Seow, R. Y. C. (2024). Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 2314-2330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3604 google scholar
48. Seltzer, L. H., Starks, L., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Climate regulatory risk and corporate bonds (No. w29994). National Bureau of Economic Research. google scholar
49. Sun, H. P., Tariq, G., Haris, M., & Mohsin, M. (2019). Evaluating the environmental effects of economic openness: evidence from SAARC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(24), 24542-24551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05750-6 google scholar
50. Taylor, M. P., & Sarno, L. (1998). The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period. Journal of International Economics, 46(2), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00054-8 google scholar
51. Turanli, M., Özden, Ü. H., & Türedi, S. Avrupa Birliği’ne Aday ve Üye Ülkelerin Ekonomik Benzerliklerinin Kümeleme Analiziyle. google scholar
52. Waldau, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on determinants and outcomes of ESG performance in family firms. Management Review Quarterly, 75(4), 3357-3415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00462-9 google scholar
53. Wu, J., Yang, L., Wang, B., & Liu, Y. (2025). How does ESG performance enhance the export competitiveness of Chinese manufacturing?. Sustainability, 17(21), 9684. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219684 google scholar
54. Xiao, J., Lu, J., & Li, X. (2017). Davies Bouldin Index based hierarchical initialization K-means. Intelligent Data Analysis, 21(6), 1327-1338. https://doi.org/10.3233/IDA-163129 google scholar
55. Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business strategy and the environment, 31(7), 3371-3387. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089], google scholar
56. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (2002). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410372 google scholar