Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

In vitro characterization of mucoadhesive polysaccharide polymers tablets fabricated using FTIR press

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2, 79 - 82, 27.08.2020

Öz

Background and Aim: Buccal/sublingual drug delivery is gradually becoming one of the most experimented routes for alternate drug delivery. The major advantage of both routes is their high vascularity that allows a substantial permeation of drugs into systemic circulation. Mucoadhesive biopolymers are the mainstay of a transmucosal drug delivery system. Methods: We formulated blank tablets of explored mucoadhesive biopolymers (sodium alginate, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyl propyl methyl) cellulose using a combination of two at a time. The novelty of this script lies in the formation of tablets using the FTIR hydraulic press, as opposed toa conventional tablet punching machine, at two different pressures. The tablets were subjected to basic characterizations of polymeric interaction, hardness, and swelling behaviour. Results: An interaction analysis using XRD revealed a good interaction between the polymers. HC-300 and AC-300 were found to be the hardest among the tablets formulated. In terms of swelling behaviour, AC-200 and HA-300 displayed the best swelling as compared to other combinations. Conclusion: In the absence of a conventional tablet punching machine, we fabricated swellable biopolymeric tablets using the regular KBr hydraulic press that comes as an accessory with the FTIR instrument. These tablets can possible be used for delivering drugs through buccal mucosa.

Kaynakça

  • Barua, S., Kim, H., Jo, K., Seo, C. W., Park, T. J., Lee, K. B. … Lee, J. (2016). Drug delivery techniques for buccal route: Formulation strategies and recent advances in dosage form design. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 46, 593–613. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40005-016-0281-9.
  • Boddupalli, B. M., Mohammad, Z. N. K., Nath, R. A., & Banji, D. (2010). Mucoadhesive drug delivery system - an overview. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research, 1(4), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.4103/0110-5558.76436
  • Favacho, H. A. S., do Couto, R. O., Duarto, M. P. F., Peixoto, M. P. G., Lopez, R. F. V., Pedrazzi, V, de Gaitani, C. M., & de Freitas, O. (2020). Synergy between surfactants and mucoadhesive polymers enhances the transbuccal permeation of local anesthetics from freeze-dried tablets. Material Science and Engineering: C, 108, 110373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110373.
  • Mura, P., Cirri, M., Mennini, N., Casella, G., & Maestrelli, F. (2016). Polymeric mucoadhesive tablets for topical or systemic buccal delivery of clonazepam: Effect of cyclodextrin complexation. Carbohydrate Polymers, 152, 755–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. carbpol.2016.07.075
  • Koland, M., Vijayanarayana, K., Charyulu, R. N., & Prabhu, N. (2011). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of chitosan buccal films of ondansetron hydrochloride. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 1(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-973X.85967
  • Shridhar, G. S., Manohar, S. D., & Bhanudas, S. R. (2013). Mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery: An overview. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research,3(4), 319-332.
  • Sudhakar, Y., Kuotsu, K., & Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2006). Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery — A promising option for orally less efficient drugs. Journal of Controlled Release,114, 15–40. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.012
  • Vila, M. M., Tardelli, E. R., Chaud, M. V., Tubino, M., & Balcão, V. M. (2014). Development of a buccal mucoadhesive film for fast dissolution: Mathematical rationale, production and physicochemical characterization, Drug Delivery, 21(7), 530–539. https://doi.org /10.3109/10717544.2013.851301.
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2, 79 - 82, 27.08.2020

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Barua, S., Kim, H., Jo, K., Seo, C. W., Park, T. J., Lee, K. B. … Lee, J. (2016). Drug delivery techniques for buccal route: Formulation strategies and recent advances in dosage form design. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 46, 593–613. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40005-016-0281-9.
  • Boddupalli, B. M., Mohammad, Z. N. K., Nath, R. A., & Banji, D. (2010). Mucoadhesive drug delivery system - an overview. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research, 1(4), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.4103/0110-5558.76436
  • Favacho, H. A. S., do Couto, R. O., Duarto, M. P. F., Peixoto, M. P. G., Lopez, R. F. V., Pedrazzi, V, de Gaitani, C. M., & de Freitas, O. (2020). Synergy between surfactants and mucoadhesive polymers enhances the transbuccal permeation of local anesthetics from freeze-dried tablets. Material Science and Engineering: C, 108, 110373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110373.
  • Mura, P., Cirri, M., Mennini, N., Casella, G., & Maestrelli, F. (2016). Polymeric mucoadhesive tablets for topical or systemic buccal delivery of clonazepam: Effect of cyclodextrin complexation. Carbohydrate Polymers, 152, 755–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. carbpol.2016.07.075
  • Koland, M., Vijayanarayana, K., Charyulu, R. N., & Prabhu, N. (2011). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of chitosan buccal films of ondansetron hydrochloride. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 1(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-973X.85967
  • Shridhar, G. S., Manohar, S. D., & Bhanudas, S. R. (2013). Mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery: An overview. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research,3(4), 319-332.
  • Sudhakar, Y., Kuotsu, K., & Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2006). Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery — A promising option for orally less efficient drugs. Journal of Controlled Release,114, 15–40. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.012
  • Vila, M. M., Tardelli, E. R., Chaud, M. V., Tubino, M., & Balcão, V. M. (2014). Development of a buccal mucoadhesive film for fast dissolution: Mathematical rationale, production and physicochemical characterization, Drug Delivery, 21(7), 530–539. https://doi.org /10.3109/10717544.2013.851301.
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eczacılık ve İlaç Bilimleri, Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Article
Yazarlar

Ashwini Kumar Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-4696-4652

Sudhanshu Kumar Bharti Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-9925-5553

Awanish Kumar Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-8735-479X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Ağustos 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Haziran 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Kumar, A., Kumar Bharti, S., & Kumar, A. (2020). In vitro characterization of mucoadhesive polysaccharide polymers tablets fabricated using FTIR press. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, 50(2), 79-82.
AMA Kumar A, Kumar Bharti S, Kumar A. In vitro characterization of mucoadhesive polysaccharide polymers tablets fabricated using FTIR press. iujp. Ağustos 2020;50(2):79-82.
Chicago Kumar, Ashwini, Sudhanshu Kumar Bharti, ve Awanish Kumar. “In Vitro Characterization of Mucoadhesive Polysaccharide Polymers Tablets Fabricated Using FTIR Press”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 50, sy. 2 (Ağustos 2020): 79-82.
EndNote Kumar A, Kumar Bharti S, Kumar A (01 Ağustos 2020) In vitro characterization of mucoadhesive polysaccharide polymers tablets fabricated using FTIR press. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 50 2 79–82.
IEEE A. Kumar, S. Kumar Bharti, ve A. Kumar, “In vitro characterization of mucoadhesive polysaccharide polymers tablets fabricated using FTIR press”, iujp, c. 50, sy. 2, ss. 79–82, 2020.
ISNAD Kumar, Ashwini vd. “In Vitro Characterization of Mucoadhesive Polysaccharide Polymers Tablets Fabricated Using FTIR Press”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 50/2 (Ağustos 2020), 79-82.
JAMA Kumar A, Kumar Bharti S, Kumar A. In vitro characterization of mucoadhesive polysaccharide polymers tablets fabricated using FTIR press. iujp. 2020;50:79–82.
MLA Kumar, Ashwini vd. “In Vitro Characterization of Mucoadhesive Polysaccharide Polymers Tablets Fabricated Using FTIR Press”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, c. 50, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 79-82.
Vancouver Kumar A, Kumar Bharti S, Kumar A. In vitro characterization of mucoadhesive polysaccharide polymers tablets fabricated using FTIR press. iujp. 2020;50(2):79-82.