Environmental Intervention: An Activist Idea or Legal Tool? An Analysis of the Possibilities of Environmental Protection under the Principle of Non-Intervention

Öz

Climate change is arguably the single most important threat to all life on Earth. Through the 2015 Paris Agreement and annual United Nations (UN) climate change conferences, the international community has attempted to rally universal support for mandatory greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. If attained, it is likely that destructive global temperature rises would be at least slowed. The fact that States agree to pursue environmental protection objectives, but routinely fail to act accordingly provides essential context for this four-section critical discussion. ‘Environmental intervention’ as contemplated by this research topic is more than a mere activist idea. It necessarily represents a valid international law alternative given that the entire world faces a potentially catastrophic climate emergency. The various points considered in this discussion confirm that unilateral State intervention to prevent transborder pollution created in another State might seem justified under well-recognised ‘Responsibility to Protect’ principles. The materials assembled for present discussion purposes support an alternative conclusion. The combined effect of the international law emphasis placed on State sovereignty, and a dysfunctional, inconsistent international community commitment to achieving actual climate change mitigation likely condemns to failure any environmental intervention measures that the UN might advance through proposed treaties or similar international agreements.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environmental Intervention
• Responsibility to Protect
• Climate Change
• The Principle of Non-Intervention
• Humanitarian Intervention

Kaynakça

1. Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment of 27 June 1986, (1986) ICJ Rep 14 (1986) google scholar
2. Certain Activities Carried Out By Nicaragua In the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) (Compensation Owed By The Republic Of Nicaragua To The Republic Of Costa Rica) (2018) [Online] < https:// www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/150/150-20180202-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf> [17 October 2023] google scholar
3. Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2004 (ICJ) google scholar
4. Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) 1997 I.C.J. 7 (ICJ), reprinted in 37 I.L.M. 162 (1998) google scholar
5. Trail Smelter Case (United States v Canada) (1935, 1938, 1941) [Online] [17 October 2023] google scholar
6. Charter of the United Nations 1945 (UN) google scholar
7. Convention For Settlement Of Difficulties Arising From Operation Of Smelter At Trail, B.C. 1935 google scholar
8. International Court of Justice Statute 1946 (UN) google scholar

9. Paris Agreement 2015 (UN) google scholar
10. Security Council Resolution 1160 (1998) google scholar
11. Security Council Resolution 2014 (2011) google scholar
12. Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998 (UN) google scholar
13. UN Charter 1945 google scholar
14. UNGA Resolution 76/300, ‘The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment’ (28 July 2022) google scholar
15. Vienna Convention on the law of treaties 1969 (UN) google scholar
16. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1980 (UN) google scholar
17. Beckman, R ‘The Relationship Between UNCLOS and IMO Instruments’ (2017) 2(2) Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy 245 google scholar
18. Betlem, G ‘Trail Smelter II: Transnational Application of CERCLA’ (2007) 19(3) Journal of Environmental Law 396 google scholar
19. Bratspies, R ‘Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration’ (2006), in Transboundary Harm In International Law: Lessons From The Trail Smelter Arbitration, Rebecca M. Bratspies & Russell A. Miller, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2006 (Article updated in 2012], [Online] ]17 October 2023] google scholar
20. Brunnee, J ‘The Sources of International Environmental Law: Interactional Law’ (2017) Samantha Besson & Jean d’Aspremont, eds., Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (2017) [Online] [16 October 2023] google scholar
21. Farrall, J ‘The Populist Challenge and the Future of the United Nations Security Council’ (May 2020) 35 Maryland Journal of International Law 1 [Online] [19 October 2023] google scholar
22. Giladi, R and Shany, Y ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of the International Court of Justice’ (December 2020), in the Cambridge Companion to the International Court of 'Jusiice, Carlos Esposito, Kate Parlett and Callista Harris [Online] [19 October 2023] google scholar
23. Nakamichi, M ‘The International Court of Justice Decision Regarding the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project’ (2017) 9(2) Fordham Law Review 337 google scholar
24. Pepper, R and Hobbs, H ‘The Environment is All Rights: Human Rights, Constitutional Rights and Environmental Rights’ (2020) 44(2) Melbourne University Law Review 1 google scholar
25. Stephan, P ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’ (January 2020), in Palgrave Handbook of International Political Theory (Palgrave MacMillan: New York, Howard Williams, David Boucher, Peter Sutch & David A. Reidy, eds., (2021) [Online] [18 October 2023] google scholar
26. Trahan, J Existing Legal Limits to Security Council Veto Power in the Face of Atrocity Crimes (Cambridge University Press, 2020) google scholar
27. Axelsson, E and Schill, V ‘Eco-Intervention, the Protection of Sovereignty and the Duty of the Sovereign State to Protect the Environment: An Analysis of Eco-Intervention in Connection with the Principle of Sovereignty and Other Norms of International Law’ (2021) [Online] [17 October 2023] google scholar
28. Ansong, A ‘The Concept of Sovereign Equality of States in International Law’ 2(1) GIMPA Law Review, 14 34 (2016) [16 October 2023] google scholar
29. Britannica ‘The nature and development of international law’ (October 2023) [Online] www.britannica.com/topic/international-law#Definition%20and%20scope> [14 October 2023] google scholar
30. Desierto, D ‘Environmental Damages, Environmental Reparations, and the Right to a Healthy Environment: The ICJ Compensation Judgment in Costa Rica v. Nicaragua and the IACtHR Advisory Opinion on Marine Protection for the Greater Caribbean’ (2018) EJIL Talk [Online] [17 October 2023] google scholar
31. Dennis, B ‘The U.N. chief’s relentless, frustrating pursuit to bring the world together on climate change’ (October 2021) Washington Post [Online] [19 October 2023] google scholar
32. Dreyer, J ‘Military Intervention in Environmental Affairs’ (2011) APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper [Online] [16 October 2023] google scholar
33. Geneva Environmental Network, ‘Human rights and the environment’ (2022) [Online] www.genevaenvironmentnetwork.org/resources/updates/human-rights-and-the-environment/> [15 October 2023] google scholar
34. Giannini, R ‘The Rule of Law: State Sovereignty vs. International Obligations’ (2014) [14 October 2023] google scholar
35. Jervan, M ‘The Prohibition of Transboundary Environmental Harm. An Analysis of the Contribution of the International Court of Justice to the Development of the No-Harm Rule’ (2014; revised 2020) [Online] [16 October 2023] google scholar
36. Ibrahim, I ‘The Paris Agreement Compliance Mechanism: Preparing For COP 26 In Glasgow And Beyond’ (2021) 11 Wake Forest Law Review Online [Online] [27 February 2024]. google scholar
37. International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘Occupation and international humanitarian law: questions’ (2023) [Online] [16 October 2023] google scholar
38. International Court of Justice ‘Jurisdiction’ (2023) [Online] [17 October 2023] google scholar
39. Pardo, K ‘Uneven Evolution of Regional European Summer Heatwaves Under Climate Change’ (2023) [Online] [14 October 2023] google scholar
40. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2023) [Online] [20 October 2023] google scholar
41. International Maritime Organization (IMO) ‘Structure of IMO’ (2024) [Online] [5 March 2024] google scholar
42. Karim, S ‘IMO Institutional Structure and Law-Making Process. In: Prevention of Pollution of the Marine Environment from Vessels’ (2015) [5 March 2024]. google scholar
43. Punella, C ‘An International Environmental Law case study: The Trail Smelter Arbitration’ (2014) InternationalPollution Issues [Online] [17 October 2023] google scholar
44. Rotter, C ‘Watts Up with That? COP28 in Dubai: A Crossroads of Rhetoric and Reality’ (2023) [Online] [16 October 2023] google scholar
45. Savaresi, A ‘The Paris Agreement: Reflections on an International Law Odyssey’ (2022) 8(7) ESIL Conference Paper Series [Online] [17 October 2023] google scholar
46. Smith, K ‘A reflection on the Responsibility to Protect in 2020’ (2020) [Online] [16 October 2023] google scholar
47. Stankovic, T ‘The Paris Agreement’s inherent tension between ambition and compliance’ (September 2023) Nature [Online] [18 October 2023] google scholar
48. United Nations ‘The right to a healthy environment’ (2022) [Online] [14 October 2023] google scholar
49. United Nations ‘Security Council Strongly Condemns Attacks against Critical Infrastructure, Unanimously Adopting Resolution 2573 (2021) [Online] [16 October 2023] google scholar
50. UNESCO ‘Heard and McDonald Islands’ (2023) [Online] [17 October 2023] google scholar
51. United Nations General Assembly, ‘Rio Declaration On Environment And Development’ (also A/ CONF.151/26 (Vol. I) (1992) [Online] [16 October 2023] google scholar
52. UN Meetings Coverage and Press Releases (SG/SM (2021)” ‘New United Nations climate change report ‘red alert’ for planet, Secretary-General says, warning current emission plans not enough to adequately curb global temperature rise’ (2022) [Online] [19 October 2023] google scholar
53. United Nations Security Council ‘Current Members’ (2023) [Online] [20 October 2023] google scholar
54. Varella, M ‘Right of Intervention and Right to Environmental Intervention’ (September 2019) [Online] [15 October 2023] google scholar
55. Voigt, C ‘International Environmental Responsibility and Liability’ (February 2021) [Online] [15 October 2023] google scholar
56. Werrell, C and Femia, F ‘Climate Change, the Erosion of State Sovereignty, and World Order’ (2016) 22(2) Brown Journal of World Affairs 221, 235 [Online] google scholar