BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 19 - 30, 03.05.2014

Ömer Çakıroğlu Ömer Çakıroğlu Barış Elbir

Öz

The present study was conducted at 2 primary public schools and 4 Private Examination Centres (PEC) in Istanbul, Turkey, including three hundred 8th grade students. The survey investigated students’ attitudes towards science education in public schools and PECs. The questionnaire contained 48 questions assessing understanding of the concept of “Force” in science lessons. The survey results were analysed using the SPSS package program. The Cranach’s Alpha coefficient ranged from 0.713 and 0.821. Contributions of the PECs in elementary science were examined. Reasons behind lower student performance in science education in public school settings were investigated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Private Education Centre Quantity and Qualitative Science Education

Kaynakça

  • Bangser, M., 2008. Preparing High School Students for Successful Transitions to Postsecondary Education and Employment. National High School Center 1-24, E-mail: buchmann.4@sociology.osu.edu.
  • Basturk, S., & Dogan, S. 2010. Investigating high school teachers’ views on Cram School. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(2):135-157.
  • Basturk, S., & Dogan, S. 2011. Evaluations of Cram School Mathematics Teachers on Cram Schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 2(3):68-84.
  • Board, J., 2002. Private Schooling-What Is a Private School?, History of Private Schools in the United States. American Federation of Teachers http://education.stateuniversity.com
  • Bray, M., 2010. Researching Shadow Education: Methodological Challenges and Directions. Asia Pacific Education Review 11:3-13.
  • Buchmann, C., Condron, D J. & Roscigno, V J. 2010. Social Forces. Shadow Education, American Style: Test Preparation, the SAT and College Enrollment, 89 (2): 435-461. Buyukbas, N., 1997. Private courses and Aims of the Turkish Education System. Journal of Contemporary Education 229: 23–25.
  • Byun, S-Y. & Park, P., 2012. The Academic Success of East Asian American Youth: The Role of Shadow Education. Sociology of Education 85(1): 40–60.
  • Carpenter, D., &Kafer, K. 2012. A History of Private School Choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 87 3): 336-350.
  • Celen, F K., Celik, A., & Seferoglu, S S. 2011. Turkish Education System and PISA Results. Academic Information. Inonu University, Turkey, 2:1-9.
  • Chin, C., &Brown, D E. 2000. Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 : 109-138.
  • Cladia, B., Condron, D., & Roscigno, V. 2010. Shadow Education, American Style: Test Preparation, the SAT and College Enrollment. Social Forces 89 (2): 435-61.
  • Dierkes, J., (2010). Teaching in the shadow: operators of small shadow education institutions in Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11: 25-35.
  • Kale, M., (2003). Liselerin örgütsel öğrenme düzeylerinin belirlenmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, 199s. Gok, F., 2006. Expectations Market in the Entrance to Universities: Private Tutoring Centers. Education, Science, Society, 8: 102-109.
  • Kennedy, R,. 2011. A Timeline of Private School Events and History, Review Private School, www.privateschoolreview.com
  • Kıral, B., & Kıral, E. 2009. Comparison of Primary Education System in Turkey and Japanese. Dicle University, Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 12:53-65. Ministry of Education (ME) 2006. General Directorate of Teacher Training, General Qualifications of the Teaching Profession. http//oyegm.meb.gov.tr
  • Ozden, M., 2010. Compare the chemistry teaching in schools and preparatory courses for university entrance examination. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 8(2): 397-416
  • Ozoglu, M. 2011. Private Education Istitutions: Facing the Shadow Education System, Seta Analaysis, 36:1-26
  • Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. 2005. Effect of Private Tutoring on University Entrance Examination Discussion Paper, 1609:1-23.
  • Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. 2008. Private Supplementary Tutoring in Turkey, Recent Evidence on Its Various Aspects. Social Science Research, 3471:1-43.
  • Tsai, C C., 2004a. Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26:1733–1750.
  • Tsai, C C.& Kuo P C., 2008. Cram School Students’ Conceptions of Learning and Learning Science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (3):351-373.
  • Tsukada, M., 1988. Institutionalised Supplementary Education in Japan: The Yobiko and Ronin Student Adaptations. Journal Articles; Reports Descriptive, 24(3): 285-303. Turkay, N T., 2013. The Shadow Education System: Private Courses. International J. Soc. Sci.&Education. l.3(3): 619-634. www.osym.gov.tr/documatation

ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 19 - 30, 03.05.2014

Ömer Çakıroğlu Ömer Çakıroğlu Barış Elbir

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de İstanbul’da 2 devlet ilköğretim okulu ve 4 özel dershanede
8. sınıflara uygulanmıştır. Devlet okullarındaki ve özel dershanelerdeki öğrencilerin
fen eğitimindeki tutumları araştırılmıştır. Katılımcılara fen dersinde “kuvvet”
kavramı değerlendiren 48 soruluk bir anket uygulanmıştır. Anket sonuçları SPSS
paket Programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Cranach’s Alpha güvenirlik katsayısı
0.713-0.821 arasında bulunmuştur. Çalışmada İlköğretimde özel dershanelerin fen
eğitimine katkısı ve Devlet okullarındaki fen eğitimindeki başarısızlığın arkasında
yatan nedenler araştırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Özel Dershaneler Nitel ve Nicel Fen Eğitimi

Kaynakça

  • Bangser, M., 2008. Preparing High School Students for Successful Transitions to Postsecondary Education and Employment. National High School Center 1-24, E-mail: buchmann.4@sociology.osu.edu.
  • Basturk, S., & Dogan, S. 2010. Investigating high school teachers’ views on Cram School. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(2):135-157.
  • Basturk, S., & Dogan, S. 2011. Evaluations of Cram School Mathematics Teachers on Cram Schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 2(3):68-84.
  • Board, J., 2002. Private Schooling-What Is a Private School?, History of Private Schools in the United States. American Federation of Teachers http://education.stateuniversity.com
  • Bray, M., 2010. Researching Shadow Education: Methodological Challenges and Directions. Asia Pacific Education Review 11:3-13.
  • Buchmann, C., Condron, D J. & Roscigno, V J. 2010. Social Forces. Shadow Education, American Style: Test Preparation, the SAT and College Enrollment, 89 (2): 435-461. Buyukbas, N., 1997. Private courses and Aims of the Turkish Education System. Journal of Contemporary Education 229: 23–25.
  • Byun, S-Y. & Park, P., 2012. The Academic Success of East Asian American Youth: The Role of Shadow Education. Sociology of Education 85(1): 40–60.
  • Carpenter, D., &Kafer, K. 2012. A History of Private School Choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 87 3): 336-350.
  • Celen, F K., Celik, A., & Seferoglu, S S. 2011. Turkish Education System and PISA Results. Academic Information. Inonu University, Turkey, 2:1-9.
  • Chin, C., &Brown, D E. 2000. Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 : 109-138.
  • Cladia, B., Condron, D., & Roscigno, V. 2010. Shadow Education, American Style: Test Preparation, the SAT and College Enrollment. Social Forces 89 (2): 435-61.
  • Dierkes, J., (2010). Teaching in the shadow: operators of small shadow education institutions in Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11: 25-35.
  • Kale, M., (2003). Liselerin örgütsel öğrenme düzeylerinin belirlenmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, 199s. Gok, F., 2006. Expectations Market in the Entrance to Universities: Private Tutoring Centers. Education, Science, Society, 8: 102-109.
  • Kennedy, R,. 2011. A Timeline of Private School Events and History, Review Private School, www.privateschoolreview.com
  • Kıral, B., & Kıral, E. 2009. Comparison of Primary Education System in Turkey and Japanese. Dicle University, Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 12:53-65. Ministry of Education (ME) 2006. General Directorate of Teacher Training, General Qualifications of the Teaching Profession. http//oyegm.meb.gov.tr
  • Ozden, M., 2010. Compare the chemistry teaching in schools and preparatory courses for university entrance examination. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 8(2): 397-416
  • Ozoglu, M. 2011. Private Education Istitutions: Facing the Shadow Education System, Seta Analaysis, 36:1-26
  • Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. 2005. Effect of Private Tutoring on University Entrance Examination Discussion Paper, 1609:1-23.
  • Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. 2008. Private Supplementary Tutoring in Turkey, Recent Evidence on Its Various Aspects. Social Science Research, 3471:1-43.
  • Tsai, C C., 2004a. Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26:1733–1750.
  • Tsai, C C.& Kuo P C., 2008. Cram School Students’ Conceptions of Learning and Learning Science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (3):351-373.
  • Tsukada, M., 1988. Institutionalised Supplementary Education in Japan: The Yobiko and Ronin Student Adaptations. Journal Articles; Reports Descriptive, 24(3): 285-303. Turkay, N T., 2013. The Shadow Education System: Private Courses. International J. Soc. Sci.&Education. l.3(3): 619-634. www.osym.gov.tr/documatation
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil EN
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ömer Çakıroğlu Bu kişi benim

Ömer Çakıroğlu Bu kişi benim

Barış Elbir Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 3 Mayıs 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Çakıroğlu, Ö., Çakıroğlu, Ö., & Elbir, B. (2014). ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education, 11(1), 19-30.
AMA Çakıroğlu Ö, Çakıroğlu Ö, Elbir B. ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education. Mayıs 2014;11(1):19-30.
Chicago Çakıroğlu, Ömer, Ömer Çakıroğlu, ve Barış Elbir. “ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI”. HAYEF Journal of Education 11, sy. 1 (Mayıs 2014): 19-30.
EndNote Çakıroğlu Ö, Çakıroğlu Ö, Elbir B (01 Mayıs 2014) ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education 11 1 19–30.
IEEE Ö. Çakıroğlu, Ö. Çakıroğlu, ve B. Elbir, “ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI”, HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 11, sy. 1, ss. 19–30, 2014.
ISNAD Çakıroğlu, Ömer vd. “ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI”. HAYEF Journal of Education 11/1 (Mayıs 2014), 19-30.
JAMA Çakıroğlu Ö, Çakıroğlu Ö, Elbir B. ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2014;11:19–30.
MLA Çakıroğlu, Ömer vd. “ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI”. HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 11, sy. 1, 2014, ss. 19-30.
Vancouver Çakıroğlu Ö, Çakıroğlu Ö, Elbir B. ÖĞRENCI BAKIŞI İLE ÖZEL DERSHANELERIN FEN BILGISI EĞITIMINE KATKISI ÜZERINE BIR ANKET ARAŞTIRMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2014;11(1):19-30.
 Kapak Resmi İndir