YENİLİKÇİ KÜLTÜRÜN ÖRGÜTSEL YARATICILIK ÖĞRENME ÇABALARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Öz

Yeniliğe ihtiyaç duyan çevre koşullarında sürekli değişen talebin, firmaların faaliyet amaçlarının temel taşı olan devamlılık ve yüksek marka değeri ile buluşabilmesi için, daha esnek, daha uyumlu, girişim yetenekleri daha gelişmiş ve daha yenilikçi firmalar oluşturulması gerekliliği doğmuştur. Firmaların pazarda sürekli değişen talebe yanıt verebilmesi, yenilik ile ilgili süreçlere olan açıklığı ile doğru orantılıdır. Teknoloji, yeniliğin tabanını oluşturmakta ve yenilik ile yenilikçi kültür ortamının oluşmasına zemin sağlamaktadır. Firmaların teknolojinin yarattığı karmaşıklığa rağmen yenilikçi bakış açılarını örgüt kültürleri ile yoğurarak yenilikçi kültürü benimsemeleri, küreselleşen pazarlarda rekabetçi avantaj sağlamalarının en önemli koşulu olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bununla birlikte örgüt içinde sağlanan yenilikçi kültür tek başına yeterli olmamakta, çalışanların yaratıcılıkları da yenilikçilikle desteklendiğinde bu avantajı maksimize etmek kolaylaşmaktadır. Dolayısıyla örgüt içinde yaratıcılığın öğrenilmesi ve devam ettirilmesi rakiplere karşı başka bir rekabet avantajı olarak, firmalar tarafından değerlendirilmektedir. Buradan yola çıkarak araştırmada yenilikçi kültürün örgütsel yaratıcılık öğrenme çabaları üzerine etkisi incelenmiş ve bu ilişkideki teknolojik karmaşıklığın etkisi irdelenerek literatüre bu alanda ışık tutulmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yenilikçi Kültür, Örgütsel Yaratıcılık Öğrenme Çabaları

THE EFFECT OF INNOVATIVE CULTURE ON ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY LEARNING EFFORTS

Öz

In order to meet the cornerstone of the continuity and high brand value of goal activities and the necessity of establishing a more flexible, more compliant, more advanced interference ability and more innovative firms is becoming much more important in the environmental conditions which needs innovation in constantly changing demand situations. The companies respond to the constantly changing demands of the market is directly proportional to the aperture processes related to innovation. Technology provides the ground for the emergence of an innovative culture medium to create the base of the novelty and innovation. Technology provides the base of innovation and prepares the formation of innovation and innovative culture. Despite the complexity occurred by technology, firms, that are embracing to innovative culture with their innovative perspectives kneading organizational cultures, are emerging as the most important requirement of providing a competitive advantage in global markets. However, the innovative culture is not sufficient alone within the organization and the creativity of employees is easier to maximize which is also supported by innovation. Therefore the creativity within the organization to learn and maintain a competitive advantage against other competitors is being evaluated by firms. Based on this research, the effect of innovative culture and technological complexity on organizational creativity learning efforts has been examined in this study and this relationship is shed light in this area of the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovative Culture, Organizational Creativity Learning Efforts

Kaynakça

1. Amabile T. M., (1988). “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations”, Research and Organizational Behaviour, No.10, s.123-167.
2. Amabile, T. M. ve Conti, R. (1999). “Changes in The Work Environment For Creativity During Downsizing”. Academy of Management Journal. Sayı 42, s.1154−1184.
3. Andersen, P.H. ve Kragh, H., (2013), “Managing Creativity in Business Market Relationships”, Original Research Article Industrial Marketing Management, Sayı. 42, Konu.1, s.82-85.
4. Baron, R. A. ve Tang, J., (2011), “The Role of Entrepreneurs in Firm-level Innovation: Joint Effects of Positive Affect, Creativity and Environmental Dynamism”, Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages 49-60.
5. Bharadwaj S. ve Menon A., (2000). “Making Innovation Happen in Organizations: Individual Creativity Mechanisms, Organizational Creativity Mechanisms or Both?”, Journal of Production Innovation Management, Sayı. 17, s.424-434.
6. Brettel M. ve Cleven, N.J., (2011). “Innovation Culture, Collaboration with External Partners and NPD Performance”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Sayı. 20, Konu.4, s. 253–272.
7. Çekmecelioğlu, H.G. ve Günsel, A., (2013), “The Effects of Individual Creativity and Organizational Climate on Firm Innovativeness”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Sayı. 99, s.257-264.
8. Crossan, M., Vera, D. ve Len, N. (2008), “Transcendent Leadership: Strategic Leadership in Dynamic Environments”, The Leadership Quarterly, No.19, s.569–581.

9. Darvish, H. ve Nazari, E. A. (2013).“Organizational Learning Culture - The Missing Link Between Innovative Culture and Innovations (Case Study: Saderat Bank of Iran)”.
10. Economic Insights-Trends and Challenges. Sayı 2. Konu.1, s.1-16.
11. Dobni, C.B., (2006). “The Innovation Blueprint”, Business Horizons, Sayı. 49, s.329–339.
12. Dombrowski C, Kim J.Y., Desouza K.C., Braganza A., Papagari S., Baloh P. ve Jha S. (2007). “Elements of Innovative Cultures”. Knowledge and Process Management. Sayı. 14. Konu 3, s.190-202.
13. Goncalo J. A. ve Duguid, M.M., (2012), “Follow the crowd in a new Direction: When Conformity Pressure Facilitates Group Creativity (and When it Does Not)”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Sayı.118, Konu.1, s.14-23.
14. Fang J., Cai S., ve Xu S. , (2014). “Interacting Effects of Uncertainties and Institutional Forces on Information Sharing in Marketing Channels”, Industrial Marketing Management, Sayı.43, Konu.5, s.737-746.
15. Hogan S.J. ve Coote L.V., (2013). “Organizational Culture, Innovation and Performance: A test of Schein's Model”, Journal of Business Research, s.1-13.
16. Hurley, R. ve Hult, T. (1998),`Innovation, Market Orientation and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination’’, Journal of Marketing, Sayı.62, Temmuz, s.42-54.
17. Jung D.I., Chow C. ve A. Wu, (2013). “The Role of Transformational Leadership in Enhancing Organizational Innovation: Hypothesis and Some Preliminary Findings”, Leadership Quarterly, Sayı.14, Konu.4-5, s.525-544.
18. Kitchell S., (1995), “Corporate Culture, Environmental Adaptation and Innovation Adaptation: A Qualitative / Quantitative Approach”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Sayı. 23, s.195-205.
19. Khandwalla, P. N., (1977), “The Design of Organizations”, Harcourt, Brace Javanovich Inc. USA.
20. Kohli, A. K. and B. J. Jaworski, (1990),"Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications," Journal of Marketing, Sayı. 54 (Nisan), s.1-18.
21. Laanti R., Gabrielsson M. ve P. Gabrielsson, (2007). “The Globalization Strategies of Business-to-business Born Global Firms in the Wireless Technology Industry”, Industrial Marketing Management, Sayı.36, Konu.8, s.1104-1117.
22. Leagreid P., P.G. Roness ve Verhoest K. (2011). “Explaining the Innovative Culture and Activities of State Agencies”, Organization Studies, Sayı. 32, s.1321-1347.
23. Prajogo, D.T., ve Ahmed, P.K. (2006). “Relationships Between Innovation Stimulus, Innovation Capacity and Innovation Performance”, R&D Management, Sayı. 36, Konu.5, s. 499-515.
24. Salunke S., Weerawardena J ve J. R. McColl-Kennedy, 2011. “Towards a Model of Dynamic Capabilities in Innovation-based Competitive Strategy: Insights from Projectoriented Service Firms”, Industrial Marketing Management, Sayı. 40, Konu.8, s. 1251-1263.
25. Samli C., (2012). “Generating A Culture of Innovation: The Necessary Ingredient for Economic Progress”, The Marketing Review, Sayı. 12, Konu.2, s. 125-140.
26. Skerlavaj, M. Song, J.H. ve Lee, Y. (2010). “Organizational Learning Culture, Innovative Culture and Innovations in South Korean Firms”. Expert Systems with Applications. Sayı 37, s.6391.
27. Steinberg Robert,J., O’Hara Linda A., Lubart,Todd I.,(1997), “Creativity as Investment”, California Management Review, No. 40, Sayı.1, s.8-21.
28. Tucker RB. (2002). Driving Growth Through Innovation, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.:San Francisco.
29. Waldman, D. A., Javidan, M. & Varella, P. (2004), Charismatic Leadership at the Strategic Level: A New Application of Upper Echelons Theory, The Leadership Quarterly, 15, pp.355–380.