BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 33 - 46, 24.03.2012

Mehmet Kanık

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Austin, J . L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words. (Ed. J . O. Urmson) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bachman, Lyle F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Blum-Kuika, Shoshana and Elite Oishtain (1984). Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patters (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, pp. 196-213.
  • Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1982). Learning to Say What You Mean in a Second Language: A Study of the Speech Act Performance of Learners of Hebrew as a Second Language. Applied Linguistics 3, pp. 29-59.
  • Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Canale, Michael and Merrill Swain (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, I (1980) pp. 1-47.
  • Cohen, Andrew (2005). Strategies for Learning and Performing L2 Speech Acts. intercultural Pragmatics 2-3, pp. 275-301.
  • Cohen, Andrew (2004). Assessing Speech Acts in a Second Language. In Diana Boxer and Andrew D. Cohen (Eds.) Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. pp. 302ı 327:
  • Cohen, Andrew and Rachel, L. Shively (2002). Measuring Speech Acts with Multiple Rejoinder DCT's. Language Testing Update, 32, pp. 39-42.
  • Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
  • Davies, Alan (1989). Communicative Competence as Language Use. Applied Linguistics, 10, pp. 157-170.
  • Golato, A. (2003). Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk. Applied Linguistics, 24: 1, 90-121.
  • Grice, H. Paul. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (Eds. Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan) New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
  • Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of Advice: DCT and Multiple Choice Data. Applied Linguistics. 18:1, pp. 1-26.
  • Hymes, Dell (1979). On Communicative Competence. In C. J. Brumfit and K. Johnson (Eds) The Communicative approach to Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5-26.
  • Hudson, Thorn, Emily Detmer and J . D. Brown (1995). Developing Prototypic Measures of Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Technical Report # 7. Honolulu, Hi: University of Hawai'i Press.
  • Johnston, Bill; Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (1998). Effect of Rejoinders in Production Questionnaires. Applied Linguistics, 19/2, pp. 157-182.
  • McNamara, Tim and Carsten Roever (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Language Learning, 56, Supplement 2.
  • Morris, Charles (1971). Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Ochs, E. & B. B. Schiefflin. (1983). Acquiring Conversational Competence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ÖSYM Arşivi. Retrieved 24 April 2007 from the World Wide Web: http://www.osvm.gov.tr/BeigeGoster.aspx7F6E10F8892433CFFAC8287D 72AD903BE13CD5B1F6141993C
  • Roever, Carsten (2006). Validation of a Web-based Test of ESL Pragmalinguisitics. Language Testing, 2006, 23, pp. 229-256.
  • Rose, Kenneth L. and Reiko Ono (1995). Eliciting Speech Act Data in Japanese: The Effect of Questionnaire Type. Language Learning, 45:2, pp. 191-223.
  • Rose, Kenneth, L. (1994). On the Validity of Discourse Completion Tests on non-Western Contexts. Applied Linguistics, 15:1,1-14.
  • Rose, Kenneth, L. (1992). Speech Acts and Questionnaires: The Effect of Hearer Response. Journal of Pragmatics, 17:1, 49-62.
  • Sasaki, Miyuki (1998). Investigating EFL Students' Production of Speech Acts : A Comparison of Production Questionnaires and Roleplays. Journal of Pragmatics 30, pp. 457-484.
  • Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Searle, John R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Son Hazırlık Yayınları (2001). YDS İngilizce Sınav Soruları ve Cevapları. İstanbul: Son Hazırlık Yayınları.
  • Varghese, Manka and Kristine Billmyer (1996). Investigating the Structure of Discourse Completion Tests. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 12 (1), 39-58.
  • Yuan, Y. (2001). An Inquiry into Empirical Pragmatics Data-Gathering Methods: Written DCTs, Oral DCTs, Field Notes, and Natural Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 2, 271-292.
  • Zuskin, Robin D. (1993). Assessing L2 Sociolinguistic Competence: In Search of Support from Pragmatic Theories. Pragmatics and Language Learning 4,166-182.

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 33 - 46, 24.03.2012

Mehmet Kanık

Öz

Bu çalışmada Türkiye'deki üniversite giriş sınavının bir parçası olan
yabancı dil sınavının (YDS) İngilizce testindeki söz edimler ve edimsel
durum ve ölçütler araştırılmaktadır. Araştırma sonucunda edimsel
soruların söylem tamamlama testi ve diyalog tamamlama testi şeklinde
1978'de ortaya çıktığı gözlenmiştir. Bu soru türleri 20 değişik söz edimi
içermektedir. Bu söz edimler her ne kadar YDS'de şimdiye dek toplamda
diyalog tamamlama sorularının sayısı söylem tamamlama sorularından
çok olsa da söylem tamamlama testlerinde daha çok görülmüştür. 1978-
2007 yılları arasında uygulanan YDS soruları dikkate alındığında, söylem
tamamlama sorularında verilen durumlardaki bilgi miktarında artış
gözlenmiştir. Edimsel soruların oranı 90'lı yıllarda gözle görülür bir şekilde artmış ancak bu oran 2003 yılında tekrar düşmüştür. Edimbilimi eğitim
alanındaki testlere uygulamaya çalışması açısından bakıldığında, edimsel
durumları teste ekleme çabası Önemli gibi düşünülse de, çeldiricilerin
zayıflığı gibi belli faktörler bu soruları edimsel yetiyi hedef alan sorular
olmaktan alıkoymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yabancı Dil Sınavı Edimsel Ölçütler Söz Edimler

Kaynakça

  • Austin, J . L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words. (Ed. J . O. Urmson) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bachman, Lyle F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Blum-Kuika, Shoshana and Elite Oishtain (1984). Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patters (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, pp. 196-213.
  • Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1982). Learning to Say What You Mean in a Second Language: A Study of the Speech Act Performance of Learners of Hebrew as a Second Language. Applied Linguistics 3, pp. 29-59.
  • Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Canale, Michael and Merrill Swain (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, I (1980) pp. 1-47.
  • Cohen, Andrew (2005). Strategies for Learning and Performing L2 Speech Acts. intercultural Pragmatics 2-3, pp. 275-301.
  • Cohen, Andrew (2004). Assessing Speech Acts in a Second Language. In Diana Boxer and Andrew D. Cohen (Eds.) Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. pp. 302ı 327:
  • Cohen, Andrew and Rachel, L. Shively (2002). Measuring Speech Acts with Multiple Rejoinder DCT's. Language Testing Update, 32, pp. 39-42.
  • Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
  • Davies, Alan (1989). Communicative Competence as Language Use. Applied Linguistics, 10, pp. 157-170.
  • Golato, A. (2003). Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk. Applied Linguistics, 24: 1, 90-121.
  • Grice, H. Paul. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (Eds. Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan) New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
  • Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of Advice: DCT and Multiple Choice Data. Applied Linguistics. 18:1, pp. 1-26.
  • Hymes, Dell (1979). On Communicative Competence. In C. J. Brumfit and K. Johnson (Eds) The Communicative approach to Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5-26.
  • Hudson, Thorn, Emily Detmer and J . D. Brown (1995). Developing Prototypic Measures of Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Technical Report # 7. Honolulu, Hi: University of Hawai'i Press.
  • Johnston, Bill; Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (1998). Effect of Rejoinders in Production Questionnaires. Applied Linguistics, 19/2, pp. 157-182.
  • McNamara, Tim and Carsten Roever (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Language Learning, 56, Supplement 2.
  • Morris, Charles (1971). Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Ochs, E. & B. B. Schiefflin. (1983). Acquiring Conversational Competence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ÖSYM Arşivi. Retrieved 24 April 2007 from the World Wide Web: http://www.osvm.gov.tr/BeigeGoster.aspx7F6E10F8892433CFFAC8287D 72AD903BE13CD5B1F6141993C
  • Roever, Carsten (2006). Validation of a Web-based Test of ESL Pragmalinguisitics. Language Testing, 2006, 23, pp. 229-256.
  • Rose, Kenneth L. and Reiko Ono (1995). Eliciting Speech Act Data in Japanese: The Effect of Questionnaire Type. Language Learning, 45:2, pp. 191-223.
  • Rose, Kenneth, L. (1994). On the Validity of Discourse Completion Tests on non-Western Contexts. Applied Linguistics, 15:1,1-14.
  • Rose, Kenneth, L. (1992). Speech Acts and Questionnaires: The Effect of Hearer Response. Journal of Pragmatics, 17:1, 49-62.
  • Sasaki, Miyuki (1998). Investigating EFL Students' Production of Speech Acts : A Comparison of Production Questionnaires and Roleplays. Journal of Pragmatics 30, pp. 457-484.
  • Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Searle, John R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Son Hazırlık Yayınları (2001). YDS İngilizce Sınav Soruları ve Cevapları. İstanbul: Son Hazırlık Yayınları.
  • Varghese, Manka and Kristine Billmyer (1996). Investigating the Structure of Discourse Completion Tests. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 12 (1), 39-58.
  • Yuan, Y. (2001). An Inquiry into Empirical Pragmatics Data-Gathering Methods: Written DCTs, Oral DCTs, Field Notes, and Natural Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 2, 271-292.
  • Zuskin, Robin D. (1993). Assessing L2 Sociolinguistic Competence: In Search of Support from Pragmatic Theories. Pragmatics and Language Learning 4,166-182.

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 33 - 46, 24.03.2012

Mehmet Kanık

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Austin, J . L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words. (Ed. J . O. Urmson) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bachman, Lyle F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Blum-Kuika, Shoshana and Elite Oishtain (1984). Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patters (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, pp. 196-213.
  • Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1982). Learning to Say What You Mean in a Second Language: A Study of the Speech Act Performance of Learners of Hebrew as a Second Language. Applied Linguistics 3, pp. 29-59.
  • Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Canale, Michael and Merrill Swain (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, I (1980) pp. 1-47.
  • Cohen, Andrew (2005). Strategies for Learning and Performing L2 Speech Acts. intercultural Pragmatics 2-3, pp. 275-301.
  • Cohen, Andrew (2004). Assessing Speech Acts in a Second Language. In Diana Boxer and Andrew D. Cohen (Eds.) Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. pp. 302ı 327:
  • Cohen, Andrew and Rachel, L. Shively (2002). Measuring Speech Acts with Multiple Rejoinder DCT's. Language Testing Update, 32, pp. 39-42.
  • Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
  • Davies, Alan (1989). Communicative Competence as Language Use. Applied Linguistics, 10, pp. 157-170.
  • Golato, A. (2003). Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk. Applied Linguistics, 24: 1, 90-121.
  • Grice, H. Paul. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (Eds. Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan) New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
  • Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of Advice: DCT and Multiple Choice Data. Applied Linguistics. 18:1, pp. 1-26.
  • Hymes, Dell (1979). On Communicative Competence. In C. J. Brumfit and K. Johnson (Eds) The Communicative approach to Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5-26.
  • Hudson, Thorn, Emily Detmer and J . D. Brown (1995). Developing Prototypic Measures of Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Technical Report # 7. Honolulu, Hi: University of Hawai'i Press.
  • Johnston, Bill; Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (1998). Effect of Rejoinders in Production Questionnaires. Applied Linguistics, 19/2, pp. 157-182.
  • McNamara, Tim and Carsten Roever (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Language Learning, 56, Supplement 2.
  • Morris, Charles (1971). Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Ochs, E. & B. B. Schiefflin. (1983). Acquiring Conversational Competence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ÖSYM Arşivi. Retrieved 24 April 2007 from the World Wide Web: http://www.osvm.gov.tr/BeigeGoster.aspx7F6E10F8892433CFFAC8287D 72AD903BE13CD5B1F6141993C
  • Roever, Carsten (2006). Validation of a Web-based Test of ESL Pragmalinguisitics. Language Testing, 2006, 23, pp. 229-256.
  • Rose, Kenneth L. and Reiko Ono (1995). Eliciting Speech Act Data in Japanese: The Effect of Questionnaire Type. Language Learning, 45:2, pp. 191-223.
  • Rose, Kenneth, L. (1994). On the Validity of Discourse Completion Tests on non-Western Contexts. Applied Linguistics, 15:1,1-14.
  • Rose, Kenneth, L. (1992). Speech Acts and Questionnaires: The Effect of Hearer Response. Journal of Pragmatics, 17:1, 49-62.
  • Sasaki, Miyuki (1998). Investigating EFL Students' Production of Speech Acts : A Comparison of Production Questionnaires and Roleplays. Journal of Pragmatics 30, pp. 457-484.
  • Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Searle, John R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Son Hazırlık Yayınları (2001). YDS İngilizce Sınav Soruları ve Cevapları. İstanbul: Son Hazırlık Yayınları.
  • Varghese, Manka and Kristine Billmyer (1996). Investigating the Structure of Discourse Completion Tests. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 12 (1), 39-58.
  • Yuan, Y. (2001). An Inquiry into Empirical Pragmatics Data-Gathering Methods: Written DCTs, Oral DCTs, Field Notes, and Natural Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 2, 271-292.
  • Zuskin, Robin D. (1993). Assessing L2 Sociolinguistic Competence: In Search of Support from Pragmatic Theories. Pragmatics and Language Learning 4,166-182.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mehmet Kanık Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Mart 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2008 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Kanık, M. (2012). HAYEF Journal of Education, 5(1), 33-46.
AMA Kanık M. HAYEF Journal of Education. Mart 2012;5(1):33-46.
Chicago Kanık, Mehmet. HAYEF Journal of Education 5, sy. 1 (Mart 2012): 33-46.
EndNote Kanık M (01 Mart 2012) HAYEF Journal of Education 5 1 33–46.
IEEE M. Kanık, HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 5, sy. 1, ss. 33–46, 2012.
ISNAD Kanık, Mehmet. HAYEF Journal of Education 5/1 (Mart 2012), 33-46.
JAMA Kanık M. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;5:33–46.
MLA Kanık, Mehmet. HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 5, sy. 1, 2012, ss. 33-46.
Vancouver Kanık M. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;5(1):33-46.