TÜRKİYE’DE İSLAMİ BANKACILIK, FİNANSAL GELİŞME VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİLERİNİN DOĞRUSAL VE DOĞRUSAL OLMAYAN YÖNTEMLERLE ANALİZİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de İslami bankacılık, finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkileri, 2005:4 ve 2020:1 dönemine ilişkin çeyrekli veriler kullanılarak yürütülen doğrusal (geleneksel) ve doğrusal olmayan (Fourier serisi yaklaşımına dayanan) birim kök testleri ve Granger nedensellik analizleri aracılığıyla aydınlatılmaya çalışılmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular üç ayrı kümede özetlenebilir: (i) Geleneksel ve doğrusal olmayan Granger nedensellik tahmin yöntemlerinden elde edilen bulgular, İslami bankacılık ve ekonomik büyüme arasında herhangi bir yönde nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmadığı sonucunu ortaya koymaktadır. (ii) Geleneksel test, finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme arasında herhangi bir nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edemezken; doğrusal olmayan yöntem, finansal gelişmenin “Granger nedeni” olarak ekonomik büyümeye işaret etmektedir. (iii) Son olarak, İslami bankacılık ve finansal gelişme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi geleneksel Granger nedensellik testi ile yakalanamazken; doğrusal olmayan yöntem, bu iki değişken arasında her iki yönde Granger nedensellik bulunduğu sonucunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Türk İslami Bankacılık Endüstrisi
• Fourier Granger Nedensellik Testi
• Kesirli Fourier ADF Birim Kök Testi
• Finansal Gelişme
• Ekonomik Büyüme

THE ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG ISLAMIC BANKING, FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN TURKEY BY LINEAR AND NONLINEAR PROCEDURES

Öz

This study investigates the causal relationships among Islamic banking, financial development, and economic growth in Turkey by using quarterly data for the period 2005:4 – 2020:1 and conducting linear (conventional) as well as nonlinear (Fourier series approximation) unit root testing procedures and Granger causality analyses. The empirical findings can be classified into the following three groups: (i) The evidence from both conventional and nonlinear Granger causality methods revealed that there is no causal relationship between Islamic banking and economic growth in any direction. (ii) While the linear procedure fails to capture a causal link between financial development and economic growth, the nonlinear procedure on the contrary points to economic growth as the “Granger cause” of financial development. (iii) Finally, while the conventional Granger causality test proved to miss the causal relationship between Islamic banking and financial development, the findings from the nonlinear test disclosed that there is a two-way Granger causality between these two variables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Turkish Islamic Banking Industry
• Fourier Granger Causality Test
• Fractional Fourier ADF Unit Root Test
• Financial Development
• Economic Growth

Kaynakça

1. Bagehot, W. (1873). Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market. NY: JohnWiley and Sons Inc. 1999.
2. Baiardi, D. ve Morana, C. (2016). The Financial Kuznets Curve: Evidence for the Euro Area. Journal of Empirical Finance, 39, 265-269.
3. Banerjee, A. ve Newman, A. (1993). Occupational Choice and the Process of Development. Journal of Political Economy, 101(2), 274-298.
4. Barro, R. (2000). Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5-32.
5. BDDK (2020). Türkiye Bankacılık Sektörü Temel Göstergeleri, Mart 2020.
6. Beck, T., Levine, R. ve Levkov, A. (2009). Big Bad Banks? The Impact of U.S. Branch Deregulation on Income Distribution. NBER Working Paper(13299).
7. Beck, T., Levine, R. ve Loayza, N. (2000). Finance and the Sources of Growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 261-300.
8. Becker, R., Enders, W. ve Lee, J. (2006). A Stationarity Test in the Presence of An Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27 (3): 381-409.

9. Bozkurt, M., Altıntaş, N. ve Yardımcıoğlu, F. (2020). Katılım Bankacılığı ve Konvansiyonel Bankacılığın Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Üzerine Bir İnceleme. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 2020/1: 95-114.
10. Christopoulos, D. K. ve Leon-Ledesma, M. A. (2011). International Output Convergence, Breaks, and Asymmetric Adjustment. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics. 15 (3): 1-31.
11. Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
12. Enders, W., & Jones, P. (2016). Grain Prices, Oil Prices, and Multiple Smooth Breaks in a VAR. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 20 (4), 399–419.
13. Gallant, R. (1981). On the Bias in Flexible Functional Forms and an Essentially Unbiased Form. Journal of Econometrics, 15 (2): 211–245.
14. Goldsmith, R. W. (1969). Financial Structure and Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Granger, C. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
16. Greenwood, J. ve Jovanovic, B. (1990). Financial Development, Growth, and the Distribution of Income. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 1076-1107.
17. Gurley, J. G. ve Shaw, E. S. (1955). Financial Aspects of Economic Development. The American Economic Review, 45(4), 515-538.
18. Islamic Financial Services Board (2018). Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report.
19. Jeong, H. ve Townsend, R. (2007). Sources of TFP Growth: Occupational Choice and Financial Deepening. Economic Theory, 32(1), 179-221.
20. Jeong, H. ve Townsend, R. M. (2008). Growth and Inequality: Model Evaluation Based on An Estimation-Calibration Strategy. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 12(S2), 231-284.
21. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y. ve Snell, A. (2003). Testing for A Unit Root in the Non-linear STAR Framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359-379.
22. King, R. ve Levine, R. (1993a). Finance, Entrepreneurship and Growth Theory and Evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 513-542.
23. King, R. ve Levine, R. (1993b). Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 717-737.
24. Koçak, E. (2018). İslami Finans ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Türkiye Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Uygulama. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 51, Ocak-Haziran 2018, ss. 67-91.
25. McKinnon, R. I. (1973). Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
26. Phillips, P. B. ve Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
27. Samargandi, N., Fidrmuc, J. ve Ghosh, S. (2015). Is the Relationship Between Financial Development and Economic Growth Monotonic? Evidence from a Sample of Middle- Income Countries. World Development, 68, 66-81.
28. Schumpeter, J. A. (1911, 1934). Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and The Business Cycle. New Brunswick, USA.
29. Shaw, E. S. (1973). Financial Deepening in Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Thomson Reuters (2018). Islamic Finance Development Report 2018: Building Momentum.