This article examines how the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union (EU) shapes the institutional design and authority of independent data protection authorities (DPAs) beyond the EU, focusing on Türkiye and Brazil. Contributing to debates around the “Brussels Effect,” the paper seeks to explore whether the establishment of GDPR-style DPA model might represent a form of pure mimicry or a more complex process of localized legal transplant in two particular settings.
The analysis is both doctrinal (of constitutional and statutory systems) and comparative (comparing institutions’ independence, powers to enforce the law, and accountability mechanisms). It illustrates that although both DPAs loosely follow the GDPR model in terms of their competency and sanctioning capacities, the autonomy and relevance of these institutions are strongly shaped by the domestic constitutional framework and administrative historical legacy.
The paper contends that GDPR-motivated DPAs should be conceptualized as hybrid"public"institutions embedded at the intersection of fundamental rights protection, market order, and administrative enforcement. Instead of producing uniform convergence, the GDPR acts as a soft law catalyst that facilitates institutional change within national and constitutional confines.
Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) Legal Transplant Global Administrative Law Extraterritoriality Data Protection Law
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Hukuk (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 2 Aralık 2025 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 29 Aralık 2025 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 13 Ocak 2026 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.26650/ihid.24.006 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA66DR59GW |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Sayı: 24 |