AN EXPLORATORY NOTE ON THE EFFICIENT UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 19 Sayı: Temmuz 2020(Özel Ek) - Prof. Dr. Sabri ORMAN Özel Sayısı, 394 - 403, 31.07.2020

Ahmet Kara

Öz

This note extends some of the points developed in Kara (2018, 2019) so as to explore new avenues for an efficient university management. The particular avenues we will explore center around certain processes that we think are fundamental, namely the processes of accumulation, concentration and deepening of knowledge, experience, skills/capabilities and expertise that facilitate or give rise to scientific output. One can suggest policies that could influence those processes and help the university to achieve its objectives. Such policies could be derived through properly formulated and solved optimization problems involving objective functions and constraints of the university. The objective functions to be formulated should properly take into account the possible paths in the world of science and realistically reflect the university’s short and long term target and preferences. We will make some suggestions for constructing objective functions incorporating the objectives of the university.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Knowledge-Based Processes of Accumulation, Concentration and Deepening, Efficiency, University Management

ETKİN ÜNİVERSİTE YÖNETİMİ ÜZERİNE AÇIMLAYICI BİR NOT

Öz

Bu kısa makale (not), Kara (2018,2019) kapsamında geliştirilen bazı fikirlerden hareketle, etkin üniversite yönetimi ile ilgili yeni bir açılım getirmeyi denemektedir. Söz konusu açılım, bilgi, tecrübe, yeterlik ve yetkinliklerle ilgili birikme, yoğunlaşma ve derinleşme süreçlerine odaklanmakta; bu süreçleri etkileyerek, üniversiteyi amaçlarına taşıyacak bazı politikalara işaret etmektedir. Bu politikalar, üniversitenin amaç fonksiyonları ve kısıtlarına dayalı, doğru formüle edilmiş optimizasyon problemlerinin çözümlerinden türetilebilirler. Formüle edilecek amaç fonksiyonlarının, üniversitenin kısa ve uzun dönem hedef ve tercihlerini, dünya bilimindeki doğrultuları da dikkate alarak, gerçekçi bir tarzda yansıtmaları gerekir. Makalede, üniversitenin amaçlarını temsil edecek amaç fonksiyonlarının kurgusu ile ilgili bazı önerilerde de bulunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilgi-Temelli Birikme, Yoğunlaşma ve Derinleşme Süreçleri, Etkinlik, Üniversite Yönetimi

Kaynakça

• Abramo, G., Cicero, T. & D'Angelo, C.A. (2012). Revisiting size effects in higher education research productivity. Higher Education, 63 (6), 701-717.
• Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.A. & Di Costa, F. (2014). Investigating returns to scope of research fields in universities. Higher Education, 68 (1), 69-85.
• Barlas, Y. & Diker V. (2000). A Dynamic Simulation Game for Strategic University Management, Simulation and Gaming, 31(3), 331-358.
• Barlas, Y., Diker, V. & Polat, S. (Eds.). (1997). Systems approach to learning and education into the 21st century (Proceedings of 15th International System Dynamics Conference). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
• Dzisah, J. (2007). Institutional transformations in the regime of knowledge production: The University as a catalyst for the science-based knowledge economy, Asian Journal of Social Science, 35(1), 126-140.
• Ehrenberg, R. G. (2020). Akademinin yönetimi: Modern Üniversite’de sorunlu kim? Küre Yayınları.
• Hage, J., Mote, J.E. & Jordan, G. B. (2013). Ideas, innovations, and networks: a new policy model based on the evolution of knowledge. Policy Sciences (Special Issue: Protecting and Sustaining Indigenous People's Traditional Environmental knowledge and Cultural Practice), 46(2), 199-216.
• Häyrinen-Alestalo, M. & Peltola, U. (2006). The problem of a market-oriented university, Higher Education, 52(2), 251-281.
• Ivanov, V.V., Markusova, V.A. & Mindeli, L.E. (2016). Government investments and the publishing activity of higher educational institutions: Bibliometric analysis, Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 86 (4), 314-321.
• Kara, A. (1996). The economic self as a multidimensional complexity: Towards a critique and reconstruction of economic theory [Ph. D. dissertation]. The University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Microfilm version, UMI.
• Kara, A. (2007). Discrete stochastic dynamics of income inequality in education. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. 2007(1), 1-15.
• Kara, A. (2009). Implications of multiple preferences for a deconstructive critique and a reconstructive revision of economic theory. Journal of Economic & Social Research, 11(1), 69-78.
• Kara, A. (2013). Dynamics of education and technology in higher education. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 42(1), 87-99.
• Kara, A. (2015). Simulations of technology-induced and crisis-led stochastic and chaotic fluctuations in higher education processes, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(2), 303-312.
• Kara, A. (2018). Escaping mediocre-quality, low-productivity, low-performance traps at universities in developing countries: A human capital-based structural equation model with system-dynamics simulations, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(3), 541-559.
• Kara, A. (2019, April 21-24). Bilgi çağı Türkiye'sinde üniversite yönetimi [Conference presentation]. 15th International Conference on Knowledge, Economy & Management, Rabat, Morocco.
• Kosslyn, S. M. (Editor), Nelson, B. (Editor) and Kerrey, B. (2018). Building the intentional university: Minerva and the future of higher education. The MIT Press.
• Lach, S. and Schankerman, M. (2008). Incentives and invention in universities, The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(2), 403-433.
• Metcalfe, J. S. (2010). University and business relations: Connecting the knowledge economy. Minerva, 48 (1), 5-33.
• Munoz, D.A. (2016). Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile: A data envelopment analysis approach, International Journal of Educational Management, 30 (6), 809-825.
• Owen-Smith, J. (2018). Research universities and the public good: Discovery for an uncertain future (Innovation and technology in the world economy). Stanford Business Books.
• Parrilli, M.D. & Elola, A. (2012). The strength of science and technology drivers for SME innovation. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 897-907.
• Ramos-Vielba, I. and Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2012). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university—industry linkages. Higher Education, 64(2), 237-265.
• Shin, J.C. (2009). Building world-class research university: The brain korea 21 project. Higher Education, 58(5), 669-688.
• Simai, M. (2003). Knowledge, research, development and innovations: Some ideas from a research program. Society and Economy, 25(3), 305-319.
• Spencer, J. W. (2001). How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States-Japan comparison. The Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2), 432-440.
• Walton, A. L., Tornatzky, L. G. & Eveland, J. D. (1986). Research Management at the University Department. Science &Technology Studies, 4 (3/4), 35-38.