BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 3, 111 - 116, 20.07.2014

Yasin Arifoğlu , Merih İş Özdemir Sevinç Çağatay Barut

Anahtar Kelimeler

Servikal vertebra intervertebral disk morfometri direkt radyografi cinsiyet

Kaynakça

  • 1. Heler JG, Pedlow FX Jr, Gill SS. Anatomy of the cervical spine. In: Clark CR, ed. The Cervical Spine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2005. p. 3-36.
  • 2. Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, et al. Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1992; 17: 299-306.
  • 3. Ayd›nl›o¤lu A. Discus intervertebralis: De¤iflen fonksiyonel özellikler(III). Van T›p Dergisi 1998; 5: 106-110.
  • 4. Ghanayem AJ, Paxinos O. Functional Anatomy of joints, ligaments, and discs. In: Clark CR. Ed. The Cervical Spine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2005. p. 46-54.
  • 5. White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; 109: 85-96.
  • 6. Hirsch C. The reaction of intervertebral discs to compression forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1955; 37: 1188- 1196.
  • 7. Virgin WJ. Experimental investigations into the physical properties of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1951; 33: 607-611.
  • 8. Hendry NG. The hydration of the nucleus pulposus and its relation to intervertebral disc derangement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1958; 40: 132-144.
  • 9. McBroom RJ, Hayes WC, Edwards WT, et al. Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 1206-1214.
  • 10. Montgomery DM, Brower RS. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical syndrome and natural history. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23: 487-493.
  • 11. Friedenberg ZB, Edeiken J, Spencer HN, Tolentino SC. Degenerative changes in the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959; 41: 61-70.
  • 12. Stookey B. Compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots by herniation of nucleus pulposus in cervical region. Arch Surg 1940; 40: 417.
  • 13. Brain WR, Northfield D, Wilkinson M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain 1952; 75: 187-225.
  • 14. Gore DR. Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up. Spine 2001; 26: 2463-2466.
  • 15. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 1986; 11: 521-524.
  • 16. Harrison DD, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Murphy DJ. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996; 19: 398-405.
  • 17. Borden AG, Rechtman AM, Gershon-Cohen J. The normal cervical lordosis. Radiology 1960; 74: 806- 809.
  • 18. Hald HJ, Danz B, Schwab R, et al. Radiographically demonstrable spinal changes in asymptomatic young men. Rofo 1995; 163: 4-8.
  • 19. Juhl JH, Miller SM, Roberts GW. Roentgenographic variations in the normal cervical spine. Radiology 1962; 78: 591-597.
  • 20. Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, et al. Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99(1 Suppl): 80-83.
  • 21. Cheng XG, Sun Y, Bonen S, et al. Measurements of vertebral shape by radiographic morphometry: sex differences and relationships with vertebral level and lumbar lordosis. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27: 380-384.
  • 22. EPOS Study Group Authors. Incidence of vertebral fracture in europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 716-724.
  • 23. Goh S, Price RI, Song S, et al. Magnetic resonancebased vertebral morphometry of the thoracic spine: age, gender and level-specific influences. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000; 15: 417-425.
  • 24. Goh S, Tan C, Price RI, et al. Influence of age and gender on thoracic vertebral body shape and disc degeneration: an MR investigation of 169 cases. J Anat 2000; 4: 647-657.
  • 25. Weber K, Lunt M, Gowin W, et al. Measurement imprecision in vertebral morphometry of spinal radiographs obtained in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study: consequences for the identification of prevalent and incident deformities. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 957-966.
  • 26. Schmitt H, Dubljanin E, Schneider S, Schiltenwolf M. Radiographic changes in the lumbar spine in former elite athletes. Spine 2004; 29: 2554-2559.
  • 27. Shao Z, Rompe G, Schiltenwolf M. Radiographic changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs and lumbar vertebrae with age. Spine 2002; 27: 263-268.
  • 28. Burger H, Van Daele PL, Grashuis K, et al. Vertebral deformities and functional impairment in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 152-157.
  • 29. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, et al. Precision measurement of disc height, vertebral height and sagittal plane displacement from lateral radiographic views of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1997; 12(Suppl 1): 1-63.
  • 30. Ismail AA, Cooper C, Felsenberg D, et al. Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1999; 9: 206-213.
  • 31. Rea JA, Steiger P, Blake GM, et al. Morphometric Xray absorptiometry: reference data for vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 464-474.
  • 32. O'Neill TW, Varlow J, Felsenberg D, etal Variation in vertebral height ratios in population studies. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 1895-907.
  • 33. Lawrence JS. Disc degeneration. Its frequency and relationship to symptoms. Ann Rheum Dis 1969; 28: 121-138.
  • 34. Horwitz T. Degenerative lesions in the cervical portion of the spine. Arch Intern Med 1940; 55; 1178.
  • 35. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Rheumatism in miners. II. X-ray study. Br J Ind Med 1952; 9: 197-207.
  • 36. Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 1178-1184.
  • 37. Holt S, Yates PO. Cervical spondylosis and nerve root lesions. Incidence at routine necropsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1966; 48: 407-423.
  • 38. Tomomitsu T, Murase K, Sone T, Fukunaga M. Comparison of vertebral morphometry in the lumbar vertebrae by T1-weighted sagittal MRI and radiograph. Eur J Radiol 2005; 56: 102-106.

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 3, 111 - 116, 20.07.2014

Yasin Arifoğlu , Merih İş Özdemir Sevinç Çağatay Barut

Kaynakça

  • 1. Heler JG, Pedlow FX Jr, Gill SS. Anatomy of the cervical spine. In: Clark CR, ed. The Cervical Spine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2005. p. 3-36.
  • 2. Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, et al. Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1992; 17: 299-306.
  • 3. Ayd›nl›o¤lu A. Discus intervertebralis: De¤iflen fonksiyonel özellikler(III). Van T›p Dergisi 1998; 5: 106-110.
  • 4. Ghanayem AJ, Paxinos O. Functional Anatomy of joints, ligaments, and discs. In: Clark CR. Ed. The Cervical Spine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2005. p. 46-54.
  • 5. White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; 109: 85-96.
  • 6. Hirsch C. The reaction of intervertebral discs to compression forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1955; 37: 1188- 1196.
  • 7. Virgin WJ. Experimental investigations into the physical properties of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1951; 33: 607-611.
  • 8. Hendry NG. The hydration of the nucleus pulposus and its relation to intervertebral disc derangement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1958; 40: 132-144.
  • 9. McBroom RJ, Hayes WC, Edwards WT, et al. Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 1206-1214.
  • 10. Montgomery DM, Brower RS. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical syndrome and natural history. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23: 487-493.
  • 11. Friedenberg ZB, Edeiken J, Spencer HN, Tolentino SC. Degenerative changes in the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959; 41: 61-70.
  • 12. Stookey B. Compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots by herniation of nucleus pulposus in cervical region. Arch Surg 1940; 40: 417.
  • 13. Brain WR, Northfield D, Wilkinson M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain 1952; 75: 187-225.
  • 14. Gore DR. Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up. Spine 2001; 26: 2463-2466.
  • 15. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 1986; 11: 521-524.
  • 16. Harrison DD, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Murphy DJ. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996; 19: 398-405.
  • 17. Borden AG, Rechtman AM, Gershon-Cohen J. The normal cervical lordosis. Radiology 1960; 74: 806- 809.
  • 18. Hald HJ, Danz B, Schwab R, et al. Radiographically demonstrable spinal changes in asymptomatic young men. Rofo 1995; 163: 4-8.
  • 19. Juhl JH, Miller SM, Roberts GW. Roentgenographic variations in the normal cervical spine. Radiology 1962; 78: 591-597.
  • 20. Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, et al. Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99(1 Suppl): 80-83.
  • 21. Cheng XG, Sun Y, Bonen S, et al. Measurements of vertebral shape by radiographic morphometry: sex differences and relationships with vertebral level and lumbar lordosis. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27: 380-384.
  • 22. EPOS Study Group Authors. Incidence of vertebral fracture in europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 716-724.
  • 23. Goh S, Price RI, Song S, et al. Magnetic resonancebased vertebral morphometry of the thoracic spine: age, gender and level-specific influences. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000; 15: 417-425.
  • 24. Goh S, Tan C, Price RI, et al. Influence of age and gender on thoracic vertebral body shape and disc degeneration: an MR investigation of 169 cases. J Anat 2000; 4: 647-657.
  • 25. Weber K, Lunt M, Gowin W, et al. Measurement imprecision in vertebral morphometry of spinal radiographs obtained in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study: consequences for the identification of prevalent and incident deformities. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 957-966.
  • 26. Schmitt H, Dubljanin E, Schneider S, Schiltenwolf M. Radiographic changes in the lumbar spine in former elite athletes. Spine 2004; 29: 2554-2559.
  • 27. Shao Z, Rompe G, Schiltenwolf M. Radiographic changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs and lumbar vertebrae with age. Spine 2002; 27: 263-268.
  • 28. Burger H, Van Daele PL, Grashuis K, et al. Vertebral deformities and functional impairment in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 152-157.
  • 29. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, et al. Precision measurement of disc height, vertebral height and sagittal plane displacement from lateral radiographic views of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1997; 12(Suppl 1): 1-63.
  • 30. Ismail AA, Cooper C, Felsenberg D, et al. Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1999; 9: 206-213.
  • 31. Rea JA, Steiger P, Blake GM, et al. Morphometric Xray absorptiometry: reference data for vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 464-474.
  • 32. O'Neill TW, Varlow J, Felsenberg D, etal Variation in vertebral height ratios in population studies. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 1895-907.
  • 33. Lawrence JS. Disc degeneration. Its frequency and relationship to symptoms. Ann Rheum Dis 1969; 28: 121-138.
  • 34. Horwitz T. Degenerative lesions in the cervical portion of the spine. Arch Intern Med 1940; 55; 1178.
  • 35. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Rheumatism in miners. II. X-ray study. Br J Ind Med 1952; 9: 197-207.
  • 36. Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 1178-1184.
  • 37. Holt S, Yates PO. Cervical spondylosis and nerve root lesions. Incidence at routine necropsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1966; 48: 407-423.
  • 38. Tomomitsu T, Murase K, Sone T, Fukunaga M. Comparison of vertebral morphometry in the lumbar vertebrae by T1-weighted sagittal MRI and radiograph. Eur J Radiol 2005; 56: 102-106.
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırmalar
Yazarlar

Yasin Arifoğlu

Merih İş Bu kişi benim

Özdemir Sevinç Bu kişi benim

Çağatay Barut Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Temmuz 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2008 Cilt: 39 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Arifoğlu, Y., İş, M., Sevinç, Ö., Barut, Ç. (2014). Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi, 39(3), 111-116.
AMA Arifoğlu Y, İş M, Sevinç Ö, Barut Ç. Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. Temmuz 2014;39(3):111-116.
Chicago Arifoğlu, Yasin, Merih İş, Özdemir Sevinç, ve Çağatay Barut. “Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra Ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi”. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi 39, sy. 3 (Temmuz 2014): 111-16.
EndNote Arifoğlu Y, İş M, Sevinç Ö, Barut Ç (01 Temmuz 2014) Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi 39 3 111–116.
IEEE Y. Arifoğlu, M. İş, Ö. Sevinç, ve Ç. Barut, “Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi”, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi, c. 39, sy. 3, ss. 111–116, 2014.
ISNAD Arifoğlu, Yasin vd. “Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra Ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi”. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi 39/3 (Temmuz 2014), 111-116.
JAMA Arifoğlu Y, İş M, Sevinç Ö, Barut Ç. Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. 2014;39:111–116.
MLA Arifoğlu, Yasin vd. “Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra Ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi”. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi, c. 39, sy. 3, 2014, ss. 111-6.
Vancouver Arifoğlu Y, İş M, Sevinç Ö, Barut Ç. Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. 2014;39(3):111-6.