Küresel Rekabet Gücü Konusundaki Yayınların Görsel Haritalandırılması ve Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Bir ülkenin temel amaçlarından biri, uygun serbest piyasa koşullarında ve uzun vadede halkının reel gelirini artırmaktır. Küresel rekabet gücü aynı zamanda uluslararası piyasaların standartlarını takip ederek mal ve hizmet üretme yeteneği ile de ilgilidir. Amaç: Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, 1991-2021 yılları arasında küresel rekabet gücü alanındaki yayınların, araştırmacıların, ilgili kurumların, ülkelerin ve bunların bağlantılarının görsel haritalama yoluyla ortaya çıkarılması ve bibliyometrik analizinin yapılmasıdır. Yöntem: Araştırmanın güncel verileri, Ocak 2022' de Web of Science veri tabanında indekslenen yayınlardan toplanmıştır. Veriler, 426 dergide yayınlanan 613 makalenin dahil edilme ve hariç tutulma kriterlerine göre analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada "küresel rekabet gücü" konulu yayınlardaki anahtar kavramların ortak kelime analizi, atıf analizi, ortak atıf analizi ve ülke/kurum analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Bulgular, küresel rekabet edebilirlik kavramı üzerinde çalışanların, küresel rekabet edebilirliğin temel varsayımlarını ve bu alandaki temel kavramları birlikte tartıştıklarını belirlemiştir. Diğer bir bulgu ise küresel rekabet gücüne olan ilginin her geçen gün arttığı ve bu ilginin göreli olarak gelişmiş ülkelerde daha yüksek olduğudur. Özgünlük: Ortak yazar ve atıf analizleri, farklı üniversitelerden ve ülkelerden araştırmacıların ortak çalışma kültürüne sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca küresel rekabet edebilirlik konusuna gösterilen ilgi, küresel düşüncenin gelişmesinde bilimsel kurumların önemli bir yere sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Küresel Rekabet Gücü
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Görsel Haritalama
• Ortak Atıf Analizi
• Ortak Kelime Analizi

Visual Mapping and Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Global Competitiveness

Öz

One of the primary goals of a country is to increase the real income of its people in convenient free market conditions and the long run. Global competitiveness is also related to the ability to produce goods and services following the standards of international markets. Objective: The main purpose of this research is to reveal and make the bibliometric analysis of the publications, researchers, related institutions, countries and their connections published in the field of global competitiveness between 1991-2021 through visual mapping. Method: The current data of the research were collected from the publications indexed in the Web of Science database in January 2022. We analyzed the data according to inclusion and exclusion criteria of 613 articles published in 426 journals. In the research, we made common word analysis of key concepts, citation analysis, common citation analysis, institution/university analysis, and country analysis of publications on "global competitiveness." Findings: The findings determined that those working on the concept of global competitiveness discussed the basic assumptions of global competitiveness and the basic concepts in this field together. Another finding is that the interest in global competitiveness is increasing day by day, and the interest in the subject is relatively higher in developing and developed countries. Originality: Co-author and citation analyses show that researchers from different universities and countries have a working culture. In addition, the interest shown in the issue of global competitiveness shows that scientific institutions have an important place in the development of global thought.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Global Competitiveness
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Visual Mapping
• Co-citation Analysis
• Co-word Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Aktan, C. C., & İstiklal Y. V. (2004) Rekabet gücü ve rekabet stratejileri. Ankara: Türkiye İşveren Sendikaları Konfederasyonu Yayınları
2. Aktaş C. (2003). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde rekabet politikası: Bir çerçeve çalışması, Rekabet Kurumu, Yayın No: 114.
3. Al, U. & Soydal, İ., 2012. Dergi kendine atıfının etkisi: Energy education science and technology örneği. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 26(4), 699-714.
4. Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrics: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
5. Baron, J., & Kemp, S. (2004). Support for trade restrictions, attitudes, and understanding of comparative advantage. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(5), 565-580.
6. Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F., Neubaum, D. O., 2005. A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 663-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.03.004
7. Bess, R. (2006). New Zealand seafood firm competitiveness in export markets: The role of the quota management system and aquaculture legislation. Marine Policy, 30(4), 367-378
8. Block, J., & Fisch, C. (2020). Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research, Management Review Quarterly, 70, 307-312.

9. Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
10. Davis, D. R., & Weinstein, D. E. (2003). Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: An empirical test. Journal of International Economics, 59(1), 1-23.
11. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
12. Durand, M., Madaschi, C., & Terribile, F. (1998). Trends in OECD countries' international Competitiveness: The influence of emerging market economies. Economics Department Working Papers No. 195. Paris: OECD Press.
13. Egghe, L. & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
14. Enright, M. J., & Newton, J. (2005). Determinants of tourism destination competitiveness in the Asia Pacific: Comprehensiveness and universality. Journal of Travel Research, 43(1), 339-350.
15. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
16. Fisher, E. O. N., & Kakkar, V. (2004). On the evolution of comparative advantage in matching models. Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 169-193.
17. Garfield. E. (1980). Bradford's Law and related statistical patterns. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4, 476-483.
18. Guan, J. C., Yam, R. C. M., Mok, C. K., & Ma, N. (2006). A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 971-986.
19. Higuchi, K. (2016). A two-step approach to quantitative content analysis. Ritsumeikan Social Sciences Review, 52(3), 77-89.
20. Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.3.153 Koehler, W. (2001). Information science as Little Science: The implications of a bibliometric analysis of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Scientometrics, 51(1),117-132
21. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28-46.
22. Laengle, S., Merigó, J.M., Miranda, J., Słowiński, R., Bomze, I., Borgonovo, E., & Teunter, R. (2017). Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), 803-816.
23. Laengle, S., Modak, N. M., Merigó, J. M., & De La Sotta, C. (2018). Thirty years of the International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31(12), 1247-1268.
24. Law, R., & Cheung, P. (2008). An analysis of publications in leading tourism journals and its implications on China tourism research. Journal of China Tourism Research, 4(1), 78-97.
25. Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(1), 135-158.
26. Merigó, J. M., Blanco-Mesa, F., Gil-Lafuente A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2017). Thirty years of the International Journal of Intelligent Systems: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(5), 526-554.
27. OECD (2000). The Competitiveness of European industry: 1999 Report. Working Document of the Services of the European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/2980/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native
28. Olsgaard, J. (1989). Principles and applications of information science for library professionals. Chicago: American Library Association.
29. Ovalı, S. (2014). Küresel rekabet gücü açısından Türkiye’nin konumu üzerine bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 13, 17-36.
30. Özturk, O., 2021. Bibliometric review of resource dependence theory literature: An overview. Management Review Quarterly. 71, 525-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00192-8
31. Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73-93.
32. Ruhanen, L., Weiler, B., Moyle, B. D., & McLennan, C. J. (2015). Trends and patterns in sustainable tourism research: A 25-year bibliometric analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(4), 517-535.
33. Savanur, K. P., & Hulloli, P. B. (2018). Application of Bradford's Law of scattering to the solar physics world literature: A scientometric study. Journal of Library Development, 4(1), 19-30.
34. Sim, L. L., Ong, S. E., & Agarwal, A. (2003). Singapore's competitiveness as a global city: Development strategy, institutions and business environment. Cities, 20(2), 115-127.
35. Tang, M., Liao, H., & Su, S.F. (2018). A bibliometric overview and visualization of the International Journal of Fuzzy Systems between 2007 and 2017. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(5), 1403-1422.
36. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize co-occurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(8), 1635-1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075
37. Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538.
38. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468- 2370.00083
39. Verma, S., Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057
40. Vogel, R. (2012). The visible colleges of management and organization studies: A bibliometric analysis of academic journals. Organization Studies, 33(8), 1015-1043.
41. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
42. Wang, T.Y, Lee, H.Y, Zamora, E.A, Talısayon, S.D., Supangco, V. T., Gutierrez, B. P. B., & Patalinghug, E. E. (2004). A research framework for evaluating the competitiveness of developing countries: An example of the Philippines. Asia Pacific Management Review, 9(2), 301-321.
43. World Economic Forum. (2007). The Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2006-07.pdf
44. World Economic Forum. (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf
45. Xu, Z., Yu, D., & Wang, X. (2018). A bibliometric overview of International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics between 2010 and 2017. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10, 2375-2387.
46. Yılmaz, H. O., Babazade, R., Turan, O. A., Babazade, B., Koyuncu, O., Turan, A. (2017). Scientific publication performance of Turkish anesthesia clinics in high impact factor international journals between 2005 and 2014: A bibliometric analysis. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, 45 (1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2016.16680
47. Zanakis, S. H., & Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2005). Competitiveness of nations: A knowledge discovery examination. European Journal of Operational Research, 166(1), 185-211.
48. Zupic, I. & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.