BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 45 - 62, 26.03.2012

Muazzez Yavuz Kırık

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alderson, J.C. (2000), Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press
  • Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford University Press.
  • Bachman, L.F. & Palmer A.S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and developing useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press.
  • Bailey, K.M. (1998). Learning about Language Assessment: Dilemmas, Decisions and Directions. Heinle & Heinle Publishers
  • Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in Language Programs. Mc Graw
  • Brown, H.D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice. Pearson Education Inc.
  • Brown, J.D. & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-Referenced Language Testing. Cambridge University Press
  • Cumming, A. (1996). Introduction: The Concept of Validation (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.1-14). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Cumming, A., & Mellow, D. (1996). An Investigating into the Validity of Written Indicators of Second Language Proficiency (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.72-93). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Cushingweigle, S., & Lynch, B. (1996). Hypothesis Testing in Construct Validation (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.58-71). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Davies, A. & Brown, A. & Elder, C., & Hill, K. & Cumley, T. & McNamara, T. (1999). Dictionary of language Testing, Studies in Language Testing 7. Cambridge University Press.
  • Delonay, V. (1991). Assessing Textual Understanding and Literature Learning in ESL (Ed: C. Brumfit). Assessment in Literature Teaching: Development in English Language Teaching, (pp.106-112). McMillan Publishers Limited.
  • Ellis, R. (2001). Some Thoughts on Testing Grammar: An SLA perspectives (Ed: C. Elder, A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11. (pp. 251-263). Cambridge University Press.
  • Genesee, F., Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom- based Evaluation in Second Language Education. Cambridge University Press.
  • Harrison, A. (1983). A Language Testing Handbook. MacMillan Publishers Limited, London.
  • Hasselgreen, A. (2004). Testing the Spoken English of Young Norwegians, A study of Test Validity and the Role of 'Smallwords' in Contributing to Pupils Fluency, Studies in Language Testing 20. Cambridge University Press.
  • Herzog, M. (1988). Issues in Writing Proficiency Assessment (Ed: P. Lowe, Jr., C. W. Stansfield). Language in Education: Theory and Practice Second Language Proficiency Assessment: current issues. (pp. 149-175). Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey.
  • Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press
  • McNamara, T. (2000). Language Testing (Ed: H.G. Widdowson). International Journal of AppliedLinguistics. 16. (3) (pp. 424-434). Oxford University Press.
  • McNamara, T. & Carsten, R. (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, USA.
  • Purpura, J. E. (2004). Assessing Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Fossilization or Evolution: The case of grammar testing"(Ed: C. Elder, A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11 . (pp.21-32). Cambridge University Press.
  • Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
  • Shohamy, E. (2001). The Power of Tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Spolsky, B. (1990). Social Aspects of Individual Assessment (Ed: J.H. A.L. De Jong, D.K. Stevenson). Individualizing the Assessment of Language Abilities. Multilingual.
  • Turner, C. E. (2001). The Need for Impact Studies of L2 Performance Testing and Rating: Identifying areas of potential consequences at all levels of the testing cycle (Ed: C. Elder , A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11. (pp. 138-149). Cambridge University Press.
  • Yavuz Kırık, M. (2008). Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Ölçme Değerlendirme Bağlamında Tutum ve Yaklaşımları. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi.
  • Wall, D. (2005). The Impact of High-stakes Examinations on Classroom Teaching. Studies in Language Testing 22, Cambridge University Press.
  • Weir, C.J. (1988). Communicative Language Testing. Prentice Hall.
  • Weir, C.J. (1993). Understanding and Developing language Tests. Prentice Hall
  • Neill, M. (2003 Ocak 13). Transforming student Assessment. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/template.html' den Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır. (s.1-8).
  • FairTest. (2007 Aralık 17). The Dangerous Consequences of High-Stakes Standardized Testing. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/Dangerous%20 Consequences.html'den 29 Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır. (s. 1-3).
  • FairTest. (2007 Aralık 17). Multiple-Choice Tests. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/ mctfcat.html' den 29 Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır.
  • Jones, K. (2000 Ekim). High Stakes vs. Democracy. http://www.fairtest.org/highstakes-vs-democracy' den 31 Mart 2009'da alınmıştır.
  • ÖSYM. (2009) 2009 Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Sistemi (ÖSYS) 2009ÖSYS: YDS Soruları ve Yanıtları ftp://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/2009/2009YDS/yds2009ingilizce.pdf

ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 45 - 62, 26.03.2012

Muazzez Yavuz Kırık

Öz

Yabancı dilde başarı ya da yeterliliğe dair kararların geçerlilik
kazanması alana özgü ölçütlerin sağlanmasına bağlıdır. Ölçme
değerlendirme etkinlikleri bir ölçütler oluşturma etkinliği olarak öğretim
içerik ve uygulamalarının, hedeflere ulaşmayı sağlayan nitelikler taşıyıp
taşımadıklarının göstergeleridir. Ölçme değerlendirme süreci aynı
zamanda kararlar alma sürecidir. Yabancı dilde yeterlilik düzeyiyle ilgili
kararların geçerliliği, ölçme değerlendirme içerik ve tekniklerinin
iletişimsellik ve özgünlük düzeyiyle ilgilidir. Bu bağlamda, çoktan-seçmeli
soru yapılarını içeren ölçünlendirilmiş sınavların sınava giren adayların
yaşamındaki belirleyiciliği göz önünde bulundurulduğunda sorgulanmaları
anlam kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, çoktan-seçmeli soru tekniğiyle
hazırlanmış bir ölçünlendirilmiş sınav örneği olarak 2009-YDS sınavının
geçerlilik ölçütü bağlamında değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde Ölçme Değerlendirme Teknikleri Ölçünlendirilmiş Sınavlar Çoktan-seçmeli Sorular Geçerlilik Ölçütü

Kaynakça

  • Alderson, J.C. (2000), Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press
  • Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford University Press.
  • Bachman, L.F. & Palmer A.S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and developing useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press.
  • Bailey, K.M. (1998). Learning about Language Assessment: Dilemmas, Decisions and Directions. Heinle & Heinle Publishers
  • Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in Language Programs. Mc Graw
  • Brown, H.D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice. Pearson Education Inc.
  • Brown, J.D. & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-Referenced Language Testing. Cambridge University Press
  • Cumming, A. (1996). Introduction: The Concept of Validation (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.1-14). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Cumming, A., & Mellow, D. (1996). An Investigating into the Validity of Written Indicators of Second Language Proficiency (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.72-93). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Cushingweigle, S., & Lynch, B. (1996). Hypothesis Testing in Construct Validation (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.58-71). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Davies, A. & Brown, A. & Elder, C., & Hill, K. & Cumley, T. & McNamara, T. (1999). Dictionary of language Testing, Studies in Language Testing 7. Cambridge University Press.
  • Delonay, V. (1991). Assessing Textual Understanding and Literature Learning in ESL (Ed: C. Brumfit). Assessment in Literature Teaching: Development in English Language Teaching, (pp.106-112). McMillan Publishers Limited.
  • Ellis, R. (2001). Some Thoughts on Testing Grammar: An SLA perspectives (Ed: C. Elder, A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11. (pp. 251-263). Cambridge University Press.
  • Genesee, F., Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom- based Evaluation in Second Language Education. Cambridge University Press.
  • Harrison, A. (1983). A Language Testing Handbook. MacMillan Publishers Limited, London.
  • Hasselgreen, A. (2004). Testing the Spoken English of Young Norwegians, A study of Test Validity and the Role of 'Smallwords' in Contributing to Pupils Fluency, Studies in Language Testing 20. Cambridge University Press.
  • Herzog, M. (1988). Issues in Writing Proficiency Assessment (Ed: P. Lowe, Jr., C. W. Stansfield). Language in Education: Theory and Practice Second Language Proficiency Assessment: current issues. (pp. 149-175). Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey.
  • Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press
  • McNamara, T. (2000). Language Testing (Ed: H.G. Widdowson). International Journal of AppliedLinguistics. 16. (3) (pp. 424-434). Oxford University Press.
  • McNamara, T. & Carsten, R. (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, USA.
  • Purpura, J. E. (2004). Assessing Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Fossilization or Evolution: The case of grammar testing"(Ed: C. Elder, A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11 . (pp.21-32). Cambridge University Press.
  • Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
  • Shohamy, E. (2001). The Power of Tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Spolsky, B. (1990). Social Aspects of Individual Assessment (Ed: J.H. A.L. De Jong, D.K. Stevenson). Individualizing the Assessment of Language Abilities. Multilingual.
  • Turner, C. E. (2001). The Need for Impact Studies of L2 Performance Testing and Rating: Identifying areas of potential consequences at all levels of the testing cycle (Ed: C. Elder , A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11. (pp. 138-149). Cambridge University Press.
  • Yavuz Kırık, M. (2008). Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Ölçme Değerlendirme Bağlamında Tutum ve Yaklaşımları. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi.
  • Wall, D. (2005). The Impact of High-stakes Examinations on Classroom Teaching. Studies in Language Testing 22, Cambridge University Press.
  • Weir, C.J. (1988). Communicative Language Testing. Prentice Hall.
  • Weir, C.J. (1993). Understanding and Developing language Tests. Prentice Hall
  • Neill, M. (2003 Ocak 13). Transforming student Assessment. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/template.html' den Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır. (s.1-8).
  • FairTest. (2007 Aralık 17). The Dangerous Consequences of High-Stakes Standardized Testing. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/Dangerous%20 Consequences.html'den 29 Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır. (s. 1-3).
  • FairTest. (2007 Aralık 17). Multiple-Choice Tests. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/ mctfcat.html' den 29 Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır.
  • Jones, K. (2000 Ekim). High Stakes vs. Democracy. http://www.fairtest.org/highstakes-vs-democracy' den 31 Mart 2009'da alınmıştır.
  • ÖSYM. (2009) 2009 Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Sistemi (ÖSYS) 2009ÖSYS: YDS Soruları ve Yanıtları ftp://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/2009/2009YDS/yds2009ingilizce.pdf

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 45 - 62, 26.03.2012

Muazzez Yavuz Kırık

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alderson, J.C. (2000), Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press
  • Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford University Press.
  • Bachman, L.F. & Palmer A.S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and developing useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press.
  • Bailey, K.M. (1998). Learning about Language Assessment: Dilemmas, Decisions and Directions. Heinle & Heinle Publishers
  • Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in Language Programs. Mc Graw
  • Brown, H.D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice. Pearson Education Inc.
  • Brown, J.D. & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-Referenced Language Testing. Cambridge University Press
  • Cumming, A. (1996). Introduction: The Concept of Validation (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.1-14). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Cumming, A., & Mellow, D. (1996). An Investigating into the Validity of Written Indicators of Second Language Proficiency (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.72-93). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Cushingweigle, S., & Lynch, B. (1996). Hypothesis Testing in Construct Validation (Ed: A. Cumming, R. Berwick). Validation in Language testing, Modern Language in Practice 2. (pp.58-71). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Davies, A. & Brown, A. & Elder, C., & Hill, K. & Cumley, T. & McNamara, T. (1999). Dictionary of language Testing, Studies in Language Testing 7. Cambridge University Press.
  • Delonay, V. (1991). Assessing Textual Understanding and Literature Learning in ESL (Ed: C. Brumfit). Assessment in Literature Teaching: Development in English Language Teaching, (pp.106-112). McMillan Publishers Limited.
  • Ellis, R. (2001). Some Thoughts on Testing Grammar: An SLA perspectives (Ed: C. Elder, A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11. (pp. 251-263). Cambridge University Press.
  • Genesee, F., Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom- based Evaluation in Second Language Education. Cambridge University Press.
  • Harrison, A. (1983). A Language Testing Handbook. MacMillan Publishers Limited, London.
  • Hasselgreen, A. (2004). Testing the Spoken English of Young Norwegians, A study of Test Validity and the Role of 'Smallwords' in Contributing to Pupils Fluency, Studies in Language Testing 20. Cambridge University Press.
  • Herzog, M. (1988). Issues in Writing Proficiency Assessment (Ed: P. Lowe, Jr., C. W. Stansfield). Language in Education: Theory and Practice Second Language Proficiency Assessment: current issues. (pp. 149-175). Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey.
  • Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press
  • McNamara, T. (2000). Language Testing (Ed: H.G. Widdowson). International Journal of AppliedLinguistics. 16. (3) (pp. 424-434). Oxford University Press.
  • McNamara, T. & Carsten, R. (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, USA.
  • Purpura, J. E. (2004). Assessing Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Fossilization or Evolution: The case of grammar testing"(Ed: C. Elder, A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11 . (pp.21-32). Cambridge University Press.
  • Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
  • Shohamy, E. (2001). The Power of Tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Spolsky, B. (1990). Social Aspects of Individual Assessment (Ed: J.H. A.L. De Jong, D.K. Stevenson). Individualizing the Assessment of Language Abilities. Multilingual.
  • Turner, C. E. (2001). The Need for Impact Studies of L2 Performance Testing and Rating: Identifying areas of potential consequences at all levels of the testing cycle (Ed: C. Elder , A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, K. O'Loughlin). Experimenting with Uncertainty, Studies in Language Testing 11. (pp. 138-149). Cambridge University Press.
  • Yavuz Kırık, M. (2008). Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Ölçme Değerlendirme Bağlamında Tutum ve Yaklaşımları. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi.
  • Wall, D. (2005). The Impact of High-stakes Examinations on Classroom Teaching. Studies in Language Testing 22, Cambridge University Press.
  • Weir, C.J. (1988). Communicative Language Testing. Prentice Hall.
  • Weir, C.J. (1993). Understanding and Developing language Tests. Prentice Hall
  • Neill, M. (2003 Ocak 13). Transforming student Assessment. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/template.html' den Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır. (s.1-8).
  • FairTest. (2007 Aralık 17). The Dangerous Consequences of High-Stakes Standardized Testing. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/Dangerous%20 Consequences.html'den 29 Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır. (s. 1-3).
  • FairTest. (2007 Aralık 17). Multiple-Choice Tests. http://www.fairtest.org/facts/ mctfcat.html' den 29 Kasım 2006'da alınmıştır.
  • Jones, K. (2000 Ekim). High Stakes vs. Democracy. http://www.fairtest.org/highstakes-vs-democracy' den 31 Mart 2009'da alınmıştır.
  • ÖSYM. (2009) 2009 Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Sistemi (ÖSYS) 2009ÖSYS: YDS Soruları ve Yanıtları ftp://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/2009/2009YDS/yds2009ingilizce.pdf
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Muazzez Yavuz Kırık Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Mart 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Yavuz Kırık, M. (2012). ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education, 6(2), 45-62.
AMA Yavuz Kırık M. ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education. Mart 2012;6(2):45-62.
Chicago Yavuz Kırık, Muazzez. “ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. HAYEF Journal of Education 6, sy. 2 (Mart 2012): 45-62.
EndNote Yavuz Kırık M (01 Mart 2012) ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education 6 2 45–62.
IEEE M. Yavuz Kırık, “ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”, HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 6, sy. 2, ss. 45–62, 2012.
ISNAD Yavuz Kırık, Muazzez. “ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. HAYEF Journal of Education 6/2 (Mart 2012), 45-62.
JAMA Yavuz Kırık M. ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;6:45–62.
MLA Yavuz Kırık, Muazzez. “ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 6, sy. 2, 2012, ss. 45-62.
Vancouver Yavuz Kırık M. ÇOKTAN-SEÇMELİ ÖLÇÜNLENDİRİLMİŞ SINAVLARIN GEÇERLİLİK ÖLÇÜTÜ BAĞLAMINDA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;6(2):45-62.