BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 169 - 182, 07.08.2013

Öz

The importance of writing skill is undeniable in various areas of human life for individuals to explore and improve themselves. The present paper aims to investigate the success of teaching writing in English- as- a –foreign- language by analyzing the writing activities in English language coursebooks used at 9th and 10th grade state schools of Turkey. For the purposes of the study, the theory of writing instruction, specifically genre-based approach, has been explored. Findings have suggested that although some writing activities are compatible with the idea of writing as a purposeful activity, still most activities need to be updated applying the criteria of genre teaching.

Kaynakça

  • Albayrak, Yalçin, Hatice İnce and et al. (2010)Breeze 10- 2. Baskı, MEB Devlet Kitapları, Bediralp Matbaacılık- İstanbul.
  • Baydar, Funda, Hatice, İnce and et al. (2010) Breeze 9- 3. Baskı, MEB Devlet Kitapları, Bediralp Matbaacılık- İstanbul.
  • Bhatia, Vijay K. (1997). “Applied Genre Analysis and ESP”, p.p. 134-149 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Cameron, Lynne. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners, Cambridge University Press.
  • Canagarajah, A. Suresh. (2002). Critical Academic Writing and Multilingual Students. The University of Michigan Press.
  • Casanave, Christine Pearson. (2004). Controversies in Second Language Writing: Dilemmas and Decisions in Research and Instruction. The University of Michigan Press.
  • Connor, Ulla. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing, Cambridge University Press.
  • Dudley-Evans, Tony. (1997) “Genre Models for the Teaching of Academic Writing to Second Language Speakers: Advantages and Disadvantages”, p.p. 150-159 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Ellis, Rod. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press. Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar- Third Edition. Arnold. Hyland, Ken. (2002). Teaching and Researching Writing. Longman.
  • Hyland, Ken. (2003). “Genre-Based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 12. (2003), p.p. 17-29.
  • Kaplan, Robert. (1997). “Contrastive Rhetoric”, p.p. 18-32 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Kramsch, Claire. (1997). “Rethorical Models of Understanding”, p.p. 50-63 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Kubato, R. (1997). “A Reevaluation of the uniqueness of Japanese Written Discourse”. Written Communication. Volume: 14, 1997, p.p. 460-480.
  • Kucer, Stephen B. (2005). Dimensions of Literacy- A Conceptual for Teaching Reading and Writing in School Settings (Second Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Kucer, Stephen B. And Cecilia Silva. (2006). Teaching the Dimensions of Literacy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding Language Teaching- From Method to Postmethod. Lewrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Leki, Ilona. (1991). “Twenty-Five Years of Contrastive Rhetoric: Text Analysis and Writing Pedagogies”. TESOL Quarterly. Volume: 25. (1991), p.p. 123-143.
  • Matsuda, Paul Kei. (2003) “Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 12. Issue: 1. (February 2003), p.p. 65-83.
  • Matsuda, Paul, K. (1997). “Contrastive Rhetoric in Context: A Dynamic Model of L2 Writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 6 (1997), p.p. 45-60.
  • Polio, Charlene. (2001). “Research methodology in Second Language Writing- Research: The Case of Text-Based Studies”, p.p. 91-116 in Silva, Tony and Paul Kei Matsuda, (Eds.). (2001). On Second Language Writing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Ortaöğretim Kurumları İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı 2011, Ankara
  • T. C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Tebliğler Dergisi, Ocak 2011, Cilt: 74, Sayı: 2640. http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari-ve-kurul-kararlari/icerik/150- 19.03.2013
Yıl 2013, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 169 - 182, 07.08.2013

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Albayrak, Yalçin, Hatice İnce and et al. (2010)Breeze 10- 2. Baskı, MEB Devlet Kitapları, Bediralp Matbaacılık- İstanbul.
  • Baydar, Funda, Hatice, İnce and et al. (2010) Breeze 9- 3. Baskı, MEB Devlet Kitapları, Bediralp Matbaacılık- İstanbul.
  • Bhatia, Vijay K. (1997). “Applied Genre Analysis and ESP”, p.p. 134-149 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Cameron, Lynne. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners, Cambridge University Press.
  • Canagarajah, A. Suresh. (2002). Critical Academic Writing and Multilingual Students. The University of Michigan Press.
  • Casanave, Christine Pearson. (2004). Controversies in Second Language Writing: Dilemmas and Decisions in Research and Instruction. The University of Michigan Press.
  • Connor, Ulla. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing, Cambridge University Press.
  • Dudley-Evans, Tony. (1997) “Genre Models for the Teaching of Academic Writing to Second Language Speakers: Advantages and Disadvantages”, p.p. 150-159 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Ellis, Rod. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press. Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar- Third Edition. Arnold. Hyland, Ken. (2002). Teaching and Researching Writing. Longman.
  • Hyland, Ken. (2003). “Genre-Based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 12. (2003), p.p. 17-29.
  • Kaplan, Robert. (1997). “Contrastive Rhetoric”, p.p. 18-32 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Kramsch, Claire. (1997). “Rethorical Models of Understanding”, p.p. 50-63 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Kubato, R. (1997). “A Reevaluation of the uniqueness of Japanese Written Discourse”. Written Communication. Volume: 14, 1997, p.p. 460-480.
  • Kucer, Stephen B. (2005). Dimensions of Literacy- A Conceptual for Teaching Reading and Writing in School Settings (Second Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Kucer, Stephen B. And Cecilia Silva. (2006). Teaching the Dimensions of Literacy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding Language Teaching- From Method to Postmethod. Lewrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Leki, Ilona. (1991). “Twenty-Five Years of Contrastive Rhetoric: Text Analysis and Writing Pedagogies”. TESOL Quarterly. Volume: 25. (1991), p.p. 123-143.
  • Matsuda, Paul Kei. (2003) “Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 12. Issue: 1. (February 2003), p.p. 65-83.
  • Matsuda, Paul, K. (1997). “Contrastive Rhetoric in Context: A Dynamic Model of L2 Writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 6 (1997), p.p. 45-60.
  • Polio, Charlene. (2001). “Research methodology in Second Language Writing- Research: The Case of Text-Based Studies”, p.p. 91-116 in Silva, Tony and Paul Kei Matsuda, (Eds.). (2001). On Second Language Writing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Ortaöğretim Kurumları İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı 2011, Ankara
  • T. C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Tebliğler Dergisi, Ocak 2011, Cilt: 74, Sayı: 2640. http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari-ve-kurul-kararlari/icerik/150- 19.03.2013
Yıl 2013, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 169 - 182, 07.08.2013

Öz

Yazmanın önemi bireyler için kendilerini keşfedip geliştirmeleri açısından birçok yaşam alanında reddedilemez. Bu yazı Türkiye'de devlet okullarında kullanılan 9. ve 10. sınıf ders kitaplarındaki yazma alıştırmalarını incelemek yoluyla İngilizce'de yazma öğretimindeki başarıyı araştırmaktadır. Bu yazı kapsamında yazma öğretiminin özellikle tür odaklı yazma öğretiminin kuramsal temelleri araştırılmıştır. Bulgular şunu göstermektedir ki; bazı yazma alıştırmaları amaçlı bir eylem olarak yazma fikri ile uyumlu olsalar da, bir çok alıştırma tür öğretimi kurallarına göre güncellenmelidir.

Kaynakça

  • Albayrak, Yalçin, Hatice İnce and et al. (2010)Breeze 10- 2. Baskı, MEB Devlet Kitapları, Bediralp Matbaacılık- İstanbul.
  • Baydar, Funda, Hatice, İnce and et al. (2010) Breeze 9- 3. Baskı, MEB Devlet Kitapları, Bediralp Matbaacılık- İstanbul.
  • Bhatia, Vijay K. (1997). “Applied Genre Analysis and ESP”, p.p. 134-149 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Cameron, Lynne. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners, Cambridge University Press.
  • Canagarajah, A. Suresh. (2002). Critical Academic Writing and Multilingual Students. The University of Michigan Press.
  • Casanave, Christine Pearson. (2004). Controversies in Second Language Writing: Dilemmas and Decisions in Research and Instruction. The University of Michigan Press.
  • Connor, Ulla. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing, Cambridge University Press.
  • Dudley-Evans, Tony. (1997) “Genre Models for the Teaching of Academic Writing to Second Language Speakers: Advantages and Disadvantages”, p.p. 150-159 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Ellis, Rod. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press. Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar- Third Edition. Arnold. Hyland, Ken. (2002). Teaching and Researching Writing. Longman.
  • Hyland, Ken. (2003). “Genre-Based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 12. (2003), p.p. 17-29.
  • Kaplan, Robert. (1997). “Contrastive Rhetoric”, p.p. 18-32 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Kramsch, Claire. (1997). “Rethorical Models of Understanding”, p.p. 50-63 in Miller, Tom (Ed.). (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Kubato, R. (1997). “A Reevaluation of the uniqueness of Japanese Written Discourse”. Written Communication. Volume: 14, 1997, p.p. 460-480.
  • Kucer, Stephen B. (2005). Dimensions of Literacy- A Conceptual for Teaching Reading and Writing in School Settings (Second Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Kucer, Stephen B. And Cecilia Silva. (2006). Teaching the Dimensions of Literacy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding Language Teaching- From Method to Postmethod. Lewrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Leki, Ilona. (1991). “Twenty-Five Years of Contrastive Rhetoric: Text Analysis and Writing Pedagogies”. TESOL Quarterly. Volume: 25. (1991), p.p. 123-143.
  • Matsuda, Paul Kei. (2003) “Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 12. Issue: 1. (February 2003), p.p. 65-83.
  • Matsuda, Paul, K. (1997). “Contrastive Rhetoric in Context: A Dynamic Model of L2 Writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume: 6 (1997), p.p. 45-60.
  • Polio, Charlene. (2001). “Research methodology in Second Language Writing- Research: The Case of Text-Based Studies”, p.p. 91-116 in Silva, Tony and Paul Kei Matsuda, (Eds.). (2001). On Second Language Writing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Ortaöğretim Kurumları İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı 2011, Ankara
  • T. C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Tebliğler Dergisi, Ocak 2011, Cilt: 74, Sayı: 2640. http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari-ve-kurul-kararlari/icerik/150- 19.03.2013
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gülay Kıray Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 7 Ağustos 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Kıray, G. (2013). HAYEF Journal of Education, 10(1), 169-182.
AMA Kıray G. HAYEF Journal of Education. Ağustos 2013;10(1):169-182.
Chicago Kıray, Gülay. HAYEF Journal of Education 10, sy. 1 (Ağustos 2013): 169-82.
EndNote Kıray G (01 Ağustos 2013) HAYEF Journal of Education 10 1 169–182.
IEEE G. Kıray, HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 10, sy. 1, ss. 169–182, 2013.
ISNAD Kıray, Gülay. HAYEF Journal of Education 10/1 (Ağustos 2013), 169-182.
JAMA Kıray G. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2013;10:169–182.
MLA Kıray, Gülay. HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 10, sy. 1, 2013, ss. 169-82.
Vancouver Kıray G. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2013;10(1):169-82.