BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 76, 0 - 0, 22.05.2014

Aygül Turan

Öz

It has been many studies on social capital, knowledge sharing attitude and motivation in the literature, which is illustrated the importance of the concepts for organization. Hence, this study aims to research into the mediating role of motivation in the effect of social capital on knowledge sharing attitude. This study also aims whether there is a difference in social capital, knowledge sharing attitude and motivation, in terms of the employee’s demographic characteristics. Based on the data collection from 400 white-collar employee of the firms in Telecommunication sector in Turkey, altruism, one of the internal motivation factor, is a partial mediator factor in the effect of social capital on knowledge sharing attitude. Reciprocity, an external motivation factor, is also partial mediator factor in the effect of social capital on knowledge sharing attitude.

Anahtar Kelimeler

social capital knowledge sharing attitude motivation reciprocity altruism

Kaynakça

  • ADLER, P. S., KWON, S. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept.
  • Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40. AJZEN, I., FISHBEIN, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social
  • Behavior. New Jersey, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Prentice Hall. BAGOZZI, R. P., DHOLAKIA, U. M. (2002). Intentional Social Action in Virtual
  • Communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(12), 1-20. BAKER, W. (1990). Market Networks and Corporate Behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 589-625.
  • BANDURA, A. (1982). Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
  • BANDURA, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social
  • Cognitive Theory. New Jersey, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Pentice Hall. BANDURA, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory, An Agentic Perspective. Annual
  • Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. BARON, R. M., KENNY , D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical
  • Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • BERKOWITZ, L., LUTTERMAN, K. G. (1968). The Traditional Socially Responsible Personality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(2), 169-185.
  • BLAU, P. M. (1967). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, Amerika
  • Birleşik Devletleri: Willey. BOCK, G., KIM, Y. (2002). Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 1112-1125.
  • BOCK, G. W., ZMUD, R. W., KIM, Y. G., LEE, J. (2005). Behavioral Intention
  • Formation in Knoweldge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators,Social–Psychological Forces and Organizational Climate. MISQuarterly, 24(1), 87-111. BOLAND, R. J., TENKASI, R. V. (1995). Perspective Making and Perspective
  • Taking in Communities of Knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350-372. BOURDIEU, P. (1985). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of
  • Education. New York, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Greenwood Press.In Richardson, J. G. (Eds.), The Forms of Capital (p. 240-287). BREHM, J., RAHN, W. (1997). Individual-Level of Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 99910
  • BRIEF, A. P., MOTOWIDLO, S. J. (1986). Prosocial Organizational Behaviors.
  • The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725. BURT, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.
  • Harvard, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Harvard University Press. BURT, R. S. (1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
  • CHANG, H. H., CHUANG, S. S. (2011). Social Capital and Individual Motivations on Knowledge Sharing: Participant Involvement as a Moderator. Information & Management, 48(1), 9-18.
  • CHIU, C. M., HSU, M. H., WANG , E. T. (2006). Understanding Knowledge
  • Sharing in Virtual Communities: An integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories. Decision Support System, 42(1), 1872-1888.
  • CHOW W. S., CHAN L. S. (2008) Social Network, Social Trust and Shared Goals in
  • Organizational Knowledge Sharing, Information & Management, 40 (1),.458-465. COLEMAN, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.
  • American Journal of Sociology , 94, 95-120. COLEMAN, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Amerika
  • Birleşik Devletleri: Harvard University Press. CONNELLY, C. E., KELLOWAY, K. E. (2003). Predictors of Employees’ Perceptions of Knowledge Sharing Cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5), 294-301.
  • CONSTANT, D., SPROULL, L., KIESLER, S. (1996). The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.
  • DAVENPORT, T. H., PRUSAK, L. (2001). İş Dünyasında Bilgi Yönetimi
  • [Working Knowledge]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Rota Yayıncılık. DÖĞERLİOĞLU, Ö. (2005). Sosyal Ağlar ve Örgütsel Başarı: Yerleşiklik Teorisi.
  • İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 20(235), 36-41. ERDOĞAN, İ. (2007). İşletmelerde Davranış. İstanbul, Türkiye: MİAD Yayınları.
  • EREN, E. (2001). Örgütsel Davranış: Yönetim Psikolojisi. İstanbul, Türkiye: Beta Yayınları.
  • FEHR, E., GACHTER, S. (2000). Fairness and Retaliation:The Economics of
  • Reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-181. FUKUYAMA, F. (1995). The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New
  • York, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Free Press. GÖKSEL, A., AYDINLATAN, B., BİNGÖL, D. (2010). Örgütlerde Bilgi Paylaşım
  • Davranışı: Sosyal Sermaye Boyutundan Bir Bakış. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65( 4), 87-109. GRANOVETTER, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
  • GROOTAERT, C. (2002). Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A
  • Multidisciplinary Tool for Practitioners. Washington, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: World Bank Publications. HANSEN, M. T. (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in
  • Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111. HARGADON, A. B. (1998). Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lesson in Pursuing
  • Continuous Innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 209-227. HAU Y.S., KIM B., LEE H., KIM Y.G., The Effects of Individual Motivations and Social Capital on Employees’ Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Sharing Intentions, International Journal of Information Management, 33 (2), 2012, s. 243-418.
  • HODSON, R. (1996). Dignity in the Workplace Under Participative Management: Alienation and Freedom Revisited. American Sociological Review, 60, 719-738.
  • HOLT, D. H. (1993). Productivity through People, Management Principles and Practices (2. ed.). New Jersey, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Prentice-Hall.
  • HUNG, S., DURCIKOVA, A., LAI, H., LIN, W. (2011). The Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Individuals’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior.
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(1), 415-427. IGLEHART, R. (1997). Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, Amerika Birleşik
  • Devletleri: Princeton University Press. JONES, C., HESTERLY, W. S., BORGATTI, S. P. (1997). A General Theory of
  • Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911-945. KNOKE, D. (1999). Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston, Amerika
  • Birleşik Devletleri: Kluwer Academic Publisher.In Leenders , R. T., & Gabbay, S. M. (Eds.), Organizational Networks and Corporate Social Capital (p. 17-42). KOLLOCK, P. (1999). Communities in Cyberspace. NewYork, Amerika Birleşik
  • Devletleri: Routledge.In Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (Eds.), The Economies of Online Cooperation:Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace (p. 3-25). KURTULUŞ, K. (2010). Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul, Türkiye: Türkmen Kitapevi.
  • LEANA, C. R., VAN BURREAN, H. J. (1999). Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538-555.
  • LEE, C. C., YANG, J. (2000). Knowledge Value Chain. Journal of Management Development, 19(9), 783-793.
  • LEVIN, D. Z., CROSS, R. (2004). The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
  • LIN, H. (2007). Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation on Employee Knowledge Sharing Intentions. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 135-149.
  • LOURY, G. C. (1992). The Economics of Discrimination: Getting to the Core of the Problem. Harvard Journal for American Public Policy, 1, 91-110.
  • LUTHANS, F. (1973). Organizational Behavior (4. ed.). New York, Amerika
  • Birleşik Devletleri: McGraw Hill. MAYER, R. C., DAVIS, J. H. (1999). The Effect of the Performance Appraisal
  • System on Trust for Management: A Field Quasi-Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123-136. MCPODOLNY, J., BARON, J. (1997). Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 673--693.
  • MCALLISTER D. J. (1995) Affect and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundatitions for
  • Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-60. MISZTAL, B. A. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge, Amerika Birleşik
  • Devletleri: Polity Press. MORGAN, R. M., HUNT, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
  • NAHAPIET, J., GHOSHAL, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-286.
  • PARKHE, A. (1993). Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.
  • PAYNE, T. G., MOORE, C. B., GRIFFIS, S. E., AUTRY , C. W. (2011). Multilevel
  • Challenges and Opportunities in Social Capital Research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491-520. POLANYI, K. (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic
  • Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press. PORTES, A., SENSENBRENNER, J. (1993). Embeddednes and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350.
  • PUTNAM, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern
  • Italy. Princeton, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Princeton University Press. PUTNAM, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.
  • Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-.78. RENKO, Y. H., AUTIO, E., SAPIENZA, H. (2001). Social Capital, Knowledge
  • Acquisition, And Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 587-613. RING, P. S., VAN DE VEN, A. H. (1994). Developmental Processes of Cooperative
  • Interorganizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90-118. SCOTT, C. R., CORMAN, S. R., CHENEY, G. (2014). Development of a Structurational Model of Identification in The Organization. Communication Theory, 8(3), 298-336.
  • SETHI, R., COMPEAU, L. D., (2002). Social Construction Organizational Identity and Market Orientation of the Firm. American Marketing Association Proceeding, 13, 183-184.
  • TAJFEL, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
  • TSAI, W., GHOSHAL, S. (1998). Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of
  • Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-478. WASKO, M. FARAJ, S. (2000) It Is What One Does: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 155-173.
  • WASKO, M. M., FARAJ, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. (1998). Social Capital and Economic Development:Toward a
  • Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework. Theory and Society, 27(3), 151-208. YU, Y., WILKINS, L. C., MA, W. W. K. (2004). Innovation Through Information
  • Technology. Louisiana, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Idea Group Inc..In Khosrowpour, M. (Eds.), Developing an Instrument for Measuring Knowledge Sharing Attitudes (p. 272-276).

SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 76, 0 - 0, 22.05.2014

Aygül Turan

Öz

Literatürde sosyal sermaye, bilgi paylaşımı ve motivasyon kavramları konusunda yapılan çalışmaların sayıca fazla olması, bu kavramların organizasyonlar için ne kadar önemli olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.  Çalışanların bilgi paylaşma davranışlarının organizasyonlar için ne kadar kıymetli olduğu noktasından hareketle; bu çalışmada, bilgi paylaşma davranışı ortaya çıkmadan oluşan bilgi paylaşma tutumu incelenmiş ve tutumların yönlendirilmesiyle davranış değişikliğinin gerçekleştirilebileceği varsayımına dayanarak sosyal sermaye ile bilgi paylaşma tutumu arasındaki ilişkide motivasyonun aracılık rolünü araştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Ayrıca çalışanların demografik özellikleri açısından sosyal sermaye, bilgi paylaşma tutumu ve motivasyonlarında bir farklılık olup olmadığının araştırılması, bu çalışmanın bir diğer amacıdır. Araştırmanın kapsamını Türkiye’deki Telekomünikasyon sektöründe çalışan beyaz yakalı çalışanlar oluşturmaktadır. Bu kapsam dahilinde 400 çalışandan alınan verilerle yapılan analiz sonuçları; içsel motivasyon boyutlarından özgeciliğin sosyal sermaye ile bilgi paylaşma tutumu arasındaki ilişkide aracılık rolü üstlendiğini ve dışsal motivasyon boyutlarından karşılıklı fayda bekleme boyutunun da sosyal sermaye ile bilgi paylaşma tutumu arasındaki ilişkide aracılık rolü üstlendiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Sermaye Bilgi Paylaşma Tutumu Motivasyon Karşılıklı Fayda Bekleme Özgecilik

Kaynakça

  • ADLER, P. S., KWON, S. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept.
  • Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40. AJZEN, I., FISHBEIN, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social
  • Behavior. New Jersey, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Prentice Hall. BAGOZZI, R. P., DHOLAKIA, U. M. (2002). Intentional Social Action in Virtual
  • Communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(12), 1-20. BAKER, W. (1990). Market Networks and Corporate Behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 589-625.
  • BANDURA, A. (1982). Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
  • BANDURA, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social
  • Cognitive Theory. New Jersey, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Pentice Hall. BANDURA, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory, An Agentic Perspective. Annual
  • Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. BARON, R. M., KENNY , D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical
  • Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • BERKOWITZ, L., LUTTERMAN, K. G. (1968). The Traditional Socially Responsible Personality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(2), 169-185.
  • BLAU, P. M. (1967). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, Amerika
  • Birleşik Devletleri: Willey. BOCK, G., KIM, Y. (2002). Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 1112-1125.
  • BOCK, G. W., ZMUD, R. W., KIM, Y. G., LEE, J. (2005). Behavioral Intention
  • Formation in Knoweldge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators,Social–Psychological Forces and Organizational Climate. MISQuarterly, 24(1), 87-111. BOLAND, R. J., TENKASI, R. V. (1995). Perspective Making and Perspective
  • Taking in Communities of Knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350-372. BOURDIEU, P. (1985). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of
  • Education. New York, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Greenwood Press.In Richardson, J. G. (Eds.), The Forms of Capital (p. 240-287). BREHM, J., RAHN, W. (1997). Individual-Level of Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 99910
  • BRIEF, A. P., MOTOWIDLO, S. J. (1986). Prosocial Organizational Behaviors.
  • The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725. BURT, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.
  • Harvard, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Harvard University Press. BURT, R. S. (1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
  • CHANG, H. H., CHUANG, S. S. (2011). Social Capital and Individual Motivations on Knowledge Sharing: Participant Involvement as a Moderator. Information & Management, 48(1), 9-18.
  • CHIU, C. M., HSU, M. H., WANG , E. T. (2006). Understanding Knowledge
  • Sharing in Virtual Communities: An integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories. Decision Support System, 42(1), 1872-1888.
  • CHOW W. S., CHAN L. S. (2008) Social Network, Social Trust and Shared Goals in
  • Organizational Knowledge Sharing, Information & Management, 40 (1),.458-465. COLEMAN, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.
  • American Journal of Sociology , 94, 95-120. COLEMAN, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Amerika
  • Birleşik Devletleri: Harvard University Press. CONNELLY, C. E., KELLOWAY, K. E. (2003). Predictors of Employees’ Perceptions of Knowledge Sharing Cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5), 294-301.
  • CONSTANT, D., SPROULL, L., KIESLER, S. (1996). The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.
  • DAVENPORT, T. H., PRUSAK, L. (2001). İş Dünyasında Bilgi Yönetimi
  • [Working Knowledge]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Rota Yayıncılık. DÖĞERLİOĞLU, Ö. (2005). Sosyal Ağlar ve Örgütsel Başarı: Yerleşiklik Teorisi.
  • İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 20(235), 36-41. ERDOĞAN, İ. (2007). İşletmelerde Davranış. İstanbul, Türkiye: MİAD Yayınları.
  • EREN, E. (2001). Örgütsel Davranış: Yönetim Psikolojisi. İstanbul, Türkiye: Beta Yayınları.
  • FEHR, E., GACHTER, S. (2000). Fairness and Retaliation:The Economics of
  • Reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-181. FUKUYAMA, F. (1995). The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New
  • York, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Free Press. GÖKSEL, A., AYDINLATAN, B., BİNGÖL, D. (2010). Örgütlerde Bilgi Paylaşım
  • Davranışı: Sosyal Sermaye Boyutundan Bir Bakış. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65( 4), 87-109. GRANOVETTER, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
  • GROOTAERT, C. (2002). Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A
  • Multidisciplinary Tool for Practitioners. Washington, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: World Bank Publications. HANSEN, M. T. (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in
  • Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111. HARGADON, A. B. (1998). Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lesson in Pursuing
  • Continuous Innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 209-227. HAU Y.S., KIM B., LEE H., KIM Y.G., The Effects of Individual Motivations and Social Capital on Employees’ Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Sharing Intentions, International Journal of Information Management, 33 (2), 2012, s. 243-418.
  • HODSON, R. (1996). Dignity in the Workplace Under Participative Management: Alienation and Freedom Revisited. American Sociological Review, 60, 719-738.
  • HOLT, D. H. (1993). Productivity through People, Management Principles and Practices (2. ed.). New Jersey, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Prentice-Hall.
  • HUNG, S., DURCIKOVA, A., LAI, H., LIN, W. (2011). The Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Individuals’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior.
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(1), 415-427. IGLEHART, R. (1997). Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, Amerika Birleşik
  • Devletleri: Princeton University Press. JONES, C., HESTERLY, W. S., BORGATTI, S. P. (1997). A General Theory of
  • Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911-945. KNOKE, D. (1999). Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston, Amerika
  • Birleşik Devletleri: Kluwer Academic Publisher.In Leenders , R. T., & Gabbay, S. M. (Eds.), Organizational Networks and Corporate Social Capital (p. 17-42). KOLLOCK, P. (1999). Communities in Cyberspace. NewYork, Amerika Birleşik
  • Devletleri: Routledge.In Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (Eds.), The Economies of Online Cooperation:Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace (p. 3-25). KURTULUŞ, K. (2010). Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul, Türkiye: Türkmen Kitapevi.
  • LEANA, C. R., VAN BURREAN, H. J. (1999). Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538-555.
  • LEE, C. C., YANG, J. (2000). Knowledge Value Chain. Journal of Management Development, 19(9), 783-793.
  • LEVIN, D. Z., CROSS, R. (2004). The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
  • LIN, H. (2007). Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation on Employee Knowledge Sharing Intentions. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 135-149.
  • LOURY, G. C. (1992). The Economics of Discrimination: Getting to the Core of the Problem. Harvard Journal for American Public Policy, 1, 91-110.
  • LUTHANS, F. (1973). Organizational Behavior (4. ed.). New York, Amerika
  • Birleşik Devletleri: McGraw Hill. MAYER, R. C., DAVIS, J. H. (1999). The Effect of the Performance Appraisal
  • System on Trust for Management: A Field Quasi-Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123-136. MCPODOLNY, J., BARON, J. (1997). Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 673--693.
  • MCALLISTER D. J. (1995) Affect and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundatitions for
  • Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-60. MISZTAL, B. A. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge, Amerika Birleşik
  • Devletleri: Polity Press. MORGAN, R. M., HUNT, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
  • NAHAPIET, J., GHOSHAL, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-286.
  • PARKHE, A. (1993). Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.
  • PAYNE, T. G., MOORE, C. B., GRIFFIS, S. E., AUTRY , C. W. (2011). Multilevel
  • Challenges and Opportunities in Social Capital Research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491-520. POLANYI, K. (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic
  • Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press. PORTES, A., SENSENBRENNER, J. (1993). Embeddednes and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350.
  • PUTNAM, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern
  • Italy. Princeton, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Princeton University Press. PUTNAM, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.
  • Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-.78. RENKO, Y. H., AUTIO, E., SAPIENZA, H. (2001). Social Capital, Knowledge
  • Acquisition, And Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 587-613. RING, P. S., VAN DE VEN, A. H. (1994). Developmental Processes of Cooperative
  • Interorganizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90-118. SCOTT, C. R., CORMAN, S. R., CHENEY, G. (2014). Development of a Structurational Model of Identification in The Organization. Communication Theory, 8(3), 298-336.
  • SETHI, R., COMPEAU, L. D., (2002). Social Construction Organizational Identity and Market Orientation of the Firm. American Marketing Association Proceeding, 13, 183-184.
  • TAJFEL, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
  • TSAI, W., GHOSHAL, S. (1998). Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of
  • Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-478. WASKO, M. FARAJ, S. (2000) It Is What One Does: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 155-173.
  • WASKO, M. M., FARAJ, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. (1998). Social Capital and Economic Development:Toward a
  • Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework. Theory and Society, 27(3), 151-208. YU, Y., WILKINS, L. C., MA, W. W. K. (2004). Innovation Through Information
  • Technology. Louisiana, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Idea Group Inc..In Khosrowpour, M. (Eds.), Developing an Instrument for Measuring Knowledge Sharing Attitudes (p. 272-276).
Toplam 76 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm MAKALELER
Yazarlar

Aygül Turan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 22 Mayıs 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 76

Kaynak Göster

APA Turan, A. (2014). SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi, 25(76).
AMA Turan A. SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi. Ekim 2014;25(76).
Chicago Turan, Aygül. “SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi 25, sy. 76 (Ekim 2014).
EndNote Turan A (01 Ekim 2014) SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi 25 76
IEEE A. Turan, “SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi, c. 25, sy. 76, 2014.
ISNAD Turan, Aygül. “SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi 25/76 (Ekim 2014).
JAMA Turan A. SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi. 2014;25.
MLA Turan, Aygül. “SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi, c. 25, sy. 76, 2014.
Vancouver Turan A. SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞMA TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNDE MOTİVASYONUN ROLÜ: TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi. 2014;25(76).
 Kapak Resmi İndir