Effect of Belief in Free Will on the Intensity of Third-Party Punishment

Öz

The institutionalized criminal justice mechanisms are built on two psychological and social traits: third-party punishment (TPP) and belief in free will (BFW). TPP is the administration of a sanction to a transgressor by an individual not affected by the transgression. BFW posits that humans are in control of their actions. Previous studies have indicated that BFW influences TPP. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the level of BFW has an impact on the magnitude of punishment in TPP tasks. Furthermore, it questions whether the degree of affective arousal of the punisher creates an additional effect on the magnitude of the punishment. Our basic hypothesis is that the BFW and punishment magnitude are positively correlated. We also hypothesize that the expected positive correlation between BFW and punishment magnitude will be more manifest in low-affect scenarios than in highaffect ones. Participants (N = 726) were given 49 hypothetical crime scenarios categorized as low- and high-affect cases. Upon reading each scenario, the participants were tasked to attribute a penalty between the two given options. Our results showed that the level of BFW was positively correlated with the degree of punishment administered in the hypothetical crime scenarios and that the average punishment magnitude for participants with a low level of BFW increased in the high-affect crime scenarios. We assume that our results would shed light on the underlying causes of public reactions to criminal sentencing policies, thus helping lawmakers in enacting better regulations in this respect.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Belief in free will
• third-party punishment
• high-low affect
• criminal sentencing policies
• lawmaking

Kaynakça

1. Alper S ve Sümer N, ‘Özgür irade ve belirlenimcilik ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlaması ve psikometrik özellikleri’ (2017) 20 Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 26. google scholar
2. Alquist J L, Ainsworth S E and Baumeister R F, ‘Determined to conform: Disbelief in free will increase conformity’ (2013) 49 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 80. google scholar
3. Ashworth A, Horder J, Principles of criminal law, (Oxford University Press, 7th ed. 2013) google scholar
4. Atabey G, Siyasal katılım ile siyasal yeterlik, toplumsal cinsiyet, sistemi meşrulaştırma ve dini yönelim değişkenlerinin ilişkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (2017). google scholar
5. Baumeister R, Crescioni A and Alquist J, ‘Free will as advanced action control for human social life and culture’ (2010) 4 Neuroethics 1. google scholar
6. Baumeister R F, Masicampo E J and Dewall C N, ‘Prosocial benefits of feeling free: disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness’ (2009) 35 Personality & social psychology bulletin 260.google scholar
7. Bobzien S, Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford University Press 2001). google scholar
8. Buckholtz J W, Asplund C L, Dux P E, Zald D H, Gore J C, Jones O D and Marois R, ‘The Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment’ (2008) 60 Neuron 930.google scholar

9. Buckholtz J and Marois R, ‘The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement’ (2012) 15 Nature Neuroscience 655. google scholar
10. Carey J and Paulhus D, ‘Worldview implications of believing in free-will and/or determinism: Politics, morality, and punitiveness’ (2013) 81 Journal of Personality 130. google scholar
11. Carlsmith K M, Darley J M and Robinson P H, ‘Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment’ (2002) 83 JournaL of Personality and Social Psychology 284. google scholar
12. Caspar E A, Vuillaume L, Magalhâes De Saldanha da Gama P A and Cleeremans A, ‘The influence of (Dis)beLief in free will on immoral behavior’ (2017) 8 Frontiers in Psychology. google scholar
13. CLark C J, Luguri J B, Ditto P H, Knobe J, Shariff A F and Baumeister R F, ‘Free to punish: A motivated account of free will belief’ (2014) 106 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 501. google scholar
14. CLark C J, Winegard B and Baumeister R F, ‘Forget the FoLk: Moral Responsibility Preservation Motives and Other Conditions for CompatibiLism’ 10 Frontiers in Psychology. google scholar
15. Cova F and Kitano Y, ‘ExperimentaL phiLosophy and the compatibility of free wll and determinism: A survey’ (2014) 22 Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 17. google scholar
16. Crone D L and LevY N L, ‘Are free-wiLL beLievers nicer people? (Four studies suggest not)’ (2019) 10 Social PsYchoLogicaL and PersonaLitY Science 612. google scholar
17. Cushman F, ‘Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment’ (2008) 108 Cognition 353. google scholar
18. ÇaL B, (2018), ‘Müşteri Değeri Yaratmak: Düşünme Tarzlarının Müşteri Deneyimi ile Etkileşimi’ 10 İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi 115. google scholar
19. Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V and Heier H, ‘Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles’ (1996) 71 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 390. google scholar
20. Everett J A C, CLark C J, MeindL P, Luguri J B, Earp B D, Graham J, Ditto P H and Shariff A F, ‘PoLiticaL differences in free wiLL beLief are associated with differences in moraLization’ (2021) 120 JournaL of PersonaLitY and SociaL PsYchoLogY 461. google scholar
21. Ewusi-Boisvert E and Racine E, ‘A criticaL review of methodoLogies and resuLts in recent research on beLief in free wiLL’ (2018) 11 Neuroethics 97. google scholar
22. FeLdman G, Chandrashekar S B and Wong K F K, ‘The freedom to exceL: BeLief in free wiLL predicts better academic performance’ (2016) 90 PersonaLitY and IndividuaL Differences 377. google scholar
23. FeLtz A and Cova F, ‘MoraL responsibiLitY and free wiLL: A meta-anaLYsis’ (2014) 30 Consciousness and Cognition 234. google scholar
24. GoLdberg L R ‘The deveLopment of markers for the Big-Five factor structure’ (1992) PsYchoLogicaL Assessment 26. google scholar
25. Genschow O, Cracco E, Schneider J, Protzko J, Wisniewski D, Brass M and SchooLer J W ‘ManipuLating BeLief in Free WiLL and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-AnaLYsis’ (2022) 27 PersonaLitY and SociaL PsYchoLogY Review 52.google scholar
26. Greene J and Cohen J, ‘For the Law, neuroscience changes nothing and everYthing’ (2004) 359 PhiLos Trans R Soc Lond B BioL Sci 1775. google scholar
27. HaYnes S, Rojas D and VineY W ‘Free wiLL, determinism, and punishment’ (2003) 93 PsYchoLogicaL Reports 1013. google scholar
28. Henningham J P, ‘A 12-item scaLe of sociaL conservatism’ (1996) 20 PersonaLitY and IndividuaL Differences 517. google scholar
29. John O P and Srivastava S, ‘The Big Five Trait taxonomY: HistorY, measurement, and theoreticaL perspectives’ in L. A. Pervin and O. P. google scholar
30. John (eds.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research (GuiLford Press 1999). google scholar
31. Jost J T, Banaji M R and Nosek B A, ‘A decade of sYstem justification theorY: AccumuLated evidence of conscious and unconscious boLstering of the status quo’ (2004) 25 PoLiticaL PsYchoLogY 881. google scholar
32. Jost J T and Burgess D, ‘AttitudinaL ambivaLence and the conflict between group and sYstem justification motives in Low status groups’ (2000) 26 PersonaLitY and SociaL PsYchoLogY BuLLetin 293. google scholar
33. Jost J T and HunYadY O, ‘Antecedents and consequences of sYstem-justifYing ideoLogies’ (2005) 14 Current Directions in PsYchoLogicaL Science 260.google scholar
34. KaY A C and Jost J T, ‘CompLementarY justice: effects of “poor but happY” and “poor but honest” stereotYpe exempLars on sYstem justification and impLicit activation of the justice motive’ 85 JournaL of PersonaLitY and SociaL PsYchoLogY 823. google scholar
35. Koca M, ÜzüLmez İ, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Seçkin, 16. Baskı 2023) google scholar
36. Krueger F, Hoffman M, WaLter H and Grafman J, ‘An fMRI investigation of the effects of beLief in free wiLL on third-partY punishment’ (2014) 9 SociaL Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 1143. google scholar
37. KurY H and Ferdinand T, ‘PubLic opinion and punitivitY’ (1999) 22 InternationaL journaL of Law and psYchiatrY 373. google scholar
38. Lee Y and Warneken F, ‘The influence of age and experience of (un)fairness on third-partY punishment in chiLdren’ (2022) 31 SociaL DeveLopment 1176.google scholar
39. Liang F, Tan Q, Zhan Y, Wu X and Li J, ‘SeLfish or aLtruistic? The influence of thinking stYLes and stereotYpes on moraL decision-making’ (2020) PersonaLitY and IndividuaL Differences 110465 google scholar
40. Nadelhoffer T, Shepard J, Crone D, Everett J, Earp B and Levy N, ‘Does encouraging a belief in determinism increase cheating? Recon-sidering the vaLue of beLieving in free wiLL’ (2020) 203 Cognition 104342 google scholar
41. NichoLs S and Knobe J, ‘MoraL responsibiLitY and determinism: The cognitive science of foLk intuition’ (2007) 41 Noûs 663. google scholar
42. Pacini R and Epstein S, ‘The reLation of rationaL and experientiaL information processing stYLes to personaLitY, basic beLiefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon’ (1999) 76 JournaL of personaLitY and sociaL psYchoLogY 972. google scholar
43. Partington M, Introduction to the English legal system (Oxford UniversitY Press, 8th ed. 2013) google scholar
44. PauLhus D and CareY J, ‘The FAD-PLus: Measuring LaY beLiefs regarding free wiLL and reLated constructs’ (2011) 93 JournaL of PersonaLitY Assessment 96. google scholar
45. RiedL K, Jensen K, CaLL J and TomaseLLo M, ‘No third-partY punishment in chimpanzees’ (2012) 109 Proceedings of The NationaL AcademY of Sciences 14824. google scholar
46. Roberts S C, Vakirtzis A, Kristjânsdottir L and HavLîcek J, ‘Who punishes? PersonaLitY traits predict individuaL variation in punitive sentiment’ (2013) 11 EvoLutionarY PsYchoLogY 186. google scholar
47. Rodriguez-Ruiz C, Munoz-ReYes J A, IgLesias-JuLios M, Sânchez-Pages S and Turiegano E, ‘Sex affects the reLationship between third partY punishment and cooperation’ (2019) Scientific Report 4288 google scholar
48. Roxin C, Arzt G and Tiedemann K, Einführung in das Strafrecht und Strafprozessrecht (MüLLer Juristischer VerLag 1983). google scholar
49. Sarkissian H, Chatterjee A, de Brigand F, Knobe J, NichoLs S and Sirker S, ‘Is beLief in free wiLL a cuLturaL universaL?’ (2010) 25 Mind & Language 346.google scholar
50. Schwartz F, Djeriouat H and TremoLiere B, ‘The association between personaLitY traits and third-partY moraL judgment: A preregistered studY’ (2021) Acta PsYchoLogica 103392. google scholar
51. Shariff A F and Vohs K, ‘The worLd without free wiLL’ (2014) Scientific American 76. google scholar
52. Shariff A F, Greene J D, Karremans J C, Luguri J B, CLark C J, SchooLer J W, Baumeister R F and Vohs K D, ‘Free wiLL and punishment: a mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution’ (2014) PsYchoLogicaL science 1563. google scholar
53. Singer R and La Fond J, Criminal Law (WoLters KLuwer 2013) google scholar
54. Sommers T, ‘ExperimentaL phiLosophY and free wiLL’ (2010) 5 PhiLosophY Compass 199. google scholar
55. Spiranovic C A, Roberts L D and Indermaur D, ‘What predicts punitiveness? An examination of predictors of punitive attitudes towards offenders in Australia’ (2012) 19 Psychiatry, PsychoLogy and Law 249. google scholar
56. Stroessner S and Green C, ‘Effects of beLief in free will or determinism on attitudes toward punishment and Locus of control’ (1990) 130 The Journal of Social Psychology789. google scholar
57. Tatar A, ‘Büyük Beş-50 KişiLik Testinin Türkçeye çevirisi ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri Kısa Formu ile karşılaştırılması’ (2017) 18 Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 51.google scholar
58. Viney W, Parker-Martin P and Dotten S, ‘BeLiefs in free will and determinism and Lack of relation to punishment rationale and magnitude’ (1988) 115 The Journal of General Psychology 15. google scholar
59. Viney W, Waldman D and BarchiLon J, ‘Attitudes toward punishment in relation to beLiefs in free will and determinism’ (1982) 35 Human ReLations 939.google scholar
60. Vohs K and Schooler J, ‘The value of believing in free will’ (2008) 19 Psychological Science 49. google scholar
61. Wegner D, The Illusion of Conscious Will (The MIT Press 2002). google scholar
62. Yıldırım N ve Akgün S, ‘Sivil Toplum Kuruluşu Gönüllülerinin Sosyal Sistemin Meşruiyetine İlişkin Algıları, Adil Dünya İnançları ve Sosyal Baskınlık Yönelimleri’ (2013) 24 Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet 115.google scholar
63. Yılmaz O and Sarıbay S A, ‘An Attempt to Clarify the Link between Cognitive Style and Political Ideology: A Non-Western Replication and Extension’, (2016) 11 Judgment and Decision Making 287. google scholar
64. Ylmaz O, BahçekapıLı H G and Harma M, ‘Different types of reLigiosity and Lay intuitions about free will/determinism in Turkey’ (2018) 28 The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 89. google scholar