A Comparative Hermeneutic of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche for Democratic Subjectivity

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 54, 1099 - 1128, 29.12.2025

Alim Yılmaz , Didem Geylani

https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1772769

Öz

This article argues that, for democratic legitimacy to be ethically sustainable, there is a need for an individual model that combines Søren Kierkegaard's faith-based inwardness with Friedrich Nietzsche's secular self-creation within a robust understanding of the democratic subject. This article advances a comparative hermeneutic account of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche on the politics of the individual. Methodologically, the study specifies a three-step framework: (a) text-immanent reconstruction, (b) concept-level mapping, and (c) normative integration, to compare their views of subjectivity, freedom, morality, and modernity. Substantively, it argues that Kierkegaard’s inwardness (faith, accountability, anti-crowd) and Nietzsche’s self-overcoming (perspectivism, value-creation, anti-ressentiment) constitute complementary disciplines of freedom. The resulting integrative framework shows how inward responsibility and creative autonomy can underwrite democratic legitimacy and a post-secular ethical horizon resilient to technocratic flattening. The article tries to clarify its method, tighten its argumentative architecture, unpack quotations, and standardize citations and style in relation to the individual and politics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kierkegaard , Nietzsche , subjectivity , authenticity , democratic legitimacy

Kierkegaard ve Nietzsche'de Demokratik Öznellik: Karşılaştırmalı Hermenötik

Öz

Bu makale, demokratik meşruiyetin etik bakımdan sürdürülebilir olabilmesi için Søren Kierkegaard’ın iman temelli içselliği ile Friedrich Nietzsche’nin seküler öz-yaratımını güçlü demokratik özne anlayışı içinde birleştiren bir birey modeline ihtiyaç duyulduğunu savunmaktadır. Makalede Kierkegaard ile Nietzsche’nin birey ve siyaset ilişkisine dair görüşleri karşılaştırmalı hermenötik bir çerçevede ele alınmaktadır. Araştırma yöntemsel olarak üç aşamada anılan konuyu analiz etmektedir: (a) metinsel yeniden oluşturma, (b) kavramsal eleştiri, (c) normatif bütünleştirme. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular, Kierkegaard’ın içselliği -iman, hesap verebilirlik, kitle eleştirisi- ile Nietzsche’nin kendini aşma çabasının birbirini tamamlayan özgürlük disiplinleri olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bütünleşik çerçeve, içsel sorumluluk ve yaratıcı özerklik temelinde demokratik meşruiyet ve post-seküler etik için teknokratik yaratıma karşı güçlü bir zemin sunmaktadır. Makalede ele alınan birey ve siyaset ilişkisi yöntemsel netliğe ve akışa sahip olup, standart metin kullanımı ve atıf çerçevesi sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kierkegaard , Nietzsche , öznellik , özgünlük , demokratik meşruiyet

Kaynakça

• Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. The University of Chicago Press.
• Ayer, A. J. (1936). Language, truth, and logic. Penguin Books.
• Camus, A. (1991). The myth of Sisyphus and other essays (J. O'Brien, Trans.). Vintage.
• Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. MIT Press.
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). MIT Press.
• Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press.
• Kaufmann, W. (2013). Nietzsche: Philosopher, psychologist, antichrist. Princeton University Press.
• Kierkegaard, S. (1971). The present age (A. Drua, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1846)
• Kierkegaard, S. (1980). The concept of anxiety: A simple psychologically orienting deliberation on the dogmatic issue of hereditary sin (R. Thomte & A. Anderson, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
• Kierkegaard, S. (1983). Either/or (H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1843)
• Kierkegaard, S. (1986). Fear and trembling (A. Hannay, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1843)
• Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding unscientific postscript to philosophical fragments (H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1846)
• Levinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press.
• MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
• Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. Verso. Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power (W. Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published posthumously in 1901)
• Nietzsche, F. (1974). The gay science (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published in 1882)
• Nietzsche, F. (1989). Beyond good and evil: Prelude to a philosophy of the future (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1886).
• Nietzsche, F. (1997). On the genealogy of morals (C. Diethe, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1887)
• Nietzsche, F. (2005). Thus spoke Zarathustra (G. Parkes, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1883)
• Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
• Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
• Sartre, J.P. (1956). Existentialism is a humanism (P. Mairet, Trans.). World Publishing Company.
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
• Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.