EN
The comparison of losartan and ramipril on the incidence of hyperkalaemia among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease
Abstract
Background and Aims: The Joint National Committee 8th guideline recommends the initiation of renin angiotensin aldoste- rone system (RAAS)-linked drugs for hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and ramipril, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, are widely utilized antihypertensive agents with sound efficacy and safety. The study compared the hyperkalemia incidences in CKD patients exposed to losartan and ramipril.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted for 12 months in the nephrology outpatient setting of a private tertiary care referral hospital in the Malabar region of Kerala. CKD patients with hypertension who were on ACE inhibitors or ARB therapy constituted our study population. Their demographic details, serum creatinine and potassium and urine protein were documented for three consecutive patient consultations.
Results: There were an equal number of samples (n=186) in each of the losartan and ramipril administered groups. Losar- tan and ramipril doses preferred by the nephrologist were 1.25, 25, 50 & 100 mg and 0.625, 1.2, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg, respec- tively. The Mann-Whitney U test showed statistical significance (p0.05) between RAAS-related drugs and patients’ total daily doses. We noticed more frequency of hyperkalemia in the losartan group (n=11, 5.9%) than in the ramipril group (n=4, 2.2%). Initially, the mean serum potassium was low in the ACE inhibitor (4.35±0.55) subset, and then there was augmenta- tion in the second (4.46±0.52) and third (4.52±0.55) patient consultations. The repeated measures ANOVA tests depicted the samples to be different (p<0.05) in the serum potassium measurements within the losartan group (p-=0.018) and ramipril group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Losartan gave favorable clinical effects in CKD patients with regards to serum creatinine and potassium. How- ever, the frequency in reduction of proteinuria was profound in ramipril understudies.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted for 12 months in the nephrology outpatient setting of a private tertiary care referral hospital in the Malabar region of Kerala. CKD patients with hypertension who were on ACE inhibitors or ARB therapy constituted our study population. Their demographic details, serum creatinine and potassium and urine protein were documented for three consecutive patient consultations.
Results: There were an equal number of samples (n=186) in each of the losartan and ramipril administered groups. Losar- tan and ramipril doses preferred by the nephrologist were 1.25, 25, 50 & 100 mg and 0.625, 1.2, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg, respec- tively. The Mann-Whitney U test showed statistical significance (p0.05) between RAAS-related drugs and patients’ total daily doses. We noticed more frequency of hyperkalemia in the losartan group (n=11, 5.9%) than in the ramipril group (n=4, 2.2%). Initially, the mean serum potassium was low in the ACE inhibitor (4.35±0.55) subset, and then there was augmenta- tion in the second (4.46±0.52) and third (4.52±0.55) patient consultations. The repeated measures ANOVA tests depicted the samples to be different (p<0.05) in the serum potassium measurements within the losartan group (p-=0.018) and ramipril group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Losartan gave favorable clinical effects in CKD patients with regards to serum creatinine and potassium. How- ever, the frequency in reduction of proteinuria was profound in ramipril understudies.
Keywords
References
- Baker, M., & Perazella, M. A. (2020). NSAIDs in CKD: Are they safe? American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 76(4), 546–557. https://doi. org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.03.023
- Bakris, G. L., & Weir, M. R. (2000). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated elevations in serum creatinine: Is this a cause for concern? Archives of Internal Medicine, 160(5), 685–693. https:// doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.5.685
- Chan, J. C., Critchley, J. A., Lappe, J. T., Raskin, S. J., Snavely, D., Gold- berg, A. I., & Sweet, C. S. (1995). Randomised, double-blind, paral- lel study of the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan potassium compared with felodipine ER in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension, 9(9), 765–771.
- Collard, D., Brouwer, T. F., Peters, R. J. G., Vogt, L., & van den Born, B.-J. H. (2018). Creatinine Rise during blood pressure therapy and the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 dia- betes mellitus. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979), 72(6), 1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11944
- Coresh, J., Selvin, E., Stevens, L. A., Manzi, J., Kusek, J. W., Eggers, P. … Levey, A. S. (2007). Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA, 298(17), 2038–2047. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.298.17.2038
- Council on Credentialing in Pharmacy, Albanese, N. P., & Rouse, M. J. (2010). Scope of contemporary pharmacy practice: Roles, responsibilities, and functions of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association: JAPhA, 50(2), e35-69. https://doi.org/10.1331/JAPhA.2010.10510
- Doggrell, S. A. (2001). Is Ramipril the pril for diabetes and kidney disease? Drugs of Today (Barcelona, Spain: 1998), 37(5), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1358/dot.2001.37.5.627954
- Duan, J., Wang, C., Liu, D., Qiao, Y., Pan, S., Jiang, D. … Liu, Z. (2019). Prevalence and risk factors of chronic kidney disease and dia- betic kidney disease in Chinese rural residents: A cross-sectional survey. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 10408. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-019-46857-7
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
April 28, 2022
Submission Date
May 17, 2021
Acceptance Date
November 2, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 52 Number: 1
APA
Kt, M. S., Rt, S., & C, D. (2022). The comparison of losartan and ramipril on the incidence of hyperkalaemia among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, 52(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2022.937821
AMA
1.Kt MS, Rt S, C D. The comparison of losartan and ramipril on the incidence of hyperkalaemia among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. iujp. 2022;52(1):1-7. doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2022.937821
Chicago
Kt, Mohammed Salim, Saravanakumar Rt, and Dilip C. 2022. “The Comparison of Losartan and Ramipril on the Incidence of Hyperkalaemia Among Hypertensive Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 52 (1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2022.937821.
EndNote
Kt MS, Rt S, C D (April 1, 2022) The comparison of losartan and ramipril on the incidence of hyperkalaemia among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 52 1 1–7.
IEEE
[1]M. S. Kt, S. Rt, and D. C, “The comparison of losartan and ramipril on the incidence of hyperkalaemia among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease”, iujp, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2022.937821.
ISNAD
Kt, Mohammed Salim - Rt, Saravanakumar - C, Dilip. “The Comparison of Losartan and Ramipril on the Incidence of Hyperkalaemia Among Hypertensive Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 52/1 (April 1, 2022): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2022.937821.
JAMA
1.Kt MS, Rt S, C D. The comparison of losartan and ramipril on the incidence of hyperkalaemia among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. iujp. 2022;52:1–7.
MLA
Kt, Mohammed Salim, et al. “The Comparison of Losartan and Ramipril on the Incidence of Hyperkalaemia Among Hypertensive Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 52, no. 1, Apr. 2022, pp. 1-7, doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2022.937821.
Vancouver
1.Mohammed Salim Kt, Saravanakumar Rt, Dilip C. The comparison of losartan and ramipril on the incidence of hyperkalaemia among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. iujp. 2022 Apr. 1;52(1):1-7. doi:10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2022.937821