BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Nazal Provokasyon Testleri

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2, 76 - 80, 18.07.2014

Rauf Tahamiler Gkioukxel Sarıtzalı Salih Çanakçıoğlu

Öz

Nazal provokasyon testleri nazal patofizyolojilerin tespitinde, farmakolojik ve klinik araştırmalarda sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Spesifik (allerjenler) ve nonspesifik (histamin ya da metakolin) maddeler ile yapılan nazal provokasyonlar, klinik araştırmalarda kullanılmasının yanında allerjik rinitin klinik hikaye, deri testleri ve spesifik IgE ile tam olarak tanısının konulamadığı durumlarda tanının kesinleştirilmesinde, yapılan tedavinin etkinliğini ve tedaviyi sonlandırma kararı almada da kullanılır. Peak nazal inspiratuar flow (PNİF), rinomanometri (RMM), rinostereometri (RSM) ve akustik rinometri (AR) yöntemleri provokasyon sonucu oluşan burun tıkanıklığının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan ölçüm yöntemleridir. NP cevabının değerlendirilmesinde bugüne kadar birçok farklı metod denenmiş olup standart bir teknik yoktur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nazal provokasyon testi nazal patofizyoloji nazal farmakoloji

Kaynakça

  • 1. Naclerio RM, Norman PS, Fish JE. İn vivo methods for the study of allergy: Mucosal tests, techniques, and interpretations, in mMiddleton Jr. E, Reed CE, et al (eds): Allergy - Principles and Practice. St. Louis, Missouri, Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1993; 595-613.
  • 2. Pipkorn U, Bisgaard H, Wihl J - A. Nasal provocation testing and lavage techniques, in Mygind N (ed): Nasal Allergy. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1978; 149-164.
  • 3. Wihl JA, Malm L. Rhinomanometry in routine allergen challenge. Clin Otolaryngol 1985; 10: 185-189.
  • 4. Fireman P. Nasal provocation testing: an objective assessment for nasal and eustachian tube obstruction. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 81: 953-960.
  • 5. Morrow Brown H. Some aspects of clinical allergy. Br J Clin Pract 1970; 24: 513-521.
  • 6. Pelikan Z, De Vries K. Comparison of the nasal mucosa response on challenge of house dust and mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) allergens. Acta Allergol 1972; 27: 167-178.
  • 7. Britton MG, Empey DW, John GC, Mc Donnell KA, Hughes DT. Histamine challenge and anterior nasal rhinometry: their use in the assessment of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine as nasal decongestants in subjects with hayfever. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1978; 6: 51-58.
  • 8. Okuda M, Ohtsuka H, Sakaguchi K, Watase T. Nasal histamine sensitivity in allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy 1983; 51: 51-55.
  • 9. Asakura K, Enomoto K, Ara H, Azuma E, Kataura A. Nasal responsiveness to methacholine stimulation in allergic rhinitis patients. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1984; 239: 273-278.
  • 10. Druce HM, Wright RH, Kossoff D, Kaliner MA. Cholinergic nasal hyperreactivity in atopic subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985; 76: 445-452.
  • 11. Gerth van Wijk R, Dieges PH. Nasal reactivity to histamine and methacholine: two different forms of upper airway responsiveness. Rhinology 1994; 32: 119-122.
  • 12. Borum P. Nasal methacholine challenge. A test for the measurement of nasal reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1979; 63: 253-257.
  • 13. Clement PA, Stoop AP, Kaufman L. Histamine threshold and nasal hyperreactivity in non specific allergic rhinopathy. Rhinology 1985; 23: 35-42.
  • 14. Gerth van Wijk R, Dieges PH. Nasal hyper-responsiveness to histamine, methacholine and phentolamine in patients with perennial non-allergic rhinitis and in patients with infectious rhinitis. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16: 133-137.
  • 15. Doyle WJ, Boehm S, Skoner DP. Physiologic responses to intranasal dose-response challenges with histamine, methacholine, bradykinin, and prostaglandin in adult volunteers with and without nasal allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86: 924-935.
  • 16. Tonnesen P, Mygind N. Nasal challenge with serotonin and histamine in normal persons. Allergy 1985; 40: 350-253.
  • 17. Kirkegaard J, Secher C, Borum P, Mygind N. Inhibition of histamine-induced nasal symptoms by the H1 antihistamine chlorpheniramine maleate: demonstration of topical effect. Br J Dis Chest 1983; 77: 113-122.
  • 18. Wihl JA, Mygind N. Studies on the allergen-challenged human nasal mucosa. Acta Otolaryngol 1977; 84: 281 286.
  • 19. Doğru H, Topuz B. Kulak Burun Boğazda Allerjik Hastalıklar; Hamle Yayınevi İstanbul, 2001. s41-48.
  • 20. Gronborg H, Borum P, Mygind N. Histamine and methacholine do not increase nasal reactivity. Clin Allergy 1986; 16: 597-602.
  • 21. White MV. Nasal cholinergic hyperresponsiveness in atopic subjects studied out of season. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1993; 92: 278-287.
  • 22. Corrado OJ, Gould CA, Kassab JY, Davies RJ. Nasal response of rhinitic and non-rhinitic subjects to histamine and methacholine: a comparative study. Thorax 1986; 41: 863-868.
  • 23. McLean JA, Mathews KP, Ciarkowski AA, Brayton PR, Solomon WR. The effects of topical saline and isoproterenol on nasal airway resistance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1976; 58: 563-574.
  • 24. Druce HM, Schumacher MJ. Nasal provocation challenge: Report of the Committee on Upper Airway Allergy. J Allerg Clin Immunol 1990; 86: 261-264.
  • 25. Malm L, Gerth van Wijk R, Bachert C. Guidelines for nasal provocations with aspects on nasal patency, airflow, and airflow resistance. International Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airways, International Rhinologic Society. Rhinology 2000; 38: 1-6.
  • 26. Youlten LJF. The peak nasal inspiratory flow meter: a new instrument for the assessment of the response to immunotherapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1980; 8: 344.
  • 27. Gleeson MJ,Youlten LJF, Shelton DM, Siodlack MZ, Eiser NM, Wengraf CL. Assessment of nasal airway patency: a comparison of four methods. Clin Otolaryngol 1986; 11: 99-107.
  • 28. Wihl J-A, Malm L. Rhinomanometry in routine allergy challenge. Clin Otolaryngol 1985; 10: 185-189. 29. Dokic D, Jovanovic S, Berghaus A, Brunnee T. Diagnosis of nasal allergy to the house dust mite. Rhinology 1991; 29: 117-123.
  • 30. Naclerio RM, Meier HL, Kagey-Sobotka A, et al. Mediator release after nasal airway challenge with allergen. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 128: 597-602.
  • 31. Meslier N,Braunstein G,Lacronique J, et al. Local celluler and humoral responses to antigenic and distilled water challenge in subjects with allergic rhinitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 137: 617-624.
  • 32. Druce HM. Measurment of nasal mucosal blood flow. J Allerg Clin Immunol 1988; 81: 505-508. 33. Olive-Perez A. Cross-sectional area of nasal airways during the nasal provocation tests. Allergol et Immunopathol 1992; 20: 101-104.
  • 34. Havas TE, Cole P, Parker LP, et al. The effects of combined H1 and H2 histamine antagonists on alterations in nasal airflow resistance induced by topical histamine provocation. J Allerg Clin Immunol 1986; 78: 856-860.
  • 35. Solomon WR, McLean JA. Nasal provocative testing, in Spector Sl (ed): Provocative Challenge Procedures: Background and Methodology. Mount Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing Co., Inc., 1989. 569-625.
  • 36. Schumacher M (chair). Nasal provocation test [Fireside Conference 14]. Rhinology 1992; 14(Suppl): 242-246.
  • 37. Courtiss E, Goldwyn R. The effects of nasal surgery on airflow. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 7: 18-19.
  • 38. Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Petersen OF, et al. Acoustic rhinometry: Values from adults with subjective normal nasal patency. Rhinology 1991; 29: 35-47.
  • 39. Lenders H, Pirsig W. Diagnostic value of acoustic rhinometry: Patients with allergic and vasomotor rhinitis compared with normals.Rhinology 1990; 28: 5-16.
  • 40. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66: 295-303. 41. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, et al. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Lary
  • cope 1995; 105: 275-281. 42. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, et al. Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometric measurements. Am J Radiol 1995; 9: 263-267.
  • 43. Hilberg O, Jensen FT, Pedersen OF. Nasal airway geometry: Comparison between acoustic reflections and magnetic resonance scanning. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75: 2811-2819.
  • 44. Lai VWS, Corey JP. The use of acoustic rhinometry to quantitatively assess changes after intranasal allergen challenge. Am J Rhinol 1994; 8: 171-173.
  • 45. Rasp G. Akustische rhinometrie: Messung der früh- und spatphase der allergischen sofortreaktion bei der allergischen rhinitis. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1993; 72: 125-130.
  • 46. Austin CE, Foreman JC. Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin- induced changes in nasal airway patency. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 37: 33-37.
  • 47. Ganslmayer M, Spertini F, Rahm F, Terrien MH, Mosimann B, Leimgruber A. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergen. Allergy 1999; 54: 974-979.
  • 48. Roithmann R, Shpirer I, Cole P, Chapnik J, Szalai JP, Zamel N. The role of acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation testing. Ear Nose Throat J 1997; 76: 747-750.
  • 49. Hilberg O. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. Allergy 2002; 57 (Suppl 70):5-39.
  • 50. Hilberg O, Grymer LF, Pedersen OF. Nasal histamine challenge in nonallergic and allergic subjects evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Allergy 1995; 50: 166-173.
  • 51. Phipatanakul W, Kesavanathan J, Eggleston PA, Johnson EF, Wood RA. The value of acoustic rhinometry in assessing nasal responses to cat exposure. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998; 102: 896-901.

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2, 76 - 80, 18.07.2014

Rauf Tahamiler Gkioukxel Sarıtzalı Salih Çanakçıoğlu

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Naclerio RM, Norman PS, Fish JE. İn vivo methods for the study of allergy: Mucosal tests, techniques, and interpretations, in mMiddleton Jr. E, Reed CE, et al (eds): Allergy - Principles and Practice. St. Louis, Missouri, Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1993; 595-613.
  • 2. Pipkorn U, Bisgaard H, Wihl J - A. Nasal provocation testing and lavage techniques, in Mygind N (ed): Nasal Allergy. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1978; 149-164.
  • 3. Wihl JA, Malm L. Rhinomanometry in routine allergen challenge. Clin Otolaryngol 1985; 10: 185-189.
  • 4. Fireman P. Nasal provocation testing: an objective assessment for nasal and eustachian tube obstruction. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 81: 953-960.
  • 5. Morrow Brown H. Some aspects of clinical allergy. Br J Clin Pract 1970; 24: 513-521.
  • 6. Pelikan Z, De Vries K. Comparison of the nasal mucosa response on challenge of house dust and mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) allergens. Acta Allergol 1972; 27: 167-178.
  • 7. Britton MG, Empey DW, John GC, Mc Donnell KA, Hughes DT. Histamine challenge and anterior nasal rhinometry: their use in the assessment of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine as nasal decongestants in subjects with hayfever. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1978; 6: 51-58.
  • 8. Okuda M, Ohtsuka H, Sakaguchi K, Watase T. Nasal histamine sensitivity in allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy 1983; 51: 51-55.
  • 9. Asakura K, Enomoto K, Ara H, Azuma E, Kataura A. Nasal responsiveness to methacholine stimulation in allergic rhinitis patients. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1984; 239: 273-278.
  • 10. Druce HM, Wright RH, Kossoff D, Kaliner MA. Cholinergic nasal hyperreactivity in atopic subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985; 76: 445-452.
  • 11. Gerth van Wijk R, Dieges PH. Nasal reactivity to histamine and methacholine: two different forms of upper airway responsiveness. Rhinology 1994; 32: 119-122.
  • 12. Borum P. Nasal methacholine challenge. A test for the measurement of nasal reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1979; 63: 253-257.
  • 13. Clement PA, Stoop AP, Kaufman L. Histamine threshold and nasal hyperreactivity in non specific allergic rhinopathy. Rhinology 1985; 23: 35-42.
  • 14. Gerth van Wijk R, Dieges PH. Nasal hyper-responsiveness to histamine, methacholine and phentolamine in patients with perennial non-allergic rhinitis and in patients with infectious rhinitis. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16: 133-137.
  • 15. Doyle WJ, Boehm S, Skoner DP. Physiologic responses to intranasal dose-response challenges with histamine, methacholine, bradykinin, and prostaglandin in adult volunteers with and without nasal allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86: 924-935.
  • 16. Tonnesen P, Mygind N. Nasal challenge with serotonin and histamine in normal persons. Allergy 1985; 40: 350-253.
  • 17. Kirkegaard J, Secher C, Borum P, Mygind N. Inhibition of histamine-induced nasal symptoms by the H1 antihistamine chlorpheniramine maleate: demonstration of topical effect. Br J Dis Chest 1983; 77: 113-122.
  • 18. Wihl JA, Mygind N. Studies on the allergen-challenged human nasal mucosa. Acta Otolaryngol 1977; 84: 281 286.
  • 19. Doğru H, Topuz B. Kulak Burun Boğazda Allerjik Hastalıklar; Hamle Yayınevi İstanbul, 2001. s41-48.
  • 20. Gronborg H, Borum P, Mygind N. Histamine and methacholine do not increase nasal reactivity. Clin Allergy 1986; 16: 597-602.
  • 21. White MV. Nasal cholinergic hyperresponsiveness in atopic subjects studied out of season. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1993; 92: 278-287.
  • 22. Corrado OJ, Gould CA, Kassab JY, Davies RJ. Nasal response of rhinitic and non-rhinitic subjects to histamine and methacholine: a comparative study. Thorax 1986; 41: 863-868.
  • 23. McLean JA, Mathews KP, Ciarkowski AA, Brayton PR, Solomon WR. The effects of topical saline and isoproterenol on nasal airway resistance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1976; 58: 563-574.
  • 24. Druce HM, Schumacher MJ. Nasal provocation challenge: Report of the Committee on Upper Airway Allergy. J Allerg Clin Immunol 1990; 86: 261-264.
  • 25. Malm L, Gerth van Wijk R, Bachert C. Guidelines for nasal provocations with aspects on nasal patency, airflow, and airflow resistance. International Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airways, International Rhinologic Society. Rhinology 2000; 38: 1-6.
  • 26. Youlten LJF. The peak nasal inspiratory flow meter: a new instrument for the assessment of the response to immunotherapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1980; 8: 344.
  • 27. Gleeson MJ,Youlten LJF, Shelton DM, Siodlack MZ, Eiser NM, Wengraf CL. Assessment of nasal airway patency: a comparison of four methods. Clin Otolaryngol 1986; 11: 99-107.
  • 28. Wihl J-A, Malm L. Rhinomanometry in routine allergy challenge. Clin Otolaryngol 1985; 10: 185-189. 29. Dokic D, Jovanovic S, Berghaus A, Brunnee T. Diagnosis of nasal allergy to the house dust mite. Rhinology 1991; 29: 117-123.
  • 30. Naclerio RM, Meier HL, Kagey-Sobotka A, et al. Mediator release after nasal airway challenge with allergen. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 128: 597-602.
  • 31. Meslier N,Braunstein G,Lacronique J, et al. Local celluler and humoral responses to antigenic and distilled water challenge in subjects with allergic rhinitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 137: 617-624.
  • 32. Druce HM. Measurment of nasal mucosal blood flow. J Allerg Clin Immunol 1988; 81: 505-508. 33. Olive-Perez A. Cross-sectional area of nasal airways during the nasal provocation tests. Allergol et Immunopathol 1992; 20: 101-104.
  • 34. Havas TE, Cole P, Parker LP, et al. The effects of combined H1 and H2 histamine antagonists on alterations in nasal airflow resistance induced by topical histamine provocation. J Allerg Clin Immunol 1986; 78: 856-860.
  • 35. Solomon WR, McLean JA. Nasal provocative testing, in Spector Sl (ed): Provocative Challenge Procedures: Background and Methodology. Mount Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing Co., Inc., 1989. 569-625.
  • 36. Schumacher M (chair). Nasal provocation test [Fireside Conference 14]. Rhinology 1992; 14(Suppl): 242-246.
  • 37. Courtiss E, Goldwyn R. The effects of nasal surgery on airflow. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 7: 18-19.
  • 38. Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Petersen OF, et al. Acoustic rhinometry: Values from adults with subjective normal nasal patency. Rhinology 1991; 29: 35-47.
  • 39. Lenders H, Pirsig W. Diagnostic value of acoustic rhinometry: Patients with allergic and vasomotor rhinitis compared with normals.Rhinology 1990; 28: 5-16.
  • 40. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66: 295-303. 41. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, et al. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Lary
  • cope 1995; 105: 275-281. 42. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, et al. Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometric measurements. Am J Radiol 1995; 9: 263-267.
  • 43. Hilberg O, Jensen FT, Pedersen OF. Nasal airway geometry: Comparison between acoustic reflections and magnetic resonance scanning. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75: 2811-2819.
  • 44. Lai VWS, Corey JP. The use of acoustic rhinometry to quantitatively assess changes after intranasal allergen challenge. Am J Rhinol 1994; 8: 171-173.
  • 45. Rasp G. Akustische rhinometrie: Messung der früh- und spatphase der allergischen sofortreaktion bei der allergischen rhinitis. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1993; 72: 125-130.
  • 46. Austin CE, Foreman JC. Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin- induced changes in nasal airway patency. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 37: 33-37.
  • 47. Ganslmayer M, Spertini F, Rahm F, Terrien MH, Mosimann B, Leimgruber A. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergen. Allergy 1999; 54: 974-979.
  • 48. Roithmann R, Shpirer I, Cole P, Chapnik J, Szalai JP, Zamel N. The role of acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation testing. Ear Nose Throat J 1997; 76: 747-750.
  • 49. Hilberg O. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. Allergy 2002; 57 (Suppl 70):5-39.
  • 50. Hilberg O, Grymer LF, Pedersen OF. Nasal histamine challenge in nonallergic and allergic subjects evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Allergy 1995; 50: 166-173.
  • 51. Phipatanakul W, Kesavanathan J, Eggleston PA, Johnson EF, Wood RA. The value of acoustic rhinometry in assessing nasal responses to cat exposure. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998; 102: 896-901.
Toplam 48 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Derlemeler
Yazarlar

Rauf Tahamiler Bu kişi benim

Gkioukxel Sarıtzalı Bu kişi benim

Salih Çanakçıoğlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 18 Temmuz 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Tahamiler, R., Sarıtzalı, G., & Çanakçıoğlu, S. (2014). Nazal Provokasyon Testleri. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi, 37(2), 76-80.
AMA Tahamiler R, Sarıtzalı G, Çanakçıoğlu S. Nazal Provokasyon Testleri. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. Temmuz 2014;37(2):76-80.
Chicago Tahamiler, Rauf, Gkioukxel Sarıtzalı, ve Salih Çanakçıoğlu. “Nazal Provokasyon Testleri”. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi 37, sy. 2 (Temmuz 2014): 76-80.
EndNote Tahamiler R, Sarıtzalı G, Çanakçıoğlu S (01 Temmuz 2014) Nazal Provokasyon Testleri. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi 37 2 76–80.
IEEE R. Tahamiler, G. Sarıtzalı, ve S. Çanakçıoğlu, “Nazal Provokasyon Testleri”, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi, c. 37, sy. 2, ss. 76–80, 2014.
ISNAD Tahamiler, Rauf vd. “Nazal Provokasyon Testleri”. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi 37/2 (Temmuz 2014), 76-80.
JAMA Tahamiler R, Sarıtzalı G, Çanakçıoğlu S. Nazal Provokasyon Testleri. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. 2014;37:76–80.
MLA Tahamiler, Rauf vd. “Nazal Provokasyon Testleri”. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi, c. 37, sy. 2, 2014, ss. 76-80.
Vancouver Tahamiler R, Sarıtzalı G, Çanakçıoğlu S. Nazal Provokasyon Testleri. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. 2014;37(2):76-80.