Non-Punitive Reaction Measures in Polish Petty Offences Law

Öz

The subject of this article is non-punitive reaction measures (non-punitive means of reaction) existing in Polish petty offences law. The Polish Code of Petty Offences, in addition to penalties and penal measures, provides for non-punitive measures of reaction to petty offences. These are the means of educational influence and the means of social influence. The means of educational influence are used by public prosecutors and entities having the powers of a public prosecutor in petty offence cases. The means of social influence may be applied by the court in the event of waiving the penalty for the offence committed. The author analyses selected issues relating to both categories of non-punitive reaction measures. As a result of the analysis, the author concludes that statutory catalogues of non-punitive reaction measures should be closed, i.e. both the means of social influence and the means of educational influence should be enumerated exhaustively in the Code of Petty Offences, and the application of a means of educational influence should constitute a negative premise for proceedings before the court. Therefore the author supports the de lege ferenda postulates in these aspects expressed in the literature. The author proposes to introduce a new provision into the Code of Petty Offences, namely a provision according to which educational influence measures are not applied if a penal measure should be imposed for a given petty offence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Non-punitive reaction measures
• means of educational influence
• means of social influence
• petty offences law
• Polish criminal law

Kaynakça

1. Act dated 20 July 2018 - Law on Higher Education and Science, Journal of Laws 2018 item 1668 as amended. google scholar
2. Act dated 20 May 1971 - The Code of Petty Offences, Journal of Laws 1971 no. 12 item 114 as amended. google scholar
3. Act dated 24 August 2001 - The Petty Offences Procedure Code, Journal of Laws 2001 no. 106 item 1148 as amended. google scholar
4. Act dated 26 June 1974 - The Labour Code, Journal of Laws 1974 no. 24 item 141 as amended. google scholar
5. Act dated 6 June 1997 - The Code of Criminal Procedure, Journal of Laws 1997 no. 89 item 555 as amended. google scholar
6. Bojarski T. [in:] T. Bojarski (ed.), Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz, Warsaw 2009. google scholar
7. Budyn-Kulik M. [in:] M. Mozgawa (ed.), Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz, Warsaw 2009. google scholar
8. Decision of the European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) of 16 April 1998 in Demel v. Austria, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{“itemid”:[“001-4210”]} DEMEL v. AUSTRIA (coe.int). google scholar

9. Decision of the European Commission of Human Rights of 7 November 1990 in Kremzow v. Austria, https:// hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{“itemid”:[“001-772”]} KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA (coe.int). google scholar
10. Gensikowski P. [in:] P. Daniluk (ed.), Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz, Warsaw 2016. google scholar
11. Grudecki M., Kara nagany i srodki oddziafywania spolecznego oraz srodki oddziafywania wychowawczego w prawie wykroczen, Prokuratura i Prawo 2018, no. 7-8. google scholar
12. Grzegorczyk T. [in:] T. Grzegorczyk (ed.), Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz, Warsaw 2013 google scholar
13. Guide on Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights. Right not to be tried or punished twice, updated on 30 September 2021, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_4_Protocol_7_ ENG.pdf. google scholar
14. Jakubowska-Hara J. [in:] P. Daniluk (ed.), Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz, Warsaw 2016. google scholar
15. Kosierb I. [in:] J. Lachowski (ed.), Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz, Warsaw 2021. google scholar
16. Kotowski W., Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz, Warsaw 2009. google scholar
17. Krajewski R., Srodki oddziafywania wychowawczego w prawie wykroczen, Palestra 2013, no. 7-8. google scholar
18. Nowicka I., Kupinski R., Stosowanie srodkow oddziafywania wychowawczego w sprawach o wykroczenia, Prokuratura i Prawo 2004, no. 7-8. google scholar
19. Paskiewicz J. [in:] M. Rogalski (ed.), Kodeks postçpowania w sprawach o wykroczenia. Komentarz, Warsaw 2009. google scholar
20. Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Strasbourg 22.11.1984, as amended by Protocol No. 11, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Library_Collection_ P7postP11_ETS117E_ENG.pdf. google scholar
21. Radecki W. [in:] M. Bojarski (ed.), W. Radecki (ed.), Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz, Warsaw 2013. google scholar
22. Skwarczynski H., Prokurator w postçpowaniu w sprawach o wykroczenia, Prokuratura i Prawo 2003, no. 11. google scholar
23. Stefanski R. A., Oskarzycielpubliczny w sprawach o wykroczenia, Prokuratura i Prawo 2002, no. 1. google scholar
24. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union 2012/C 326/02, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT. google scholar
25. Van Bockel W. B., The Ne Bis in Idem Principle in EU Law, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan de Rinn 2010, Abstract, https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/14641. google scholar
26. Verdict of the District Court in Gliwice dated 19 June 2018, V Ka 258/18, LEX no. 2507950. google scholar
27. Verdict of the District Court in Piotrkow Trybunalski dated 2 February 2016, IV Ka 753/15, LEX no. 2125235. google scholar
28. Verdict ofthe District Court in Piotrkow Trybunalski dated 2 October 2018, IV Ka 635/18, Legalis no. 2087714. google scholar
29. Verdict of the District Court in Swidnica dated 16 May 2018, IV Ka 256/18, Legalis no. 2165868. google scholar
30. Verdict of the District Court in Wroctaw dated 6 February 2014, IV Ka 1311/13, LEX no. 1882476. google scholar
31. Verdict ofthe Regional Court Gdansk-Potnoc in Gdanskdated 13 April 2016, IIW 2268/15, Legalis no. 2013889. google scholar
32. Verdict of the Regional Court Gdansk-Potnoc in Gdansk dated 30 November 2015, II W 493/15, Legalis no. 2009892. google scholar
33. Verdict of the Regional Court in Torun dated 29 August 2016, II K 296/16, Legalis no. 2026304. google scholar
34. Vervaele J., The transnational ne bis in idem principle in the EU. Mutual recognition and equivalent protection of human rights, Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 1, Issue 2 (December) 2005. google scholar
35. Wasmeier M., The principle of ne bis in idem, Revue internationale de droit penal 2006, no. 1-2 (Vol. 77), https:// www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-penal-2006-1-page-121.htm#no16. google scholar
36. Wtodkowski O., Srodki oddzialywania wychowawczego wprawie wykroczen (uwagi de lege lata i postulaty de lege ferenda), Monitor Prawniczy 2019, no. 14. google scholar