Cinsiyet ve Cezaevi Koşulları Bakımından Tekerrür: Koruyucu Faktörler ve Risk Faktörlerinin Etkisi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 185 - 211, 27.09.2019

Kerryn E. Bell Scott A. Mathers Dale M. Lındekugel

https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2019-0001

Öz

...

Anahtar Kelimeler

...

Gender and Prison Recidivism: The Influence of Protective and Risk Factors

Öz

Recidivism after incarceration is a fundamental concern for the criminal justice system. Although men remain the largest percentage of the prison population, women are entering prison at an increasing frequency. Insufficient research has looked at the influence of prison protective and risk factors on recidivism by gender or any theoretical model to consider this increase in the female prison population. Using data from a large western state in the USA, all male and female inmates incarcerated from 2009 through 2011 are evaluated in terms of protective (education, programming, community ties, relationship status) and risk factors (race/ethnicity, age, homelessness, prison conduct, gang membership, prison sentence length and type) associated with their initial incarceration or recidivism. The findings and implications are subsequently discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Prison, Gender, Recidivism

Kaynakça

• Bales, W. & Mears, D. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: does visitation reduce recidivism? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 287–321.
• Baradon, T., Fonagy, P., Kata, L., Sleed, M. (2008). New beginnings: an experienced-based programme addressing the attachment relationship between mothers and their babies in prison. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 34(2), 240–258.
• Barrick, K., Lattimore, P., & Visher, C. (2014). Reentering women: the impact of social ties on long-term recidivism. The Prison Journal, 94(3), 279–304.
• Bayse, D., Allgood, S., & Van Wyk, P. (1991). Family life education: an effective tool for prisoner rehabilitation. Family Relations, 40(3), 245–257.
• Belknap, J. (1996). The invisible woman: gender, crime, and justice. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth.
• Benda, B. (2005). Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: a survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(3), 325–342.
• Berg, M. & Huebner, B. (2010). Reentry and the ties that bind: an examination of socialties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410.
• Bloom, B. & Covington, S. (1998) Gender specific programming for female offenders: what is it and why is it important? Paper presented at the 50th annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC.
• Brewster, D. & Sharp, S. (2002). Educational programs and recidivism in Oklahoma: another look. The Prison Journal, 82(3), 314–334.
• Calhoun, S., Messina, N., Cartier, J., & Torres, S. (2010). Implementing gender-responsive treatment for women in prison: client and staff perspectives. Federal Probation, 74(3), 27–33.
• Cao, L., Zhao, J., & Van Dine S. (1997). Prison disciplinary tickets: a test of the deprivation and importation models. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25(2), 103–113.
• Casey-Acevedo, K., Bakken, T., & Karle, A. (2004). Children visiting mothers in prison: the effect on mothers behavior and Disciplinary Adjustment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37, 418–430.
• Cobbina, J., Huebner, B., & Berg, M. (2012). Men, women, and post release offending: an examination of the nature of the link between relational ties and recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 58(3), 331–361.
• Cochran, J., Mears, D., Bales, W., & Stewart, E. (2014). Does inmate behavior affect post-release offending? Investigating the misconduct-recidivism relationship among youth and adults. Justice Quarterly 31(6), 1044–1073.
• Collins, R. (2010). The effect of gender on violent and nonviolent recidivism: a meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 675–684.
• Davis, S. (1985). Recidivism among offenders released from incarceration in 1982. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Department of Corrections
• Dooley, B., Seals, A., & Skarbek, D. (2014). The effect of prison gang membership on recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(3), 267–275.
• Education Services Newsletter. (2009). Issue II. NDOC. Web. Spring, 2009: 2–3.
• Esperian, J. (2010). The effect of prison education programs on recidivism. The Journal of Correctional Education, 61(4), 316–334.
• Fedock, G., Fries, L., & Kubiak S. (2013). Service needs for incarcerated adults: exploring gender differences, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52, 493–508.
• Foley, A. (2008). The current state of gender-specific delinquency programming. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(3), 262–269.
• French, S. A. & Gendreau, P. (2006). Reducing Prison Misconducts: What Works! Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(2), 185–218.
• Gerber, J., & Fritsch, E. (1995). Adult academic and vocational correctional education programs: a review of recent research. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22, 199–242.
• Harer, M. D. (1995). Recidivism among federal prisoners released in 1987. Journal of Correctional Education, 46(3), 98–128.
• Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press. Holt, N. & Miller, D. (1971). Explorations in Inmate-Family Relationships. Sacramento: Research Division, Department of Corrections, State of California (http://www.fcnetwork.org/reading/holt-miller/holt-miller8. html)
• Huebner, B., DeJong, C., & Cobbina, J. (2010). Women coming home: long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 225–254.
• Huebner, B. & Pleggenkuhle, B. (2015). Residential location, household, composition, and recidivism: an analysis by gender. Justice Quarterly, 32(5): 818–844.
• Huebner, B., Varano, S., & Bynum, T. (2007). Gangs, guns, and drugs: recidivism among serious, young offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(2), 187–221.
• Jancic, M. (1998). Does correctional education have an effect on recidivism? Journal of Correctional Education, 49(4), 152–161.
• Jones, M. & Sims, B. (1997). Recidivism of offenders released from prison in North Carolina: a gender comparison. The Prison Journal 77(3), 335–348.
• Jurik, N. (1983). The economics of female recidivism. Criminology, 21(4), 603–622.
• Karp, D. (2010). Unlocking me, unmasking masculinities: doing men’s work in prison. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 18(1), 63–83.
• Keyes, D. (1996). Preventing Prison Misconduct Behavior: A Quantitative Review of the Literature. Unpublished Honor’s Thesis. Saint John, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
• Laub, J. & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
• Lauderdale, M. & Burman, M. (2009). Contemporary patterns of female gangs in correctional settings. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(3), 258–280.
• Makarios, M., Steiner, B., & Travis, L. (2010). Examining the correlates of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(12), 1377–1391.
• Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 22–54.
• Mills, J., Kroner, D., & Hemmati, T. (2003). Predicting violent behavior through a static-stable variable. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(8): 891–904.
• Mitchell, M., Spooner, K., Jai, D., & Zhang Y. (2016). The effect of prison visitation on reentry success: a metaanalysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 74–83.
• McCoy, L. & Miller, H. (2013). Comparing gender across risk and recidivism in nonviolent offenders. Women & Criminal Justice, 23(2), 143–162.
• Mears, D., Cochran, J., Bales, W., & Bhati, A. (2016). Recidivism and time served in prison. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 106(1), 83–124.
• Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2011). The Effects of Prison Visitation on Offender Recidivism. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
• Morash, M., Bynum, T., & Koons, B. (1998). Women offenders: programming needs and promising approaches. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
• Morgan, R. & Flora, D. (2002). Group psychotherapy with incarcerated offenders: a research synthesis. Group Dynamics, 6, 203–218.
• Olson, D., Stalans, L., and Escobar, G. (2016). Comparing male and female prison releasees across risk factors and post-prison recidivism. Women & Criminal Justice, 26(2), 122–144.
• Phelps, M. (2011). Rehabilitation in the punitive era: the gap between rhetoric and reality in U.S. prison programs. Law and Society Review, 45(1): 33–68.
• Piehl, A. (1998). Economic conditions, work, and crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 302–319). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Ryan, J., & Yang, H. (2005). Family contact and recidivism: a longitudinal study of adjudicated delinquents in residential care. Social Work Research, 29, 31–39.
• Schafer, N. (1994). Exploring the link between visits and parole success: a survey of prison visitors”. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (38)1, 17–32.
• Scott, C., Grella, C., Dennis, M., & Funk, R. (2014). Correlates of recidivism over 3 years among substanceusing women released from jail. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 41(11), 1257–1289.
• Scott, T. & Ruddell, R. (2011). Canadian female gang inmates: risk, needs, and the potential for prison rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(6), 305–326.
• Solinas-Saunders, M. & Stacer, M. (2017). A retrospective analysis of repeated incarceration using a national sample: what makes female inmates different to male inmates? Victims & Offenders, 12(1), 138–173.
• Stuart, B. & Brice-Baker, J. (2004). Correlates of higher rates of recidivism in female prisoners: an exploratory study. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 32, 29–70.
• Sykes, G. (2007). The society of captives: a study of a maximum security prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Taylor, C. (2015). Gendered pathways to recidivism: differential effects of family support by gender. Women & Criminal Justice, 25(1), 169–183.
• Thomas, C. & Foster, S. (1973). The importation model perspective on inmate social roles: an empirical test. Sociological Quarterly, 14, 226–234.
• Thomas, C. & Peterson, D. (1977). Prison organization and inmate subcultures. Indianapolis, IN: The BobbsMerrill Company, Inc.
• Tietjen, G., Garneau, C., Horowitz, V., & Noel, H. (2018). Showing up: the gendered effects of social engagement on education participation on U.S. correctional facilities. The Prison Journal, 98(3): 359–381.
• Tracy, A., Smith, L., & Steurer, S. (1998). Standing up for education: new CEA study seeks to definitively show correlation between education and reduced recidivism. Corrections Today, 60, 144–147.
• Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: a duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65(4), 529–546.
• Wright, E., Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2012). Gender responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: a review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1612–1632.