Turkish Adaptation of Behavioral Inhibition System / Behavioral Activation System Scales (BIS/BAS Scales): Validity and Reliability Studies

Öz

According to the Reinforcement Sensitivity

Theory (Gray, 1987, 1990), there are two ba-

sic motivational systems which are sensitive to

signals of reward (Behavioral Activation Sys-

tem-BAS) and punishment (Behavioral

Inhibition System-BIS). One of the most

commonly used instrument for evaluating

these two systems is BIS/BAS Scales (Carver

and White, 1994). The purpose of this study is

to determine the validity and reliability of the

Turkish version of the BIS/ BAS Scales. The

Turkish scale was administered to 371 college

undergraduates. In order to de- termine the

validity of the scale; exploratory factor

analysis was conducted using principal

components analysis, inter-correlations among

the subscales were examined with Pearson cor-

relation analysis, Sensation Seeking Scale-V

and I-7 Impulsiveness Questionnaire were also

administered to 89 subjects for convergent va-

lidity. For the reliability study, Cronbach’s alpha

coefficients and test-retest reliability values were

calculated. Factor analysis indicated that the

same 4-factor structure (behavioral inhibition,

fun seeking, reward responsiveness and drive).

Alpha and reliability values were significant

and the expected correlations were determined

among the similar subscales of the three scales.

These results suggested that the Turkish BIS/BAS

Scales is a valid and reliable measure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Behavioral Inhibition System/ Behavioral Activation System Scales (BIS/BAS Scales),validity,reliability

Davranışsal İnhibisyon Sistemi / Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Gray'in (1987, 1990) önerdiği Pekiştirmeye
Duyarlılık Teorisi'ne göre, ceza (Davranışsal
İnhibisyon Sistemi-DİS) ve ödül (Davranışsal
Aktivasyon Sistemi-DAS) sinyallerine duyarlı
olan iki temel motivasyonel sistem vardır. Bu iki
sistemi incelemek için en sık kullanılan ölçek ise,
Carver ve White (1994) tarafından geliştirilen
DİS/DAS Ölçeği'dir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, DİS/
DAS Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye uyarlanması ile geçerlik
ve güvenirliğinin tespit edilmesidir. Türkçeye
çevrilen ölçek 371 üniversite öğrencisine
uygulanmıştır. Geçerlik çalışmasında; temel
bileşenler analizi ile açıklayıcı faktör analizi
yürütülmüş, Pearson korelasyon analizi ile alt
ölçekler arasındaki ilişki incelenmiş ve birleşen
geçerlik tespiti için ise 89 öğrenciye ayrıca
Heyecan Arama Ölçeği-V ve I-7 Dürtüsellik
Ölçeği de uygulanmıştır. Güvenirlik çalışmasında,
cronbach alfa katsayıları ile test-tekrar test
güvenirlik değerleri saptanmıştır. Faktör analizi,
orijinal ölçekteki 4-faktörlü yapıyı (davranışsal
inhibisyon, eğlence arayışı, ödüle duyarlılık ve
dürtü) desteklemiştir. Ayrıca, alfa ve güvenirlik
değerleri anlamlı olup uygulanan üç ölçeğin
benzer alt ölçekleri arasında beklenen yönde
korelasyonlar elde edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, Türkçe
DİS/DAS Ölçeği'nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir
ölçek olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Davranışsal İnhibisyon
Sistemi/Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeği
(DİS/DAS Ölçeği), geçerlik, güvenirlik.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Davranışsal İnhibisyon Sistemi/Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeği (DİS/DAS Ölçeği),geçerlik,güvenilirlik

Kaynakça

1. Ayçiçeği-Dinn, A., Arıcak, T., & Dinn, W. M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Turkish I-7 Impulsiveness Questi- onnaire. Personality and Individual Dif- ferences, (Değerlendirme aşamasında).
2. Beevers, C. G., & Meyer, B. (2002). Lack of positive experiences and positive expec- tancies mediate the relationship betwe- en BAS responsiveness and depression. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 549-564.
3. Beyaz, Ş. (2004). Heyecan Arama Gerek- sinimi ve Akran Baskısının Ergenlerin Risk Alma Eğilimleriyle İlişkisi. Yayın- lanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
4. Bijttebier, P., Beck, I., Claes, L., & Vande- reycken, W. (2009). Gray’s Reinforce- ment Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopatho- logy associations. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 421-430.
5. Bjİrnebekk, G. (2009). Psychometric pro- perties of the scores on the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scales in a sample of Norwegian children. Educa- tional and Psychological Measurement, 69/4, 636-654.
6. Bulduk, S., & Cesur, S. (2003). Kişilikte Heyecanların Rolü: Gray-Wilson Kişilik Ölçeği, Psikometrik Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, Çantay Kitabevi, İstanbul.
7. Caci, H., Deschaux, O., & Baylé, F. J. (2007). Psychometric properties of the French versions of the BIS/BAS scales and the SPSRQ. Personality and Indivi- dual Differences, 47, 987-998.
8. Carver, C. S. & White, T. L. (1994). Beha- vioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67/2, 319-333.

9. Cogswell, A., Alloy, L. B., van Dulmen, M. H. M., & Fresco, D. M. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report me- asures. Personality and Individual Die- rences, 40, 1649-1658.
10. Cooper, A., Gomez, R., & Aucote, H. (2007). The Behavioural Inhibition System and Behavioural Approach System (BIS/ BAS) Scales: Measurement and struc- tural invariance across adults and ado- lescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 295-305.
11. Corr, P. J. (2001). Testing problems in J. A. Gray’s personality theory: A commen- tary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 333-352.
12. Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317-332.
13. Corr, P. J., & Perkins, A. M. (2006). The role of theory in the psychophysiology of personality: From Ivan Pavlov to Jeffrey Gray. International Journal of Psychoph- ysiology, 62/3, 367-76.
14. Corr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): Introduction. In P. J. Corr (Ed), The reinforcement sensitivity the- ory of personality (s. 1-43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dissabandara, L., Loxton, N., Dias, S., Dag- lish, M., & Stadlin, A. (2011). Psycho- metric properties of three personality inventories translated to Sinhalese. Sri Lanka Journal of Psychiatry, 2/1, 13-17.
16. Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, C. C. Tho- mas.
17. Eysenck, S., Pearson, P., Eastıng, G., All- sopp, J. (1985). Age norms for impulsi- veness, venturesomeness, and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6/5, 613-619.
18. Fowles, D. C. (1980). The three arousal mo- del: Implications of Gray’s two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electroder- mal activity, and psychopathy. Psychoph- ysiology, 17, 87-104.
19. Franken, I. H. A., Muris, P., & Rassin, E. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Dutch BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral As- sessment, 27, 25-30.
20. Franken, I. H. A., Muris, P., & Georgieva, I. (2006). Gray’s model of personality and addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 399-403.
21. Gomez, R., Cooper, A., & Gomez, A. (2005). An item response theory analysis of the Carver & White (1994) BIS/BAS Scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1093-1103.
22. Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiologi- cal basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8/3, 249-266.
23. Gray, J. A. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Reseach in Personality, 21, 493-509.
24. Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that media- te both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269-288.
25. Gray, J. A. & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippo- campal system (2. Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Hashimoto, T., Mojaverian, T., & Kim, H. S. (2012). Culture, interpersonal stress, and psychological distress. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 43/4, 527-532.
27. Heubeck, B., Wilkinson, R., & Cologon, J. (1998). A second look at Carver and White’s (1994) BIS/BAS scales. Per- sonality and Individual Differences, 25, 785-800.
28. Hughes, K. A., Moore, R. A., Morris, P. H., & Corr, P. J. (2012). Throwing light on the dark side of personality: Reinfor- cement sensitivity theory and primary/ secondary psychopathy in a student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 532-536.
29. Johnson, S. L., Turner, R. J., & Iwata, N. (2003). BIS/BAS levels and psychiat- ric disorder: An epidemiological study. Journal of Psychopathology and Beha- vioral Assessment, 25, 25-36.
30. Jones, S., & Day, C. (2008). Self appraisal and behavioral activation in the pre- diction of hypomanic personality and depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 643-648.
31. Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Henderson, A. S., Jacomb, P. A., Korten, A. E., & Rodgers, B. (1999). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation: Factor structu- re, validity and norms in a large commu- nity sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 49-58.
32. Kasch, K. L., Rottenberg, J., Arnow, B. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2002). Behavioral acti- vation and inhibition systems and the se- verity and course of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 589-597.
33. Kimbrel, N. A., Nelson-Gray, R. O., & Mitchell, J. T. (2007). Reinforcement sensitivity and maternal style as predic- tors of psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1139-1149.
34. Leone, L., Perugini, M., Bagozzi, R. P., Pi- erro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2001). Cons- truct validity and generalizability of the Carver-White behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system scales. European Journal of Personality, 15, 373-390.
35. Loxton, N. J., & Dawe, S. (2001). Alcohol abuse and dysfunctional eating in ado- lescent girls: The influence of individual differences in sensitivity to reward and punishment. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 455-462.
36. Loxton, N. J., & Dawe, S. (2007). How do dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking women perform on behavio- ral measures of reward and punishment sensitivity? Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1163-1172.
37. Mardaga, S., & Hansenne, M. (2007). Rela- tionships between Cloninger’s biosocial model of personality and the Behavio- ral Inhibition/ Activation Systems (BIS/ BAS). Personality and Individual Diffe- rences, 42, 715-722.
38. Matthews, G., & Gilliland, K. (1999). The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583-626.
39. Mitchell, J. T., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2006). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disor- der symptoms in adults: Relationship to Gray’s behavioral approach system. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 749-760.
40. Muris, P., Meesters, C., De Kanter, E., & Timmerman, P. E. (2005). Behavioral in- hibition and behavioral activation system scales for children: Relationships with Eysenck’s personality traits and psycho- pathological symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 831-841.
41. Müller, J. M. & Wytykowska, A. M. (2005). Psychometric properties and validati- on of a Polish adaptation of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 795-805.
42. Newman, J. P., MacCoon, D. G., Vaughn, L. J., & Sadeh, N. (2005). Validating a distinction between primary and se- condary psychopathy with measures of Gray’s BIS and BAS constructs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 319-323.
43. O’Connor, R. M., Stewart, S. H., & Watt, M. C. (2009). Distinguishing BAS risk for university students’s drinking, smoking, and gambling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 514-519.
44. Pardo, Y., Aguilar, R., Molinuevo, B., & Torrubia, R. (2007). Alcohol use as a be- havioral sign of disinhibition: Evidence from J.A. Gray’s model of personality. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2398-2403.
45. Patterson, C. M., & Newman, J. P. (1993). Reflectivity and learning from aversive events: Toward a psychological mecha- nism for the syndromes of disinhibition. Psychological Review, 100/4, 716-736.
46. Pickering, A. D. (1997). The conceptual nervous system and personality: From Pavlov to neural networks. European Psychologist, 2, 139-163.
47. Pinto-Meza, A., Caseras, X., Soler, J., Pu- igdemont, D., Perez, V., & Torrubia, R. (2006). Behavioral inhibition and beha- vioral activation systems in current and recovered major depression participants. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 215-226.
48. Quay, H. C. (1997). Inhibition and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 7-13.
49. Ross, S. C., Millis, S. R., Bonebright, T. L., & Bailley, S. E. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavioral Inhibi- tion and Activation Scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 861-865.
50. Sava, F. A., & Sperneac, A. M. (2006). Sensitivity to reward and sensitivity to punishment rating scales: A validation study on the Romanian population. Per- sonality and Individual Differences, 41, 1445-1456.
51. Simons, J. S., Dvorak, R. D., & Batien, B. D. (2008). Methamphetamine use in a rural college population: Associations with marijuana use, sensitivity to punishment, and sensitivity to reward. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 444-449.
52. Strobel, A., Beauducel, A., Debener, S., & Brocke, B. (2001). A German version of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diag- nostische Psychologie, 22/3, 216-227.
53. Şişman, S. (2008). Sigara Kullanımı: Klinik Sunum ve Nöropsikolojik Performans Profili. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bi- limler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
54. Şişman S., Ayçiçeği-Dinn, A., & Dinn, W. M. (2008). Davranışsal İnhibisyon Sis- temi/ Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeği’nin Üniversite Öğrencileri için Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Çalışması. 15. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi, 3-5 Eylül 2008, İstanbul.
55. Takahashi, Y., Yamagata, S., Kijima, N., Shi- gemasu, K., Ono, Y., & Ando, J. (2007). Gray’s temperament model: Develop- ment of a Japanese version of BIS/BAS scales and a behavior genetic investigati- on using the twin method. The Japanese Journal of Personality, 15, 276-289.
56. Wilson, G. D., Barrett, P. T., & Gray, J. A. (1989). Human reactions to reward and punishment: A questionnaire examinati- on of Gray’s personality theory. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 509-515.
57. Wilson, G. D., Gray, J. A., & Barrett, P. T. (1990). A factor analysis of the Gray- Wilson personality questionnaire. Per- sonality and Individual Differences, 11, 1037-1045.
58. Yu, R., Branje, S. J. T., Keijsers, L., & Me- eus, W. H. J. (2011). Psychometric Cha- racteristics of Carver and White’s BIS/ BAS Scales in Dutch Adolescents and Their Mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93/5, 500-507.
59. Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sen- sation seeking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36/1, 45-52.
60. Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in Eng- land and America: Cross-cultural and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46/1, 139-149.
61. Zuckerman, M. (1990). The psychophysi- ology of sensation seeking. Journal of Personality, 58/1, 313-345.
62. Zuckerman, M., Ball, S., & Black, J. (1990). Influences of sensation seeking, gender, risk appraisal, and situational motivation on smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 15/3, 209−220.